Skip to content

Patients › Shoulder

ORIF ng Proksimal Humerus (Pagtitiyak ng Plaka at Pako)

PDF Evidence
Updated Aug 2026
Illustrasyon ng isang fracture ng upper arm bone malapit sa balikat.
Isang pagkabasag ng itaas na dulo ng buto ng braso, malapit sa balikat. Kieran Hirpara 4.0

Ang pahinang ito ay isinalin ng makina at hindi pa nasusuri ng isang doktor. Ang bersyong Ingles ang siyang opisyal.

Bakit inirekomenda ang operasyong ito

Ang pahinang ito ay nagpapakita kung paano ni Dr. Kieran Hirpara, isang iskargong pang-itaas na bahagi ng katawan sa Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, ang pamamaraan namin sa klinika. Dumadating kami sa mga pasyente sa pamamagitan ng referral mula sa GP o physiotherapist. Isang pagsusuri sa klinika ang nagtatatag ng diagnosis. Para sa mga akutong structural na problema, maaari naming inirekomenda ang operasya agad-agad. Para sa mga matagal nang isyu, karaniwan naming sinusubukan muna ang non-operative na paggamot. Ang operasya ay susunod kapag hindi ito nagbigay ng sapat na pagpapabuti.

Maaaring imungkahi ng iyong iskargong ang open reduction at internal fixation upang panatilihin ang mga piraso ng basag na buto sa kanilang tamang posisyon. Ginagamit nito ang plate at mga tornilyo sa pamamagitan ng isang tradisyonal na incision. Inooffer namin ito upang tulungan kang muling makuha ang katatagan at kakayahan. Ang ebidensya ay nagpapakita na ang mga locking plate ay nagbibigay ng magagandang resulta para sa mga fracture na hindi osteoporotic pagkatapos ng 10 taon. Gayunpaman, sa mga pasyenteng higit sa 60 taong gulang, mayroong 44% na rate ng komplikasyon at 34% na rate ng pagkabigo. Ipinag-uusapan namin ang mga numerong ito sa iyo upang suportahan ang shared decision tungkol sa iyong paggamot.

Bago ang operasyon

Kailangan mong magpasa ng blood tests at undergo ng anaesthetic review upang masuri ang iyong kakayahang makapagpasok sa operasyon. Maaaring mag-order ng X-rays o MRI upang ma-map ang fracture. Dapat kang mag-fast o hindi kumain ng anumang bagay sa loob ng anim na oras bago ka dumating. Itigil ang pag-inom ng blood thinners lamang pagkatapos mabigyan ka ng tiyak na instruksyon ng iyong surgeon. Mag-arrange ng lift pauwi, dahil hindi ka makakapagmaneho agad. Dalhin ang listahan ng lahat ng kasalukuyang gamot at magsuot ng komportableng, maluwag na damit. Isasagawa ng iyong surgeon ang operasyon sa pamamagitan ng isang karaniwang incision sa itaas ng operasyon site upang ayusin ang buto gamit ang plate o nail. Ang ganitong open approach ay nagbibigay ng direktang access sa fracture para sa matatag na fixation.

Sa araw ng operasyon

Dadating ka sa ospital para sa admission. Gabayin ka ng aming koponan sa proseso ng check-in. Ang operasyong ito ay isinasagawa sa ilalim ng general anaesthetic na pinagsama ng regional nerve block. Ikaw ay ganap na matutulog sa panahon ng operasyon, at ang block — isang injeksyon na nagpapabango sa mga nerbiyong nagbibigay-suplay sa braso bago ka gumising — ay nagbibigay ng pagpapagaan ng sakit sa unang 12 hanggang 24 oras pagkatapos ng operasyon. Ang anaesthetist ay makikita ka bago ang operasyon at ipaliwanag sa iyo ang parehong bahagi.

Kapag handa ka na, pupunta ka sa operating theatre. Ang iyong surgeon ay isasagawa ang operasyong ito gamit ang open approach na may iisang konbensyonal na incision sa itaas ng operative site. Ito ay nagbibigay ng direktang access sa fracture upang maibalik ang tamang alignment. Pagkatapos ng proseso, gagising ka sa recovery area. Ang aming mga nurse ay magm-monitor sa iyong kumportable at vital signs nang mahigpit. Mananatili ka sa recovery hanggang sa ikaw ay stable at handa na para lumipat sa ward bed.

Ano ang kinabibilangan ng operasyon

Gagawa ang iyong doktor ng isang hiwa na humigit-kumulang 8 hanggang 10 cm ang haba sa harap ng iyong balikat. Ang bukas na pamamaraang ito ay nagbibigay ng malinaw na access sa basag na buto. Sa pamamagitan ng hiwang ito, dahan-dahang ililipat ng iyong doktor ang mga kalamnan at tisyu upang makita nang direkta ang lugar ng fracture.

Kapag nakita na ang mga piraso ng basag na buto, i-aalign ng iyong doktor ang mga ito sa tamang posisyon. Ang hakbang na ito ay tinatawag na reduction. Upang panatilihing matatag ang mga buto habang nagpapagaling, gagamitin ng iyong doktor ang metal plate at mga turnilyo. Ang plate ay nakaupo sa ibabaw ng iyong humerus (buto ng itaas na braso). Ang mga turnilyo ay dadaan sa plate at papasok sa mga fragment ng buto upang hawakan nang mahigpit ang lahat sa tamang posisyon. Ang pamamaraang ito, na kilala bilang open reduction at internal fixation, ay nagbibigay ng matatag na suporta para sa nagpapagaling na buto.

Pagkatapos maging secure ang fixation, susuriin ng iyong doktor kung tama ang alignment. Pagkatapos, ibabalik ang mga kalamnan at tisyu sa kanilang normal na posisyon. Isasara ang hiwa gamit ang mga tahi o staples. Maglalagay ng dressing upang protektahan ang lugar. Ang pamamaraang ito ay nagpapahintulot sa iyong doktor na direktang ibalik ang istruktura ng iyong shoulder joint.

Pagkatapos ng operasyon

Gising ka sa recovery ward habang tumatagal ang epekto ng anestesia. Pinamamahalaan namin ang iyong sakit gamit ang gamot upang manatili kang komportable. Nasa sling o brace ang iyong balikat, at may sterile dressing na sumasakop sa incision. Karamihan sa mga pasyente ay nananatili ng isang gabi sa ospital pagkatapos ng operasyong ito, bagama't may ilang makakapunta na sa bahay sa parehong araw. Mangyaring mag-ayos ng taong mananatili sa iyo sa loob ng unang 24 na oras. Hindi ka dapat magmaneho ng hindi bababa sa ANIM NA LINGGO pagkatapos ng anumang operasyon sa balikat, anuman ang kung aling braso ang na-operahan. Kapag pinapayagan ka ng iyong surgeon, karaniwan sa six-week review, maaari ka nang bumalik sa pagmamaneho. Tingnan ang Pagmamaneho pagkatapos ng upper-limb surgery para sa kumpletong detalye.

Pagbawi

Maaaring maranasan mong masakit at pamamaga sa iyong balikat at itaas na braso sa unang ilang araw. Normal ito habang gumagaling ang iyong katawan mula sa bukas na operasyon. Ginagamit namin ang isang karaniwang hiwa sa itaas ng lugar ng operasyon upang ilagay ang device para sa pagkukumpuni. Makakatulong ang mga ice pack at mga iniresetang gamot pang-alis ng sakit upang bawasan ang hindi komportableng pakiramdam. Itayo ang iyong braso kapag nagpapahinga upang bawasan ang pamamaga.

Magdudulot ka ng sling upang suportahan ang iyong braso habang gumagaling ito. Huwag magmaneho habang nakasuot ng sling. Ayon sa aming patakaran, kailangan mong maghintay ng hindi bababa sa anim na linggo bago magmaneho, anuman ang braso na inoperahan. Maaari kang magmaneho kapag pinahintulutan ka ng iyong doktor, karaniwan sa pagsusuri sa anim na linggo. Tingnan ang aming gabay tungkol sa Pagmaneho pagkatapos ng operasyon sa itaas na bahagi ng katawan para sa karagdagang detalye.

Gabay ng iyong pisyoterapeuta ang iyong mga ehersisyo sa rehabilitasyon. Ang mga banayad na galaw na ito ay tumutulong upang muling makuha ang saklaw ng galaw at lakas. Karaniwang inirerekomenda ang maagang aktibong paggalaw upang maiwasan ang pagkatigas. Unti-unting babalik ka sa iyong mga pang-araw-araw na gawain habang pinapayagan ng sakit at bumabalik ang paggalaw. Maaaring magkaiba ang iyong timeline; gabay ng iyong doktor at pisyoterapeuta ang bawat hakbang ng iyong pagbawi.

Maaaring mangyari

Karamihan sa mga pasyente ay gumagaling nang maayos, ngunit minsan ay maaaring magkaroon ng mga problema. Ang iyong doktor at ang koponan ay masusing susubaybayan ka upang maagang matukoy ang anumang isyu.

Ang impeksyon ay isang seryosong panganib pagkatapos ng operasyong ito. Maaaring mapansin mo ang pamumula na kumakalat mula sa sugat, init, o pagdaloy ng pus. Ang malalim na sakit na hindi bumababa kahit may gamot pang-alis ng sakit ay isa ring senyales. Kung makikita mo ang mga senyales na ito, agad na kontakin ang klinika o pumunta sa emergency department. Mahalaga ang maagang paggamot upang maprotektahan ang iyong buto at kasu-kasuan.

Maaaring hindi maayos ang paggaling ng iyong buto, na kilala bilang nonunion. Maaaring mararamdaman mo ang patuloy na sakit o mapansin na tila hindi pa stabil ang iyong braso ilang linggo pagkatapos ng operasyon. Minsan, ang buto ay gumagaling sa maling posisyon, na tinatawag na malunion, na maaaring limitahan ang iyong galaw sa balikat. Ipabatid sa iyong doktor kung hindi bumababa ang iyong sakit gaya ng inaasahan sa iyong mga follow-up visits.

Maaaring masira ang suplay ng dugo sa ulo ng iyong buto ng braso, na nagdudulot ng avascular necrosis. Ibig sabihin, mamamatay ang tisyu ng buto dahil kulang ito sa dugo. Maaaring mararamdaman mo ang malalim at nakakalungkot na sakit sa balikat na lumalala sa paglipas ng panahon. Susubaybayan ng iyong doktor ang kondisyong ito sa iyong mga regular na review gamit ang mga scan.

Maaaring magdulot ng mga isyu ang metal na hardware na ginamit upang ikabit ang iyong mga buto. Maaaring mararamdaman mo ang iritasyon sa ilalim ng balat kung saan nakapwesto ang plate. Sa ilang kaso, maaaring lumuwag o masira ang mga turnilyo o plate. Maaaring magdulot ito ng biglaang sakit o pakiramdam ng pag-click kapag gumagalaw. Iulat sa iyong koponan ng pag-aalaga ang anumang bagong pakiramdam ng mekanikal o matulis na sakit.

Mayroong mga pangkalahatang panganib sa kalusugan, lalo na para sa mga mas matandang pasyente. Ang operasyon ay maaaring magdagdag ng panganib ng mga hindi magandang kaganapan habang ikaw ay nasa ospital. Magkaroon ng kamalayan sa mga senyales tulad ng sakit sa dibdib, hirap sa paghinga, o biglaang pamamaga sa iyong mga binti. Kailangan ng agad na medikal na pansin ang mga ito. Gagawin ng iyong koponan ng medikal na pag-aalaga ang mga hakbang upang bawasan ang mga panganib na ito bago at pagkatapos ng iyong operasyon.

Ang table ng mga komplikasyon sa pahinang ito ay naglalaman ng karaniwang mga rate kung gusto mo ng mga detalye.

Kailan tawagan ang amin

Tawagan kami kung ikaw ay magkaroon ng lagnat, pagtaas ng pamumula sa sugat, o paglabas ng dugo. Pumunta sa emergency kung ikaw ay magkaroon ng biglaang matinding sakit, pamamaga sa binti, o hirap sa paghinga. Humingi ng agad na tulong kung ikaw ay mawalan ng pakiramdam o hindi makagalaw ang iyong kamay o paa. Ang mga sintomas na ito ay nangangailangan ng agad na pagsusuri upang matiyak na ang iyong paggaling ay nasa tamang landas.

Reviewed by Dr Kieran Hirpara · 7 August 2026.

Want the clinical detail? Read the clinician version.

Talk to your treating clinician for advice specific to you.

For an appointment with the CQ Hand + Upper Limb team, ask your GP about a referral or visit www.cqupperlimb.com.

Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

  • Modern proximal humeral nail designs and techniques demonstrate promising outcomes and provide stable fixation [1].
  • Intramedullary nailing and locked plating demonstrate equivalent clinical outcomes for the surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adults [2].
  • Intramedullary nailing is superior to locking plates in reducing total complications, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, and postoperative humeral head necrosis rates [3].
  • Both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures [6].
  • There is unclear superiority of intramedullary nails versus locking plates for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures [6].
  • Limited evidence suggests that both locking plates and intramedullary nails are valuable options for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures [13].
  • Intramedullary fixation represents an alternative treatment option for proximal humeral fractures with specific fixation and biologic advantages [7].
  • Reported outcomes for intramedullary fixation are comparable with other techniques [7].
  • Fixation of proximal humerus fractures with proximal humerus locking plates is associated with a high rate of complications and reoperation [9].
  • Augmentation of plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures mechanically increases construct stability and reduces complication rates while improving patient outcomes [18].
  • Augmentation of plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures is a reliable and safe procedure [18].
  • No single fixation method is a panacea for proximal humeral fractures [21].
  • The choice of implant and method for proximal humeral fractures should be selected according to individual patient and fracture pattern characteristics based on clearly defined indications and contraindications [21].
  • Treatment for proximal humerus fractures remains controversial [5].
  • Nonsurgical management of proximal humerus fractures demonstrates successful outcomes and union rates greater than 90% [5].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

  • Proper technique for internal fixation of the proximal humerus requires an understanding of osseous and neurovascular anatomy [29].

Classification

  • Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus can provide stable fixation [1].
  • Intramedullary nailing is superior to locking plate in reducing total complications, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, and postoperative humeral head necrosis rate [3].
  • There is unclear superiority of intramedullary nails versus locking plates for displaced proximal humeral fractures [6].
  • Reported outcomes with intramedullary fixation are comparable with other techniques [7].
  • Plate fixation was associated with a higher risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) development than conservative treatment in patients with proximal humeral fractures [11].
  • Limited evidence suggests that locking plate and intramedullary nail are both valuable options for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures [13].
  • No superior treatment was suggested between locking plates and intramedullary nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures [14].
  • Treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures must be individualized based on patient and fracture characteristics [16].
  • Treatment options for displaced proximal humerus fractures range from nonsurgical immobilization to various surgical techniques including locking plate fixation and hemiarthroplasty [16].
  • The choice of treatment for proximal humeral fractures depends on the fracture type and severity, surgeon expertise, patient age, and patient health status [25].

Clinical Presentation

  • Intramedullary nailing is superior to locking plate in reducing total complication rate, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, and postoperative humeral head necrosis rate [3].
  • Patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fracture dislocations have reasonable functional outcomes but relatively high avascular necrosis and reoperation rates [4].
  • Both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, with unclear superiority of either method [6].
  • Intramedullary fixation represents an alternative treatment option for proximal humeral fractures with specific fixation and biologic advantages, including reported outcomes comparable with other techniques [7].
  • Most proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients can be treated nonoperatively with good functional outcomes [8].
  • Most pediatric patients with proximal humerus fractures have favorable results, and complications are infrequent [12].
  • Over the past decade, most older adults who sustain proximal humerus fractures continue to receive nonoperative treatment [15].
  • Treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures must be individualized based on patient and fracture characteristics, with a general evolution toward humeral head preservation using options ranging from nonsurgical immobilization to various surgical techniques including locking plate fixation and hemiarthroplasty [16].
  • Considerable variability exists in the use of outcome measures across the proximal humerus fracture literature, making treatment comparison challenging [17].
  • Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures yields variable long-term clinical outcomes and high rates of failure, with the majority due to greater tuberosity malunion or nonunion [38].
  • Optimal management of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures has evolved to include the use of locking plates and augmentation with intramedullary fibular grafts, calcium phosphate or sulfate cement, and iliac crest bone graft [43].

Investigations

  • Intramedullary nailing and plating demonstrate equivalent clinical outcomes for the surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adults [2].
  • Intramedullary nailing is superior to locking plate in reducing total complication rates, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time, and postoperative humeral head necrosis rate [3].
  • Modern proximal humeral nail designs and techniques have demonstrated promising outcomes and can provide stable fixation [1].
  • Patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fracture dislocations have relatively high avascular necrosis and reoperation rates [4].
  • Preoperative CT is extremely valuable for careful analysis of fracture type, fragment displacement, and bone quality in the surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures [54].
  • Imaging-based assessment of fracture stability does not reliably predict outcomes in patients with two-part proximal humeral fractures and may lead to unnecessary surgeries [52].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • Most older adults who sustain proximal humerus fractures continue to receive nonoperative treatment [15].
  • Multiple studies comparing nonoperative and operative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the geriatric population have demonstrated minimal differences in functional outcomes [27].
  • Non-operative treatment is advocated for the majority of non-displaced and minimally displaced proximal humerus fractures, which generally yield good outcomes [41].

Operative Management: General Considerations

  • No single fixation method is a panacea for proximal humerus fractures; the choice of implant and method should be selected according to individual patient and fracture pattern characteristics based on clearly defined indications and contraindications [21].
  • Surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in younger patients is challenging due to high expectations and the lack of a single device providing reproducible results [19].
  • Technical strategies to maximize the success of surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures emphasize innovations in technique and implant design to mitigate high complication rates [39].
  • Modern management controversies surrounding adult proximal humerus fractures include surgical indications, the role of intramedullary nailing and supplemental fixation, as well as timing and techniques for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [53].

Intramedullary Nailing vs. Locking Plate Fixation

  • The intramedullary nail is superior to locking plate in reducing the total complication, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time and postoperative humeral head necrosis rate of proximal humerus fractures [3].

Augmentation Techniques

  • Augmentation of plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures seems to be a reliable and safe procedure that mechanically increases construct stability and reduces complication rates while improving patient outcomes [18].
  • Fixation of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients using locked plates with or without cement augmentation has no significant difference in revision rate, but the implant failure and total complication rates may be lesser on using the cement-augmented locked plate for fixation than on using a locked plate alone [26].

Specific Fracture Patterns and Populations

Anesthesia

  • Regional anesthesia is a good option for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing surgical repair of a proximal humerus fracture and is associated with fewer adverse events, a shorter recovery time, and a better functional outcome than those achieved by general anesthesia alone [44].

Complications and Definitions

  • Significant heterogeneity exists in the terminology and definitions used to describe complications following non-surgical management of proximal humeral fractures, calling for standardized definitions to improve evidence synthesis [20].

Complications

  • Intramedullary fixation represents an alternative treatment option with reported outcomes comparable with other techniques [7].
  • Fixation of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients using locked plates with cement augmentation may have lesser implant failure and total complication rates than using a locked plate alone [26].
  • Standard components and fracture-specific components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for proximal humerus fractures show no significant differences in complication rates [47].
  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) was the most frequently reported complication after shoulder arthroplasty (SA) compared to ORIF, with RSA having the highest VTE rate [50].
  • Revision surgery for failed arthroplasty of proximal humerus fracture is complex with a high likelihood of inferior outcomes compared with primary arthroplasty [57].
  • Locked humeral stems provide reliable diaphyseal fixation with a low incidence of screw-related complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fractures [58].
  • Open fractures and 4-part proximal humerus fractures had the highest complication rates following intramedullary nailing [59].
  • Fracture stems showed promising overall clinical outcomes with low complication rates in treating proximal humeral fractures [60].
  • Proximal humerus fractures treated with a locking compression plate (LCP) augmented with a fibular allograft have decreased odds of a major complication when compared with patients treated with an LCP alone [61].

Recovery

  • Modern proximal humeral nail designs and techniques can provide stable fixation [1].
  • In most studies of proximal humerus fractures, only 1 or 2 patients experiencing an alternative outcome or lost to follow-up would change the conclusions for the dichotomous outcome studied [24].
  • Patients 65 years of age with 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures achieve the most benefit in terms of ROM, postoperative functional outcomes, tuberosity union, and overall complication rate when undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) with a noncemented stem and early postoperative ROM compared to rTSA with cemented stem and delayed rehabilitation [48].
  • Published rehabilitation protocols for proximal humerus fractures vary considerably regardless of management [49].

Key Evidence

  • [L5] Modern proximal humeral nail designs and techniques have demonstrated promising outcomes and can provide stable fixation. [1] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.016)
  • [L1] Intramedullary nailing and plating demonstrate equivalent clinical outcomes for the surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures in adults. [2] (10.1016/j.jse.2026.02.016)
  • [L1] The intramedullary nail is superior to locking plate in reducing the total complication, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative fracture healing time and postoperative humeral head necrosis rate of PHF. [3] (10.1186/s13018-019-1345-0)
  • [L4] Patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fracture dislocations have reasonable functional outcomes but relatively high avascular necrosis and reoperation rates. [4] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.018)
  • [L5] Treatment for proximal humerus fractures remains controversial, with nonsurgical management demonstrating successful outcomes and union rates greater than 90%. [5] (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01073)
  • [L5] The available evidence suggests that both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, with unclear superiority of either method. [6] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.01.001)
  • [L4] Intramedullary fixation represents an alternative treatment option for proximal humeral fractures with specific fixation and biologic advantages, including reported outcomes comparable with other techniques. [7] (10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00360)
  • [L5] Most proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients can be treated nonoperatively with good functional outcomes. [8] (10.2106/jbjs.l.01293)
  • [L4] Fixation of proximal humerus fractures with proximal humerus locking plates is associated with a high rate of complications and reoperation. [9] (10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.058)
  • [L1] Plate fixation was associated with a higher risk of AVN development than conservative treatment in patients with proximal humeral fractures. [11] (10.1186/1749-799x-9-31)
  • [L5] Most pediatric patients with proximal humerus fractures have favorable results, and complications are infrequent. [12] (10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00033)
  • [L1] Limited evidence suggests that locking plate and intramedullary nail are both valuable options for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. [13] (10.1186/s13018-015-0242-4)
  • [L1] No superior treatment was suggested between locking plates and intramedullary nails for displaced proximal humeral fractures. [14] (10.1007/s00264-017-3683-z)
  • [L4] Over the past decade, most older adults who sustain proximal humerus fractures continue to receive nonoperative treatment. [15] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.08.006)
  • [L5] Treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures must be individualized based on patient and fracture characteristics, with a general evolution toward humeral head preservation using options ranging from nonsurgical immobilization to various surgical techniques including locking plate fixation and hemiarthroplasty. [16] (10.5435/00124635-200701000-00003)
  • [L4] Considerable variability exists in the use of outcome measures across the proximal humerus fracture literature, making treatment comparison challenging. [17] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.006)
  • [L1] Augmentation of plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures seems to be a reliable and safe procedure that mechanically increases construct stability and reduces complication rates while improving patient outcomes. [18] (10.1007/s00402-019-03162-2)
  • [L5] The paper concludes that surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in younger patients is challenging due to high expectations and the lack of a single device providing reproducible results. [19] (10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.006)
  • [L1] This systematic review highlights significant heterogeneity in the terminology and definitions used to describe complications following non-surgical management of proximal humeral fractures, calling for standardized definitions to improve evidence synthesis. [20] (10.1186/s12891-019-2459-6)
  • [L4] No single fixation method is a panacea for proximal humeral fractures; choice of implant and method should be selected according to individual patient and fracture pattern characteristics based on clearly defined indications and contraindications. [21] (10.1016/j.injury.2010.10.016)
  • [L2] In most studies of proximal humeral fractures, only 1 or 2 patients experiencing an alternative outcome or lost to follow-up would change the conclusions for the dichotomous outcome studied. [24] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.141)
  • [L4] The choice of treatment for proximal humeral fractures depends on the fracture type and severity, surgeon expertise, patient age, and patient health status. [25] (10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00240)
  • [L1] Fixation of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients using locked plates with or without cement augmentation has no significant difference in revision rate, but the implant failure and total complication rates may be lesser on using the cement-augmented locked plate for fixation than on using a locked plate alone. [26] (10.1186/s12891-024-07502-1)
  • [L5] Multiple studies comparing nonoperative and operative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in the geriatric population have demonstrated minimal differences in functional outcomes. [27] (10.2106/jbjs.20.00665)
  • [L5] Proper technique for internal fixation of the proximal humerus requires an understanding of osseous and neurovascular anatomy, with biomechanical studies showing that locked plating provides stable fixation. [29] (10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00558)
  • [L5] Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures yields variable long-term clinical outcomes and high rates of failure, with the majority due to greater tuberosity malunion or nonunion. [38] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100616)
  • [L5] This review highlights various technical strategies to maximize the success of surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures, emphasizing innovations in technique and implant design to mitigate high complication rates. [39] (10.5435/jaaos-d-22-01211)
  • [L4] Non-operative treatment is advocated for the majority of non-displaced and minimally displaced fractures with generally good outcomes, while displaced fractures may require arthroscopically assisted fixation or open/percutaneous reduction and internal fixation depending on fracture type and patient factors. [41] (10.1016/j.injury.2007.09.022)
  • [L4] Optimal management of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures has evolved to include the use of locking plates and augmentation with intramedullary fibular grafts, calcium phosphate or sulfate cement, and iliac crest bone graft. [43] (10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.003)
  • [L1] This systematic review suggests that RA is a good option for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing surgical repair of a proximal humerus fracture and is associated with fewer adverse events, a shorter recovery time, and a better functional outcome than those achieved by general anaesthesia alone. [44] (10.1007/s00402-019-03253-0)
  • [L1] This meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication rates between standard components and fracture-specific components in RSA, suggesting comparable performance in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. [47] (10.1302/0301-620x.107b9.bjj-2024-1508.r2)
  • [L1] Patients 65 years of age with 3- or 4-part proximal humerus fractures achieve the most benefit in terms of ROM, postoperative functional outcomes, tuberosity union, and overall complication rate when undergoing rTSA with a noncemented stem and early postoperative ROM compared to rTSA with cemented stem and delayed rehabilitation. [48] (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.040)
  • [L4] Published rehabilitation protocols for proximal humerus fractures vary considerably regardless of management. [49] (10.1177/17585732231182374)
  • [L4] Among the various procedures, VTE was the most frequently reported after SA when compared to ORIF, with RSA having the highest VTE rate. [50] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.06.003)
  • [L5] Imaging-based assessment of fracture stability does not reliably predict outcomes in patients with two-part proximal humeral fractures and may lead to unnecessary surgeries. [52] (10.1530/eor-2026-0043)
  • [L5] This review discusses modern management controversies surrounding adult proximal humerus fractures, including surgical indications, the role of intramedullary nailing and supplemental fixation, as well as timing and techniques for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to assist surgeons in making evidence-based decisions. [53] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.009)
  • [L4] All available ORIF techniques require careful analysis of fracture type, fragment displacement, and bone quality, making preoperative CT extremely valuable. [54] (10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.006)
  • [L5] Revision surgery for failed arthroplasty of proximal humerus fracture is complex with a high likelihood of inferior outcomes compared with primary arthroplasty. [57] (10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00051)
  • [L4] Locked humeral stems provide reliable diaphyseal fixation with a low incidence of screw-related complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fractures. [58] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100625)
  • [L4] Open fractures and 4-part proximal humerus fractures had the highest complication rates. [59] (10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.049)
  • [L1] Fracture stems showed promising overall clinical outcomes with low complication rates in treating proximal humeral fractures. [60] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.044)
  • [L1] The pooled WMD and prediction interval suggest that 95% of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with an LCP augmented with a fibular allograft will have improved radiographic outcomes, improved ASES clinical outcome scores, and decreased odds of a major complication when compared with patients treated with an LCP alone. [61] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.004)

References

[1] Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: evolution, technique, and results. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.016

[2] Effectiveness of intramedullary nailing vs. locked plating (open reduction and internal fixation) in adult displaced proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2026.02.016

[3] Effect of intramedullary nail and locking plate in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1345-0

[4] Fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.018

[5] Contemporary Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01073

[6] Intramedullary versus locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: indications and technical considerations. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.01.001

[7] Intramedullary Fixation for Proximal Humeral Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2020. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00360

[8] Proximal Humeral Fracture Treatment in Adults. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.l.01293

[9] A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.058

[11] Avascular necrosis in proximal humeral fractures in patients treated with operative fixation: a meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799x-9-31

[12] Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00033

[13] Meta-analysis of locking plate versus intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0242-4

[14] Locking plates versus intramedullary nails in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3683-z

[15] Trending a decade of proximal humerus fracture management in older adults. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.08.006

[16] Innovations in the Management of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200701000-00003

[17] Outcome measures reported for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.006

[18] Augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of current biomechanical and clinical studies. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03162-2

[19] Proximal humeral fractures in younger patients: fixation techniques and arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.006

[20] Complications after non-surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of terms and definitions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2459-6

[21] New trends in fixation of proximal humeral fractures: A review. Injury. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.10.016

[24] Fragility of randomized controlled trials on treatment of proximal humeral fracture. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.141

[25] Management of Acute Proximal Humeral Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2017. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00240

[26] Cement-augmented locked plate fixation proximal humerus fractures in elderly patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07502-1

[27] Current Controversies in the Treatment of Geriatric Proximal Humeral Fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00665

[29] Principles of Locking Plate Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00558

[38] Long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review of clinical studies with minimum 10-year follow-up. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100616

[39] Technical Tips for Reduction and Stable Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2023. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-01211

[41] Isolated tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: Current concepts. Injury. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.09.022

[43] Evaluation of the osteoporotic proximal humeral fracture and strategies for structural augmentation during surgical treatment. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.003

[44] Regional anaesthesia for surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03253-0

[47] Standard compared with fracture-specific components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.107b9.bjj-2024-1508.r2

[48] Optimal combination of arthroplasty type, fixation method, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a network meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.040

[49] Rehabilitation protocols in proximal humerus fracture management: A systematic review. Shoulder & Elbow. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231182374

[50] Venous thromboembolism following surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.06.003

[52] Imaging-based assessment of fracture stability does not reliably predict outcomes in patients with two-part proximal humeral fractures and may lead to unnecessary surgeries. EFORT Open Reviews. 2026. DOI: 10.1530/eor-2026-0043

[53] Controversies in the Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.009

[54] Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.006

[57] Management of the Failed Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2019. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00051

[58] Use of locking humeral stems in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fractures: a scoping review. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100625

[59] Complications following intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.049

[60] Improved functional outcome and tuberosity healing in patients treated with fracture stems than nonfracture stems during shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.044

[61] Improved outcomes for proximal humerus fracture open reduction internal fixation augmented with a fibular allograft in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.004

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.

Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.