Skip to content

Patients › Hand

Gãy ngón tay

Phalangeal and metacarpal fractures of the hand — non-operative care and indications for fixation.

Updated Oct 2026
Một hình vẽ tay minh họa xương ngón tay bị gãy.
Đường gãy ngón tay có thể chạy ngang hoặc chạy dọc theo xương ngón tay (đốt ngón tay). Servier Medical Art / smart.servier.com, CC BY 4.0

Trang này được dịch bằng máy và chưa được bác sĩ kiểm tra. Bản tiếng Anh là bản chính thức.

Những triệu chứng bạn đang gặp phải

Gãy ngón tay thường xảy ra trong một khoảnh khắc rõ ràng. Một quả bóng đập mạnh vào đầu ngón tay, bạn ngã chống tay, hoặc ngón tay bị va đập trực tiếp. Bạn có thể nghe thấy hoặc cảm thấy một tiếng gãy hay tiếng rắc ngay lúc đó. Cơn đau xuất hiện ngay lập tức, và ngón tay sưng lên nhanh chóng. Vết bầm tím thường xuất hiện sau đó trong vòng vài giờ.

Ngón tay bị thương có thể trông bị cong hoặc bị xoay vẹo, hoặc đơn giản là đau đến mức không cử động được. Bạn có thể nhận thấy các ngón tay không còn thẳng hàng với nhau khi bạn nắm tay lại. Ở trẻ em, chấn thương tương tự thường xảy ra ở gốc ngón tay, và ngón út cùng ngón cái là những ngón hay bị thương nhất. Đầu ngón tay bị kẹp dập có thể làm rách da, và đôi khi móng tay hoặc vùng da quanh móng bị rách.

Trong những ngày đầu, cơn đau rõ nhất khi bạn cố gập ngón tay hoặc cầm nắm. Những việc đơn giản như cầm bút, cài cúc áo hay vặn tay nắm cửa đều có thể gây đau. Trong giai đoạn đầu, cơn đau thường khiến bạn thức giấc vào ban đêm. Trong khoảng hai đến ba tuần đầu, tình trạng sưng và đau giảm dần khi xương bắt đầu liền lại.

Một vài dấu hiệu cảnh báo cần được xử lý ngay trong ngày chúng xuất hiện, không đợi đến lần hẹn khám tiếp theo. Hãy đến khoa cấp cứu ngay trong ngày nếu có vết rách da ở ngón tay hoặc khớp bị thương, nếu lộ xương ra ngoài, hoặc nếu ngón tay trông biến dạng rõ rệt. Cũng hãy làm như vậy nếu ngón tay trở nên tái nhợt, lạnh, trắng bệch hoặc tím tái, hoặc nếu bạn đột ngột mất cảm giác hoặc không cử động được ngón tay sau chấn thương. Nếu ngón tay trở nên nóng, đỏ, sưng và đau, đặc biệt khi kèm theo sốt, thì cũng cần được cấp cứu ngay trong ngày. Bạn không cần giấy giới thiệu của bác sĩ đa khoa cho bất kỳ trường hợp nào kể trên.

Nếu cơn đau không thuyên giảm sau nhiều tuần, đang nặng dần lên, hoặc khiến bạn không thể sử dụng bàn tay hay làm việc, hãy gặp bác sĩ đa khoa hoặc yêu cầu được bác sĩ chuyên khoa khám.

Điều gì đang thực sự xảy ra

Gãy ngón tay là tình trạng gãy một trong những xương nhỏ bên trong ngón tay của bạn. Mỗi ngón tay có ba xương như vậy, còn ngón cái có hai. Vết gãy thường xảy ra khi một cú va đập trực tiếp, một cú ngã hoặc một chấn thương khi chơi thể thao bẻ cong xương vượt quá giới hạn chịu đựng của nó. Đôi khi nhiều ngón tay bị gãy cùng lúc, và các xương cổ tay hoặc xương bàn tay cũng có thể bị tổn thương trong cùng một tai nạn.

Xương bị gãy có thể vẫn thẳng hàng hoặc có thể bị di lệch khỏi vị trí. Khi xương di lệch, các cơ và gân bám vào xương đó sẽ kéo các mảnh xương gãy. Gân là những dải mô nối cơ với xương, và chúng chạy sát các xương ngón tay đến mức kéo các mảnh xương ngay khi xương bị gãy. Lực kéo đó là lý do ngón tay bị gãy có thể trông bị cong hoặc ngắn lại, và vì sao ngón tay không thể cầm nắm hoặc duỗi thẳng bình thường khi các mảnh xương chưa thẳng hàng.

Cơ thể bạn bắt đầu sửa chữa chỗ gãy ngay lập tức. Máu tụ lại quanh chỗ gãy, và xương bắt đầu liền lại qua khe gãy, giống như một cành cây bị nứt được phủ lại bằng lớp gỗ mới. Điều đáng lưu ý là mọi thứ gần chỗ gãy cũng lành lại. Máu và dịch sưng biến thành mô sẹo có thể làm dính các gân vào xương. Vì các gân nằm sát ngay trên xương, gần như không có gì ở giữa, nên tình trạng cứng này có thể xảy ra ngay cả khi bản thân vết gãy chỉ nhẹ. Đó là lý do một ngón tay đã liền xương tốt vẫn có thể bị cứng và gập chậm.

Nếu vết gãy lan vào bề mặt của một khớp ngón tay, bề mặt trượt trơn nhẵn sẽ không còn khít với nhau, và điều này gây ra những vấn đề riêng. Hầu hết các trường hợp gãy ngón tay đều ổn định mà không cần phẫu thuật, nhưng một số vết gãy, đặc biệt là những vết gãy bị di lệch hoặc không vững, cần được hỗ trợ để giữ yên trong khi lành lại.

Những gì chúng tôi có thể làm

Bác sĩ Kieran Hirpara, bác sĩ phẫu thuật chi trên tại Bệnh viện tư nhân Mater Rockhampton, sẽ lựa chọn phương pháp điều trị phù hợp với chấn thương cụ thể của bạn. Một số trường hợp gãy ngón tay lành mà không cần phẫu thuật, còn những trường hợp khác cần phẫu thuật sớm sau chấn thương, vì vậy việc thăm khám kịp thời là rất quan trọng. Thông thường, bệnh nhân được bác sĩ đa khoa giới thiệu đến phòng khám của chúng tôi; nếu nhà vật lý trị liệu khuyên bạn nên đến gặp chúng tôi, bạn vẫn cần có giấy giới thiệu từ bác sĩ đa khoa để được hưởng mức hoàn trả từ Medicare. Tại phòng khám, chúng tôi sẽ hỏi bệnh sử, khám bàn tay của bạn và chỉ định chụp X-quang khi cần thiết. Phim X-quang cho thấy xương có còn thẳng hàng hay không, xương đã di lệch đến mức nào, và vết gãy có lan vào bề mặt khớp hay không.

Hầu hết các trường hợp gãy ngón tay có thể được điều trị mà không cần phẫu thuật. Nếu xương vững hoặc chỉ hơi lệch khỏi vị trí, chúng tôi giữ xương yên bằng nẹp hoặc bó bột trong khi xương lành lại. Nẹp cho ngón tay bị gãy thường giữ khớp gốc ngón ở tư thế gập và các khớp ngón tay ở tư thế thẳng, và có thể để cổ tay của bạn được cử động tự do. Thay vào đó, một số chấn thương được giữ bằng một lực kéo nhẹ và liên tục, giúp giữ các mảnh xương thẳng hàng mà không cần phẫu thuật. Dán băng ngón tay bị thương vào ngón bên cạnh là một cách khác để nâng đỡ ngón tay, và cách này hiệu quả với nhiều trường hợp gãy ngón tay ở trẻ em. Chúng tôi theo dõi ngón tay bằng cách chụp lại hình ảnh khi cần thiết, và cho ngón tay vận động trở lại theo từng giai đoạn khi vết gãy đã chịu được. Vận động sớm là quan trọng vì một ngón tay bị giữ bất động quá lâu sẽ bị cứng, ngay cả khi xương liền tốt.

Phẫu thuật được khuyến nghị ngay từ đầu khi xương bị di lệch nhiều, khi xương không giữ được ở đúng vị trí, hoặc khi vết gãy lan vào một khớp ngón tay và các bề mặt khớp không còn khít với nhau. Một số dạng gãy luôn cần phẫu thuật, chẳng hạn như một khớp vừa bị gãy vừa bị trật cùng lúc, hoặc gãy xương gần móng ở trẻ em có rách da bên dưới móng. Nhu cầu riêng của bạn cũng quan trọng: một người thợ cần sức nắm mạnh có thể lựa chọn khác với một người làm công việc nhẹ nhàng. Mục đích của phẫu thuật là giữ các mảnh xương ở đúng vị trí để ngón tay có thể cử động trong khi lành lại. Chúng tôi sẽ cùng bạn thảo luận về các lựa chọn, bao gồm ý nghĩa của mỗi hướng điều trị đối với cơn đau, tình trạng cứng khớp, cũng như hình dáng và sức mạnh sau cùng của ngón tay, và chúng ta sẽ cùng nhau quyết định.

Dù bạn theo hướng điều trị nào, những tuần đầu tiên đều tương tự nhau. Thuốc giảm đau giúp bạn dễ chịu trong khi tình trạng sưng giảm dần. Bạn bảo vệ ngón tay khỏi va chạm và gắng sức trong khi xương liền lại. Trị liệu bàn tay bắt đầu vào giai đoạn phù hợp với chấn thương của bạn, với các bài tập giúp phục hồi khả năng gập và duỗi mà không ảnh hưởng đến xương đang lành.

Những điều bạn có thể mong đợi

Hầu hết các trường hợp gãy ngón tay đều lành tốt, nhưng ngón tay thường cần nhiều thời gian hơn để có cảm giác bình thường so với thời gian xương liền. Nhiều vết gãy liền trong vòng 4 tuần, và hầu hết lành trong khoảng từ 5 đến 9 tuần. Thời gian lành trung bình là khoảng 6 tuần. Trong những tuần đó, ngón tay được bảo vệ trong nẹp hoặc bột, và tình trạng đau và sưng giảm dần đều đặn. Khi vết gãy đã chịu được, khả năng vận động sẽ trở lại theo từng giai đoạn.

Mức độ phục hồi chức năng của bạn phụ thuộc vào chính vết gãy. Gãy các xương nhỏ của ngón tay nhìn chung hồi phục tốt, và hầu hết mọi người lấy lại chức năng tốt vào khoảng tuần thứ chín. Một số dạng gãy khó hơn: gãy gần các khớp ngón tay, gãy thành nhiều mảnh, và gãy kèm theo da xung quanh bị tổn thương nặng có thể khiến ngón tay cứng hơn hoặc yếu hơn so với mong muốn của bạn. Cứng khớp là trở ngại thường gặp nhất sau điều trị, và có thể xảy ra ngay cả khi xương đã liền hoàn hảo. Đó là lý do ngón tay của bạn được cho vận động sớm bất cứ khi nào an toàn, và vì sao trị liệu bàn tay lại quan trọng đến vậy.

Một vài vấn đề có thể xảy ra trong quá trình hồi phục. Đôi khi xương liền chậm hoặc hoàn toàn không liền. Đôi khi xương liền ở tư thế không tốt, điều này có thể hạn chế mức độ gập và duỗi của ngón tay. Nếu một vết gãy gần khớp ngón tay liền lệch trục, khớp đó có thể mất khả năng gập và duỗi. Những vấn đề này là lý do bác sĩ phẫu thuật kiểm tra ngón tay bằng phim X-quang trong khi xương lành lại, và vì sao việc tuân thủ hướng dẫn về nẹp hoặc bột lại quan trọng.

Sau phẫu thuật, xương được giữ đúng vị trí bằng đinh, ốc vít hoặc một nẹp vít nhỏ để ngón tay có thể bắt đầu cử động sớm hơn. Hầu hết mọi người lấy lại được khả năng cử động và sức nắm tốt, và nhiều người trở lại công việc và các hoạt động thường ngày khi ngón tay cho phép. Việc trị liệu bàn tay sau phẫu thuật được thực hiện với Ruby Doolan tại Extend Rehabilitation. Ruby hướng dẫn các bài tập của bạn và làm bất kỳ loại nẹp nào bạn cần trong suốt quá trình hồi phục.

Nếu tình trạng đau hoặc cứng khớp không thuyên giảm sau nhiều tuần, đang nặng dần lên, hoặc khiến bạn không thể làm việc hay sử dụng bàn tay, hãy gặp bác sĩ đa khoa hoặc yêu cầu được bác sĩ chuyên khoa khám.

Khi nào nên đi khám bác sĩ

Hãy đi khám cấp cứu nếu ngón tay của bạn trông bị cong hoặc xoay vẹo rõ rệt, nếu có vết rách da ở chỗ bị thương, nếu lộ xương ra ngoài, nếu ngón tay trở nên tái nhợt, lạnh, trắng bệch hoặc tím tái, hoặc nếu bạn đột ngột mất cảm giác hoặc không cử động được ngón tay. Ngón tay trở nên nóng, đỏ, sưng và đau, đặc biệt khi kèm theo sốt, cũng cần được cấp cứu ngay trong ngày. Bạn không cần giấy giới thiệu của bác sĩ đa khoa cho bất kỳ trường hợp nào kể trên. Nếu bạn không liên lạc được với phòng khám, hãy đến khoa cấp cứu gần nhất.

Hãy gặp bác sĩ đa khoa hoặc yêu cầu được bác sĩ chuyên khoa khám nếu cơn đau không thuyên giảm sau nhiều tuần, nếu cơn đau đang nặng dần lên, hoặc nếu tình trạng sưng, khả năng cử động hoặc sức nắm không cải thiện dần qua từng tuần khi xương lành lại. Một số chấn thương ngón tay lúc đầu trông có vẻ nhẹ nhưng vẫn cần được thăm khám đúng cách, vì vậy bạn nên đi kiểm tra bất kỳ ngón tay nào bị đau, sưng hoặc cử động không bình thường thay vì chờ cho nó tự khỏi.

Phân tích chi tiết hơn

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

Phần này đi sâu hơn mức cần thiết để bạn tự đưa ra quyết định điều trị. Gãy ngón tay là chủ đề đáng để tìm hiểu thêm vì hai phát hiện trái với cách làm thông thường: kháng sinh dự phòng dường như không có lợi cho trường hợp gãy hở đầu ngón tay, và đối với dạng gãy khó ở khớp đốt ngón giữa, chưa có phương pháp cố định nào được chứng minh là tốt hơn các phương pháp khác.

Kháng sinh không làm giảm nhiễm trùng trong gãy hở đầu ngón tay

Gãy hở đốt xa ngón tay, tức là xương lộ ra qua vết thương, thường xảy ra sau chấn thương kẹp dập, và theo thông lệ vẫn được cho dùng kháng sinh dự phòng dựa trên nguyên tắc chung là gãy xương hở cần kháng sinh.

Bằng chứng không ủng hộ điều này trong trường hợp này. Trên 353 bệnh nhân, kết quả không cho thấy bất kỳ tác dụng nào của kháng sinh dự phòng đối với tỷ lệ nhiễm trùng nông sau gãy hở đốt xa ngón tay, và các tác giả kết luận rằng cần tập trung vào việc rửa sạch và cắt lọc vết thương kịp thời thay vì dùng kháng sinh dự phòng [1].

Điểm khác biệt nằm giữa việc làm sạch vết thương và việc dùng thuốc cho vết thương. Việc loại bỏ chất bẩn một cách cơ học mới là điều giúp giảm nhiễm trùng; trong tình huống này, kháng sinh chưa được chứng minh là mang lại thêm lợi ích. Xét đến cái giá của việc dùng kháng sinh không cần thiết, bạn nên biết rằng việc không dùng kháng sinh sau khi vết thương đã được chăm sóc kỹ lưỡng là dựa trên bằng chứng chứ không phải do sơ suất.

Với gãy trật khớp đốt ngón giữa, không có kỹ thuật nào vượt trội

Gãy trật khớp liên đốt gần là một trong những chấn thương khó điều trị hơn ở bàn tay: một khớp nhỏ có bề mặt bị gãy, cần được nắn về đúng vị trí và giữ nguyên vị trí đó trong khi vẫn cử động.

Trên 735 bệnh nhân, sự so sánh này mang tính gợi mở chính vì nó không phân biệt được các lựa chọn: cố định qua da mang lại biên độ vận động sau phẫu thuật cao nhất, xuyên đinh chặn duỗi mang lại sức nắm lớn nhất, và không có phương pháp điều trị hay loại gãy xương nào cho kết quả tốt hơn một cách nhất quán so với các phương pháp khác [2].

Khi hơn một nửa bề mặt khớp bị tổn thương, một lựa chọn tái tạo là xây dựng lại bề mặt khớp bằng mảnh ghép lấy từ xương móc (hamate). Trên 235 bệnh nhân, phương pháp tạo hình khớp bằng nửa xương móc được đánh giá là đáng tin cậy và hiệu quả, giúp giảm triệu chứng và phục hồi chức năng [3].

Vì sao cứng khớp mới là kẻ thù thực sự

Lý do những chấn thương này khó điều trị không phải vì xương không lành; gãy xương ngón tay liền lại khá dễ dàng. Mà là vì ngón tay bị cứng lại.

Các gân gấp và gân duỗi chạy sát ngay trên xương, với rất ít mô mềm ở giữa, nên máu và dịch sưng quanh chỗ gãy sẽ hình thành mô sẹo làm dính các gân vào xương. Quá trình này đã tiến triển nhiều chỉ trong vài tuần, và một khi đã hình thành thì rất khó đảo ngược.

Đây là lý do gãy ngón tay được cho vận động sớm bất cứ khi nào vết gãy đủ vững để cho phép, và vì sao phương pháp cố định được lựa chọn một phần dựa trên việc nó có cho phép vận động hay không, chứ không chỉ dựa trên mức độ giữ xương chắc chắn. Điều này cũng giải thích tình huống có vẻ nghịch lý: một vết gãy đã lành hoàn hảo trên phim X-quang nhưng ngón tay lại không gập được; xương chưa bao giờ là vấn đề.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Metcalfe D, Aquilina AL, Hedley HM. Kháng sinh dự phòng trong gãy hở đốt xa ngón tay: tổng quan có hệ thống và phân tích gộp. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015;41(4):423-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415601055

[2] Demino C, Yates M, Fowler JR. Điều trị phẫu thuật gãy trật khớp liên đốt gần: tổng quan có hệ thống. Hand (N Y). 2019;16(4):453-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719873152

[3] Faulkner H, Graham DJ, Hile M, Lawson RD, Sivakumar BS. Tạo hình khớp bằng nửa xương móc trong gãy nền đốt giữa ngón tay: tổng quan có hệ thống. Hand (N Y). 2021;18(2):300-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447211014623


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

  • Recent PIP joint fractures present challenges in both diagnosis and treatment, with final outcomes significantly impacting global finger and hand function [1].
  • Most pediatric hand fractures are treated nonoperatively with good results [2].
  • A subset of pediatric phalangeal fractures requires prompt recognition and surgical intervention to minimize complications [2].
  • The majority of hand fractures can be treated without surgery [3].
  • Surgery offers distinct advantages in properly selected cases of hand fractures [3].
  • Good or excellent function was achieved in 94% of metacarpal fractures treated with external fixation by nine weeks [4].
  • Good or excellent function was achieved in 85% of phalangeal fractures treated with external fixation by nine weeks [4].
  • No differences in outcome were observed between dorsal and lateral plate fixation for finger proximal phalangeal fractures [5].
  • Approximately one quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure [6].
  • The need for multiple surgical procedures in open finger fractures is especially common in more severely injured fingers, due to crush or with vascular impairment [6].
  • Results from external fixation of closed metacarpal and phalangeal fractures were similar to those obtained in the management of stable and undisplaced fractures [7].
  • Indications for surgical treatment of finger fractures are more clearly defined than previously [8].
  • Operative techniques and implants for osteosynthesis of finger fractures are continuing to evolve and improve [8].
  • Results for finger fracture treatment vary according to fracture type, surgeon experience, and patient compliance [8].
  • It is recommended that all finger fractures should be assessed and treated by surgeons with training in the management of hand injuries [9].
  • Conservative functional techniques are the optimum treatment for the majority of patients with single metacarpal fractures [10].
  • All six fingers in a study of intramedullary fixation through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach obtained satisfactory union of proximal phalangeal fractures [11].
  • No patient complained of pain at the final follow-up in a study of intramedullary fixation through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach [11].
  • Open finger fractures formed the majority of the workload of open fractures at a specific trauma centre [12].
  • Open finger fractures usually required simple treatments only [12].
  • Traction splinting has been shown to be successful in the treatment of closed proximal phalangeal fractures [13].
  • Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation after vascular reconstruction [14].
  • The likelihood of unplanned reoperation for thumb and index finger injuries may guide initial treatment decision-making and postoperative follow-up [14].
  • Miniature plates and screws are applicable for selected unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of certain configurations [17].
  • Miniature plate fixation showed to be safe and effective when used for treatment of extra-articular metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures [19].
  • Most pediatric phalangeal fractures can be treated nonsurgically [22].
  • A small subset of pediatric phalangeal fractures benefits from surgical intervention [22].
  • Screw fixation is suggested to achieve patient satisfaction and optimal functional recovery of closed, isolated proximal phalanx fractures of the long fingers [23].
  • The Ichi-Fixator system is a definitive treatment option for managing various phalangeal fractures [28].
  • Taping finger fractures can be recommended irrespective of the degree of displacement or the need for reduction in children [44].
  • Intramedullary fixation approaches have been reviewed for metacarpal fractures, phalangeal fractures, and interphalangeal joint arthrodesis [55].
  • Percutaneous compressive bone tie was used to treat two intraarticular proximal phalangeal fractures of the thumb with satisfactory outcomes [68].
  • Full range of movements was achieved within 3 weeks in a study using percutaneous compressive bone tie for thumb phalangeal fractures [68].
  • No complications were reported in a study using percutaneous compressive bone tie for thumb phalangeal fractures [68].
  • No need for implant removal was reported in a study using percutaneous compressive bone tie for thumb phalangeal fractures [68].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Bony Anatomy

  • All phalanges consist of a proximal base, a central diaphysis, and a distal head [52].
  • In contrast with the metacarpals, the bases of all the phalanges and not the heads develop as metaphyses [52].
  • The distal portion of the distal phalanx is referred to as the tuft [52].
  • Fingers usually follow a typical pattern of relative lengths where the tip of the index finger extends to the base of the nail of the middle finger, the tip of the ring finger to the mid-aspect of the middle finger nail, and the tip of the small finger to a corresponding point [52].
  • The length of the metacarpal and the phalanges of the same finger resembles the series of Fibonacci [79].
  • In complex flexion, a finger describes an equiangular spiral [79].
  • The articulations of the fingers form a triarticular chain that flexes toward the thumb and the palm to allow grasp [79].
  • The interphalangeal articulations of the digits function uniquely in flexion–extension and their trochlear-shaped articulations are closely congruent throughout excursion of motion [79].
  • The normal finger phalangeal joint surfaces are congruent throughout the arc of motion of the interphalangeal joints [52].
  • The third and fourth metacarpal heads help stabilize the metacarpal arch by providing attachments for the transverse metacarpal ligament [18].
  • The proximal phalanx of either the middle or the ring finger is important functionally because its absence creates a hole through which small objects can pass and impairs scooping maneuvers [18].
  • The small finger plays an important role in palmar grip because of the mobility of its CMC joint and the action of the hypothenar muscles [33].
  • The small finger increases the span of the hand for grasp owing to its abduction moment [33].
  • The ring finger forms the keystone of the palmar arch and participates in power grip [48].
  • The ring finger plays a minimal role in precision pinch [48].

Joint Anatomy & Ligaments

  • The articulations of the digits have two firm collateral ligaments and a thick reinforced anterior capsule, the anterior fibrocartilage, also known as the volar plate [79].
  • The fibrous dorsal capsule of the digit articulations is thin and lax [79].
  • The interphalangeal joint is a stable uniaxial hinge joint [79].
  • Flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint is about 85 degrees [79].
  • Flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint is about 115 degrees [79].
  • Flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint is 80 degrees [79].
  • The index finger is capable of less flexion than the other fingers because it opposes the thumb [79].
  • The normal ulnar inclination of the fingers occurs at the metacarpophalangeal joints [84].
  • Ulnar inclination is most marked in the index finger, less in the middle and little fingers, and almost non-existent in the ring finger [84].
  • The ulnar inclination is due to anatomical factors including asymmetry of the metacarpal heads and collateral ligaments, tendon crossing on the ulnar side, intrinsic muscle predominance, and forward displacement of the ulnar metacarpals [84].
  • The ulnar inclination is normally limited by capsuloligamentous resistance at the MP joints and by the action of the interosseous muscles [84].
  • The dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the little finger causes rupture of the hamatometacarpal and intermetacarpal ligaments [65].
  • The dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the little finger leaves intact the deep transverse metacarpal ligament and the extensor and flexor carpi ulnaris tendons [65].

Soft Tissue & Tendon Anatomy

  • The extensor tendons pass from the forearm onto the dorsum of the hand through six compartments beneath the extensor retinaculum [83].
  • The first compartment contains the extensor pollicis brevis and the abductor pollicis longus [83].
  • The second compartment contains the extensors carpi radialis longus and brevis [83].
  • The third compartment contains the extensor pollicis longus [83].
  • The fourth compartment contains the four tendons of the extensor digitorum communis plus the extensor indicis proprius [83].
  • The fifth compartment contains the extensor digiti quinti [83].
  • The sixth compartment contains the extensor carpi ulnaris [83].
  • The interosseous muscles produce lateral movements of fingers through their insertions on the lateral aspect of the base of the proximal phalanges [89].
  • When the metacarpophalangeal joint is in extension, the interosseous muscles extend the distal phalanges [89].
  • When the metacarpophalangeal joint is in flexion, the interosseous muscles reinforce flexion of the proximal phalanx and lose their extensor action on the distal phalanges [89].
  • The lumbrical muscles are able to extend the two distal phalanges whether the metacarpophalangeal joint is in extension or flexion [89].
  • The lumbricals participate in extension of the distal phalanges by pulling distally on the flexor profundus tendon when this muscle is at rest [89].
  • The palmar skin is anchored to the underlying fascial planes by a system of fibrous tracts [80].
  • The palmar skin adheres closely to the aponeurosis in the mid-palmar area [80].
  • In all other areas, the deep aspect of the skin is separated from the superficial palmar fascia by a layer of fatty tissue divided into compartments by fibrous septa [80].
  • The metacarpophalangeal pad sits transversely over the base of the fingers from the ulnar to the radial border of the hand [80].
  • The pulp has a lobulated palmar pad where fibrous septa join the periosteum of the distal phalanx to the deep aspect of the dermis [80].
  • The cutaneous striations that make up fingerprints reflect the arrangement of the papillary ridges of the underlying dermis [80].
  • The concentric arrangement of striae at the pulp ensures the presence of a group of striae perpendicular to the force exerted, whatever its direction [80].
  • The soft tissue of the fingertips is tightly anchored [81].
  • The soft tissue of the fingers between the fingertips and the area of the aponeurosis is mobile and flexible [81].
  • The mobile soft tissue of the fingers overlies the fibrous tendon sheaths and extends from the distal phalanges to the metacarpophalangeal joints [81].
  • The midlateral finger incision allows the neurovascular bundle to be carried volarward with the volar flap of the incision [47].
  • On the radial sides of the index and middle fingers and on the ulnar side of the little finger, the dorsal branch of the digital nerve should be preserved if possible [47].

Pathophysiology & Mechanism of Injury

  • Intrinsic and extrinsic tendon insertions act as deforming forces to create typical angulation patterns in phalangeal fractures [52].
  • Proximal and middle phalangeal shaft fractures typically collapse into apex volar angulation because of the proximal flexion moment of the intrinsics and distal extensor moment of the extensor mechanism [52].
  • Intraarticular fractures that disrupt joint congruency can occur at either the distal (condylar fracture) or proximal (pilon or proximal condylar fracture) articular surface [52].
  • Most commonly, intraarticular phalangeal fractures are produced by an axial loading injury [52].
  • Fractures of the proximal phalangeal shaft typically exhibit an apex palmar angulation with the fracture gap wider volarly and compressed dorsally [36].
  • The intrinsic muscles flex the proximal fragment of a proximal phalangeal shaft fracture, whereas the distal fragment is extended by the attachment of the central slip to the dorsal lip of the middle phalanx [36].
  • The axis of rotation of proximal phalangeal fractures lies on the fibro-osseous border of the flexor tendon sheath [36].
  • The moment arm from the rotational axis of the fracture site to the extensor tendon is greater than that to the flexor tendon [36].
  • Fracture hematoma permeates the zone of injury and incites a proliferative fibroblastic response of the multiple surrounding collagenous structures [36].
  • Scar tissue tends to involve all of the structures within the zone of injury, producing adherence between the bone and the adjacent tendons, joint capsule, and ligaments [36].
  • Adhesions formed between the extensor mechanism and the fracture may result in loss of extensor glide [36].
  • The mallet finger deformity is characterized by a loss of active distal interphalangeal joint extension with full passive ROM evident [61].
  • The mallet finger reflects the loss of normal extensor force transmission via the terminal tendon insertion onto the distal phalanx [61].
  • The unopposed flexor digitorum profundus pulls the distal joint into flexion in mallet finger [61].
  • The usual mechanism of injury for mallet finger involves sudden passive flexion of the actively extended distal interphalangeal joint [61].
  • Disruption of the terminal tendon in mallet finger may be entirely confined to the tendon or may involve an avulsed fracture fragment from the dorsal lip of the distal phalanx proximal articular surface [61].
  • The forces of the extensor digitorum communis and of the flexor superficialis on the middle phalanx have a component that produces extension of the proximal phalanx [89].
  • The intrinsic muscles (lumbrical and interossei) normally oppose the extension force on the proximal phalanx produced by extrinsic tendons [89].
  • When intrinsic muscles are paralyzed, no force exists to prevent the proximal phalanx from swinging into hyperextension if the extensor digitorum communis and flexor superficialis are active [89].
  • Shortening and closing an injury that leads to proximal migration of the FDP from its insertion at the base of the distal phalanx may result in a lumbrical-plus finger [31].
  • In a lumbrical-plus finger, the FDP tendon retracts and creates tension on the extensor mechanism through the lumbrical that originates off the FDP tendon, causing paradoxical IP joint extension with active digit flexion [31].
  • The "jammed" finger with a swollen, painful PIP joint usually involves a volar plate injury or small nondisplaced avulsion fracture off the volar base of the middle finger epiphysis [29].
  • Salter-Harris II fractures of the digits are an extremely common hand fracture with the little finger proximal phalanx being the most commonly injured [29].
  • Salter-Harris II fractures of the digits usually occur because of a jamming or hyperextension injury to the finger resulting in an abduction deformity [29].
  • Malrotation in Salter-Harris II fractures does not remodel and can result in problems with grip formation [29].
  • Seymour fractures are a Salter-Harris I/II or juxtaphyseal fracture of the distal phalanx with interposed nail bed at the fracture site [29].
  • Seymour fractures are open fractures but are often missed [29].
  • Missed Seymour fractures have a high rate of complication including infection and nail or physeal growth disturbance [29].
  • The key to diagnosis of Seymour fractures is disruption of the nail plate/cuticle as well as a displaced fracture of the distal phalanx on radiographs [29].
  • Displaced phalangeal neck fractures require reduction and pin fixation which can usually be achieved through a closed fashion [29].
  • Condyle fractures can often also be treated with closed reduction and pinning [29].
  • Open procedures for condyle fractures increase a risk for osteonecrosis [29].
  • The dislocation of the carpometacarpal joint of the little finger results in fixed supination of the finger, disturbing the normal axis of movement and weakening power grip if treatment is delayed [65].
  • This deformity may be obscured by swelling and bruising on the ulnar border of the hand [65].
  • Palmar dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint is a rare injury where the mechanism is likely hyperextension force applied during strong active flexion [127].

Classification

  • Type I phalangeal neck fractures are defined as undisplaced fractures [148].
  • Type II phalangeal neck fractures are defined as displaced fractures where the distal fragment maintains some bone-to-bone contact with the proximal fragment [35, 148].
  • Type III phalangeal neck fractures are defined as displaced fractures with loss of bone-to-bone contact between the proximal and distal fragments at the fracture site [35].
  • A minimally displaced phalangeal neck fracture should be classified as Type II rather than Type I [148].
  • Salter-Harris type II fractures of the proximal phalanx are the most frequent phalangeal fractures in children [74].
  • Type II D phalangeal neck fractures tend to occur in young children and the majority involve the middle phalanx [146].

Clinical Presentation

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • Fractures of the finger phalanges account for about 10% of all fractures seen [42].
  • Finger phalangeal fractures are the second most common fracture in males [42].
  • The little and ring fingers are the most affected by finger phalangeal fractures [42].
  • The prevalence of little finger phalangeal fractures is 32.5% [42].
  • The prevalence of ring finger phalangeal fractures is 25.8% [42].
  • The prevalence of thumb phalangeal fractures is 18.4% [42].
  • The prevalence of middle finger phalangeal fractures is 14.3% [42].
  • The prevalence of index finger phalangeal fractures is 9.0% [42].
  • Direct blow or assault is the most common mode of injury for finger phalangeal fractures, accounting for 39.1% of cases [42].
  • Falls from standing height account for 29.5% of finger phalangeal fractures [42].
  • Sports injuries account for 23.8% of finger phalangeal fractures [42].
  • Approximately 70% of all phalangeal and metacarpal fractures occur in patients between the ages of 11 and 45 years [52].
  • Phalangeal fractures are more common in men than women [52].
  • Hand and finger fractures are the second most common fracture presenting to emergency departments in the pediatric population [29].
  • Pediatric hand and finger fractures have a bimodal age distribution with peaks at 0 to 2 years of age and 12 to 16 years of age [29].
  • The most commonly injured location in pediatric hand fractures is the base of the proximal phalanx, accounting for 67% of cases [29].
  • In pediatric hand fractures, the little finger is the most commonly injured border ray at 52.2% [29].
  • In pediatric hand fractures, the thumb is the second most commonly injured border ray at 23.5% [29].
  • Open fractures of the phalanges are relatively common, with the highest prevalence seen in 36- to 64-year-old males [42].
  • The distal phalanges are the most common site for open phalangeal fractures, with 25.3% of fractures at this site being open [42].
  • About 55% of patients with multiple phalangeal fractures have other phalangeal fractures as the associated injury [42].
  • The average age of patients presenting with multiple phalangeal fractures is 55.4 years [42].

Mechanism and Injury Patterns

  • Proximal and middle phalangeal shaft fractures typically collapse into apex volar angulation due to the proximal flexion moment of the intrinsics and distal extensor moment of the extensor mechanism [52].
  • Intraarticular phalangeal fractures that disrupt joint congruency are most commonly produced by an axial loading injury [52].
  • The classic "jammed" finger with a swollen, painful PIP joint usually involves a volar plate injury or small nondisplaced avulsion fracture off the volar base of the middle finger epiphysis [29].
  • Phalangeal neck and condyle fractures have a similar presentation to a simple "jammed" finger and are often missed [29].
  • Toddlers and preschool age children usually sustain hand injuries while at home, usually as a crush injury [29].
  • Adolescents most often get injured outside the home with sporting activities [29].
  • A spiral fracture of the proximal phalanx of the index finger can result from finger wrestling [25].
  • Severe mincer injuries carry a potential risk of damaging vital structures if the caught hand is freed by rotating the handle in the reverse direction [27].
  • Punch injuries commonly occur in road traffic accidents and are usually associated with other serious injuries of the hand, wrist, and distal forearm [58].

Clinical Examination and Diagnosis

  • Appropriate evaluation of hand and finger fractures includes clinical examination and radiographs [29].
  • Clinical examination must assess for open injuries and angular and rotational malalignment of the injured ray [29].
  • Rotational alignment can be confirmed by ensuring that all fingers point to the scaphoid tubercle when the fingers are flexed [29].
  • Radiographs should include PA, lateral, and oblique views of the injured location [29].
  • The coronal plane deformity in Salter-Harris II fractures is easy to assess, but extra care must be taken to assess for rotational deformity, which is not as obvious on radiographs [29].
  • Prolonged immobilization of simple "jammed" finger injuries can result in significant joint stiffness [29].
  • Seymour fractures are open fractures that are often missed [29].
  • The key to diagnosing Seymour fractures is disruption of the nail plate/cuticle, which indicates disruption of the nail bed and the likelihood of an open fracture with interposed tissue [29].
  • Radiographs for Seymour fractures reveal a displaced fracture of the distal phalanx [29].
  • A meticulous examination of the patient’s hand is required for injury diagnosis [52].
  • Open finger fractures formed the majority of the workload of open fractures at a trauma centre but usually required simple treatments only [12].
  • Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation, which may guide initial treatment decision-making and postoperative follow-up [14].

Pediatric Specifics

  • Most pediatric phalangeal fractures can be treated nonsurgically, but a small subset benefits from surgical intervention [22].
  • Most phalangeal neck fractures in children less than 3 years old obtained satisfactory results [16].
  • Articular fractures of the fingers in children often result in sequelae, with a rate as high as 50% when the fracture was displaced initially [21].
  • Complications of distal phalanx fractures in children are frequent [100].
  • Avascular necrosis following phalangeal neck fractures usually affects the little finger and presents with stiffness [57].
  • Further surgery is not often required short term for avascular necrosis following phalangeal neck fractures in children [57].
  • Salter-Harris II fractures of the digits are an extremely common hand fracture in children, with the little finger proximal phalanx being the most commonly injured [29].
  • Treatment for Seymour fractures involves removal of the nail plate with débridement of the fracture site, extrication of the interposed nail bed, and reduction of the fracture [29].
  • If a Seymour fracture is unstable, it may require Kirschner wire placement in addition to immobilization in splint/cast [29].
  • Antibiotics are a necessity to prevent infection in Seymour fractures as these are open fractures [29].
  • Recommended antibiotic treatment for Seymour fractures includes a dose of IV antibiotic in the emergency department followed by a 7- to 10-day course of oral antibiotic [29].
  • A first-generation cephalosporin is the preferred antibiotic for Seymour fractures [29].
  • Displaced phalangeal neck fractures in children require reduction and pin fixation which can usually be achieved through a closed fashion [29].
  • Condyle fractures in children can often be treated with closed reduction and pinning [29].
  • Open procedures for condyle fractures increase a risk for osteonecrosis, so all attempts should be made for early diagnosis and treatment [29].
  • In a retrospective review of 105 pediatric patients treated with closed reduction pin fixation of a displaced proximal phalanx fracture, the average age was 11 years [29].
  • The complication rate for closed reduction pin fixation of displaced proximal phalanx fractures in children was 4.8%, including infection, pin site complication, and malunion [29].
  • Thirty-six of 105 pediatric patients had postoperative stiffness, with 31 requiring therapy [29].
  • Phalangeal neck fractures had the highest rate of postoperative stiffness in pediatric patients treated with closed reduction pin fixation [29].
  • Thirty-one pediatric patients available for follow-up at 1 year or greater reported return of full motion, no pain, and happiness with function and appearance [29].
  • Despite 22% (7 of 31) of pediatric patients having a measurable coronal plane deformity on radiograph, they reported full motion and satisfaction at follow-up [29].

Adult Specifics

  • The majority of hand fractures can be treated without surgery, though surgery offers distinct advantages in properly selected cases [3].
  • Most hand fractures can be managed successfully without operation, and conservative functional techniques are the optimum treatment for the majority of patients with single metacarpal fractures [10].
  • Recent PIP fractures are challenging trauma in terms of diagnosis as well as treatment, with the final outcome having a considerable impact on global finger and hand function [1].
  • A quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure, especially in more severely injured fingers, due to crush or with vascular impairment [6].
  • Phalangeal neck fractures of the proximal phalanx in adults are rare with limited options for unstable fractures [62].
  • Fractures of the fingers are better understood, indications for surgical treatment are more clearly defined, and operative techniques and implants for osteosynthesis are continuing to evolve and improve [8].
  • Results for finger fractures vary according to fracture type, surgeon experience, and patient compliance [8].
  • The primary goals of phalangeal fracture treatment are to restore anatomy and preserve function [54].
  • Lost productivity attributed to phalangeal fractures exceeds 2 billion every year, making early return to activities a key goal [54].
  • The preferred method of treatment for phalangeal fractures is one that offers limited soft tissue damage and enables mobilization of the injured digit(s) as soon as fracture stability permits [54].
  • Operative treatment for phalangeal fractures is reserved for unstable fractures or those creating unacceptable articular incongruity [54].
  • Complications such as nonunion, malunion, infection, and stiffness can occur even in the setting of appropriate surgical treatment for phalangeal fractures [54].
  • There are two major causes of PIP joint extensor lag following proximal phalangeal fractures: soft tissue adhesions and persistent skeletal deformity [36].
  • Fracture hematoma permeates the zone of injury and incites a proliferative fibroblastic response of the multiple surrounding collagenous structures that is proportionate to injury severity [36].
  • Simple fractures caused by low-energy injuries occasionally may be complicated by some measure of permanent stiffness as a result of soft tissue adhesion [36].
  • When adjacent flexor or extensor tendon injury accompanies a proximal phalangeal fracture, the difficulty of treatment and achieving a favorable outcome may be compounded substantially [36].
  • Surgical treatment for proximal phalangeal fractures requires a second "planned injury," superimposing further soft tissue injury and increasing the risk of soft tissue adhesions [36].
  • The intrinsic muscles flex the proximal fragment, whereas the distal fragment is extended by the attachment of the central slip to the dorsal lip of the middle phalanx [36].
  • Phalangeal fractures tend to deteriorate total active motion (TAM) more than metacarpal fractures [39].
  • Pain in the post-operative week predicts pain and hand use twelve weeks after proximal phalangeal fracture fixation [34].
  • In a study of proximal phalangeal fractures, 52% of fractures were little fingers, 40% were intra-articular, and 46% were in the dominant hand [34].
  • The mean age of patients in a study on post-operative pain after proximal phalangeal fracture fixation was 35 years, with 75% being male [34].
  • Extension lags of the PIP joints were found in 67% of all fractured fingers treated with plate fixation for extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures [60].
  • At 6 weeks postoperatively, an average TAM of 183° was found in patients treated with plate fixation for extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures [60].
  • At final follow-up, an improved average TAM of 213° was found in patients treated with plate fixation for extra-articular proximal phalanx fractures [60].
  • In a study of conservative management of proximal phalangeal fractures in an A&E department, 147 of 242 phalangeal fractures (61%) involved the proximal phalanx [49].
  • Proximal phalangeal fractures formed 7% of all hand fractures and 0.3% of all attendances in a study of A&E patients [49].
  • The results achieved with external fixation for closed metacarpal and phalangeal fractures were similar to those obtained in the management of stable and undisplaced metacarpal and phalangeal fractures [7].
  • No differences in the outcome of finger proximal phalangeal fractures treated by dorsal and lateral plate fixation were observed [5].
  • All six fingers obtained satisfactory union of the fractures, and no patient complained of pain at the final follow-up in a study of intramedullary fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach [11].
  • A mini external fixator constructed from readily available materials is another tool available to the hand surgeon treating fractures of the hand and phalanges [38].
  • The Joshi's External Stabilization System (JESS) has had extensive use in the management of hand injuries [63].
  • Hand fractures require excellent communication between the surgeon and therapist to progress the patient through the course of therapy [41].
  • These findings underscore the importance of careful assessment and management of nail bed injuries and fracture healing when treating distal phalanx fractures [96].
  • The patient returned to his previous activity level but demonstrated a residual deficit in thumb IP joint flexion with follow-up radiographic evidence of a healed fracture and a physis that remains open in a case of Salter-Harris Type III fracture of the distal phalanx [24].

Investigations

Imaging and Diagnostic Modalities

  • A true lateral radiograph is required for the accurate diagnosis of carpometacarpal fracture-dislocations because swelling can obscure the deformity [108].
  • Loss of parallel joint surfaces at the carpometacarpal articulations on a posteroanterior radiograph is indicative of carpometacarpal fracture-dislocation [108].
  • Computed tomography scans are beneficial for determining the extent of joint surface involvement in carpometacarpal injuries and guiding appropriate intervention [108].
  • Ultrasonography may provide greater accuracy in fracture diagnostics by revealing small avulsed bony fragments missed on radiographs [155].
  • Ultrasonography can be beneficial in diagnosing occult fractures, especially in children [155].
  • Quantitative 3DCT analysis of fracture fragments provides useful information that could facilitate surgery and analysis of complex fractures of the base of the middle phalanx [156].

Clinical Examination

  • The coronal plane deformity of Salter-Harris II fractures is easy to assess, but extra care must be taken to assess for rotational deformity, which is not as obvious on radiographs [29].
  • Malrotation does not remodel and can result in problems with grip formation [29].
  • The key to diagnosing Seymour fractures is disruption of the nail plate/cuticle as well as a displaced fracture of the distal phalanx on radiographs [29].
  • Disruption of the nail bed indicates the likelihood of an open fracture with interposed tissue in Seymour fractures [29].

Treatment

General Principles

  • Recent PIP fractures present diagnostic and treatment challenges where final outcome significantly impacts global finger and hand function [1].
  • Fractures of the fingers are better understood, indications for surgical treatment are more clearly defined, and operative techniques and implants for osteosynthesis are continuing to evolve and improve, though results vary according to fracture type, surgeon experience, and patient compliance [8].
  • The preferred method of treatment is one that offers limited soft tissue damage and enables mobilization of the injured digit(s) as soon as fracture stability permits [54].
  • In general, operative treatment is reserved for unstable fractures or those creating unacceptable articular incongruity [54].
  • Optimal outcome from surgical treatment demands appropriate surgical plan, atraumatic soft tissue handling, and stable fixation to facilitate early motion; however, complications such as nonunion, malunion, infection, and stiffness can occur even in the setting of appropriate treatment [54].
  • A management algorithm proposes that if a fracture is deemed stable, nonoperative management is recommended [116].
  • A finger undergoing any type of surgery is likely to be stiffer than one that was treated nonoperatively [116].
  • If a fracture is deemed stable yet not quite enough to begin early active range of motion, it is reasonable to delay motion for an additional week or two [116].
  • A fracture that did not undergo surgery and progressed more slowly to allow for adequate fracture healing is still better than one that underwent surgery followed by an early range of motion protocol [116].

Non-Operative Management

  • The majority of pediatric hand and finger fractures can be treated with closed reduction, appropriate immobilization, and early motion [29].
  • Well-reduced, minimally angulated, or nonangulated fractures of the proximal phalanges of the fingers can be effectively treated using functional casts without immobilizing the wrist [122].
  • A non-invasive technique using a thermoplastic traction platform is safe and effective in the management of proximal phalangeal fractures [140].
  • Traction splinting presents a method for noninvasive management of angulated and rotated phalanx fractures [138].
  • Buddy taping is a non-inferior treatment modality for most paediatric finger fractures compared to splint immobilization [105].
  • Taping paediatric finger fractures can be recommended irrespective of the degree of displacement or the need for reduction [44].
  • Nonsurgical treatment is supported for closed and displaced mallet finger fractures with greater than one-third articular surface involvement [69].
  • For a closed extensor tendon rupture from its insertion into the distal phalanx, the treatment usually is nonsurgical [73].
  • The distal interphalangeal joint is constantly held in hyperextension on a splint for 6 to 8 weeks and at night only for 2 to 4 additional weeks to allow tendon healing and prevent stretching [73].
  • Splint treatment within 2 weeks of injury has been found to be as effective as splinting more than 4 weeks after injury for mallet finger [73].
  • This treatment can be successful in some patients 3 months after injury for mallet finger [73].
  • High patient satisfaction was reported at an average of 5 years after splint treatment of mallet deformities, with and without fracture [73].
  • Osteoarthritic changes were seen in 48% of mallet finger cases treated with splinting, usually associated with fractures [73].
  • Mallet finger deformities in children caused by traumatic separation of the epiphysis can be treated with early detection, straightforward reduction with hyperextension of the distal interphalangeal joint, and splinting for 3 to 4 weeks [73].
  • Antibiotics are a necessity to prevent infection for Seymour fractures, with recommended treatment including a dose of IV antibiotic in the emergency department followed by a 7- to 10-day course of oral antibiotic [29].
  • The classic “jammed” finger involving a volar plate injury or small nondisplaced avulsion fracture off the volar base of the middle finger epiphysis does not require surgical intervention [29].
  • Jammed fingers should be splinted in approximately 30° of flexion for a week followed by 3 weeks of buddy tape to allow for healing [29].
  • For transverse metacarpal fractures of the shaft and neck, historically patients were left to mobilize freely and healed with some deformity but good function [103].
  • Barton (1984) showed the efficacy of plaster or splint support to reduce the angulation of transverse metacarpal shaft fractures [103].
  • For metacarpal neck (boxer’s) fractures, acceptable flexion malunion has been variously suggested as 50° to 60°, 30°, and 20° [103].
  • For little finger metacarpal shaft fractures, acceptable angulation has been suggested as 30° [103].
  • A Cochrane review has shown there is no good evidence that more marked malunion causes reduced hand function or unacceptable deformity for metacarpal fractures [103].
  • The outcome of non-operative treatment for metacarpal fractures is typically an excellent functional outcome apart from a mild cosmetic abnormality [103].
  • No one technique of non-operative management has been shown to be superior in the published studies for metacarpal fractures [103].
  • Treatment for phalangeal fractures in baseball should be immediate, with nonoperative splinting for at least 3 weeks for nondisplaced fractures [129].
  • Fingertip injuries without exposed bone are allowed to heal by second intention if less than 1 cm² of the tip or pulp is involved [31].
  • Full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) are preferred for the fingertip because they provide better durability, less contraction, and superior sensibility than composite or split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) [31].
  • Composite flaps for distal fingertip amputations may be attempted in patients younger than 6 years, but patients’ parents must acknowledge possibility of failure [31].

Operative Management

  • Surgery for displaced proximal phalangeal fractures in baseball is indicated [129].
  • External fixation of unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures achieved good or excellent function in 94% of metacarpal and 85% of phalangeal fractures by nine weeks [4].
  • The results achieved with external fixation of closed metacarpal and phalangeal fractures were similar to those obtained in the management of stable and undisplaced metacarpal and phalangeal fractures [7].
  • Non-locking plates are appropriate for most metacarpal and phalangeal fractures necessitating plate fixation [132].
  • Intramedullary screw fixation for proximal phalangeal fractures finds good functional outcomes and a low complication rate [45].
  • Intramedullary fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach resulted in satisfactory union of the fractures in all six fingers, with no patient complaining of pain at the final follow-up [11].
  • Screw fixation is suggested to achieve patient satisfaction and optimal functional recovery of closed, isolated proximal phalangeal fractures of the long fingers [23].
  • The Ichi-Fixator system (IFS) is a definitive treatment option for managing various phalangeal fractures [28].
  • Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal phalangeal fractures achieved excellent outcomes, providing a benchmark for recovery [37].
  • Open reduction and interfragmentary screw fixation is an effective treatment modality for symptomatic non-union of distal phalangeal fractures with minimal morbidity, resulting in union and normal function in all patients [104].
  • In a retrospective review of 105 patients treated with closed reduction pin fixation of a displaced proximal phalanx fracture, the complication rate was 4.8% including infection, pin site complication, and malunion [29].
  • Thirty-six of 105 patients had postoperative stiffness with 31 requiring therapy after closed reduction pin fixation of displaced proximal phalanx fractures [29].
  • Phalangeal neck fractures had the highest rate of postoperative stiffness after closed reduction pin fixation [29].
  • Thirty-one patients available for follow-up at 1 year or greater all reported return of full motion, no pain, and happiness with function and appearance despite 22% (7 of 31) having a measurable coronal plane deformity on radiograph [29].
  • Unstable PIP fracture-dislocations must be managed surgically using ORIF or hemihamate arthroplasty [142].
  • Chronic PIP fracture-dislocations are managed using volar plate arthroplasty or hemihamate arthroplasty [142].
  • Pilon fractures of the base of the middle phalanx are managed using longitudinal traction (pin and rubber band traction) and immediate motion [142].
  • Rotatory subluxation-dislocations of the PIP often require surgical intervention for reduction because of interposed soft tissues [142].
  • If a voral PIP dislocation is still unstable after reduction, pinning for 3 weeks is required [142].
  • Excising the third metacarpal shaft removes the origin of the adductor pollicis and weakens pinch [18].
  • The index ray should not be transposed unless the adductor pollicis can be reattached elsewhere [18].
  • Transposition of the index metacarpal after partial middle finger metacarpal amputation is technically challenging and has significant complications [18].
  • Union of midshaft metacarpal osteotomies is more difficult, and metaphyseal fixation is recommended in such instances [18].
  • Amputation of the index, long, and small fingers requires preservation of the metacarpal base to protect the insertion of the flexor and extensor tendons [33].
  • Ray resections without transposition avoid complications such as nonunion and minimize postoperative immobilization [33].
  • Ray resections with transposition narrow the resultant open space and avoid complications such as malrotation leading to scissoring [33].
  • An acute ray amputation following trauma should be performed sparingly as delayed ray resection can be performed to address functional or esthetic concerns [33].
  • Cross-finger flap is indicated for volar oblique fingertip injuries with exposed bone [31].
  • The donor site for a cross-finger flap is covered with an STSG and the flap is split during a separate procedure 2 to 3 weeks later [31].
  • Thenar flap is indicated for volar oblique injuries to the index or long digits [31].
  • Complications of the thenar flap include donor site tenderness and PIP contracture, especially in older patients [31].
  • Homodigital island flap is raised on the digital artery of the involved finger and may maintain sensory innervation to the fingertip [31].
  • Heterodigital island flap is raised on the ulnar aspect of the long or ring finger and typically tunneled in the palm to provide coverage to the thumb [31].
  • V-Y advancement is indicated to preserve length and cover transverse or dorsal oblique fingertip injuries [31].
  • Reverse cross-finger flap is indicated for loss of tenosynovium and dorsal exposure of bone [31].
  • A lumbrical-plus finger is treated with release of the radial lateral band [31].
  • Moberg advancement flap is most useful for amputations distal to the thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint [31].
  • Complications of the Moberg advancement flap include flap necrosis and thumb IP joint flexion contracture [31].
  • First dorsal metacarpal artery “kite” flap or heterodigital island flap is indicated for thumb tip injury of any size [31].
  • The best indication of the reversed digital artery island flap is the coverage of large defects of the dorsal aspects of the middle and third phalanx, not the treatment of fingertip injuries [115].

Complications

General and Pediatric Outcomes

  • Recent PIP fractures present challenges in diagnosis and treatment, with final outcomes having a considerable impact on global finger and hand function [1].
  • In younger children, residual angulation of 30 degrees or less should remodel without significant disability [139].
  • Uncorrected angulation of 25 degrees or more in the adult or older child usually results in loss of both flexion and extension of the proximal interphalangeal joint, aside from any adherence of tendon apparatus adjacent to the fracture site [139].
  • Two of six children over age ten with impacted fractures in the proximal third of the proximal phalax had malunion with loss of significant flexion and extension of the proximal interphalangeal joint [139].
  • Of seventeen adults with impacted fractures in the proximal third of the proximal phalax, nine had malunion [139].
  • Seven adults first seen more than five weeks after injury had angulation of 25 to 70 degrees with significant loss of both flexion and extension at the proximal interphalangeal joint [139].
  • The commonest causes of malunion in impacted proximal phalangeal fractures were immobilization of the digit in insufficient flexion at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints, permitting loss of reduction [139].
  • Acceptance of oblique rather than true lateral roentgenograms for evaluation of angulation in fractures of the proximal phalanx, both before and after reduction, was a common cause of malunion [139].

Operative Complications and Reoperation

  • Postoperative finger stiffness occurred in 43% of fractures treated with titanium plates and/or screws for unstable proximal phalangeal fractures [26].
  • Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation after phalangeal fractures requiring vascular reconstruction [14].
  • The risk for postoperative complications and reoperations after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of closed proximal phalanx fractures is considerable [125].
  • Union of midshaft metacarpal osteotomies is more difficult in the context of index ray transposition [18].
  • The operation of index ray transposition is contraindicated if the hand is needed for heavy manual labor [18].
  • The authors do not agree with the system of freeing the caught hand by rotating the handle in the reverse direction due to the potential risk of damaging vital structures in severe mincer injuries [27].
  • Long-term follow-up in patients with pay phone receiver cord injuries to the hand was impossible, and anticipated hand function results are less than optimal [43].
  • The patient with a Salter-Harris Type III fracture of the distal phalanx demonstrated a residual deficit in thumb IP joint flexion [24].
  • Follow-up radiographic evidence in the patient with a Salter-Harris Type III fracture of the distal phalanx showed a healed fracture and a physis that remains open [24].

Specific Technique Outcomes

  • Good or excellent function was achieved in 94% of metacarpal and 85% of phalangeal fractures treated with external fixation by nine weeks [4].
  • All six fingers treated with intramedullary fixation through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach obtained satisfactory union of the fractures [11].
  • No patient complained of pain at the final follow-up after intramedullary fixation through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach [11].
  • Dual antegrade intramedullary headless screw fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures resulted in no complications with follow-up of at least 1 year [67].
  • An updated systematic review finds a low complication rate following the use of intramedullary screw (IMS) fixation for proximal phalangeal fractures [45].
  • The remaining patients in a series of phalangeal fractures had either suffered an unusual type of injury, or had developed an arthrosis associated with a long delay between injury and operation [76].

Recovery

General Outcomes and Prognosis

  • Recent PIP fractures have a final outcome that considerably impacts global finger and hand function [1].
  • Fractures of the fingers are better understood, with indications for surgical treatment more clearly defined, though results vary according to fracture type, surgeon experience, and patient compliance [8].
  • In a retrospective series of nearly 7,000 hospital admissions for phalangeal fractures, no significant change in incidence was found in any specific age group during the study period [75].
  • Patients who suffered an unusual type of injury or developed arthrosis associated with a long delay between injury and operation had less favorable outcomes [76].

Non-Operative Recovery

Operative Recovery and Complications

  • Good or excellent function was achieved in 94% of metacarpal and 85% of phalangeal fractures by nine weeks following external fixation [4].
  • No differences in the outcome of finger proximal phalangeal fractures were observed between dorsal and lateral plate fixation [5].
  • A quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure, especially in more severely injured fingers due to crush or vascular impairment [6].
  • Open fractures with both palmar and dorsal wounds should be treated with delayed fixation of K-wires otherwise stabilized immediately after injury [163].
  • Most fractures healed within 4 weeks following closed reduction and periarticular pinning of base and shaft fractures of the proximal phalanx, with the majority of patients having excellent or good results [157].
  • Excellent outcomes were achieved in a prospective longitudinal study of open reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures, providing a benchmark for recovery [37].
  • Dual antegrade intramedullary headless screw fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures resulted in excellent postoperative motion, near-normal grip strength, positive self-reported patient outcomes, and no complications with follow-up of at least 1 year [67].
  • An updated systematic review found good functional outcomes and a low complication rate following the use of intramedullary screw fixation for proximal phalangeal fractures [45].
  • All six fingers obtained satisfactory union of the fractures, and no patient complained of pain at the final follow-up after intramedullary fixation through a volar extra-tendon sheath approach [11].
  • The authors suggest using screw fixation to achieve patient satisfaction and optimal functional recovery of closed, isolated proximal phalanx fractures of the long fingers [23].
  • Dynamic external fixation is considered an effective tool in the management of a range of complex intraarticular phalangeal fractures [72].

Pediatric and Articular Specifics

  • A patient with a Salter-Harris Type III fracture of the distal phalanx returned to his previous activity level but demonstrated a residual deficit in thumb IP joint flexion with follow-up radiographic evidence of a healed fracture and a physis that remains open [24].

Rehabilitation and Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Long-term follow-up in a specific transient patient population with pay phone receiver cord injuries was impossible, and anticipated hand function results are less than optimal [43].
  • Bone resorption occurred in a digit reconstructed using the circumferential method seven months after surgery, though the true incidence remains unclear as radiographs are not commonly performed after such procedures [78].
  • At 6 months, very significant progress was observed with complete and total recovery of active flexion amplitudes of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of 4 long fingers following secondary tendon surgery [153].

Key Evidence

  • [L5] Recent PIP fractures are challenging trauma in terms of diagnosis as well as treatment, with the final outcome having a considerable impact on global finger and hand function. [1] (10.1016/j.main.2004.08.010)
  • [L5] Most pediatric hand fractures are treated nonoperatively with good results, but a subset of phalangeal fractures requires prompt recognition and surgical intervention to minimize complications. [2] (10.1097/01.blo.0000205890.88952.97)
  • [L5] The majority of hand fractures can be treated without surgery, though surgery offers distinct advantages in properly selected cases. [3] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.017)
  • [L3] Good or excellent function was achieved in 94% of metacarpal and 85% of phalangeal fractures by nine weeks. [4] (10.1016/0266-7681(92)90077-f)
  • [L3] No differences in the outcome of finger proximal phalangeal fractures treated by dorsal and lateral plate fixation were observed. [5] (10.1007/s00402-017-2650-x)
  • [L3] A quarter of open finger fractures will likely need more than one surgical procedure, especially in more severely injured fingers, due to crush or with vascular impairment. [6] (10.1177/15589447211043191)
  • [L2] The results achieved were similar to those obtained in the management of stable and undisplaced metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. [7] (10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.09.013)
  • [L5] Fractures of the fingers are better understood, indications for surgical treatment are more clearly defined, and operative techniques and implants for osteosynthesis are continuing to evolve and improve, though results vary according to fracture type, surgeon experience, and patient compliance. [8] (10.1054/jhsb.2002.0889)
  • [L3] It is recommended that all finger fractures should be assessed and treated by surgeons with training in the management of hand injuries. [9] (10.1016/0266-7681(90)90008-r)
  • [L5] Most hand fractures can be managed successfully without operation, and conservative functional techniques are the optimum treatment for the majority of patients with single metacarpal fractures. [10] (10.1177/1753193420928820)
  • [L4] All six fingers obtained satisfactory union of the fractures, and no patient complained of pain at the final follow-up. [11] (10.1142/s0218810411005230)
  • [L3] Open finger fractures formed the majority of the workload of open fractures at our trauma centre but usually required simple treatments only. [12] (10.1142/s2424835516500338)
  • [L4] We believe we have shown its success in the treatment of closed proximal phalangeal fractures. [13] (10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00138-3)
  • [L3] Injuries sustained in the thumb and index finger were more likely to undergo unplanned reoperation, which may guide initial treatment decision-making and postoperative follow-up. [14] (10.1177/15589447221109635)
  • [L4] Most phalangeal neck fractures in children less than 3 years old obtained satisfactory results. [16] (10.1186/s13018-025-05849-2)
  • [L4] We conclude that this technique is applicable for selected unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of certain configurations. [17] (10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80072-7)
  • [L4] It showed to be safe and effective when used for treatment of extra-articular metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures. [19] (10.1177/1558944716660555dq)
  • [L4] Articular fractures of the fingers in children often result in sequelae, with a rate as high as 50% when the fracture was displaced initially. [21] (10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00213-4)
  • [Paper] Most pediatric phalangeal fractures can be treated nonsurgically, but a small subset benefits from surgical intervention. [22] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.015)
  • [L4] The authors suggest using screw fixation to achieve patient satisfaction and optimal functional recovery of closed, isolated proximal phalanx fractures of the long fingers. [23] (10.1016/j.hansur.2016.08.009)
  • [L4] The patient returned to his previous activity level but demonstrated a residual deficit in thumb IP joint flexion with follow-up radiographic evidence of a healed fracture and a physis that remains open. [24] (10.1177/15589447221082165)
  • [L4] These two cases present an uncommon mechanism resulting in a spiral fracture of the proximal phalanx of the index finger, which to our knowledge has not been reported previously in the English literature. [25] (10.1016/0020-1383(92)90162-l)
  • [L2] Postoperative finger stiffness occurred in 43% of fractures. [26] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.107)
  • [L4] The authors do not agree with the system of freeing the caught hand by rotating the handle in the reverse direction due to the potential risk of damaging vital structures. [27] (10.1016/0266-7681(85)90045-2)
  • [L4] The IFS is a definitive treatment option for managing various phalangeal fractures. [28] (10.1016/j.hansur.2019.07.011)
  • [L3] [34] (10.1142/s2424835519500607)
  • [L4] [35] (10.1177/1753193408091430)
  • [Paper] [36] (10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80008-x)
  • [L3] Excellent outcomes were achieved, providing a benchmark for recovery after ORIF of proximal phalangeal fractures. [37] (10.1177/1753193416670591)
  • [L5] This is another tool available to the hand surgeon treating fractures of the hand and phalanges. [38] (10.1097/bth.0b013e318217615f)
  • [L2] The phalangeal fractures tend to deteriorate %TAM than metacarpal fractures. [39] (10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60047-6)
  • [L5] Hand fractures, in particular, require excellent communication between the surgeon and therapist to progress the patient through the course of therapy. [41] (10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80006-6)
  • [L4] Long-term follow-up in this particular transient patient population was impossible, and anticipated hand function results are less than optimal. [43] (10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80078-7)
  • [L1] With the current data, we can conclude that taping these finger fractures can be recommended irrespective of the degree of displacement or the need for reduction. [44] (10.1177/17531934241293338)
  • [L4] This updated systematic review finds good functional outcomes and a low complication rate following the use of IMS fixation for proximal phalangeal fractures. [45] (10.1177/15589447251329597)
  • [L4] [49] (10.1016/0266-7681(92)90123-j)
  • [L5] [52] (10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.032)
  • [L5] [54] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.006)
  • [L5] The article reviews the background, biomechanics, applications, techniques, outcomes, and costs of this approach for metacarpal fractures, phalangeal fractures, and interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. [55] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.011)
  • [L4] In contrast, avascular necrosis following phalangeal neck fractures usually affects the little finger and presents with stiffness, and hence, further surgery is not often required short term. [57] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.038)
  • [L5] It commonly occurs in RTAs and is usually associated with other serious injuries of the hand, wrist and distal forearm so adequate imaging should be sought early in all instances. [58] (10.1016/j.jhsb.2007.01.009)
  • [L4] [60] (10.1007/s00402-015-2155-4)
  • [L4] Phalangeal neck fractures of the proximal phalanx in adults are rare with limited options for unstable fractures. [62] (10.1016/j.injury.2010.06.017)
  • [Paper] The system has had extensive use in the management of hand injuries. [63] (10.1016/s0020-1383(97)88363-5)
  • [L5] [65] (10.1016/0266-7681(87)90028-3)
  • [L4] Dual antegrade IMHS fixation of proximal phalanx fractures resulted in excellent postoperative motion, near-normal grip strength, positive self-reported patient outcomes, and no complications with follow-up of at least 1 year. [67] (10.1177/1558944717750919)
  • [L4] The technique was used to treat two intraarticular proximal phalangeal fractures of the thumb with satisfactory outcomes, including full range of movements within 3 weeks, no complications, and no need for implant removal. [68] (10.1177/1753193415615032)
  • [L4] This study supports the rationale for nonsurgical treatment of closed and displaced mallet finger fractures with greater than one-third articular surface involvement. [69] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.02.010)
  • [L4] We consider that this device is an effective tool in the management of a range on complex intraarticular phalangeal fractures. [72] (10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.08.009)
  • [L5] Phalangeal fractures are the most common hand fractures in children, with Salter-Harris type II fractures of the proximal phalanx being the most frequent. [74] (10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00199)
  • [L4] In this retrospective series of nearly 7,000 hospital admissions for phalangeal fractures we found no significant change in incidence in any specific age group during the study period. [75] (10.1016/0266-7681(94)90157-0)
  • [L4] The remaining patients had either suffered an unusual type of injury, or had developed an arthrosis, associated with a long delay between injury and operation. [76] (10.1016/0020-1383(81)90217-5)
  • [L4] Bone resorption occurred in the digit reconstructed using the circumferential method seven months after surgery, though the true incidence remains unclear as radiographs are not commonly performed after such procedures. [78] (10.1177/1753193412453413)
  • [L3] These findings underscore the importance of careful assessment and management of nail bed injuries and fracture healing when treating distal phalanx fractures. [96] (10.1177/17531934261456220)
  • [L4] Complications of distal phalanx fractures in children are frequent. [100] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.042)
  • [L4] [103] (10.1177/1753193414548170)
  • [L4] Open reduction and interfragmentary screw fixation is an effective treatment modality for symptomatic non-union of distal phalangeal fractures with minimal morbidity, resulting in union and normal function in all patients. [104] (10.1177/1753193407087866)
  • [L1] Buddy taping is a non-inferior treatment modality for most paediatric finger fractures compared to splint immobilization. [105] (10.1177/1753193418822692)
  • [L4] The best indication of the reversed digital artery island flap is not the treatment of fingertip injuries, but rather the coverage of large defects of the dorsal aspects of the middle and third phalanx. [115] (10.1016/0363-5023(94)90032-9)
  • [L4] [116] (10.1177/1558944717735947)
  • [L2] Well-reduced, minimally angulated, or nonangulated fractures of the proximal phalanges of the fingers can be effectively treated using functional casts without immobilizing the wrist. [122] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.017)
  • [L3] The risk for postoperative complications and reoperations after CRPP of closed proximal phalanx fractures is considerable, and surgeons should counsel patients before surgery about these risks. [125] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.11.004)
  • [L5] Palmar dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint is a rare injury where the mechanism is likely hyperextension force applied during strong active flexion. [127] (10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.09.009)
  • [L5] Treatment should be immediate, with nonoperative splinting for at least 3 weeks for nondisplaced fractures and surgery for displaced fractures. [129] (10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.033)
  • [L5] Non-locking plates are appropriate for most metacarpal and phalangeal fractures necessitating plate fixation. [132] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.023)
  • [L5] The case study presents a method for noninvasive management of angulated and rotated phalanx fractures. [138] (10.1016/s0894-1130(04)00198-x)
  • [L4] [139] (10.2106/00004623-196951070-00006)
  • [L4] This non-invasive technique using a thermoplastic traction platform is safe & effective in the management of proximal phalangeal fractures. [140] (10.1016/j.jht.2021.02.001)
  • [Paper] Type II D phalangeal neck fractures tend to occur in young children and the majority involve the middle phalanx. [146] (10.1055/s-0040-1703097)
  • [L4] [148] (10.1054/jhsb.2000.0506)
  • [L5] At 6 months, very significant progress was observed with complete and total recovery of active flexion amplitudes of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of 4 long fingers. [153] (10.1016/j.hansur.2018.10.074)
  • [L4] Ultrasonography may provide greater accuracy in fracture diagnostics by revealing small avulsed bony fragments missed on radiographs and can be beneficial in diagnosing occult fractures, especially in children. [155] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.02.022)
  • [L4] Quantitative 3DCT analysis of fracture fragments provides useful information that could facilitate surgery and analysis of complex fractures of the base of the middle phalanx. [156] (10.1007/s11552-014-9665-3)
  • [L4] Most fractures healed within 4 weeks, and the majority of patients had excellent or good results. [157] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.008)
  • [L3] Open fractures with both palmar and dorsal wounds should be treated with delayed fixation of K-wires otherwise stabilized immediately after injury. [163] (10.1038/s41598-017-11918-2)

References

[1] Fractures récentes des articulations IPP. Chirurgie de la Main. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2004.08.010

[2] Pediatric Phalanx Fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000205890.88952.97

[3] Hand Fractures: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.017

[4] External Fixation of Unstable Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90077-f

[5] Dorsal versus lateral plate fixation of finger proximal phalangeal fractures: a retrospective study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2650-x

[6] Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Open Finger Fractures. HAND. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211043191

[7] External Fixation of Closed Metacarpal and Phalangeal Fractures of Digits. A Prospective Study of One Hundred Consecutive Patients. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.09.013

[8] Treatment of Fractures of the Fingers. What’s New?. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0889

[9] Why all finger fractures should be referred to a hand surgery service: A prospective study of primary management. The Journal of Hand Surgery: Journal of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(90)90008-r

[10] Current methods, outcomes and challenges for the treatment of hand fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1753193420928820

[11] INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION OF PROXIMAL PHALANGEAL FRACTURES THROUGH A VOLAR EXTRA-TENDON SHEATH APPROACH. Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1142/s0218810411005230

[12] Open Finger Fractures: Incidence, Patterns of Injury and the Influence of Social Deprivation. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2016. DOI: 10.1142/s2424835516500338

[13] Old principles revisited—traction splinting for closed proximal phalangeal fractures. Injury. 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00138-3

[14] Phalangeal Fractures Requiring Vascular Reconstruction: Epidemiology and Factors Predictive of Reoperation. HAND. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221109635

[16] Clinical results of phalangeal neck fractures in children aged 3 years or younger: a case series of 37 patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05849-2

[17] Fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with miniature plates and screws. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1986. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80072-7

[18] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. AMPUTATION THROUGH THE SURGICAL NECK OF THE HUMERUS > MIDDLE OR RING FINGER RAY AMPUTATIONS.

[19] Metacarpal and Proximal Phalangeal Fracture. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716660555dq

[21] ARTICULAR FRACTURES OF THE FINGERS IN CHILDREN. Hand Clinics. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00213-4

[22] Pediatric Finger Fractures: Preventing Big Problems After Small Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.08.015

[23] Surgical management of closed, isolated proximal phalanx fractures in the long fingers: Functional outcomes and complications of 87 fractures. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.08.009

[24] Salter-Harris Type III Fracture of the Distal Phalanx: A Rare Juxtaphyseal Variant. HAND. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221082165

[25] Spiral fracture of the proximal phalanx of the index finger by finger wrestling. Injury. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90162-l

[26] Predictors of Postoperative Finger Stiffness After Treatment of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Fractures With Titanium Plates And/Or Screws. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.107

[27] Severe mincer injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery: Journal of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. 1985. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(85)90045-2

[28] Treatment of finger phalangeal fractures using the Ichi-Fixator system: A prospective study of 12 cases. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.07.011

[29] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Pediatric Forearm, Wrist, and Hand Trauma > Hand and Finger Fractures.

[31] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. 4. Fingertip injuries with tissue loss.

[33] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. SMALL FINGER RAY AMPUTATION.

[34] Pain in the Post-Operative Week Predicts Pain and Hand Use Twelve Weeks after Proximal Phalangeal Fracture Fixation. The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1142/s2424835519500607

[35] Phalangeal Neck Fractures with Concurrent Vascular Injury. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408091430

[36] Rehabilitation for proximal phalangeal fractures. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80008-x

[37] Pattern of recovery after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures in the finger: a prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1753193416670591

[38] A Mini External Fixator for Hand and Finger Fractures Constructed From Readily Available Materials. Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/bth.0b013e318217615f

[39] Predictors of the Postoperative Range of Finger Motion for Comminuted Hand and Finger Fractures Treated with a Titanium Plate. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60047-6

[41] Rehabilitation approaches for distal and middle phalanx fractures of the hand. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80006-6

[42] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 3: Biologic and Biophysical Technologies for the Enhancement of Fracture Repair > Finger Phalanges.

[43] Pay phone receiver cord injuries to the hand. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1984. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80078-7

[44] Buddy taping after reduction of displaced extra-articular phalangeal finger fractures in children: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241293338

[45] Intramedullary Compression Screw Fixation of Proximal Phalanx Fractures: An Updated Systematic Review. HAND. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/15589447251329597

[47] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. RESULTS OF SUTURE OF THE SCIATIC NERVE > FINGER INCISIONS.

[48] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. RING FINGER RAY AMPUTATION.

[49] The Conservative Management of Proximal Phalangeal Fractures of the Hand in an Accident and Emergency Department. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90123-j

[52] Phalangeal Fractures. Hand Clinics. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.032

[54] Treatment of Phalangeal Fractures. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.006

[55] Intramedullary Fixation of Hand Fractures and Arthrodeses. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.011

[57] Nonunion and Avascular Necrosis Following Phalangeal Neck Fractures in Children. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.038

[58] An Unusual Punch Injury. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2007.01.009

[60] Plate fixation of extra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanx: do new implants cause less problems?. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2155-4

[61] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 9Hand Surgery > 3. Mallet Finger.

[62] Phalangeal neck fractures of the proximal phalanx of the fingers in adults. Injury. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.06.017

[63] Joshi's External Stabilization System (JESS): a simple mini external fixator for the management of hand trauma and its sequels. Injury. 1997. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)88363-5

[65] Dislocation of carpometacarpal joint of the little finger. The Journal of Hand Surgery: Journal of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand. 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(87)90028-3

[67] Dual Antegrade Intramedullary Headless Screw Fixation for Treatment of Unstable Proximal Phalanx Fractures. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717750919

[68] Percutaneous compressive bone tie for reduction of condylar phalangeal fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415615032

[69] Nonsurgical Treatment of Closed Mallet Finger Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.02.010

[72] Dynamic External Fixation for Complex Intraarticular Phalangeal Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.08.009

[73] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. RECONSTRUCTION OF FINGER FLEXORS: SINGLE-STAGE TENDON GRAFT > EXTENSOR TENDON REPAIR.

[74] Pediatric Phalanx Fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2016. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00199

[75] Phalangeal Fractures of the Hand. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90157-0

[76] Fractures of phalanges. Injury. 1981. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(81)90217-5

[78] Bone resorption of the proximal phalanx secondary to pulley reconstruction. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412453413

[79] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. Movements of the fingers > Articulations of the fingers.

[80] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. Macroscopic appearance of palmar skin > Fingerprints.

[81] Dupuytren S Disease And Related Hyperproliferative Disorders. 2. Palmar Fibromatosis or the Loss of Flexibility of the Palmar Finger Tissue: A New Insight into the Disease Process of Dupuytren Contracture > 2.2 The Skin Anchoring Fibers in the Normal and Diseased Hand > 2.2.1 The External View of the Soft Tissue of the Fingers.

[83] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. RECONSTRUCTION OF FINGER FLEXORS: SINGLE-STAGE TENDON GRAFT > EXTENSOR TENDONS.

[84] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. Movements of the fingers > Normal ulnar inclination of the fingers.

[89] Exam Of The Hand Wrist 2Ed. Mechanisms of finger flexion and extension > Actions of the intrinsic muscles.

[96] Risk factors for nail dystrophy following distal phalangeal fractures of the hand. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17531934261456220

[100] Complications of Distal Phalanx Fractures in Children. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.042

[103] The non-operative management of hand fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193414548170

[104] OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERFRAGMENTARY SCREW FIXATION FOR SYMPTOMATIC NONUNION OF DISTAL PHALANGEAL FRACTURES. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193407087866

[105] Buddy taping versus splint immobilization for paediatric finger fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1753193418822692

[108] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. FRACTURES, DISLOCATIONS, AND LIGAMENTOUS INJURIES OF THE HAND AND WRIST > FINGER METACARPALS.

[115] A Reversed Digital Artery Island Flap for the Treatment of Fingertip Injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90032-9

[116] Proximal Phalanx Fracture Management. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717735947

[122] Extra-Articular Fractures of the Proximal Phalanges of the Fingers: A Comparison of 2 Methods of Functional, Conservative Treatment. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.017

[125] Risks of Reoperation in Surgically Treated Fractures of the Proximal Phalanx. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.11.004

[127] Palmar Dislocation of the Metacarpophalangeal Joint of the Finger. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2003.09.009

[129] Phalangeal Fractures in Baseball: Commentary. Hand Clinics. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.033

[132] Non-Locked and Locked Plating Technology for Hand Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.09.023

[138] Traction splinting phalanx fractures: A case study. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/s0894-1130(04)00198-x

[139] Impacted Fractures in the Proximal Portion of the Proximal Phalanx of the Finger. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1969. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196951070-00006

[140] A traction orthosis for the treatment of proximal phalangeal fractures. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.02.001

[142] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Sports Medicine 6. Hand and Wrist Injuries > Hand Injuries > Finger Dislocations.

[146] Type II D Phalangeal Neck Fractures in Children: A Series of 20 Cases Treated According to a Preset Stepwise Algorithm. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1703097

[148] PHALANGEAL NECK FRACTURES IN CHILDREN: CLASSIFICATION AND OUTCOME IN 66 CASES. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0506

[153] Tubulure de perfusion siliconée en lieu et place de tiges de Hunter dans la chirurgie secondaire des tendons fléchisseurs en zone 2 dans un environnement chirurgical à ressources limitées. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2018.10.074

[155] Ultrasonography Can Be Used to Assess Phalanx Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.02.022

[156] Quantitative 3-Dimensional CT Analyses of Fractures of the Middle Phalanx Base. HAND. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9665-3

[157] Outcomes of Closed Reduction and Periarticular Pinning of Base and Shaft Fractures of the Proximal Phalanx. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.008

[163] Timing for Surgical Stabilization with K-wires after Open Fractures of Proximal and Middle Phalangeal Shaft. Scientific Reports. 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11918-2

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.