Patients › Elbow
कोहनी ऑस्टियोआर्थराइटिस
Osteoarthritis of the elbow — primary and post-traumatic, conservative and surgical options.
आप क्या महसूस कर रहे हैं¶
कोहनी गठिया आमतौर पर आपके आंदोलन के अंत में दर्द के रूप में शुरू होता है, जब आप अपने हाथ को पूरी तरह से सीधा करते हैं या इसे सीधे ऊपर मोड़ते हैं। आंदोलन के मध्य में अक्सर शुरू में आरामदायक रहता है। बहुत से लोगों को कोहनी में पकड़ने, क्लिक करने या लॉक करने का अनुभव होता है, जो जोड़ में तैरने वाले हड्डी या ग्रिस्टल के छोटे टुकड़ों (जिन्हें ढीले शरीर कहा जाता है) के कारण होता है। हड्डियों से बने स्पोर्स (जिन्हें ऑस्टियोफाइट्स कहा जाता है) जोड़ के चारों ओर बनते हैं और मोड़ने और सीधा करने की अंतिम कुछ डिग्री को शारीरिक रूप से अवरुद्ध करते हैं।
हाथ को पूरी तरह से सीधा करना अक्सर पहली बात होती है। ऐसे कार्य जो सीधे कोहनी की आवश्यकता होती है वे असुविधाजनक हो जाते हैंः एक ऊंची शेल्फ तक पहुंचना, हाथ की लंबाई पर एक ट्रे ले जाना, या खुद को एक कुर्सी से ऊपर धकेलना। स्क्रूड्राइवर या दरवाजे के हैंडल को मोड़ने के लिए अपने हाथ को मोड़ना आमतौर पर बाद तक ठीक रहता है। जैसे-जैसे स्थिति आगे बढ़ती है, दर्द आंदोलन के बीच में फैल सकता है और केवल चरम सीमाओं के बजाय दैनिक गतिविधि के दौरान आपको परेशान करना शुरू कर सकता है।
रात में होने वाला दर्द इस प्रकार के गठिया के लिए विशिष्ट नहीं है। यदि आपकी कोहनी आपको रात में गहरे, धड़कने वाले दर्द के साथ जगाती है, तो अपने सर्जन से इसका उल्लेख करें, क्योंकि यह एक अलग कारण की ओर इशारा कर सकता है जिसे जांचने लायक है।
यह स्थिति उन पचास के दशक के पुरुषों में सबसे आम है जिन्होंने वर्षों तक भारी शारीरिक काम किया है, हालांकि यह एक विस्तृत आयु सीमा को प्रभावित करता है। यह कभी-कभी वर्षों बाद फ्रैक्चर या विस्थापन जैसी पुरानी कोहनी की चोट के बाद भी हो सकता है। लगभग आधे लोगों में, गठिया कोहनी के अंदर की ओर एक तंत्रिका (उल्लर तंत्रिका) पर भी दबाव डालती है, जिससे अंगूठी और छोटी उंगलियों में झुनझुनी या सुन्नता होती है।
यदि इनमें से कुछ भी परिचित लगता है, तो एक साधारण एक्स-रे आमतौर पर पहला कदम होता है। यह स्पष्ट रूप से हड्डीदार स्पोर्स और ढीले शरीर दिखाता है, और अक्सर संयुक्त स्थान स्वयं आपकी अपेक्षा से बेहतर संरक्षित दिखता है।
वास्तव में क्या हो रहा है¶
आपकी कोहनी एक मोड़ के साथ एक झंझरी है। यह आपको अपनी बांह को मोड़ने और सीधा करने देता है, और यह आपके अग्रहस्त को घुमाने देता है ताकि आप अपनी हथेली को ऊपर या नीचे घुमा सकें। संयुक्त की सतह सामान्य रूप से हड्डियों की एक चिकनी परत से ढकी होती है, जो दरवाजे के झंझरी पर एक अस्तर की तरह काम करती हैः सब कुछ चुपचाप फिसल जाता है।
कोहनी के गठिया में, यह अस्तर नष्ट हो जाता है। हड्डी जोड़ के किनारों के चारों ओर हड्डी के स्पोर (ऑस्टियोफाइट्स) विकसित करके प्रतिक्रिया करती है। ये स्पोर्स एक दरवाजे की तरह काम करते हैं: वे शारीरिक रूप से झुकने और सीधा करने के अंतिम कुछ डिग्री को अवरुद्ध करते हैं, यही कारण है कि आपका आंदोलन अंत में कठोर लगता है। हड्डी या उपास्थि के छोटे टुकड़े भी टूट सकते हैं और जोड़ के अंदर तैर सकते हैं। वे चलती सतहों के बीच फंस जाते हैं, जिससे पकड़ने, क्लिक करने या लॉक करने का कारण बनता है जिसे आपने देखा होगा।
इस स्थिति में एक मोड़ है। गठिया के साथ कई जोड़ों में, पूरी सतह समान रूप से नीचे पहनती है। कोहनी में, पहनना अक्सर जोड़ के एक तरफ केंद्रित होता है (बाहरी भाग, जहां आपकी अग्रहस्त की हड्डी आपकी बांह की हड्डी के अंत से मिलती है), जबकि बीच में शंखा हिस्सा अपेक्षाकृत अच्छी तरह से संरक्षित रहता है। यही कारण है कि एक्स-रे आपके लक्षणों को महसूस करने की तुलना में बेहतर दिख सकता है, और यही कारण है कि दर्द अक्सर केवल आंदोलन के चरम पर शुरू होता है इससे पहले कि यह बीच में फैल जाए क्योंकि अधिक उपास्थि खो जाती है।
संयुक्त के चारों ओर का कैप्सूल, कठिन ऊतक का एक आस्तीन, समय के साथ भी कस जाता है। इससे जकड़न बढ़ जाती है। यदि स्पोर्स और तंग कैप्सूल आपकी कोहनी के अंदर की तरफ अलनेर तंत्रिका पर दबाव डालते हैं, तो आपको अपनी अंगूठी और छोटी उंगलियों में झुनझुनी या सुन्नता होती है जैसा कि पहले वर्णित है।
इसका मतलब यह नहीं है कि आपकी कोहनी टूट रही है। इसका मतलब यह है कि संयुक्त सतहों, स्पोर और तंग कैप्सूल एक दूसरे के खिलाफ काम कर रहे हैं, और उपचार का उद्देश्य उस संयोजन को शांत करना है।
हम इसके बारे में क्या कर सकते हैं¶
मैटर प्राइवेट हॉस्पिटल रॉकहैम्पटन में ऊपरी अंगों के सर्जन डॉ. किरण हिरपारा, आपकी स्थिति के अनुरूप कम से कम आक्रामक विकल्पों से शुरू करते हैं। मरीजों को आम तौर पर उनके जीपी द्वारा हमारे क्लिनिक में भेजा जाता है; यदि एक फिजियोथेरेपिस्ट ने सुझाव दिया है कि आप हमें देखें, तो आपको मेडिकेयर छूट के लिए पात्र होने के लिए अपने जीपी से एक रेफरल की आवश्यकता होगी। आपकी पहली यात्रा पर हम एक इतिहास लेते हैं, आपकी कोहनी की जांच करते हैं और यदि आवश्यक हो तो इमेजिंग की व्यवस्था करते हैं। लंबे समय से चली आ रही इस तरह की समस्या के लिए, हम आमतौर पर सर्जरी पर विचार करने से पहले गैर-ऑपरेटिव देखभाल से शुरू करते हैं।
पहला कदम अक्सर वह होता है जो आप स्वयं कर सकते हैं। आप जिस तरह से काम करते हैं या ट्रेनिंग करते हैं, उसे बदलना, ताकि आपकी कोहनी अपनी सीमा के बहुत अंत में बार-बार लोड न हो, लक्षणों को सुलझा सकता है। फिजियोथेरेपी का उद्देश्य जोड़ को गतिशील रखना और इसके चारों ओर शक्ति का निर्माण करना है। ये उपाय दर्द को कम कर सकते हैं, हालांकि वे आंदोलन को अवरुद्ध करने वाले अस्थि स्पोर्स के कारण होने वाली कठोरता के लिए कम करते हैं। सर्जरी के बारे में सोचने से पहले उन्हें एक निष्पक्ष परीक्षण दें।
दर्द निवारक और विरोधी भड़काऊ दवाएं आपको एक फ्लेयर-अप के माध्यम से मदद कर सकती हैं और फिजियोथेरेपी को अधिक आरामदायक बना सकती हैं। वे गठिया को बदलने के बजाय लक्षणों को शांत करते हैं।
सर्जरी तब चर्चा में आती है जब इन उपायों से आपको पर्याप्त राहत नहीं मिलती है, या जब कठोरता, तालाबंदी या पकड़ दैनिक जीवन के रास्ते में आती है। इस ऑपरेशन का उद्देश्य हड्डी और ढीले शरीर को हटाना है जो आंदोलन को अवरुद्ध करते हैं और संयुक्त के चारों ओर तंग कैप्सूल को छोड़ देते हैं। यह अक्सर एक कैमरे (कीहोल सर्जरी) का उपयोग करके छोटे चीरों के माध्यम से किया जा सकता है, या यदि गठिया अधिक उन्नत है तो एक खुले चीर के माध्यम से। कौन सा विकल्प आपको सूट करता है यह इस बात पर निर्भर करता है कि परिवर्तन कितने गंभीर हैं, आपकी उम्र, आपका स्वास्थ्य और आपकी कोहनी को क्या करने की आवश्यकता है। हम आप के साथ उस के माध्यम से बात करेंगे और एक साथ तय.
क्या उम्मीद करें¶
कोहनी गठिया एक दीर्घकालिक स्थिति है, लेकिन यह आपको चीजों को करने से नहीं रोकता है। शुरुआत में, सरल उपाय अक्सर दर्द को कम करते हैं। आपके काम करने के तरीके को बदलना, जोड़ को हिलाते रहना और सूजन रोधी दवाओं का उपयोग करना गठिया के शुरुआती चरणों में वास्तविक राहत दे सकता है। हड्डियों में होने वाली जकड़न को बिना सर्जरी के हटाना मुश्किल होता है, इसलिए दर्द कम होने के बाद भी आपकी गति में कुछ सीमाएं बनी रह सकती हैं।
यदि ये उपाय पर्याप्त नहीं हैं, तो सर्जरी का उद्देश्य जोड़ को अवरुद्ध करना है। अधिकांश लोगों के लिए इसका अर्थ होता है जोड़ों को बचाने वाला ऑपरेशन: स्पोर और ढीले निकायों को साफ करना और जोड़ को बदलने के बजाय तंग कैप्सूल को छोड़ना। इस प्रकार की सर्जरी करने वाले लोग उम्मीद कर सकते हैं कि उनकी कोहनी अच्छी तरह से काम करेगी और उनके दर्द में सुधार होगा, और बाद में एक और ऑपरेशन की आवश्यकता होने की संभावना कम है। आमतौर पर गति में भी सुधार होता है, हालांकि समय के साथ कुछ गति में सुधार हो सकता है।
प्रतिस्थापन सर्जरी एक अलग कहानी है। यह कोहनी के गठिया के लिए शायद ही कभी आवश्यक होता है और आम तौर पर गंभीर विकलांगता वाले लोगों के लिए रखा जाता है, क्योंकि कृत्रिम जोड़ युवा या अधिक सक्रिय लोगों में वर्षों से अच्छी तरह से नहीं रहता है। जब यह किया जाता है, तो अधिकांश लोगों को स्थायी दर्द से राहत मिलती है और उनके हाथ का बेहतर उपयोग होता है, लेकिन अन्य कोहनी ऑपरेशन की तुलना में जटिलताएं अधिक बार होती हैं, और समय के साथ प्रत्यारोपण ढीला हो सकता है।
इस स्थिति को अकेला छोड़ देना आमतौर पर इसे जल्दी से बदतर नहीं बनाता है, लेकिन यह अपने आप ठीक होने की प्रवृत्ति भी नहीं रखता है। पकड़ने और लॉक करने की प्रक्रिया जारी रह सकती है, और आपके आंदोलन के अंत में कठोरता अक्सर बनी रहती है या आपकी सीमा में आगे बढ़ जाती है। कुछ लोग अपने हाथ के उपयोग में मामूली बदलाव के साथ वर्षों तक अच्छी तरह से काम करते हैं। दूसरों को लगता है कि सीमाएं धीरे-धीरे रोजमर्रा की गतिविधियों में फैलती हैं।
आप जो भी रास्ता चुनते हैं, उसका लक्ष्य एक ही होता है: कम दर्द और पर्याप्त गति जो आपके लिए महत्वपूर्ण है, उसे करने के लिए, जबकि भविष्य के लिए आपके विकल्प खुले रहते हैं। उपचार आपकी उम्र, आपकी नौकरी और आर्थराइटिस की स्थिति के अनुसार होता है, और आपका सर्जन आपके साथ इस बारे में बात करेगा।
किसी से कब मिलना है¶
यदि आपकी कोहनी कई हफ्तों से कठोर या दर्दनाक है और सरल उपायों से मदद नहीं मिली है, विशेष रूप से यदि लॉक या पकड़ने से आपको काम पर अपने हाथ का उपयोग करने से रोक रहा है, तो अपने चिकित्सक से परामर्श करें। यदि आप कोहनी को पूरी तरह से सीधा या मोड़ने की क्षमता खो रहे हैं, या यदि आपकी अंगूठी और छोटी उंगलियों में झुनझुनी और सुन्नता बढ़ रही है, तो एक विशेषज्ञ की समीक्षा के लिए पूछें, क्योंकि गठिया के कारण अलनेर तंत्रिका को दबाया जा सकता है। यदि आपकी कोहनी गर्म, लाल और बुखार के साथ सूजन है, या यदि आप चोट के बाद इसे बिल्कुल नहीं हिला सकते हैं, तो आपातकालीन विभाग में जाएं। ये आर्थराइटिस के लक्षण नहीं हैं और उन्हें उसी दिन जांचने की आवश्यकता है।
अधिक गहराई से¶
यह अनुभाग आपके स्वयं के उपचार निर्णयों के लिए आवश्यक से अधिक है। कोहनी के ऑस्टियोआर्थराइटिस अतिरिक्त पढ़ने लायक है क्योंकि ऑपरेशन जो निश्चित उत्तर प्रतीत होता है, जोड़ को प्रतिस्थापित करता है, जैसा कि कूल्हे और घुटने पर नियमित रूप से किया जाता है, कोहनी पर काफी अलग व्यवहार करता है, और यह एकल तथ्य पूरे उपचार सीढ़ी को आकार देता है।
कोहनी प्रतिस्थापन डिफ़ॉल्ट क्यों नहीं है¶
कुल कोहनी आर्थ्रोप्लास्टी काम करती है, लेकिन यह लोड को हिप या घुटने के प्रतिस्थापन की तरह सहन नहीं करती है। पूलिंग 2,118 रूमेटोइड गठिया वाले रोगियों में, कोहनी प्रतिस्थापन संतोषजनक परिणाम प्रदान करना जारी रखा, जबकि कूल्हे और घुटने की आर्थ्रोप्लास्टी की तुलना में काफी अधिक इम्प्लांट विफलता और जटिलता दर [1].
इसका परिणाम रिकवरी चरण की सावधानी के बजाय स्थायी प्रतिबंध को हटाना है। क्योंकि कोहनी एक लंबे लीवर के अंत में बैठती है, हाथ में मामूली वजन इम्प्लांट पर बड़े बल उत्पन्न करते हैं, और वे बल समय के साथ इसे ढीला करते हैं।
यही कारण है कि कमर के मुकाबले कोहनी में सीढ़ी उलटी होती है। कूल्हे में, संयुक्त प्रतिस्थापन उन्नत गठिया के लिए मानक ऑपरेशन है। कोहनी पर, यह ज्यादातर वृद्ध, कम मांग वाले रोगियों के लिए आरक्षित है, और गठिया के बजाय सूजन के लिए आरक्षित है।
गंभीरता के रूप में कारण मायने रखता है¶
समान रूप से पहने हुए कोहनी वाले दो लोगों को अलग-अलग संभावनाओं का सामना करना पड़ सकता है जो इस बात पर निर्भर करता है कि जोड़ क्यों पहना हुआ है। पार करना 679 रोगियों में, प्रत्यारोपण विफलता के विशिष्ट तरीकों के संदर्भ में गठिया प्रभावित परिणाम की एटियोलॉजी, और रूमेटोइड गठिया वाले रोगियों में बेहतर कार्यात्मक परिणाम थे उन लोगों की तुलना में जिनके पास पोस्ट-ट्राउमेटिक स्थितियों के लिए प्रतिस्थापन है [2].
यह कहने लायक है क्योंकि यह इसके विपरीत है जो ज्यादातर लोग उम्मीद करते हैं, कि एक चोट से क्षतिग्रस्त जोड़ को एक प्रणालीगत बीमारी से क्षतिग्रस्त होने से बेहतर करना चाहिए। इसका कारण मांग है: पोस्ट-ट्रॉमेटिक गठिया युवा लोगों में अधिक शारीरिक रूप से अधिक मांग वाले जीवन में होता है, और प्रत्यारोपण उन ताकतों से मिलता है जिनके लिए इसे डिज़ाइन नहीं किया गया था।
डिब्रिडिंग वह कार्य है जो अधिकांश कार्य करता है¶
प्राथमिक पहनने वाले गठिया के लिए, मुख्य आधार प्रतिस्थापन नहीं बल्कि डिब्रिडमेंट है, हड्डी के स्पोर और ढीले निकायों को साफ करना जो इसकी सीमा के अंत में संयुक्त को अवरुद्ध करते हैं, और संयुक्त सतहों को छोड़ते हुए तंग कैप्सूल को छोड़ते हैं।
सबूत सुसंगत है। पार करना 1,097 रोगियों, debridement के साथ अच्छे मध्यावधि कार्यात्मक परिणामों का उत्पादन किया आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक तकनीक का उपयोग करते हुए जटिलताओं में कोई वृद्धि नहीं [3]. में 871 रोगियों, दोनों खुले और आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक osteocapsular debridement विश्वसनीय जटिलताओं की कम दर के साथ झुकने, विस्तार और कार्यात्मक स्कोर में सुधार [4], और के एक मेटा-विश्लेषण 586 रोगियों को स्वीकार्य जटिलता दर के साथ प्राथमिक कोहनी ऑस्टियोआर्थराइटिस के विकलांग लक्षणों के लिए प्रभावी पाया गया [5].
ध्यान दें कि डिब्रिडेशन क्या करने के लिए कहा जा रहा है। यह जोड़ को पुनर्जीवित नहीं करता है या गठिया को रोकता नहीं है। यह दायरे के अंत में यांत्रिक अवरोधों को हटा देता है, यही कारण है कि यह उस रोगी की मदद करता है जिसकी मुख्य शिकायत यह है कि कोहनी पूरी तरह से सीधी या झुक नहीं पाएगी और सीमा पर दर्दनाक रूप से पकड़ लेगी, और उस रोगी की कम मदद करती है जिसका दर्द पूरे आर्क में मौजूद है।
खुला या आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक निर्णायक प्रश्न नहीं है¶
कोहनी के कई ऑपरेशनों की तरह, तकनीक सबूतों के समर्थन से अधिक बहस को आकर्षित करती है। उपरोक्त समीक्षाओं में दोनों दृष्टिकोणों को सुरक्षित और प्रभावी पाया गया, और 639 मरीजों ने यह निष्कर्ष निकाला यह निर्धारित नहीं कर सका कि कौन सी प्रक्रिया श्रेष्ठ है [6].
व्यावहारिक निर्धारक यह है कि क्या प्राप्त करने की आवश्यकता है। आर्थ्रोस्कोपी पूर्ववर्ती और पश्चवर्ती कक्ष कार्य को अच्छी तरह से संभालती है; एक कठोर कोहनी जिसके लिए व्यापक कैप्सूलर रिलीज की आवश्यकता होती है, या एक विकृत शरीर रचना और एक तंत्रिका जिसे देखा और संरक्षित किया जाना चाहिए, सुरक्षित हो सकता है।
संदर्भ¶
[1] चौ टीए, मा एच, वांग जे, त्साई एस, चेन सी, वू पी, एट अल। रूमेटोइड गठिया वाले रोगियों में कुल कोहनी आर्थ्रोप्लास्टीः एक व्यवस्थित समीक्षा और मेटा-विश्लेषण। हड्डी संयुक्त जे. 2020;102-बी(8):967-80. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1465.R1
[2] वांग जे, मा एच, चौ टीए, त्साई एस, चेन सी, वू पी, एट अल। रूमेटोइड गठिया के लिए कुल कोहनी आर्थ्रोप्लास्टी के बाद परिणाम पोस्ट-ट्रॉमेटिक स्थितियों के खिलाफः एक व्यवस्थित समीक्षा और मेटा-विश्लेषण। हड्डी संयुक्त जे. 2019;101-बी(12): 1489-97। https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B12.BJJ-2019-0799.R1
[3] व्हाइट सीएचआर, रवि वी, वाटसन जे, बद्रिनारायणन एस, फडनिस जे। आर्थराइटिक कोहनी की आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक बनाम खुली डीब्रिडमेंट की एक व्यवस्थित समीक्षा। आर्थ्रोस्कोपी. 2020;37(2):747-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005
[4] गुएरेरो ईएम, बुलॉक जीएस, हेल्मकम्प जेके, मैड्रिड ए, लेडबेटर एल, रिचर्ड एमजे, एट अल। कोहनी के प्राथमिक ऑस्टियोआर्थराइटिस के लिए आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक बनाम ओपन ऑस्टियोकैप्सुलर डेब्रिडमेंट का नैदानिक प्रभावः एक व्यवस्थित समीक्षा। कंधे और कोहनी की सर्जरी 2020;29(4):689-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.003
[5] de Klerk HH, Welsink CL, Spaans AJ, Verweij LPE, van den Bekerom MPJ. प्राथमिक कोहनी के ऑस्टियोआर्थराइटिस में आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक और ओपन डिब्रिडमेंटः एक व्यवस्थित समीक्षा और मेटा-विश्लेषण। ईफोर्ट ओपन रेव. 2020;5(12):874-82. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095
[6] पूनीत के, झोउ एक्स, झाओ बी, सन सी, याओ सी, झांग एफ, एट अल। कोहनी के ऑस्टियोआर्थराइटिस का खुला या आर्थ्रोस्कोपिक डिब्रिडमेंट के साथ उपचारः एक कथा समीक्षा। बीएमसी मस्कुलोस्केलेटल विकार. 2018;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x
Evidence & references
This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.
Overview¶
Epidemiology and Demographics¶
- Symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the elbow affects 2% of the population [5].
- The average age of presentation for elbow osteoarthritis is 50 years, with a range of 20 to 70 years [5].
- Men are affected by primary elbow osteoarthritis more often than women at a 4:1 ratio [5].
- Hand dominance and strenuous manual labor are associated with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [5].
- Secondary causes of elbow osteoarthritis include trauma, osteochondritis dissecans, and synovial osteochondromatosis [5].
Pathoanatomy¶
- Elbow osteoarthritis is characterized by osteophyte formation, capsular contracture, and loose bodies, often with relative preservation of the joint space [5].
- Periarticular hypertrophic osteophytes act as a mechanical block at the end ranges of flexion and extension [5].
- Advanced elbow osteoarthritis rarely presents with joint space narrowing [5].
- Elbow osteoarthritis typically involves the radiocapitellar joint articular cartilage preferentially, with relative preservation of the ulnohumeral articular surfaces [5].
Clinical Presentation and Evaluation¶
- Patients with elbow osteoarthritis typically present with loss of terminal extension and flexion and painful catching, clicking, or locking of the elbow [5].
- Pain in elbow osteoarthritis is typically noted at the end ranges of motion and not through the midrange [5].
- Night pain is not typical of elbow osteoarthritis; if present, an inflammatory cause of the arthritis should be considered [5].
- Forearm rotation is relatively preserved until later in the disease process of elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- Ulnar neuropathy is present in up to 50% of patients with elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- Standard AP and lateral radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process, coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa [5].
- Radiographs of the elbow typically show preserved joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint and mildly narrowed joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint [5].
- Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in the elbow [5].
- CT may be useful for surgical planning of elbow osteoarthritis by allowing a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
Nonoperative Management¶
- Nonoperative treatment remains the first step in the early management of elbow osteoarthritis [1].
- Rest, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and activity modification are the mainstays of nonsurgical treatment for elbow osteoarthritis [5].
Operative Management¶
- Surgical indications for elbow osteoarthritis include failure to respond to nonsurgical interventions, loss of motion that interferes with activities of daily living, and painful locking or catching of the elbow [5].
- Joint-sparing procedures such as débridement, excision of osteophytes, capsular release, and removal of loose bodies are preferred for elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- Total elbow arthroplasty is rarely indicated for elbow osteoarthritis and is not indicated for patients younger than 65 years or physically active patients because of concerns about implant longevity [5].
- The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi arthroplasty is a classic open procedure in which the olecranon fossa is trephinated and osteophytes are removed [5].
- Limitations of the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure include incomplete anterior release and incomplete osteophyte removal anteriorly [5].
- Either a medial or lateral column approach can be used for open débridement, loose body removal, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy depending upon the location of the pathology and concomitant procedures [5].
- Contraindications for arthroscopic procedures in elbow osteoarthritis include severe contracture and periarticular heterotopic ossification [5].
- Relative contraindications for arthroscopic procedures in elbow osteoarthritis include prior ulnar nerve transposition and prior extensive open procedures [5].
- Osteocapsular arthroplasty refers to the arthroscopic technique for elbow joint débridement involving capsular release, loose body removal, and excision of osteophytes [5].
- Ulnar nerve transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament should be considered for patients with less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion regardless of the type of procedure used [5].
- Capsulectomy and debridement through a medial trans-flexor approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [2].
- Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is a safe, efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
- Arthroscopic debridement based on computer simulation is recommended in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow [7].
- Arthroscopic treatment provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate [9].
- Elbow arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates [10].
- Open elbow debridement and the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
- The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow [21].
- Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis [23].
- Open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow osteoarthritis [32].
- Surgical options for severe elbow arthritis must be tailored to cartilage integrity and bone structure, with total elbow arthroplasty generally avoided in young, active patients due to poor durability [44].
Complications¶
- Deep infections in the elbow are more common than other joints treated arthroscopically, occurring in 0.8% to 2.2% of cases [5].
- Infection related to intraoperative corticosteroid injections can manifest as a complication of elbow surgery [5].
- Stiffness due to heterotopic ossification is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
- Hematoma formation is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
- Transient nerve palsies complicate 1% to 3% of cases, with radial and ulnar nerves being the most common [5].
- Synovial ganglion formation is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Epidemiology & Demographics¶
- Symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is relatively rare, affecting 2% of the population [5].
- The average age of presentation for primary elbow osteoarthritis is 50 years, with a range of 20 to 70 years [5].
- Men are affected more often than women by primary elbow osteoarthritis at a 4:1 ratio [5, 36].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow tends to affect the dominant arm in males with a history of manual labor [12].
- Posttraumatic arthritis is commonly seen after elbow injuries such as distal humerus fractures, radial head fractures, proximal ulna fractures, or elbow fracture-dislocations [6].
- Posttraumatic arthritis can develop in response to the initial cartilage insult or secondary to residual articular incongruities from injuries [6].
- Postinjury malunions, nonunions, or residual instability can alter kinematics and load across the elbow, predisposing it to degenerative changes [6].
- Posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow primarily affects young males [95].
Bony Anatomy & Biomechanics¶
- The elbow is a trocho-ginglymoid joint consisting of medial and lateral articulations that afford bony stability [51].
- The ulnohumeral joint is formed by the articulation of the trochlea with the ulna within the greater sigmoid notch [51].
- The ulnohumeral joint has highly congruent anatomy through almost 180° of articular contact, with the exception of the bare area of the greater sigmoid notch which is devoid of cartilage [51].
- The radiocapitellar joint is formed by the articulation of the capitellum and the radial head [51].
- The radial head is a concave elliptical structure covered with articular cartilage along the radiocapitellar joint and approximately 270° of the articular margin [51].
- The distal humeral articulation is angled 30° from the longitudinal axis [51, 19, 20].
- The axis of rotation is 5° to 7° angulated in the coronal plane to the epicondylar axis, with the medial side more distal than the lateral side [51].
- In full extension, 60% of axial load is transmitted through the radiocapitellar joint [19, 20].
- The normal range of elbow flexion/extension is 0 to 150 degrees [19, 20].
- The normal forearm pronosupination is 80 to 85 degrees in each direction [19, 20].
- The functional range of motion for the elbow is 30 to 130 degrees for flexion/extension and 50 degrees for pronosupination [19, 20].
- The normal valgus carrying angle of the elbow is 5 to 10 degrees for men and 10 to 15 degrees for women [19, 20].
- The ulnohumeral articulation is a primary stabilizer of the elbow [18].
- The radiocapitellar articulation is a secondary stabilizer of the elbow [18].
Ligamentous Anatomy¶
- The medial collateral ligament (MCL) consists of anterior, posterior, and transverse bundles [19, 20].
- The anterior bundle of the MCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress within functional elbow range of motion [19, 20].
- The posterior bundle of the MCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress with the elbow in maximal flexion [19, 20].
- Stability in full extension is provided by the MCL, joint capsule, and ulnohumeral articulation [19, 20].
- The radial head functions as an important secondary stabilizer to valgus stress, particularly in medial collateral ligament–deficient elbows [79].
- The lateral ulnar collateral ligament acts as the primary stabilizer to posterolateral rotatory instability [79].
Pathoanatomy of Osteoarthritis¶
- Osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by osteophyte formation, capsular contracture, and loose bodies, often with relative preservation of the joint space [5].
- Osteoarthritis typically involves the radiocapitellar joint articular cartilage preferentially, with relative preservation of the ulnohumeral articular surfaces [5].
- Radiocapitellar degeneration is more common with increasing age [12].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow starts on the lateral side and progresses into the ulnohumeral articulation [12].
- The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved in primary elbow osteoarthritis, with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum [12].
- Osteophytic change occurs predominantly in the ulnohumeral compartment of the elbow [87].
- Joint space narrowing more frequently affects the radiocapitellar articulation than the ulnohumeral compartment [87].
- The primary pathology of elbow osteoarthritis is loss of articular cartilage with resulting osteophyte formation on the olecranon process, coronoid process, and their respective fossae [69].
- Secondary resultant changes in elbow osteoarthritis involve osteophyte formation along the margin of the radial head and formation of loose bodies [69].
- Three-dimensional computational models identify unique regions of bony impingement in elbow osteoarthritis, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension [49].
Clinical Presentation & Evaluation¶
- Night pain is not typical of elbow osteoarthritis; if present, an inflammatory cause should be considered [5].
- Most patients with elbow osteoarthritis initially complain of pain at terminal limits of motion as a result of capsular stretch and osteophyte impingement [69].
- Later in the disease process of elbow osteoarthritis, pain through the mid arc of motion develops as the extent of cartilage loss progresses [69].
- Radiographs of elbow osteoarthritis typically show preserved joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint and mildly narrowed joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint [5].
- Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- CT may be useful for surgical planning in elbow osteoarthritis, allowing detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
- In valgus extension overload syndrome, the olecranon is repeatedly and forcefully driven into the olecranon fossa during throwing, exerting shear forces on the medial aspect of the olecranon tip and the olecranon fossa [14].
- The pathoanatomy of valgus extension overload syndrome includes chondrosis, osteophyte development on the posteromedial olecranon and humerus, and loose bodies [14].
Classification¶
Radiographic Classification Systems¶
- The Broberg and Morrey classification system is based on osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing [12].
- The Hastings and Retting classification system focuses on radiocapitellar wear and subluxation [12].
- The Broberg and Morrey classification system grades elbow arthrosis as grade 0 (normal joint), grade 1 (slight joint-space narrowing with minimum osteophyte formation), grade 2 (moderate joint-space narrowing with moderate osteophyte formation), and grade 3 (severe degenerative change with gross destruction of the joint) [80].
- The Hastings and Retting classification system was developed based on commonly demonstrated radiographic features of degenerative changes, including joint space narrowing and marginal osteophytes [13].
- The Hastings and Retting classification system is a useful tool in predicting surgical outcome following debridement of primary elbow osteoarthritis [13].
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes were best in patients classified as class I preoperatively and worst in those classified as class III using the Hastings and Retting system [13].
- Both the Broberg and Morrey and Hastings and Retting classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [28].
- The four grades of the Broberg and Morrey classification system have only fair interobserver reliability that is influenced by subspecialty and experience [80].
- Binary rating systems for elbow arthrosis, such as "none or mild" versus "moderate or severe," resulted in moderate agreement among observers [80].
CT-Based Classification Systems¶
- Kwak et al. described a CT-based method of quantifying elbow arthritis [12].
- The CT-based classification demonstrated high correlation with the visual analog scale and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score [12].
- The CT-based classification demonstrated moderate correlation with range of motion [12].
- A CT-based staging system was highly reproducible and clinically feasible compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems for elbow osteoarthritis [34].
- A bony landmarks classification system effectively delineated osteophyte distribution in elbow patients using three-dimensional computed tomography [56].
Other Classification Systems¶
- The Larsen and Sharp classifications can reliably be used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels [74].
Clinical Presentation¶
Epidemiology and Demographics¶
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is most commonly seen in middle-age males who are heavy laborers [13].
- The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2%, with most cases being asymptomatic [8].
- The prevalence of elbow osteoarthritis in respondents aged 40 years or older was 55.0%, with a symptomatic prevalence of 22.6% [31].
- Older age, male sex, and a history of elbow trauma are significant risk factors for elbow osteoarthritis [31].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow accounts for 2%-3% of patients presenting with elbow arthritis [13].
Pathoanatomy¶
- Advanced disease rarely presents with joint space narrowing [5].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is unique due to relative preservation of articular cartilage and maintenance of joint space with hypertrophic osteophyte formation [25].
- The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum in primary osteoarthritis [12].
History and Symptoms¶
- Patients typically present with loss of terminal extension and flexion and painful catching, clicking, or locking of the elbow [5].
- Pain is typically noted at the end ranges of motion and not through the midrange [5].
- The degree of disability caused by osteoarthritis depends on the patient’s vocation and physical disability [5].
- Clinically, primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by stiffness, pain, mechanical symptoms, and weakness [12].
Physical Examination¶
- Inspection should check for prior surgical incisions and joint effusion at the lateral soft spot [5].
- Pain during range of motion assessment is usually felt at the end ranges of flexion and extension rather than throughout the arc [5].
- Forearm rotation is relatively preserved until later in the disease process [5].
- Understanding whether the patient has pain throughout the arc of motion or only at terminal limits is of paramount importance for evaluation [73].
Imaging¶
- Standard AP and lateral radiographs should be obtained for evaluation [5].
- Radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process (anterior and medial), coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa [5].
- Joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint are usually preserved on radiographs [5].
- Joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint are mildly narrowed on radiographs [5].
- Loose bodies may be evident on radiographs, which typically underestimate the number present [5].
- CT may be useful for surgical planning and allows a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
- CT scans with 3D reconstructions may be useful for evaluating the extent and location of disease and for surgical planning [73].
- MRI may be useful to evaluate the status of soft tissues including the medial and lateral collateral ligamentous complexes [73].
- Electromyography and nerve conduction studies may be useful to evaluate the degree of nerve compression and contribution to elbow pain or dysfunction [73].
Investigations¶
Radiography¶
- Plain radiographs remain the hallmark and best screening test for elbow evaluation [18].
- Standard views for elbow radiographs include AP and lateral views, with internal and external oblique views obtained if necessary [39].
- In primary elbow osteoarthritis, osteophytes are typically seen on the coronoid and olecranon tips [39].
- Loss of the concavity of the radial head, coronoid, and olecranon fossa is a radiographic finding in elbow osteoarthritis [39].
- Loose bodies may be seen in the anterior or posterior compartments on elbow radiographs [39].
- The ulnohumeral articular joint space is preferentially preserved in elbow osteoarthritis [39].
- Ulnohumeral joint space loss on radiographs suggests inflammatory or posttraumatic arthritis [39].
- CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis [94].
Computed Tomography¶
- CT is indicated for the assessment of severe osteoarthritis of the elbow to determine the location of loose bodies and osteophytes [39].
- CT is helpful when assessing for malunion architecture and the location and pattern of osteophytes and/or loose bodies [30].
- Three-dimensional CT is used to check for heterotopic ossification [30].
- CT is not necessary when elbow stiffness is entirely soft-tissue related [30].
- A CT-based staging system for elbow osteoarthritis was highly reproducible and clinically feasible compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems [34].
- Three-dimensional computational models identified the locations and volumes of bony impingement in patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow [49].
- Three-dimensional computational models highlighted unique regions of impingement, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension [49].
- Pre-operative simulation results can be used as an index to determine the osteophytes to be removed during arthroscopic surgery for elbow osteoarthritis [46].
Magnetic Resonance Imaging¶
- MRI is the imaging modality best suited for evaluating soft-tissue structures in the elbow, including ligaments, tendons, cartilage, and nerves [57].
- MRI can be used to evaluate ligaments and tendons in the elbow but is rarely indicated [30].
- Magnetic resonance arthrography is particularly beneficial in the evaluation of osteochondral lesions, loose bodies, and ulnar collateral ligament injury [57].
- MRI may be most helpful in evaluating associated injuries including partial or complete tears of the medial collateral ligament [14].
Classification Systems¶
- The Broberg and Morrey classification is based on osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing [12].
- The Hasting and Retting system focuses on radiocapitellar wear and subluxation [12].
- Both the Broberg and Morrey and Hasting and Retting classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [28].
- A CT-based classification for elbow arthritis demonstrated high correlation with visual analog scale and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score [12].
- A CT-based classification for elbow arthritis demonstrated moderate correlation with range of motion [12].
Prevalence and Demographics¶
- The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2% [8].
- Most cases of primary elbow osteoarthritis in the Japanese cohort were asymptomatic [8].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow affects less than 2% of the population [12].
Pathology and Imaging Correlates¶
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by stiffness, pain, mechanical symptoms, and weakness [12].
- Radiographically, primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is highlighted predominantly by osteophyte formation and progresses with cartilage loss and joint space narrowing [12].
- The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved in primary osteoarthritis with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum [12].
- Posttraumatic arthritis can develop in response to the initial cartilage insult or secondary to residual articular incongruities from injuries such as distal humerus fractures, radial head fractures, proximal ulna fractures, or elbow fracture-dislocations [6].
- Postinjury malunions, nonunions, or residual instability can alter kinematics and load across the elbow, predisposing the elbow to degenerative changes [6].
- Posttraumatic arthritis of the elbow is frequently associated with bone loss, making surgical treatment difficult [6].
Treatment¶
Nonoperative Management¶
- Nonsurgical treatments can be effective for reducing symptoms but have limited effectiveness for improving range of motion limitations and pain related to impinging osteophytes [36].
- Nonsurgical management may provide relief in early stages of elbow arthritis [35].
Surgical Indications and Goals¶
- The goal of treatment for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow is to obtain a low level of pain with sufficient motion range to ensure good function, while preserving future surgical options and delaying elbow arthroplasty to the extent possible [3].
- Surgical treatment for elbow arthritis is based on disease etiology, severity of degeneration, and patient age [11].
- Treatment of elbow arthritis must be individualized based on etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands [22].
- When conservative management fails, the appropriate surgical treatment for elbow arthritis must factor in the patient’s age, activity level, expectations, degree of pathologic changes, patient health, and surgeon experience [71].
Joint-Sparing Procedures: Arthroscopic¶
- Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty (AOA) is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
- Arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis of the elbow results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates [10].
- Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate [9].
- Arthroscopic debridement for the elbow osteoarthritis provided satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome [67].
- Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis significantly improved 6-month clinical results for functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion [61].
- Osteocapsular debridement is an effective surgical treatment option for patients with symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management [38].
- Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate [63].
- Arthroscopic debridement in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow is recommended based on computer simulation studies [7].
- Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome [64].
- Contraindications for elbow arthroscopy include severe contracture and periarticular heterotopic ossification [5].
- Relative contraindications for elbow arthroscopy include prior ulnar nerve transposition and prior extensive open procedures [5].
- Elbow arthroscopy is technically demanding, and several neurovascular structures that are at risk during the procedure include the radial, ulnar, and median nerves [36].
- The radial nerve is at greatest risk during arthroscopic capsular release, followed by the ulnar and median nerves [68].
- Strategies to protect neurovascular structures during arthroscopic capsular release include insufflating the joint before establishing portals, using proximally positioned medial and lateral portals in the anterior compartment, keeping the elbow flexed when establishing anterior portals, using retractors during débridement and capsulotomy, releasing the anterior capsule proximally, and avoiding cautery and shavers in the posterior medial gutter [68].
Joint-Sparing Procedures: Open¶
- Capsulectomy and debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow through a medial trans-flexor approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective [2].
- The medial approach is effective for the treatment of advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, especially in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms as well as medial osteophytes [16].
- The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi (OK) procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow [21].
- Both open elbow debridement and the OK procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
- Open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow OA [32].
- In the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure, the olecranon fossa is trephinated and osteophytes are removed [5].
- Either a medial or lateral column approach can be used for open débridement, loose body removal, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy depending upon the location of the pathology and concomitant procedures to be performed [5].
- The open lateral column (Morrey) approach is indicated for extrinsic and/or intrinsic contracture that has failed nonsurgical treatment and must be combined with a medial release when severe loss of flexion is noted [68].
- The open medial “over the top” (Hotchkiss) approach is indicated for patients with extrinsic contractures, associated medial side heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, and/or preoperative flexion limited to 90° to 100° [68].
- A combined approach is indicated for cases of significant elbow stiffness in which a unilateral approach is inadequate for complete elbow release, cases in which previous hardware removal is necessary, and select cases with medial and lateral heterotopic ossification [68].
- Open debridement and radiocapitellar replacement (LRE) was performed in 24 patients with primary or post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow, with 19 total LRE and 5 hemi-LRE procedures [27].
Adjunctive Procedures¶
- Ulnar nerve transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) should be considered for patients who have less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion [5].
- Ulnar nerve decompression/transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the MCL should be considered for patients who have less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion [36].
- If the elbow has less than 90° to 100° of flexion, the posteromedial band of the MCL and the posterior capsule are released to restore flexion, and ulnar nerve decompression or transposition should be considered [68].
Advanced and Salvage Procedures¶
- Total elbow arthroplasty is best reserved for low demand, elderly patients who will be able to comply with the 5-lb weightlifting restriction imposed postoperatively to protect the implants from bearing wear, hardware loosening, or failure [71].
- Interposition arthroplasty is considered for intrinsic contractures in young patients (20 to 50 years) with articular cartilage destruction in whom the anatomic architecture of the distal humerus and proximal ulna are relatively preserved [68].
- Elbow arthrodesis is reserved for patients with painful arthritis who are not candidates for total elbow arthroplasty, especially individuals who place high demands on the upper extremities, such as manual laborers [70].
- Elbow arthrodesis is also indicated for persistent infection, including tuberculosis, and massive upper extremity trauma seen on the battlefield [70].
- For unilateral arthrodesis of the elbow, a position of 90 to 100 degrees of flexion is desirable to provide the most powerful grip strength [70].
- Bilateral elbow arthrodesis rarely is indicated because of resultant functional limitations [70].
- If bilateral elbow arthrodesis is indicated, one elbow should be placed in 110 to 120 degrees of flexion to permit the patient to reach the mouth, and the other should be placed in 45 to 65 degrees to aid in personal hygiene [70].
Complications¶
- Deep infections in the elbow are more common than in other joints treated arthroscopically, with a rate of 0.8% to 2.2% [5].
- Infection can manifest as superficial minor wound complications or deep infection [5].
- Infection is related to intraoperative corticosteroid injections [5].
- Transient nerve palsies complicate 1% to 3% of cases [5].
- Radial and ulnar nerve palsies are the most common transient nerve palsies following elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
- Total elbow arthroplasty is associated with substantial complication and reoperation rates [60].
Recovery¶
Nonoperative Management¶
- Rest, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and activity modification are the mainstays of nonsurgical treatment [5].
Surgical Outcomes and Survivorship¶
- Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
- Patients with either posttraumatic or primary degenerative osteoarthritis can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration after arthroscopic elbow debridement [15].
- Both open elbow debridement and the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
- Serial assessment of patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty showed that clinical outcomes improved from preoperative assessment to short- and medium-term follow-up, although range of motion decreased between short- and medium-term follow-up [37].
Treatment Goals¶
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Nonoperative treatment remains the first step in the early management of elbow osteoarthritis. [1] (10.2106/jbjs.e.00568)
- [L4] This approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. [2] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018)
- [L4] The goal of treatment is to obtain a low level of pain with sufficient motion range to ensure good function, while preserving future surgical options and delaying elbow arthroplasty to the extent possible. [3] (10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.004)
- [L4] Elbow AOA is a safe, efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis. [4] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.018)
- [L5] [6] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014)
- [L4] The study recommends this technique in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow. [7] (10.1302/0301-620x.96b2.30714)
- [L3] The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2%, with most cases being asymptomatic. [8] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.015)
- [L4] This minimally invasive technique provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate. [9] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.003)
- [L1] Elbow arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates. [10] (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.247)
- [L5] Surgical treatment for elbow arthritis is based on disease etiology, severity of degeneration, and patient age. [11] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.022)
- [L3] [12] (10.1177/17585732251327183)
- [L4] [13] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014)
- [L3] Patients with either pathology can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration. [15] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018)
- [L4] The medial approach is effective for the treatment of advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, especially in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms as well as medial osteophytes. [16] (10.2106/jbjs.d.02684)
- [L4] Both open elbow debridement and the OK procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases. [17] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.138)
- [L4] The OK procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow. [21] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.052)
- [L5] The appropriate treatment for elbow arthritis depends on the etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands. [22] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.019)
- [L4] Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis. [23] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036)
- [L4] Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is unique due to relative preservation of articular cartilage and maintenance of joint space with hypertrophic osteophyte formation. [25] (10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005)
- [L4] [27] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.071)
- [L3] Both the BM and HR classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. [28] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.015)
- [L3] The prevalence of elbow OA was 55.0% in respondents aged 40 years or older, with a symptomatic prevalence of 22.6%; older age, male sex, and a history of elbow trauma were identified as significant risk factors. [31] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.049)
- [L5] However, from the data we obtained the open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow OA. [32] (10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x)
- [L4] CT-based staging system was highly reproducible and clinically feasible, compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems, for elbow osteoarthritis. [34] (10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.004)
- [L5] Treatment of elbow arthritis must be individualized based on etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands; nonsurgical management may provide relief in early stages, while surgical options range from arthroscopic debridement for pain at motion extremes to total elbow arthroplasty for pain throughout the arc of motion. [35] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.037)
- [L4] Serial assessment of patients with primary elbow OA who underwent arthroscopic OCA showed that the clinical outcomes improved from preoperative assessment to short- and medium-term follow-up, although ROM decreased between short- and medium-term follow-up. [37] (10.1177/23259671231162398)
- [L2] Osteocapsular debridement is an effective surgical treatment option for patients with symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management. [38] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.060)
- [L4] Surgical options must be tailored to cartilage integrity and bone structure, with total elbow arthroplasty generally avoided in young, active patients due to poor durability. [44] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100736)
- [L4] These results can be used as an index to determine the osteophytes to be removed during arthroscopic surgery for elbow osteoarthritis. [46] (10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101667)
- [L4] Three-dimensional computational models identified the locations and volumes of bony impingement in patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow and highlighted unique regions of impingement, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension. [49] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.035)
- [L3] The bony landmarks classification system effectively delineated osteophyte distribution in elbow patients. [56] (10.1186/s13018-025-06145-9)
- [L4] Total elbow arthroplasty remains associated with substantial complication and reoperation rates. [60] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100981)
- [L3] Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis significantly improved 6-month clinical results for functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion. [61] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.002)
- [L1] Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate. [63] (10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095)
- [L4] Arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. [64] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009)
- [L4] Arthroscopic debridement for the elbow osteoarthritis provided satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. [67] (10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60056-7)
- [L4] Both systems can reliably be used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels. [74] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.074)
- [L3] [80] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.043)
- [L3] Osteophytic change occurs predominantly in the ulnohumeral compartment of the elbow, whereas joint space narrowing more frequently affects the radiocapitellar articulation. [87] (10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.005)
- [L1] CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis. [94] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001)
- [L5] [95] (10.1007/s00167-015-3518-7)
References¶
[1] Management of Elbow Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.e.00568
[2] Capsulectomy and Debridement for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow Through a Medial Trans-Flexor Approach. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018
[3] Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.004
[4] Outcomes of Elbow Arthroscopic Osteocapsular Arthroplasty. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.018
[5] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > I. Osteoarthritis.
[6] Elbow Arthritis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014
[7] Arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow, based on computer simulation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2014. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.96b2.30714
[8] Prevalence and associated factors of primary elbow osteoarthritis in the Japanese general elderly population: a Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.015
[9] Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.003
[10] Arthroscopic Debridement for Primary Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Elbow Leads to Significant Improvement in Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.247
[11] Surgical Options for the Arthritic Elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.022
[12] Sex-related differences in wear patterns in primary elbow osteoarthritis. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251327183
[13] Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: Lack of radiographic evidence for morphologic predisposition, results of operative debridement at intermediate follow-up, and basis for a new radiographic classification system. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014
[14] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Injuries in the Athlete* > III. Valgus Extension Overload Syndrome and Posterior Impingement.
[15] Midterm outcomes and survivorship of arthroscopic elbow debridement: a comparison of posttraumatic versus primary degenerative osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018
[16] Débridement Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02684
[17] Long-term survivorship of open débridement and débridement arthroplasty for elbow arthritis: a retrospective chart review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.138
[18] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Summary and Conclusions.
[19] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. SECTION 16 PATELLAR TRACKING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY > ELBOW.
[20] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. ELBOW.
[21] The outerbridge-kashiwagi procedure for primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow vs. post traumatic arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.052
[22] Elbow Arthritis: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.019
[23] Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for advanced-stage primary osteoarthritis of the elbow using a computed tomography–based classification. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036
[25] Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow: Current Treatment Options. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005
[27] Open debridement and radiocapitellar replacement in primary and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow: a multicenter study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.071
[28] Reliability testing of two classification systems for osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.015
[30] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > IV. Evaluation.
[31] The prevalence of elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly populations: the relationship between risk factors and function. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.049
[32] Treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow with open or arthroscopic debridement: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x
[34] Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the computed tomography-based radiographic classification of primary elbow osteoarthritis: comparison with plain radiograph-based classification and clinical assessment. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.004
[35] Elbow Arthritis: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.037
[36] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > Osteoarthritis.
[37] Serial Changes in Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Osteocapsular Arthroplasty for Primary Elbow Osteoarthritis: A Medium-term Follow-up Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231162398
[38] The Clinical Impact of Different Approaches to Osteocapsular Debridement for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow: A Systematic Review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.060
[39] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Imaging of the Shoulder and Elbow > II. Elbow.
[44] Management of Severe Elbow Arthritis in a Young Patient. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100736
[46] Predicting impinging osteophytes based on pre-operative simulation results to guide arthroscopic débridement for elbow osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101667
[49] Identifying the Location and Volume of Bony Impingement in Elbow Osteoarthritis by 3-Dimensional Computational Modeling. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.035
[51] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Anatomy > Bony Anatomy.
[56] Bony landmarks guided mapping of the osteophytes of the elbow osteoarthritis patients: a three dimensional computed tomograph based study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06145-9
[57] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Sports Medicine 6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Elbow > Introduction.
[60] Total Elbow Arthroplasty Complication, Reoperation, and Revision Rates: A Comparison Between Arthroplasty for Arthritis Versus Fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100981
[61] Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results and analysis of predictive factors. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.002
[63] Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095
[64] Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: analysis of preoperative factors affecting outcome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009
[67] Factors Affecting the Results of Arthroscopic Debridement for the Elbow Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60056-7
[68] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > VI. Treatment.
[69] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Etiologies.
[70] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER ARTHRODESIS FOR BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY > ELBOW ARTHRODESIS.
[71] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Summary.
[73] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Evaluation.
[74] Reliability testing of the Larsen and Sharp classifications for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.074
[79] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Anatomy of the Shoulder, Arm, and Elbow > II. Arm and Elbow.
[80] Radiographic Arthrosis After Elbow Trauma: Interobserver Reliability. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.043
[87] Radiographic changes at the elbow in primary osteoarthritis: A comparison with normal aging of the elbow joint. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.005
[94] Effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography in evaluating primary elbow osteoarthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001
[95] Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the elbow. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3518-7