Patients › Wrist
Lesión del complejo fibrocartilaginoso triangular de la muñeca
TFCC injuries — pain on the ulnar side of the wrist, often with clicking, and treatment options.
Qué está sintiendo¶
El dolor se localiza en el lado del meñique de su muñeca, la zona más cercana al antebrazo. Los médicos lo denominan el lado cubital. Con frecuencia empeora cuando gira la muñeca, se apoya en ella para levantarse de una silla o gira el picaporte de una puerta. El descanso suele aliviarlo, aunque el malestar puede reaparecer al volver a realizar actividades.
El dolor suele intensificarse tras el ejercicio, y muchas personas lo notan por la noche o al despertar. Girar la tapa de un frasco, levantar una tetera llena o incorporarse de un asiento bajo se vuelve difícil. Algunas personas perciben que la fuerza de agarre y de pellizco es menor que en el otro lado, por lo que cargar bolsas de la compra o abrir un grifo difícil resulta más complicado que antes.
Este tipo de dolor puede deberse a varios problemas distintos en esa misma zona, razón por la cual suele ser difícil identificar la causa exacta. El fibrocartílago triangular, una estructura cartilaginosa que amortigua esa zona de la muñeca, es una causa frecuente. El desgaste articular en las articulaciones cercanas o una fractura de muñeca que no ha sanado correctamente también pueden provocar un dolor similar. Dado que estas condiciones pueden coexistir, lo primero es realizar una historia clínica detallada y un examen físico. Su cirujano palpará el punto exacto donde le duele y moverá la muñeca de distintas formas para estimular o aliviar el dolor. Las radiografías casi siempre se realizan para evaluar dolores crónicos de muñeca, y en algunos casos se añade una resonancia magnética para examinar el cartílago y las articulaciones adyacentes.
Los estudios por imagen y las pruebas de movilidad no siempre arrojan una respuesta clara. Una radiografía puede mostrar cambios que en realidad no causan el dolor, y un resultado normal no descarta necesariamente la existencia de una lesión. Cuando el dolor persiste más de 3 meses sin mejorar con tratamientos conservadores como el reposo, el uso de férulas o la fisioterapia, se puede plantear la artroscopia de muñeca. Se trata de una cirugía mínimamente invasiva en la que se introduce una cámara delgada dentro de la articulación. Esto permite al cirujano observar directamente las estructuras responsables del dolor y, con frecuencia, tratarlas en la misma intervención.
¿Qué está ocurriendo realmente?¶
El complejo del cartílago fibrocartilaginoso triangular es una estructura amortiguadora situada en el lado del meñique de la muñeca. Puede considerarse como un pequeño amortiguador que se encuentra entre el extremo del hueso del antebrazo y los huesos de la muñeca. También funciona como una junta selladora que estabiliza la articulación donde la muñeca se une al antebrazo.
Este amortiguador está formado por varias partes que trabajan en conjunto: un disco central de cartílago resistente y elástico, además de ligamentos de soporte que lo anclan al pequeño hueso situado en la base externa del antebrazo. Esos ligamentos son los principales estabilizadores de la articulación que permite rotar el antebrazo, el movimiento que se utiliza para girar un destornillador o un picaporte.
Este amortiguador tiene un punto débil: solo su borde externo recibe irrigación sanguínea, aproximadamente el 10% al 40% de su superficie. La parte central carece por completo de flujo sanguíneo. Esto es importante, pues el tejido sin irrigación sanguínea tiene dificultades para cicatrizar. Por eso, cuando se produce una rotura en la zona central del amortiguador, esta suele permanecer abierta en lugar de cerrarse, y el dolor que se siente al girar o cargar peso sobre la muñeca sigue reapareciendo.
Las roturas varían en profundidad. Algunas son pequeñas fisuras en el borde del amortiguador, similares a una distensión. Otras son roturas completas a través del disco central, o desgarros en los cuales los ligamentos de soporte se separan de su punto de anclaje en el hueso del antebrazo. Las roturas más profundas, especialmente aquellas que afectan la estabilidad de la articulación rotativa o involucran dichos ligamentos, son las que suelen requerir cirugía en lugar de reposo y uso de férula.
Cuando el amortiguador o sus ligamentos resultan dañados, la articulación que estabilizan puede desplazarse ligeramente de su posición normal. Este movimiento adicional irrita las superficies cercanas y es una causa frecuente de que el dolor se intensifique al girar, agarrar objetos o apoyar el peso sobre la muñeca.
Qué podemos hacer al respecto¶
El Dr. Kieran Hirpara, cirujano de extremidades superiores en el Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, comienza con las opciones menos invasivas que se adapten a su condición. Por lo general, los pacientes son derivados a nuestra clínica por su médico de cabecera; si un fisioterapeuta le ha sugerido consultarnos, igualmente necesitará una derivación de su médico de cabecera para poder acceder al reembolso de Medicare. En su primera visita, tomamos un historial clínico detallado, examinamos su muñeca y solicitamos estudios de imagen cuando es necesario, a fin de determinar la causa del dolor.
En la mayoría de los casos de desgarros del TFCC, primero se intenta el tratamiento no quirúrgico. El primer paso es evitar las actividades que provocan el dolor. Una férula puede mantener la muñeca inmóvil, dándole así al tejido dañado la oportunidad de recuperarse. La fisioterapia o terapia de la mano busca aliviar el dolor, restablecer el movimiento fluido y recuperar la fuerza necesaria para agarrar y sostener objetos. Por lo general, le pedimos que siga este tratamiento durante varios meses antes de considerar cualquier otra opción.
Los analgésicos y antiinflamatorios pueden ayudarle a sentirse más cómodo mientras la muñeca se recupera. No reparan el desgarro, pero facilitan la realización de las tareas diarias y el seguimiento de la terapia.
La cirugía se considera cuando el dolor persiste más de 3 meses sin mejoría a pesar del tratamiento conservador. La intervención principal es la artroscopia de muñeca, una cirugía mínimamente invasiva que se realiza mediante pequeñas incisiones y una cámara delgada. Esta técnica nos permite observar directamente el interior de la muñeca y, a menudo, tratar el desgarro en el mismo procedimiento. Los desgarros pequeños pueden ser recortados para evitar que interfieran con el movimiento. Los desgarros en el borde externo, donde hay buena irrigación sanguínea, pueden suturarse. También se pueden reparar aquellos desgarros en los que los ligamentos se han desprendido de su punto de anclaje en el hueso del antebrazo. Si el tejido dañado no puede repararse, a veces es posible reconstruirlo usando una tira de tendón de su propio antebrazo. En algunos casos, también se acorta un pequeño fragmento óseo para reducir la presión en esa zona de la muñeca. Analizaremos cuál de estas opciones es la más adecuada para su caso y decidiremos conjuntamente el plan de tratamiento que mejor se ajuste a usted.
Qué esperar¶
La mayoría de las personas con este tipo de dolor de muñeca experimentan mejoría, aunque esta suele ser parcial y no total. Cuando el dolor de muñeca persiste durante mucho tiempo y se realiza una cirugía artroscópica para examinar y tratar la causa, el dolor y la discapacidad suelen reducirse aproximadamente a la mitad en el transcurso de un año. Aun así, muchas personas siguen notando cierto dolor o limitación, aunque generalmente es menos molesto que antes.
Sin tratamiento, el desenlace depende de la causa del dolor. Un pequeño desgaste en el borde externo del menisco, donde hay irrigación sanguínea, puede mejorar con reposo, inmovilización y fisioterapia. En cambio, los desgarros en la zona central del menisco rara vez sanan por sí solos, ya que esa parte carece de suministro sanguíneo; por ello, el dolor tiende a reaparecer cada vez que se gira o se carga peso sobre la muñeca. Si la artrosis por desgaste o la presión en ese lado de la muñeca contribuyen al problema, los síntomas suelen persistir o volver, especialmente con la práctica de deportes o un uso intensivo. Cuando el dolor persiste a pesar de tratamientos previos, existen otras opciones, como una intervención para acortar un pequeño hueso del antebrazo y aliviar la presión en la zona afectada.
La recuperación es gradual, no repentina. Durante las primeras semanas, el objetivo es controlar el dolor y proteger la muñeca. La fuerza y la coordinación entre la muñeca y los dedos se recuperan a lo largo de semanas o meses; la mayor parte del cambio perceptible se observa entre las 8 y 12 semanas. Algunas personas regresan a la práctica deportiva antes que otras. Los atletas que también presentan lesiones en el mismo lado de la muñeca pueden necesitar más tiempo para volver a competir.
Los problemas graves tras una cirugía artroscópica de muñeca son poco frecuentes, aunque pueden ocurrir. La infección articular es rara. Problemas menos graves, como irritación cutánea temporal o entumecimiento breve de los dedos debido a la preparación quirúrgica, pueden presentarse, pero suelen desaparecer. Su cirujano le explicará los riesgos específicos para su muñeca y la intervención prevista, para que pueda sopesarlos frente al dolor que actualmente experimenta.
Cuándo consultar a un especialista¶
Acuda a su médico de cabecera si el dolor en el lado del meñique de su muñeca persiste por más de 3 meses y no mejora con reposo, el uso de férula o terapia. Solicite una evaluación especializada si al girar, agarrar objetos o apoyarse en la muñeca el dolor vuelve a aparecer, o si siente que su fuerza de agarre y de pellizco es menor que en el otro lado. Diríjase a urgencias si, tras una cirugía artroscópica de muñeca, presenta fiebre, enrojecimiento, hinchazón en la muñeca o si la hinchazón en el antebrazo o la mano es tensa y le provoca dolor al moverla. Estos síntomas pueden indicar una infección articular o acumulación anormal de líquido; ambas situaciones requieren evaluación inmediata, sin esperar a una cita programada.
En mayor profundidad¶
Esta sección profundiza más de lo necesario para que usted tome sus propias decisiones terapéuticas. Las lesiones del complejo fibrocartilaginoso triangular merecen una lectura adicional, pues los debates técnicos que predominan en la literatura aún no se han resuelto; además, un detalle del régimen postoperatorio, al que se presta mucha menos atención, parece ser importante.
¿Qué función cumple realmente esta estructura?¶
El CFMT es un disco de cartílago rodeado por un conjunto de ligamentos, situado entre el extremo del cúbito y los huesos carpianos. Cumple dos funciones simultáneamente: amortigua la carga que se transmite por el lado ulnar de la muñeca y estabiliza la articulación entre los dos huesos del antebrazo en la muñeca, es decir, la articulación radiocubital distal.
Esta doble función explica por qué las lesiones en esta zona se manifiestan de dos maneras distintas. Una rotura que afecta principalmente al disco genera dolor al soportar carga, al levantarse de una silla, al agarrar objetos o al girar la muñeca. En cambio, una rotura que separa las fibras profundas de su inserción en el cúbito, la inserción foveolar, provoca inestabilidad; la persona siente que la muñeca “cede” o “hace clic” al rotar el antebrazo. Esta segunda forma de lesión es más grave, pues dicha inserción ligamentosa es lo que mantiene la articulación unida.
La RM es precisa, con una salvedad que conviene conocer¶
El diagnóstico depende en gran medida de las imágenes obtenidas. En un total de 1,298 pacientes, la precisión general de la resonancia magnética resultó aceptable; en el caso de los desgarros periféricos, la precisión global fue relativamente alta. Por ello, la RM, siempre que se utilicen los parámetros adecuados, se considera un método ideal para diagnosticar los distintos tipos de desgarros [1].
La salvedad radica precisamente en la palabra “periféricos”. La resonancia magnética ofrece mejores resultados en la zona externa del complejo, mejor vascularizada, donde se localizan los desgarros reparables. En cambio, los desgarros centrales y degenerativos, así como el estado exacto de la inserción foveal, son más difíciles de caracterizar; por ello, los hallazgos clínicos y, en ocasiones, la artroscopia también tienen gran importancia junto con el estudio por resonancia.
Las comparaciones de técnicas no arrojan resultados claros¶
Existen dos debates quirúrgicos recurrentes, y ninguno ha sido resuelto aún.
En cuanto al desgarro periférico común en el lado cubital, una revisión sistemática realizada en 240 pacientes reveló falta de evidencia de alta calidad para llegar a conclusiones definitivas sobre si la reparación artroscópica es superior a la reparación abierta; además, no existe evidencia científica que indique la superioridad de una técnica sobre la otra [2].
Respecto a la reparación de la fóvea, al comparar el uso de anclajes de sutura con la técnica de sutura transósea en 904 pacientes, ambos métodos lograron mejorar los resultados funcionales, reducir el dolor y aumentar la fuerza de prensión, con una baja tasa de reoperaciones; sin embargo, la comparación en cuanto al rango de movimiento resultó inconclusa [3].
El mensaje constante es que la reparación debe restaurar el anclaje del tejido; no se ha demostrado que el material utilizado para ello influya en el resultado final.
El detalle postoperatorio que sí parece ser relevante¶
En este caso, la evidencia es más precisa y de utilidad práctica. Al comparar distintos regímenes de inmovilización tras la reparación de la zona foveal del CCTF en 288 pacientes, se observa que la inmovilización postoperatoria podría beneficiarse más de limitar la rotación del antebrazo que de restringir el movimiento del codo; además, la restricción adicional de la flexión y extensión del codo no ha demostrado una ventaja consistente [4].
Esto se explica directamente por la anatomía: la estructura reparada se ve sometida a carga por la rotación del antebrazo, no por el flexado del codo; por ello, la férula debe controlar el movimiento de rotación de la palma de la mano. Con frecuencia se emplea un yeso por encima del codo para lograr esto de forma indirecta, al impedir la rotación del codo; sin embargo, esta evidencia indica que el componente relacionado con el codo no es el que realmente cumple esa función. Para el paciente, pasar seis semanas con un dispositivo ortopédico que deja el codo libre supone una experiencia notablemente distinta a la de llevar un yeso por encima del codo durante el mismo período.
Referencias¶
[1] Wang ZX, Chen SL, Wang QQ, Liu B, Zhu J, Shen J. Rendimiento de la resonancia magnética en la detección de lesiones del complejo fibrocartilaginoso triangular: un metaanálisis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015;40(5):477-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193414567425
[2] Robba V, Fowler A, Karantana A, Grindlay D, Lindau T. Reparación abierta versus artroscópica de las roturas del complejo fibrocartilaginoso triangular en el lado cubital tipo 1B: una revisión sistemática. Hand (N Y). 2019;15(4):456-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718815244
[3] Ma H, Wang J, Yang C. Eficacia de la técnica de anclajes de sutura y sutura transósea en la reparación artroscópica de la fóvea del complejo fibrocartilaginoso triangular: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04530-4
[4] Lee J, Lee T, Lee S, Lim H, Chang E, Park MO, et al. Inmovilización postoperatoria tras la reparación de la fóvea del complejo fibrocartilaginoso triangular: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. J Hand Surg Am. 2026;51(5):512.e1-512.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2026.01.029
Evidence & references
This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.
Overview¶
- Acute TFCC injuries require differentiation between those causing distal radioulnar joint instability and those that do not [1].
- Management of acute TFCC injuries ranges from nonsurgical immobilization to arthroscopic or open surgical repair depending on the specific injury pattern and stability [1].
- Arthroscopic-assisted repair techniques provide detailed visualization and facilitate the repair of TFCC injuries and associated pathologies with minimally invasive techniques [6].
- The diagnosis, classification, and treatment options for TFCC injuries include open and arthroscopic techniques [3].
- Surgical treatment of TFCC tears and concomitant pathology in the pediatric and adolescent population results in decreased pain, improved motion and stability, and excellent functional outcomes in the majority of patients [4].
- About 40% of patients sustaining a TFCC tear without distal radioulnar joint instability still had pain and disability at 1 year [5].
- Arthroscopic treatment of TFCC lesions leads to satisfactory functional outcomes [7].
- TFCC repair varies substantially from surgeon-to-surgeon, suggesting repairs are discretionary and preference sensitive [10].
- TFCC repair achieves good clinical outcomes with low complication rates [14].
- There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair [17].
- There is a current lack of high-quality evidence required to draw firm conclusions on the merits of arthroscopic versus open repair of 1B TFCC tears [28].
- In high-demand athletes, arthroscopic repair of TFCC tears is becoming the treatment of choice to obtain optimum physiologic strength, complete range of motion, stability, and the shortest possible postoperative period [41].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Anatomical Structures¶
- The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) consists of the triangular (articular) disc, lunotriquetral interosseus ligament, ulnocapitate ligament, ulnotriquetral ligament, volar distal radiolunar ligament, dorsal distal radioulnar ligament, ulnolunate ligament, and short radiolunate ligament [11].
- The TFCC is a group of interrelated anatomic structures that are integral to the stability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) [33].
- The TFCC acts as the primary stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint during forearm rotation [40].
- The TFCC provides a smooth articular surface and partially absorbs axial load from the radiocarpal joint [40].
- The ulnar attachment of the TFCC is a three-dimensional complex consisting of proximal radioulnar ligaments, a distal hammock structure (centrally located fibrocartilage disk, meniscus homologue, and ulnocarpal ligaments), and a functional ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) [30].
- The functional ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) consists of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon subsheath and the thickened ulnar capsule [30].
- The distal hammock structure and the UCL are considered the distal component of the TFCC, while the radioulnar ligament represents the proximal component [30].
- The dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments span from the dorsal and volar corners of the distal radius to a broad area of the fovea at the base of the ulnar styloid [30].
- A more superficial component of the radioulnar ligaments runs obliquely and distally to the ulnar styloid [30].
- The deep foveal components of the radioulnar ligaments are considered the true stabilizers of the DRUJ [30].
- Frank DRUJ instability can occur when the proximal foveal component is injured, even if the distal component remains intact [30].
- The ulnar styloid provides attachments for portions of the ulnocarpal ligaments, the ECU tendon sheath, and superficial limbs of the radioulnar ligaments [39].
- The deep limbs of the radioulnar ligaments insert into the fovea of the ulnar head [39].
- The tip of the ulnar styloid is devoid of soft tissue attachments [39].
- The outer 10% to 40% of the articular disk is well perfused and suggests a healing potential for injured areas upon repair [30].
- The central area of the TFCC is devoid of vascularity and unable to heal [11].
- The peripheral rim of the TFCC is well vascularized, akin to the meniscus within the knee [11].
Classification¶
- Palmer classification categorizes TFCC tears into traumatic (Class 1) or degenerative (Class 2) based on mechanism [11].
- Class 1A injuries are characterized by central perforation or tear of the TFCC [11].
- Class 1B injuries are characterized by ulnar avulsion with or without ulnar styloid fracture [11].
- Class 1C injuries are characterized by distal avulsion involving the origins of the ulnolunate and ulnotriquetral ligaments [11].
- Class 1D injuries are characterized by radial avulsion involving the dorsal and/or volar radioulnar ligaments [11].
- Class 2A degenerative tears are characterized by TFCC wear or thinning [11].
- Class 2B degenerative tears are characterized by TFCC wear plus lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia [11].
- Class 2C degenerative tears are characterized by TFCC perforation plus lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia [11].
- Class 2D degenerative tears are characterized by TFCC perforation, lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia, and lunotriquetral ligament disruption [11].
- Class 2E degenerative tears are characterized by TFCC perforation, lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia, lunotriquetral ligament disruption, and ulnocarpal and DRUJ arthritis [11].
- Estrella and Ho described a dorsal type of TFCC tear located at the junction of the dorsal radioulnar ligament and the joint capsule just radial to the ECU tendon subsheath [30].
Pathophysiology & Mechanisms¶
- Injuries to the TFCC typically occur with extension and pronation of the axially loaded wrist [30].
- The most common mechanism of TFCC injury is a fall on an outstretched hand [30].
- Traumatic radial-sided tears of the TFCC typically occur during acute rotational injuries of the forearm, most frequently during combined axial load with a distraction injury to the ulnar border [73].
- Repetitive forceful movement of the wrist from supination to pronation can cause overload stress affecting components of the TFCC [33].
- Degenerative TFCC tears occur as a result of chronic excessive loading through the ulnocarpal joint along with natural tissue degeneration associated with age [73].
- Cadaveric examinations observed TFCC perforations and chondromalacia of the ulnar head, lunate, and triquetrum in 30% to 70% of specimens [73].
- A fracture through the base of the ulnar styloid that disrupts both deep and superficial limbs of the TFCC is more predictive of DRUJ instability than fractures through the shaft or tip [39].
- Most ulnar styloid fractures do not cause DRUJ instability, partly due to the dual ulnar attachments of the TFCC [39].
- Complete avulsion of the radioulnar ligaments and gross instability can occur without an ulnar styloid fracture [39].
- A small fleck of bone avulsed from the fovea indicates disruption of the deep limbs of the radioulnar ligaments [39].
- Class 1D injuries are frequently associated with distal radius fractures and often respond to reduction of the radius [11].
- Class 1A tears are relatively common and may cause pain and mechanical symptoms such as clicking, but do not cause DRUJ instability [29].
- Class 1B injuries involve partial or complete avulsion of the TFCC from its ulnar attachments, with or without an ulnar styloid fracture [39].
- Class 1C tears involve the distal attachment of the articular disk to the lunate, triquetrum, and lunotriquetral ligaments [37].
- Complete tears of the ulnocarpal ligaments can result in ulnar carpal instability and/or volar translocation of the ulnar carpus in relation to the radius [37].
- Deep TFCC fiber tears may contribute to decreased wrist rotational positioning sense and have biomechanical importance in DRUJ stability [31].
- The TFCC is subjected to considerable axial loading and shear stresses and is frequently injured [30].
Classification¶
Palmer Classification System¶
- The Palmer classification categorizes TFCC disorders into two basic categories: traumatic (Class 1) and degenerative (Class 2) [11, 12].
- Class 1 traumatic lesions are subdivided into four types based on the specific location of the tear within the TFCC [11, 12].
- Class 2 degenerative tears are associated with ulnocarpal impaction syndrome [11, 12].
- The class and location of the tear have important implications for treatment [11, 12].
Class 1 (Traumatic) Subtypes¶
- Class 1A injuries are characterized by central perforation or tear [11, 12].
- Type 1-B injuries are defined as peripheral tears located at the ulnar end of the TFCC [56].
Class 2 (Degenerative) Subtypes¶
- Class 2A is characterized by TFCC wear or thinning [11, 12].
- Class 2B is characterized by TFCC wear plus lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia [11, 12].
- Class 2C is characterized by TFCC perforation plus lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia [11, 12].
- Class 2D is characterized by TFCC perforation, lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia, and lunotriquetral ligament disruption [11, 12].
- Class 2E is characterized by TFCC perforation, lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia, lunotriquetral ligament disruption, and ulnocarpal and DRUJ arthritis [11, 12].
Atzei-EWAS Treatment-Oriented Classification¶
- The Atzei-EWAS classification subdivides type 1-B TFCC tears into five classes based on treatment orientation [56, 66].
- Class 1 in the Atzei-EWAS system is defined as a reparable distal tear [56, 66].
- Class 2 in the Atzei-EWAS system is defined as a reparable complete tear [56, 66].
- Class 3 in the Atzei-EWAS system is defined as a reparable proximal tear [56, 66].
- Class 4 in the Atzei-EWAS system is defined as a non-repairable tear [56, 66].
- Class 5 in the Atzei-EWAS system is defined as tears associated with DRUJ arthritis [56, 66].
- The Atzei-EWAS classification allows differentiation between distal and proximal lesions involving the foveal insertions of the TFCC [66].
- The Atzei-EWAS classification allows differentiation between reparable and irreparable lesions [66].
- The European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EWAS) endorsed the Atzei-EWAS classification [66].
Diagnostic and Imaging Considerations¶
- Arthroscopy is the gold standard for detection of TFCC tears [11, 12].
- The diagnostic accuracy of MRI remains lower compared to wrist arthroscopy for detailed classifications such as Atzei's classification of pc-TFCC tears [24].
- Diagnostic accuracy for TFCC injuries was highest for central TFCC injuries [27].
- Classification of central triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions as traumatic or degenerative depends on the information provided upon viewing the lesion at arthroscopy [18].
- The Melone classification system does not predict the presence of TFCC lesions [51].
- Frykman Type VI and VIII fractures show a significantly higher incidence of TFCC tears [51].
- The presence of an ulnar styloid fracture associated with a distal radius fracture predicted the presence of traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex injury and TFCC 1B injury [15].
- 1B TFCC injury is the most common type in patients with distal radius fractures and concomitant TFCC injury [8].
Clinical Presentation¶
Symptoms and Physical Findings¶
- A TFCC injury should be suspected when an athlete presents with vague ulnar-sided wrist pain or tenderness, possibly associated with an audible or palpable click on forearm rotation [52].
- Careful history and physical examination are required to determine whether a TFCC tear is symptomatic [13].
- It is important to quantify the severity of symptoms related to TFCC pathology to determine whether surgical treatment is necessary [13].
- Clinical correlation with provocative signs on ulnar wrist is part of the preoperative evaluation for TFCC pathology [16].
- About 40% of patients sustaining a TFCC tear without distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability still had pain and disability at 1 year [5].
- Deep TFCC fiber tear may contribute to decreased wrist rotational positioning sense [31].
- Deep TFCC fiber tear may have biomechanical importance in distal radioulnar joint stability [31].
Mechanisms and Associations¶
- Traumatic injuries of the TFCC may occur from fall or hyper-rotational injuries to the forearm [33].
- Repetitive forceful movement of the athlete’s wrist from supination to pronation can cause overload stress affecting components of the TFCC [33].
- Type 1B TFCC injury is most common in patients with distal radius fractures and concomitant TFCC injury [8].
- A higher frequency of accompanying extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon and/or DRUJ disorders was found in patients with chronic TFCC tears compared to a control group [38].
Diagnostic Imaging and Assessment¶
- There is a high rate of abnormal TFCC identified on MRI in patients without corresponding ulnar-sided wrist symptoms [22].
- MR arthrography is a more sensitive and specific method for the diagnosis of TFCC tears compared to conventional wrist MRI [36].
- In detailed classification of TFCC injuries, such as pc-TFCC tears classified by Atzei's classification, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI remains lower compared to wrist arthroscopy [24].
- Diagnostic accuracy was highest for central TFCC injuries [27].
- Load-bearing radioulnar (RaUl) measurement is a simple method to diagnose an unstable distal radioulnar joint in patients with TFCC injury [62].
- MRI of the wrist is used to check for edema of the lunate in cases of ulnar positive variance or suspected impaction [16].
- Checking ulnar variance is part of the preoperative evaluation for TFCC pathology [16].
Investigations¶
Clinical Examination¶
- The arthroscopic trampoline test assesses TFCC resiliency by balloting the central portion with a small probe [11].
- The arthroscopic hook test demonstrates peripheral detachment of the TFCC [11].
- The arthroscopic suction test can show laxity of the TFCC when peripherally scarred in or foveal detachment when the DRUJ is clinically unstable [11].
- A positive ulnar fovea sign is 90% sensitive and 88% specific in detecting a split tear of the ulnotriquetral ligament [42].
- Clinical correlation with provocative signs on the ulnar wrist is part of the preoperative evaluation for TFCC debridement [16].
- Checking ulnar variance is part of the preoperative evaluation for TFCC debridement [16].
- Radiographs are used to check ulnar variance and forearm alignment in the preoperative evaluation for TFCC reconstruction with tendon graft [25].
- X-ray of the wrist is used to rule out ulnar styloid fracture in the preoperative evaluation for Class 1B TFCC repair [42].
Imaging¶
- MRI is controversial for TFCC diagnosis, but newer innovations suggest value in detection and localization of TFCC pathology [11].
- The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3.0T wrist MRI for the TFCC are consistently higher compared with those of 1.5T wrist MRI [67].
- The presence of an abnormal TFCC on MRI may be of questionable clinical meaning because there is a high incidence of TFCC abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects, particularly those over the age of 50 [74].
- Ulnar-sided contrast leakage is more common in patients with peripheral TFCC injuries, making distinction between an atypical configuration of the prestyloid recess and actual leakage important in CT arthrography [72].
- MRI of the wrist is used to check for edema of the lunate in cases of ulnar positive variance or suspected impaction during preoperative evaluation [16].
- Diagnostic arthroscopy or high-resolution MRI is used to evaluate the potential for TFCC repair in the preoperative evaluation for reconstruction [25].
- A postoperative MRI helps to analyze the integrity of TFCC postrepair and adds to understanding of its natural course of healing [70].
Classification¶
- The Palmer classification categorizes TFCC injuries as traumatic (class 1) or degenerative (class 2) [11].
- Subtypes of TFCC injuries are based on the specific location within the TFCC [11].
- Class and location of the tear have important implications for treatment [11].
- Class 1A TFCC injuries are characterized by central perforation or tear [11].
- Class 1B TFCC injuries are characterized by ulnar avulsion with or without ulnar styloid fracture [11].
- Class 1C TFCC injuries are characterized by distal avulsion involving the origins of the ulnolunate and ulnotriquetral ligaments [11].
- Class 1D TFCC injuries are characterized by radial avulsion involving the dorsal and/or volar radioulnar ligaments [11].
- Class 2A degenerative TFCC tears are characterized by TFCC wear or thinning [11].
- Class 2B degenerative TFCC tears are characterized by Class 2A changes plus lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia [11].
- Class 2C degenerative TFCC tears are characterized by TFCC perforation plus lunate and/or ulnar chondromalacia [11].
- Class 2D degenerative TFCC tears are characterized by Class 2C changes plus lunotriquetral ligament disruption [11].
- Class 2E degenerative TFCC tears are characterized by Class 2D changes plus ulnocarpal and distal radioulnar joint arthritis [11].
- Class 1B TFCC injury is the most common type in patients with distal radius fractures and concomitant TFCC injury [8].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative Management¶
- Acute TFCC injuries are initially managed with immobilization and NSAIDs [11].
- All Class 1 (acute traumatic) TFCC injuries are initially managed with immobilization and NSAIDs [12].
- Conservative management for acute traumatic TFCC tears includes rest, immobilization, antiinflammatory medications, and occasionally corticosteroid injection [29].
- TFCC injuries are managed initially using nonsurgical measures, including immobilization of the wrist and forearm, activity modification, and analgesics, for the first 2 or 3 months [30].
- Initial treatment for Class 1B injuries involves protective above-elbow immobilization for 4 to 6 weeks toward the forearm in neutral rotation [39].
- Nonoperative management of traumatic TFCC injuries with above-elbow immobilization is a viable treatment method, particularly in patients without DRUJ subluxation [69].
- Nonsurgical treatment is moderately successful for treating patients with TFCC tears without DRUJ instability [32].
- Approximately 40% of patients sustaining a TFCC tear without DRUJ instability still had pain and disability at 1 year [5].
- 46% of patients with avulsion of the TFCC from the fovea were pain-free after conservative treatment [30].
- Patients with ulnar-positive wrists may be less likely to respond to conservative management for Class 1A tears [29].
Indications for Surgery¶
- Surgical treatment is indicated for Class 1 TFCC injuries upon failure of nonoperative treatment [11].
- Indications for surgical intervention include specific ulnar-sided wrist pain not relieved by conservative management for 3 months, especially in the presence of symptomatic instability of the DRUJ [30].
- Surgery is indicated for Class 1B injuries with persistent symptoms or evidence of DRUJ instability [39].
- Arthroscopic TFCC debridement is indicated for acute traumatic Palmar type 1A TFCC tears that fail to respond to conservative treatment with splint and medication for more than 3 months [16].
- Arthroscopic TFCC debridement is indicated for degenerative central tears of the TFCC with ulnar neutral or negative variance that fail to respond to conservative treatment for more than 3 months [16].
- TFCC reconstruction with tendon graft is indicated for symptomatic DRUJ instability after neglected chronic TFCC injury, massive nonrepairable tear, or failed previous surgical repair [25].
- TFCC reconstruction with tendon graft is indicated for irreparable TFCC injuries with symptomatic DRUJ instability, neglected chronic injuries, or after suboptimal healing following nonoperative or surgical repair [26].
- Skeletal malalignment that may be responsible for DRUJ instability should be addressed concomitantly with TFCC reconstruction [26].
- Osteoarthritis of the DRUJ and axial instability of the forearm due to interosseous membrane injury are contraindications to TFCC reconstruction [26].
Operative Techniques: Debridement¶
- Class 1A (central) TFCC tears are treated with débridement if persistently symptomatic because this area of the TFCC is devoid of vascularity and unable to heal [11].
- A 2-mm peripheral rim should be maintained during debridement of Class 1A tears [11].
- The peripheral 2 to 3 mm of the TFCC must be preserved during debridement to protect the radioulnar ligaments [16].
- The peripheral 1 to 2 mm of the articular disc must be preserved during debridement to avoid injury to the radioulnar ligaments [29].
- Arthroscopic debridement alone appears to be an effective and safe initial treatment for patients with traumatic central TFCC tears [45].
- Resection of unstable flaps is sufficient during TFCC debridement when the remaining margins are smooth and stable [16].
- A thorough synovectomy of the ulnocarpal joint and DRUJ is essential for early pain control during TFCC debridement [16].
- Excessive use of RF energy during TFCC debridement can lead to thermal chondral damage [16].
- Overaggressive debridement can cause DRUJ instability [16].
- Failure to diagnose ulnar impaction syndrome may lead to continued pain following TFCC debridement [16].
Operative Techniques: Repair¶
- Class 1B (peripheral) TFCC tears are amenable to arthroscopic or open repair because the rim is well vascularized [11].
- Concurrent fractures of the ulnar styloid with persistent instability in Class 1B injuries are either excised or fixed [11].
- Class 1C (distal avulsion) TFCC tears are amenable to arthroscopic or open repair [11].
- Class 1D (radial avulsion) TFCC tears are frequently associated with distal radius fractures and often respond to reduction of the radius [11].
- Repair of a traumatic TFCC tear within 3 months of injury allows a patient to regain 80% of wrist ROM and grip strength [11].
- Current evidence demonstrates that TFCC repair achieves good clinical outcomes, with low complication rates [14].
- Arthroscopy is effective in obtaining both correct diagnosis and treatment of peripheral TFCC tear [21].
- Coexisting type 2 TFCC tears significantly increased the risk of index surgery failure in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears [19].
- The combined HS and suture repair effectively restores stability to both the DRUJ and UCJ in patients with TFCC-related ulnocarpal instability, considerably reducing pain and preserving range of motion [64].
- Pediatric patients commonly have Palmer 1B (ulnar peripheral) tears, which are amenable to repair rather than solely débridement due to improved vascularity at the periphery [68].
Operative Techniques: Reconstruction and Salvage¶
- TFCC reconstruction with tendon graft aims to restore normal DRUJ kinematics by using a single tendon graft with uniform tension passed through the edges of the sigmoid notch and through the ulna at the foveal insertion site [26].
- The radial tunnel for TFCC reconstruction should be kept under 2.5 mm to reduce the risk of fracture and promote ingrowth [25].
- The ulnar tunnel for TFCC reconstruction should be kept under 3.5 mm to reduce the risk of fracture and promote ingrowth [25].
- The radial tunnel for TFCC reconstruction should be kept 5 mm away from the lunate sigmoid fossae to avoid fracture [25].
- Fracture of the sigmoid notch or lunate facet is a pitfall if the radial tunnel is too close to the joint line during TFCC reconstruction [25].
- Fracture of the ulnar styloid is a pitfall if the ulnar tunnel is too wide or too distal during TFCC reconstruction [25].
- Nonly placement of the ulnar tunnel leads to loss of rotation motion during TFCC reconstruction [25].
- A narrow ulnar tunnel may cause binding of the tendon graft and failure of tensioning during TFCC reconstruction [25].
- Postoperative care for TFCC reconstruction involves a reverse sugar tong cast with forearm in neutral rotation, changing to a splint after 3 weeks, allowing full active forearm rotation after 6 weeks, and passive motion after 8 weeks [25].
- Hemiresection or interposition arthroplasty maintains the ulnar insertion of the TFCC and prevents radioulnar impingement by soft tissue interposition [11].
- The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure involves DRUJ arthrodesis with creation of a proximal pseudarthrosis at the ulnar neck [11].
- Ulnar head or total joint implant arthroplasty maintains the relationship between the radius and the ulna [11].
- Results of ulnar head or total joint implant arthroplasty show good pain relief at the risk of ulnar head instability, aseptic loosening, and no appreciable change in pronosupination compared to preoperative values [11].
- One-bone forearm fusion represents the ultimate salvage operation for persistent pain or complications by fusing the proximal ulna to the distal radius shaft [11].
Complications¶
- Coexisting type 2 TFCC tears significantly increased the risk of index surgery failure in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-sided TFCC tears [19].
- Patients with chronic TFCC tears have a higher frequency of accompanying extensor carpi ulnaris tendon and/or distal radioulnar joint disorders compared to a control group [38].
Recovery¶
- In the first year after open TFCC reinsertion, 91% of the patients returned to work, including 50% within 12 weeks [76].
- Disability outcomes were worse in patients with distal radial fracture where TFCC was injured [71, 75].
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Acute TFCC injuries require differentiation between those causing distal radioulnar joint instability and those that do not, with management ranging from nonsurgical immobilization to arthroscopic or open surgical repair depending on the specific injury pattern and stability. [1] (10.5435/00124635-200806000-00004)
- [L5] The article reviews diagnosis, classification, and treatment options including open and arthroscopic techniques for TFCC injuries. [3] (10.1016/j.hcl.2010.07.003)
- [L4] Surgical treatment of TFCC tears and concomitant pathology in the pediatric and adolescent population results in decreased pain, improved motion and stability, and excellent functional outcomes in the majority of patients. [4] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.06.019)
- [L4] About 40% of patients sustaining TFCC tear without DRUJ instability still had pain and disability at 1 year. [5] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.064)
- [L5] Arthroscopic-assisted repair techniques have revolutionized surgical management, providing detailed visualization and facilitating the repair of TFCC injuries and associated pathologies with minimally invasive techniques. [6] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.03.011)
- [L4] Arthroscopic treatment of TFCC lesions leads to satisfactory functional outcomes. [7] (10.1055/s-0039-3400454)
- [L3] 1B TFCC injury is most common in patients with DRF and concomitant TFCC injury. [8] (10.1186/s13018-023-04438-5)
- [L4] TFCC repair varies substantially from surgeon-to-surgeon, suggesting repairs are discretionary and preference sensitive. [10] (10.1055/s-0038-1625953)
- [L4] Careful history and physical examination are required to determine whether a TFCC tear is symptomatic, and it is important to quantify the severity of symptoms related to TFCC pathology to determine whether surgical treatment is necessary. [13] (10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00998)
- [L4] Current evidence demonstrates that TFCC repair achieves good clinical outcomes, with low complication rates. [14] (10.1055/s-0040-1718913)
- [L4] The presence of ulnar styloid fracture associated with distal radius fracture predicted the presence of frequently occurring traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex injury and TFCC 1B injury. [15] (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.025)
- [L3] There was no statistical difference in clinical outcomes after open versus arthroscopic TFCC repair. [17] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020)
- [L2] Classification of central triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions as traumatic or degenerative depends on the information provided upon viewing the lesion at arthroscopy. [18] (10.1177/1753193416684658)
- [L4] However, coexisting type 2 TFCC tears significantly increased the risk of index surgery failure in these patients. [19] (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.012)
- [L4] Arthroscopy is effective in obtaining both correct diagnosis and treatment of peripheral TFCC tear. [21] (10.2174/1874325001711010525)
- [L4] There is a high rate of abnormal TFCC identified on MRI in patients without corresponding ulnar-sided wrist symptoms. [22] (10.1177/15589447241277846)
- [L4] In more detailed classification of TFCC injuries, such as pc-TFCC tears classified by Atzei's classification, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI remains lower compared to wrist arthroscopy. [24] (10.1186/s12891-023-07140-z)
- [L1] Diagnostic accuracy was highest for central TFCC injuries. [27] (10.1055/s-0038-1629911)
- [L4] This SR demonstrates a current lack of high-quality evidence required to draw firm conclusions on the merits of arthroscopic versus open repair of 1B TFCC tears. [28] (10.1177/1558944718815244)
- [L3] Deep TFCC fiber tear may contribute to decreased wrist rotational positioning sense and may have biomechanical importance in distal radioulnar joint stability. [31] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.022)
- [L3] Nonsurgical treatment is moderately successful for treating patients with TFCC tears without DRUJ instability. [32] (10.1097/corr.0000000000000533)
- [L5] [33] (10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.008)
- [L3] MR arthrography is more sensitive and specific method in terms of the diagnosis of TFCC tears compared to conventional wrist MRI. [36] (10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.032)
- [L3] We found a higher frequency of accompanying ECU tendon and/or DRUJ disorders in patients with chronic TFCC tears as compared to the control group. [38] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.040)
- [Paper] [40] (10.1055/s-0040-1713580)
- [L4] In high-demand athletes, arthroscopic repair of TFCC tears is becoming the treatment of choice to obtain optimum physiologic strength, complete range of motion, stability, and the shortest possible postoperative period. [41] (10.1016/j.hcl.2009.05.011)
- [L3] Arthroscopic debridement alone appears to be an effective and safe initial treatment for patients with traumatic central TFCC tears. [45] (10.1302/0301-620x.106b4.bjj-2023-0642.r3)
- [L3] The Melone classification system does not predict the presence of TFCC lesions, while Frykman Type VI and VIII fractures show a significantly higher incidence of TFCC tears. [51] (10.1177/1753193408090106)
- [L5] [52] (10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.014)
- [L5] [56] (10.1177/1753193409100120)
- [L2] Load-bearing RaUl measurement is a simple method to diagnose an unstable distal radioulnar joint in patients with TFCC injury. [62] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.01.008)
- [L4] The combined HS and suture repair effectively restores stability to both the DRUJ and UCJ in patients with TFCC-related ulnocarpal instability, considerably reducing pain and preserving range of motion. [64] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100806)
- [L4] [66] (10.1055/s-0035-1544226)
- [L3] The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3.0T wrist MRI for the TFCC is consistently higher compared with those of 1.5T wrist MRI, suggesting improved capability for detection of TFCC injuries. [67] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.028)
- [L5] [68] (10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01029)
- [L3] Nonoperative management of traumatic TFCC injuries with above-elbow immobilization is a viable treatment method, particularly in patients without DRUJ subluxation. [69] (10.1302/0301-620x.103b8.bjj-2020-2310.r2)
- [L5] A postoperative MRI as a noninvasive tool helps to analyze the integrity of TFCC postrepair and adds to our understanding on the natural course of its healing. [70] (10.1016/j.eats.2025.103568)
- [L2] Disability outcomes were worse in patients with distal radial fracture where TFCC was injured. [71] (10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.002)
- [L4] Since ulnar-sided contrast leakage is more common in patients with peripheral TFCC injuries, distinction between an atypical configuration of the prestyloid recess and actual leakage is important in CT arthrography of the wrist. [72] (10.1186/s12891-022-05241-9)
- [L4] [73] (10.1177/15589447221084125)
- [L3] The presence of an abnormal TFCC on MRI may be of questionable clinical meaning, because there is a high incidence of TFCC abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects, particularly those over the age of 50. [74] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.006)
- [L2] Disability outcomes were worse in patients with distal radius fracture where TFCC was injured. [75] (10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.012)
- [L3] In the first year after open TFCC reinsertion, 91% of the patients returned to work, including 50% within 12 weeks. [76] (10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.012)
References¶
[1] Management of Acute Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injury of the Wrist. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200806000-00004
[3] Arthroscopic and Open Repair of the TFCC. Hand Clinics. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.07.003
[4] Early Results of Surgical Treatment of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears in Children and Adolescents. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.06.019
[5] The Natural Course of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear without Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.064
[6] Arthroscopic-Assisted Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.03.011
[7] Patient-Reported Outcomes following Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400454
[8] Association between imaging parameter changes and triangular fibrocartilage complex injury after distal radius fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04438-5
[10] Variation in Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625953
[11] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. DISTAL RADIOULNAR JOINT, TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX, AND WRIST ARTHROSCOPY > 2. TFCC tears.
[12] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. SECTION 16 PATELLAR TRACKING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY > DISTAL RADIOULNAR JOINT, TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX, AND WRIST ARTHROSCOPY > 2. TFCC tears.
[13] Open and Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) Repair. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00998
[14] Surgical Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Systematic Review. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718913
[15] The Presence and the Location of an Ulnar Styloid Fracture Associated With Distal Radius Fracture Predict the Presence of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex 1B Injury. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.025
[16] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Arthroscopic TFCC Debridement.
[17] Clinical Comparison of Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.020
[18] Diagnosing central lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage as traumatic or degenerative: a review of clinical accuracy. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1753193416684658
[19] What Is the Effect of the Ulnar‐Plus Variance on the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair of the Peripheral Ulnar‐Side Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear?. Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.012
[21] Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Peripheral Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear With Exploration of Dorsal Sensory Branch of Ulnar Nerve. The Open Orthopaedics Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010525
[22] Incidental Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Changes on Wrist MRI. HAND. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/15589447241277846
[24] Diagnostic value of MRI in traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07140-z
[25] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Arthroscopic TFCC Reconstruction With Tendon Graft.
[26] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > TFCC Reconstruction with Tendon Graft.
[27] TFCC Injuries: Meta-Analysis and Comparison of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1629911
[28] Open Versus Arthroscopic Repair of 1B Ulnar-Sided Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Systematic Review. HAND. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718815244
[29] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. Chronic Perilunate Instability (SL Plus LT Instability) > Palmer’s Classification of TFCC Lesions > Class 1A Tear.
[30] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > TFCC Repair > Classification, Functional Anatomy, Clinical Features, and Indication for Repair.
[31] The Effect of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear on Wrist Proprioception. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.022
[32] What is the Natural History of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear Without Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability?. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000533
[33] Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain in the Athlete. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.008
[36] Comparison between conventional MRI and MR arthrography in the diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage tears and correlation with arthroscopic findings. Injury. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.032
[37] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Arthroscopic-Assisted Suture Anchor Technique (Atzei) > Arthroscopic Repair of Class IC TFCC Tears.
[38] The Factors Correlated with the Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Tendon and Distal Radioulnar Joint Disorder in Patients with Chronic Triangular Fibrocartilage Tears. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.040
[39] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. Chronic Perilunate Instability (SL Plus LT Instability) > Palmer’s Classification of TFCC Lesions > Class 1B Tear.
[40] A Systematic Review and Analysis of Palmer Type I Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injuries: Outcomes of Treatment. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713580
[41] Repair of Arthroscopic Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears in Athletes. Hand Clinics. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.05.011
[42] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Arthroscopic Repair of Class 1B TFCC Tears.
[45] Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of traumatic central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b4.bjj-2023-0642.r3
[51] The Value of Plain X-Rays in Predicting TFCC Injury after Distal Radial Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408090106
[52] Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injuries in the Elite Athlete. Hand Clinics. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2012.05.014
[56] New trends in arthroscopic management of type 1-B TFCC injuries with DRUJ instability. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193409100120
[62] Load-Bearing Radioulnar Distances to Evaluate an Unstable Distal Radioulnar Joint in Patients With Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.01.008
[64] Extensor Retinaculum Capsulorrhaphy and Suture Repair for Ulnocarpal and Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability: One-Year Results. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100806
[66] Arthroscopic Foveal Repair of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1544226
[67] Diagnostic Comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla Preoperative MRI of the Wrist in Patients With Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.028
[68] Pediatric Ulnar-sided Wrist Pain: A Review of the Current Literature. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2022. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-01029
[69] Predictors for poor outcome for conservatively treated traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex tears. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b8.bjj-2020-2310.r2
[70] Bucket‐Handle Tear of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex: Surgical Technique With Clinical and Radiologic Outcome. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103568
[71] Outcomes of surgically treated distal radial fractures with associated triangular fibrocartilage complex injury. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.002
[72] Evaluation of prestyloid recess morphology and ulnar-sided contrast leakage in CT arthrography of the wrist. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05241-9
[73] Radial Sided Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears: A Comprehensive Review. HAND. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221084125
[74] Prevalence of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Abnormalities on MRI Scans of Asymptomatic Wrists. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.006
[75] Outcomes of surgically treated distal radius fractures associated with triangular fibrocartilage complex injury. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.012
[76] Factors associated with return to work after open reinsertion of the triangular fibrocartilage. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.03.012