Patients › General-Health
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) at mga Therapiya ng Ineksyon
What the evidence shows for platelet-rich plasma and related injection therapies in tendinopathy, osteoarthritis and rotator cuff disease — where they help and where the data is weak.
Ano ang nararamdaman mo¶
Maaaring mapansin mo ang sakit sa iyong tuhod, siko, o balikat. Ang hindi komportableng pakiramdam na ito ay madalas na lumala pagkatapos mong maging aktibo. Maaari itong gisingin ka sa gabi kung ikaw ay matutulog sa apektadong gilid. Ang mga simpleng gawain tulad ng pag-abot sa likod ng iyong likod upang isara ang bra o pagtupi ng isang kamiseta ay maaaring maging mahirap.
Para sa arthritis na dulot ng pagkasuot at pagkasira ng tuhod, maaaring mararamdaman mo ang pagkahigpit o pananakit na nagbabawal sa iyong paggalaw. Maaaring irekomenda ng iyong doktor ang hindi bababa sa dalawang injeksyon ng Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) upang tulungan ito. Ang mga ito ay mga suntok na gumagamit ng iyong sariling plasma ng dugo upang bawasan ang pamamaga. Ang ginhawa mula sa mga injeksyong ito ay karaniwang tumatagal ng hindi bababa sa 24 linggo.
Kung ikaw ay may tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis), ang sakit ay karaniwang nasa labas ng iyong siko. Maaaring mararamdaman mo ang kahinaan kapag humahawak ng mga bagay. Ang dami ng ginhawa sa sintomas na makukuha mo ay madalas ay nakadepende sa konsentrasyon ng PRP na ginamit. Ang mas mataas na dosis ay karaniwang nagbibigay ng mas malaking ginhawa kumpara sa ibang mga paggamot.
Ang sakit sa balikat na dulot ng mga isyu sa rotator cuff ay maaaring gawing masakit ang pagtaas ng iyong braso. Kung ikaw ay may naging operasyon, maaaring gamitin ng iyong doktor ang isang tiyak na uri ng PRP na tinatawag na leukocyte-poor PRP. Ang uri na ito ay tumutulong upang bawasan ang panganib na muling maputol ang tendon pagkatapos ng pagkakaayos.
Para sa sakit ng Achilles tendon o greater trochanteric pain syndrome (sakit sa balakang), ang kasalukuyang ebidensya ay hindi sumusuporta sa paggamit ng PRP. Ito ay hindi mas epektibo kaysa sa placebo para sa mga kondisyong ito. Dapat mong iwasan ang mga paggamot na ito hanggang sa ang mga bagong, mataas na kalidad na pag-aaral ay magbigay ng mas magandang sagot.
Ang iyong doktor ang magdesisyon kung ang PRP ay angkop para sa iyo batay sa iyong tiyak na pinsala. Madalas itong itinuturing para sa mga atleta na may malaking arthritis ng kasu-kasuan o mga akutong pinsala sa kalamnan. Gayunpaman, magkakaiba ang mga resulta. May mga taong nakakakita ng malaking ginhawa, habang ang iba ay maaaring manatiling hindi nasiyahan. Laging talakayin ang mga potensyal na benepisyo at limitasyon sa iyong koponan ng pag-aalaga bago magsimula ng paggamot.
Ano ang nangyayari talaga¶
Ginagamit ng iyong katawan ang platelets upang gamutin ang mga sugat. Ang mga selulang ito ay nagtitipon sa lugar ng pinsala at naglalabas ng mga protina na tumutulong sa pag-aayos ng tisyu. Ang platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy ay kukuha ng iyong sariling dugo, iikot ito upang konsentradohin ang mga selulang nagagamot, at isasaksak ito pabalik sa apektadong lugar. Nagbibigay nito ng mas malakas na signal sa iyong katawan upang ayusin ang pinsala.
Sa osteoarthritis ng tuhod, ang makinis na patong sa mga dulo ng iyong buto ay nagsisira. Ito ay arthritis na dulot ng pagkasira. Nawawalan ng kakayahang sumipsip ng shock ang kasukasuan. Maaaring irekomenda ng iyong surgeon ang hindi bababa sa dalawang PRP injection para sa kondisyong ito. Ang layunin ay bawasan ang sakit at mapabuti ang pagganap. Para sa maraming pasyente, tumatagal ang mga epektong ito ng hindi bababa sa 24 linggo. Gayunpaman, patuloy pa ring umuunlad ang siyensya. May mga isyu sa metodolohiya ang ilang pag-aaral, kaya't tayo'y mag-ingat sa pagpapaliwanag ng mga resulta. Kailangan natin ng higit pang long-term data upang maging sigurado kung gaano ito epektibo para sa lahat.
Para sa mga isyu sa tendon tulad ng lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), nasisira ang mga hibla ng tendon na parang lubid. Ipakita ng pananaliksik ang direktang ugnayan sa pagitan ng konsentrasyon ng PRP na ginamit at ng dami ng pagpapagaan ng sintomas. Madalas na nagbibigay ang mas mataas na dosis ng mas magandang resulta kaysa sa mas mababa. Mas epektibo ang paggamot na ito kaysa sa ibang estratehiya para sa partikular na kondisyong ito. Tumutulong din ito upang itama ang akala na ang PRP ay placebo lamang para sa chronic tenosynovitis.
Sa mga sugat sa balikat, ang mga tendon ng rotator cuff ay gumagana parang mga lubid na humahawak sa iyong braso. Pagkatapos ng operasyon, maaaring muling mapunit ang mga tendon na ito. Ang paggamit ng leukocyte-poor PRP sa panahon ng pag-aayos ay maaaring bawasan ang panganib ng muling pagpuputol. Ang leukocytes ay mga puting selula ng dugo. Ang pag-alis ng ilang sa mga ito ay maaaring lumikha ng mas magandang kapaligiran para sa paggaling.
Para sa ibang mga kondisyon, ang ebidensya ay halong positibo at negatibo. Hindi inirerekomenda ang PRP para sa Achilles tendinopathy. Hindi ito mas epektibo kaysa sa placebo para sa isyung ito. Hindi rin sinusuportahan ang karaniwang paggamit para sa greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Sa mga setting ng isport, maaaring tumulong ang PRP sa mga acute muscle injuries, ngunit kailangan pa ring i-standardize ang mga protokol. Para sa malaking kasukasuan na may osteoarthritis sa mga atleta, ito ay dapat sistematikong ibigay.
Sa huli, ang iyong surgeon ang magdesisyon kung ang PRP ay angkop para sa iyo batay sa iyong partikular na sugat at sa pinakabagong ebidensya.
Ano ang inaasahan¶
Ang iyong prognosis ay malaki ang nakadepende sa tiyak na kondisyon na iyong pinag-aaralan. Para sa osteoarthritis ng tuhod na dulot ng pagkasira, malamang na irekomenda ng iyong doktor ang hindi bababa sa dalawang injeksyon ng PRP. Ang mga tratong ito ay makakatulong sa pamamahala ng mga sintomas ng hindi bababa sa 24 linggo. Ibig sabihin, maaaring maranasan mo ang pagpapagaan ng sintomas sa loob ng humigit-kumulang anim na buwan bago isaalang-alang ang karagdagang paggamot.
Kung ikaw ay isang atleta na may malubhang arthritis ng malalaking kasu-kasuan, maaaring maging kapaki-pakinabang na bahagi ng iyong plano sa pamamahala ang terapiyang PRP. Makakatulong ito upang manatili kang aktibo sa panahon ng mga kompetisyon. Gayunpaman, para sa mga akutong pinsala sa kalamnan, mas hindi malinaw ang ebidensya. Bagama’t maaaring makatulong ang PRP sa ilang sitwasyon sa isports, hindi pa naka-standardize ang mga protokol. Dapat mong talakayin kung ito ba ang tamang pagpipilian para sa tiyak na uri ng iyong pinsala.
Para sa ibang karaniwang isyu, magkakaiba ang mga resulta. Sa mga kaso ng kronikong tenosynovitis (pamamaga ng balat ng kalamnan), ipinakita na mas epektibo ang PRP kumpara sa placebo. Gayunpaman, para sa lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow), magkakaiba-iba ang mga ebidensya. Ilang pag-aaral ang nagpapakita na mas mahusay ang pagpapagaan ng sintomas kapag mas mataas na dosis, habang ang iba ay hindi sumusuporta sa paggamit nito sa anumang paraan. Katulad nito, hindi sinusuportahan ng kasalukuyang datos ang karaniwang paggamit para sa greater trochanteric pain syndrome (pananakit ng balakang).
Mag-ingat sa iyong mga inaasahan para sa Achilles tendinopathy. Ang kasalukuyang ebidensya ay nagpapakita na hindi mas epektibo ang PRP kaysa sa placebo para sa kondisyong ito. Karaniwang hindi ito inirerekomenda hangga’t hindi magbibigay ng kabaligtarang sagot ang mga bagong pag-aaral na may mataas na kalidad. Kung ikaw ay nasa proseso ng rotator cuff repair, maaaring gamitin ng iyong doktor ang leukocyte-poor PRP upang matulungan ang pagbawas ng panganib na muling maputol ang kalamnan.
Sa kabuuan, hindi garantiya ng PRP ang paggaling. Ito ay isang opsyon sa paggamot na epektibo sa ilang tao at kondisyon, ngunit hindi sa lahat. Tutulungan ka ng iyong doktor na desisyunin kung ang mga posibleng benepisyo ay humahigit sa mga gastusin at pagsisikap para sa iyong tiyak na sitwasyon.
Evidence & references
This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.
Overview¶
- At least two PRP injections are recommended for treating knee osteoarthritis, with effects lasting for at least 24 weeks [1].
- Conclusions regarding the clinical utility of PRP should be interpreted with caution due to major methodological concerns, including lack of PRP characterization and short-term follow-up [2].
- Future studies should prioritize long-term outcomes to guide clinical decision-making more effectively [2].
- Both leukocyte-rich (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor (LP-PRP) platelet-rich plasma are effective treatment options with comparable efficacy based on current evidence [3].
- Findings refute claims of PRP equivalence to placebo and support its efficacy over placebo in chronic tenosynovitis [4].
- PRP therapy should be systematically offered for competition sports practitioners [5].
- The authors argue that they fulfilled the reporting requirements for the injected PRP product as defined by MIBO [6].
- Findings do not support PRP as a recommended treatment for lateral epicondylitis [7].
- PRP is no more effective than placebo for treating Achilles tendinopathy and should not be used for this indication until new, large, high-quality RCTs upend current knowledge [8].
- Rigorous basic, translational, and clinical research remains fundamental to realize the promise of PRP treatment for musculoskeletal disease [9].
- Current evidence supports the selective use of PRP in sports settings, though standardization in protocols and outcomes is needed [11].
- Routine use of PRP for the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome is not supported [13].
- Studies evaluating the outcomes and procedures of the use of PRP in the setting of lateral epicondylitis have poor adherence to MIBO guidelines [14].
How It Works¶
- The clinical utility of PRP should be interpreted with caution due to major methodological concerns in some studies, including lack of PRP characterization and short-term follow-up [2].
- Both leukocyte-rich PRP (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) are effective treatment options with comparable efficacy based on current evidence [3].
- PRP therapy is recommended for competition sports practitioners [5].
- Authors argue that they fulfilled the reporting requirements for the injected PRP product as defined by MIBO [6].
- A direct, linear relationship was observed between the concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after PRP injection, with high-dose PRP showing significant efficacy over alternative treatment strategies [10].
- Corticosteroids resulted in greater short-term improvement, while PRP demonstrated superior longer-term outcomes at 6 and 12 months for lateral elbow tendinopathy [12].
- The application of PRP following small-diameter core decompression results in significant pain relief, improved short-term functional outcomes, and enhanced quality of life compared to core decompression alone in early osteonecrosis of the femoral head [15].
- The goal of characterization studies is to discern key molecular mediators between leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) derived from the same patient with equivalent platelet concentrations [16].
- Optimizing osteoarthritis treatment involves tailoring PRP protocols to disease stage, with low platelet, high leukocyte PRP recommended for early OA due to its anti-inflammatory effects and high platelet, low leukocyte PRP preferred for advanced OA to promote tissue repair and regeneration [17].
What the Evidence Shows¶
Efficacy by Condition¶
- At least two PRP injections are recommended for knee osteoarthritis, with effects lasting for at least 24 weeks [1].
- Intra-articular PRP injection is an effective treatment for improving overall function in patients with primary osteoarthritis, particularly in younger individuals [23].
- PRP injections are a safe and effective conservative treatment method for reducing pain symptoms and increasing functionality in patients with lateral epicondylitis [22].
- Current evidence supports the selective use of PRP in sports settings for acute muscle injuries, though standardization in protocols and outcomes is needed [11].
- PRP can effectively improve pain and functional impairment in patients with tendinopathy, and its midterm efficacy is superior to that of corticosteroids [20].
- Corticosteroids resulted in greater short-term improvement than PRP, while PRP demonstrated superior longer-term outcomes at 6 and 12 months for lateral elbow tendinopathy [12].
- Current evidence is of insufficient quality to determine if anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) augmented with PRP provides a clinically meaningful improvement in postoperative outcomes over ACLR without PRP [26].
Product Composition and Preparation¶
- Both leukocyte-rich (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor (LP-PRP) are effective treatment options with comparable efficacy for knee osteoarthritis based on current evidence [3].
- Leukocytes did not affect the safety and efficacy of intra-articular PRP injections for the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis in a double-blind randomized controlled trial [19].
- A direct, linear relationship was observed between the concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after PRP injection for lateral epicondylitis, with high-dose PRP showing significant efficacy over alternative treatment strategies [10].
- The findings refute claims of PRP equivalence to placebo and support its efficacy over placebo for chronic tenosynovitis [4].
Combination Therapies¶
- For patients with knee osteoarthritis, PRP combined with hyaluronic acid (PRP + HA) therapy is safe and yields better outcomes in pain relief and functional improvement compared to PRP monotherapy [21].
- The combination of PRP with non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid in mono-injection was found to be non-inferior to crosslinked hyaluronic acid regarding the percentage of responders over 6 months for knee osteoarthritis [25].
Reporting Quality and Methodological Concerns¶
- The authors' conclusions regarding the clinical utility of PRP should be interpreted with caution due to major methodological concerns, including lack of PRP characterization and short-term follow-up; future studies should prioritize long-term outcomes to guide clinical decision-making more effectively [2].
- Spin bias is highly prevalent in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intra-articular PRP to treat knee osteoarthritis, with identified spin tending to favor the use of PRP [24].
- Studies evaluating the outcomes and procedures of the use of PRP in the setting of lateral epicondylitis have poor adherence to Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines [14].
Specific Recommendations¶
- The authors recommend systematically offering PRP therapy for competition sports practitioners [5].
Practical Considerations¶
- Both leukocyte-rich (L-PRP) and leukocyte-poor (LP-PRP) are effective treatment options with comparable efficacy based on current evidence [3].
- A direct, linear relationship was observed between the concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after PRP injection [10].
- High-dose PRP shows significant efficacy over alternative treatment strategies [10].
- Corticosteroids resulted in greater short-term improvement compared to PRP for lateral elbow tendinopathy [12].
- PRP demonstrated superior longer-term outcomes at 6 and 12 months compared to corticosteroids for lateral elbow tendinopathy [12].
- Leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma reduces retear risk after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [18].
- The economic value of LP-PRP is conditional rather than uniform and depends on revision probability and preparation cost [18].
Key Evidence¶
- [L3] At least two PRP injections are recommended, with effects lasting for at least 24 weeks. [1] (10.1186/s13018-025-05756-6)
- [L5] The authors' conclusions regarding the clinical utility of PRP should be interpreted with caution due to major methodological concerns, including lack of PRP characterization and short-term follow-up; future studies should prioritize long-term outcomes to guide clinical decision-making more effectively. [2] (10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.007)
- [L1] Both L-PRP and LP-PRP are effective treatment options with comparable efficacy based on current evidence. [3] (10.1186/s13018-026-06689-4)
- [L1] These findings refute claims of PRP equivalence to placebo and support its efficacy over placebo. [4] (10.1186/s12891-025-09339-8)
- [L4] The authors recommend systematically offering PRP therapy for competition sports practitioners. [5] (10.1186/s12891-025-08663-3)
- [Paper] The authors argue that they fulfilled the reporting requirements for the injected PRP product as defined by MIBO. [6] (10.1177/03635465231203202)
- [L1] These findings do not support PRP as a recommended treatment for this condition. [7] (10.1177/03635465251383039)
- [L1] PRP is no more effective than placebo for treating Achilles tendinopathy and should not be used for this indication until new, large, high-quality RCTs upend current knowledge. [8] (10.1097/corr.0000000000003478)
- [Paper] Rigorous basic, translational, and clinical research remains fundamental to realize the promise of PRP treatment for musculoskeletal disease. [9] (10.1177/03635465251395284)
- [L1] A direct, linear relationship was observed between the concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after PRP injection, with high-dose PRP showing significant efficacy over alternative treatment strategies. [10] (10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100442)
- [L2] Current evidence supports the selective use of PRP in sports settings, though standardization in protocols and outcomes is needed. [11] (10.1177/23259671251399907)
- [L1] Corticosteroids resulted in greater short-term improvement, while PRP demonstrated superior longer-term outcomes at 6 and 12 months. [12] (10.1177/23259671251386862)
- [L1] As a result, we do not support the routine use of PRP for the treatment of this condition. [13] (10.2106/jbjs.24.00763)
- [L2] This review demonstrated that studies evaluating the outcomes and procedures of the use of PRP in the setting of LE have poor adherence to MIBO guidelines. [14] (10.5397/cise.2024.01060)
- [L3] The application of PRP following CD results in significant pain relief, improved short-term functional outcomes, and enhanced quality of life compared to CD alone. [15] (10.1186/s12891-024-08243-x)
- [L5] The goal of the study was to discern key molecular mediators between leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) derived from the same patient with equivalent platelet concentrations. [16] (10.1177/03635465231206930)
- [L1] Optimizing OA treatment involves tailoring PRP protocols to disease stage, with low platelet, high leukocyte PRP recommended for early OA due to its anti-inflammatory effects and high platelet, low leukocyte PRP preferred for advanced OA to promote tissue repair and regeneration. [17] (10.1186/s13018-025-06026-1)
- [L1] The economic value of LP-PRP is conditional rather than uniform and depends on revision probability and preparation cost. [18] (10.1016/j.jse.2026.02.018)
- [L1] This double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that leukocytes did not affect the safety and efficacy of intra-articular PRP injections for the treatment of patients with knee OA. [19] (10.1177/03635465241283500)
- [L1] PRP can effectively improve pain and functional impairment in patients with tendinopathy, and its midterm efficacy is superior to that of corticosteroids. [20] (10.1186/s12891-025-08566-3)
- [L1] This meta-analysis reveals that, for patients with KOA, PRP + HA therapy is safe and yields better outcomes in pain relief and functional improvement compared to PRP monotherapy. [21] (10.1186/s13018-024-05429-w)
- [L4] PRP injections are a safe and effective conservative treatment method for reducing pain symptoms and increasing functionality in patients with lateral epicondylitis. [22] (10.1177/2325967125s00169)
- [L1] Intra-articular PRP injection is an effective treatment for improving overall function in patients with primary OA, particularly in younger individuals. [23] (10.1186/s12891-026-09486-6)
- [L1] Spin bias is highly prevalent in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intra-articular PRP to treat knee osteoarthritis, with identified spin tending to favor the use of PRP. [24] (10.1002/arj.70027)
- [L1] The combination of PRP with non-crosslinked HA in mono-injection was found to be non-inferior to crosslinked HA, with regards to the percentage of responders over 6 months (WOMAC pain). [25] (10.1186/s12891-026-09625-z)
- [L1] Current evidence is of insufficient quality to determine if ACLR augmented with PRP application provides a clinically meaningful improvement in postoperative outcomes over ACLR without PRP. [26] (10.1186/s13018-026-06714-6)
References¶
[1] Efficacy of multiple autologous apheresis platelet-rich plasma injections for treating knee osteoarthritis and its influencing factors: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05756-6
[2] Letter Regarding “Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections are Inferior to Corticosteroid Injections for Short-Term Pain Relief: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial”. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.007
[3] Leukocyte-rich versus leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-026-06689-4
[4] Time-dependent growth factor kinetics, platelet concentration, and clinical response following platelet-rich plasma versus saline in chronic tenosynovitis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09339-8
[5] Platelet-rich plasma treatment for large joint osteoarthritis: retrospective study highlighting a possible treatment protocol with long-lasting stimulation of the joint with an adequate dose of platelets. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08663-3
[6] Improving Injectable Orthobiologics Reporting Guidelines Adherence: Response. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231203202
[7] Platelet-Rich Plasma Does Not Improve Pain or Function in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis as Compared With Placebo: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251383039
[8] Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: Is Platelet-rich Plasma Effective in Treating Achilles Tendinopathy? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000003478
[9] Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Disease in 2025 and Beyond. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251395284
[10] Platelet Concentration Factor Explains Variability in Outcomes of Platelet-rich Plasma for Lateral Epicondylitis: High Dose Critical for Positive Response. Journal of ISAKOS. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100442
[11] Platelet-Rich Plasma in Acute Muscle Injuries: An Umbrella Review and Meta-analysis of Return to Sport and Reinjury Outcomes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/23259671251399907
[12] A Randomized Controlled Trial of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Single Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Versus Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/23259671251386862
[13] Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.00763
[14] Adherence rates to the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics guidelines for clinical studies on platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2026. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2024.01060
[15] Efficacy of small-diameter core decompression with platelet-rich plasma in early osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08243-x
[16] The Accurate Characterization of Platelet-Rich Plasma Enables Its Classification and Comparison: Response. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231206930
[17] The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma preparation protocols in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06026-1
[18] Leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma reduces retear risk after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis with mechanistic and economic evaluation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2026.02.018
[19] Leukocytes Do Not Influence the Safety and Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241283500
[20] Platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injection for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08566-3
[21] RETRACTED ARTICLE: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinical efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma combined with hyaluronic acid (PRP + HA) versus PRP monotherapy for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05429-w
[22] Poster 58: Decreased Pain After Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Lateral Epicondylitis Patients in the Early Follow-up Period. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/2325967125s00169
[23] Investigating the therapeutic impact of platelet-rich plasma on knee, hip, and traumatic osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09486-6
[24] Statistically Significant Results Favored in Abstracts of Platelet Rich Plasma Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Spin Analysis. Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/arj.70027
[25] Efficacy and safety of a combination of platelet-rich plasma with non-crosslinked hyaluronic acid versus a crosslinked hyaluronic acid, in single-injection for knee osteoarthritis. Randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09625-z
[26] The impact of platelet-rich plasma augmentation on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-026-06714-6