Patients › Elbow
Osteoartritis del codo
Osteoarthritis of the elbow — primary and post-traumatic, conservative and surgical options.
Qué está sintiendo¶
La artritis de codo suele comenzar con molestias en los extremos del rango de movimiento: cuando estira el brazo por completo o lo dobla hasta el límite. La parte central del movimiento, al principio, suele permanecer indolora. Muchas personas notan sensación de atrapamiento, chasquidos o bloqueo en el codo, causados por pequeños fragmentos óseos o de cartílago (llamados cuerpos sueltos) que flotan dentro de la articulación. Los espolones óseos (denominados osteofitos) se acumulan alrededor de la articulación e impiden físicamente los últimos grados de flexión y extensión.
La extensión completa del brazo suele ser la primera función que se ve afectada. Las tareas que requieren un codo completamente recto se vuelven difíciles: alcanzar algo en un estante alto, sostener una bandeja con el brazo extendido o levantarse de una silla. Girar el antebrazo para usar un destornillador o una manija de puerta suele seguir siendo posible hasta etapas posteriores. Con el avance de la enfermedad, el dolor puede extenderse a la zona central del movimiento y empezar a molestar durante actividades cotidianas, no solo en los extremos del rango de movimiento.
El dolor nocturno no es típico de este tipo de artritis. Si el codo le despierta por la noche con un dolor profundo y palpitante, coméntele esto a su cirujano, ya que podría indicar otra causa que merece ser investigada.
Esta afección es más común en hombres de unos 50 años que han realizado trabajos manuales intensivos durante años, aunque afecta a personas de diversas edades. También puede aparecer tras una lesión previa en el codo, como una fractura o luxación, a veces años después. En aproximadamente la mitad de los casos, la artritis comprime un nervio (el nervio cubital) situado en la parte interna del codo, provocando hormigueo o entumecimiento en el dedo anular y el meñique.
Si algo de esto le resulta familiar, la radiografía simple suele ser el primer paso diagnóstico. Esta muestra claramente los espolones óseos y los cuerpos sueltos; además, con frecuencia el espacio articular parece estar mejor conservado de lo que cabría esperar.
¿Qué está ocurriendo realmente?¶
Su codo funciona como una bisagra con un componente de rotación. Le permite doblar y estirar el brazo, así como girar el antebrazo para voltear la palma de la mano hacia arriba o hacia abajo. Normalmente, la superficie de la articulación está cubierta por una capa lisa de cartílago; esta actúa un poco como el revestimiento de una bisagra: permite que todo se mueva sin fricción.
En la artritis de codo, esa capa de cartílago se desgasta. El hueso responde formando espolones óseos (osteofitos) en los bordes de la articulación. Estos espolones actúan como topes: impiden físicamente los últimos grados de flexión y extensión, motivo por el cual el movimiento resulta rígido en esos extremos. También pueden desprenderse pequeños fragmentos de hueso o cartílago que quedan flotando dentro de la articulación (cuerpos sueltos); estos quedan atrapados entre las superficies móviles, provocando sensación de “traba”, chasquidos o bloqueos que quizás haya notado.
Existe un aspecto peculiar en esta afección: en muchas articulaciones afectadas por artritis, el desgaste es uniforme en toda la superficie. En el codo, sin embargo, el desgaste suele concentrarse en un lado de la articulación (la parte externa, donde el hueso del antebrazo se une al extremo del hueso del brazo), mientras que la zona central de la bisagra permanece relativamente intacta. Por eso una radiografía puede mostrar resultados mejores de lo que sus síntomas indican; asimismo, el dolor suele aparecer primero en los extremos del rango de movimiento y luego extenderse al centro a medida que se pierde más cartílago.
La cápsula articular, que es una envoltura de tejido resistente, también se vuelve más tensa con el tiempo, lo cual contribuye a la rigidez. Si los espolones y la cápsula tensa comprimen el nervio cubital situado en la parte interna del codo, se producen los hormigueos o entumecimiento en el dedo anular y el meñique, tal como se describió anteriormente.
Nada de esto significa que su codo se esté desintegrando. Simplemente, las superficies articulares, los espolones y la cápsula tensa interactúan de forma negativa; el tratamiento tiene como objetivo atenuar esa interacción.
Qué podemos hacer al respecto¶
El Dr. Kieran Hirpara, cirujano de extremidades superiores en el Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, comienza con las opciones menos invasivas que se adapten a su condición. Por lo general, los pacientes son derivados a nuestra clínica por su médico de cabecera; si un fisioterapeuta le ha sugerido que nos consulte, igualmente necesitará una derivación de su médico de cabecera para poder acceder al reembolso de Medicare. En su primera visita, tomamos su historia clínica, examinamos su codo y solicitamos estudios de imagen si es necesario. En el caso de problemas crónicos como este, normalmente iniciamos con tratamiento no quirúrgico antes de considerar la cirugía.
El primer paso suele ser lo que usted mismo puede hacer. Modificar su forma de trabajar o entrenar, de modo que el codo no se someta repetidamente a cargas en los extremos de su rango de movimiento, puede aliviar los síntomas. La fisioterapia tiene como objetivo mantener la movilidad de la articulación y fortalecer los músculos circundantes. Estas medidas pueden reducir el dolor, aunque tienen menos efecto sobre la rigidez provocada por espolones óseos que limitan el movimiento. Pruébelas durante un tiempo razonable antes de plantearse la cirugía.
Los analgésicos y antiinflamatorios pueden ayudarle a superar los episodios de dolor agudo y hacer que la fisioterapia sea más cómoda. Estos medicamentos atenuan los síntomas, pero no modifican la artritis en sí.
La cirugía se considera cuando estas medidas no le brindan suficiente alivio, o cuando la rigidez, el bloqueo o los “tirones” de la articulación interfieren con su vida diaria. El objetivo de la operación es eliminar los espolones óseos y los cuerpos sueltos que impiden el movimiento, así como liberar la cápsula articular tensa. Con frecuencia se realiza mediante pequeñas incisiones y el uso de una cámara (cirugía artroscópica); en casos de artritis más avanzada, se opta por una incisión abierta. La opción más adecuada para usted dependerá de la gravedad de los cambios articulares, su edad, su estado de salud y las funciones que necesite desempeñar con el codo. Discutiremos todo esto con usted para tomar la decisión conjuntamente.
Qué esperar¶
La artritis de codo es una afección crónica, pero no tiene por qué impedirle hacer las cosas que desea. En las fases iniciales, medidas sencillas suelen aliviar el dolor. Modificar sus hábitos laborales, mantener el movimiento de la articulación y usar antiinflamatorios pueden brindar un alivio real mientras la artritis aún se encuentra en sus primeras etapas. La rigidez provocada por los espolones óseos es más difícil de corregir sin cirugía; por eso, es posible que persistan ciertas limitaciones de movimiento incluso cuando el dolor disminuya.
Si estas medidas no son suficientes, la cirugía tiene como objetivo eliminar lo que bloquea la articulación. Para la mayoría de los pacientes esto implica una operación que preserva la articulación: se eliminan los espolones y cuerpos sueltos, y se libera la cápsula tensa, en lugar de reemplazar la articulación. Quienes se someten a este tipo de cirugía pueden esperar que su codo funcione bien y que el dolor disminuya; además, la probabilidad de necesitar otra operación posterior es baja. Por lo general, la movilidad también mejora, aunque parte de ese aumento en el rango de movimiento puede disminuir con el tiempo.
La cirugía de reemplazo es un caso distinto. Rara vez se requiere para la artritis de codo y generalmente se reserva para personas con discapacidad grave, ya que la articulación artificial no suele durar muchos años en personas jóvenes o más activas. Cuando se realiza, la mayoría de los pacientes experimentan un alivio duradero del dolor y una mejor funcionalidad del brazo; sin embargo, las complicaciones son más frecuentes que en otras cirugías de codo, y el implante puede aflojarse con el paso del tiempo.
Dejar la afección sin tratamiento no suele empeorarla rápidamente, pero tampoco tiende a mejorar por sí sola. Los bloqueos y atrapamientos de la articulación pueden persistir, y la rigidez en los extremos del rango de movimiento suele mantenerse o incluso aumentar. Algunas personas logran manejar la situación durante años con cambios moderados en el uso de su brazo; otras, en cambio, notan que dichas limitaciones afectan progresivamente sus actividades cotidianas.
Sea cual sea el camino que elija, el objetivo es el mismo: un nivel bajo de dolor y suficiente movilidad para hacer lo que es importante para usted, manteniendo abiertas todas las opciones para el futuro. El tratamiento se adapta a su edad, su profesión y el grado de avance de la artritis; su cirujano hablará con usted sobre ello.
¿Cuándo consultar a un especialista?¶
Acuda a su médico de cabecera si su codo ha estado rígido o doloroso durante varias semanas y las medidas sencillas no han surtido efecto, especialmente si la sensación de “bloqueo” o “traba” le impide usar el brazo en el trabajo. Solicite una evaluación por parte de un especialista si está perdiendo la capacidad de estirar o doblar el codo por completo, o si el hormigueo y entumecimiento en el dedo anular y el meñique empeoran, ya que la artritis puede comprimir el nervio cubital. Diríjase a urgencias si el codo está caliente, rojo e hinchado, acompañado de fiebre, o si no puede moverlo en absoluto tras una lesión. Estos síntomas no son típicos de la artritis y requieren ser evaluados el mismo día.
En profundidad¶
Esta sección profundiza más de lo necesario para que usted tome sus propias decisiones terapéuticas. La osteoartritis del codo merece una lectura adicional, pues la intervención quirúrgica que parecería la solución definitiva —el reemplazo articular, tal como se realiza habitualmente en cadera y rodilla— se comporta de manera muy distinta en el codo; este único hecho determina todo el abanico de opciones de tratamiento.
¿Por qué el reemplazo de codo no es la opción predeterminada?¶
La artroplastia total de codo funciona, pero no tolera la carga de la misma manera que el reemplazo de cadera o rodilla. Al analizar los datos de 2,118 pacientes con artritis reumatoide, se observó que el reemplazo de codo seguía arrojando resultados satisfactorios; no obstante, se asoció con tasas de fallo del implante y complicaciones considerablemente más altas que en la artroplastia de cadera y rodilla [1].
Esto conlleva una restricción permanente para levantar pesos, en lugar de ser una medida preventiva únicamente durante la fase de recuperación. Dado que el codo se encuentra al final de una palanca larga, incluso pesos moderados en la mano generan fuerzas considerables sobre el implante, las cuales, con el tiempo, provocan su aflojamiento.
Por ello, la jerarquía de tratamientos para el codo es inversa a la de las extremidades inferiores: en la cadera, el reemplazo articular es el procedimiento estándar para casos avanzados de artritis; en el codo, en cambio, se reserva principalmente para pacientes mayores con menor demanda física, así como para casos de artritis inflamatoria en lugar de artritis por desgaste.
La causa es tan importante como la gravedad¶
Dos personas con codos igualmente desgastados pueden tener pronósticos distintos según la razón por la cual la articulación se deterioró. En un estudio con 679 pacientes, la etiología de la artritis influyó en los resultados, en particular en los modos específicos de fallo del implante; los pacientes con artritis reumatoide obtuvieron mejores resultados funcionales que aquellos sometidos a prótesis por causas postraumáticas [2].
Esto merece ser destacado, pues va en contra de lo que la mayoría esperaría: que una articulación dañada por una única lesión tenga un mejor pronóstico que una afectada por una enfermedad sistémica. La explicación radica en la demanda mecánica: la artritis postraumática suele aparecer en personas más jóvenes con estilos de vida físicamente exigentes, por lo que el implante debe soportar fuerzas para las cuales no fue diseñado.
El desbridamiento es el procedimiento que realiza la mayor parte del trabajo¶
En el caso de la artritis degenerativa primaria, el tratamiento principal no es el reemplazo articular, sino el desbridamiento: se eliminan los espolones óseos y los cuerpos sueltos que obstruyen el movimiento articular al final de su rango, y se libera la cápsula articular tensa, manteniendo intactas las superficies articulares.
La evidencia clínica es consistente. En 1,097 pacientes, el desbridamiento arrojó buenos resultados funcionales a mediano plazo, sin aumento alguno de complicaciones al emplear técnica artroscópica [3]. En 871 pacientes, tanto el desbridamiento osteocapsular abierto como el artroscópico mejoraron de manera fiable la flexión, la extensión y los índices funcionales, con tasas de complicaciones bajas [4]. Además, un metaanálisis realizado en 586 pacientes demostró que el desbridamiento resulta eficaz para aliviar los síntomas incapacitantes de la artrosis primaria del codo, con una tasa de complicaciones aceptable [5].
Es importante comprender qué se pretende lograr con el desbridamiento: no se reacondicionan las superficies articulares ni se detiene el proceso artrósico. Su función es eliminar los obstáculos mecánicos que aparecen al final del rango de movimiento. Por ello, resulta muy útil para aquellos pacientes cuya principal queja es la imposibilidad de estirar o doblar completamente el codo, así como el dolor intenso al alcanzar los límites de movimiento; en cambio, su efecto es menor en pacientes que experimentan dolor a lo largo de todo el rango de movilidad.
La elección entre cirugía abierta o artroscópica no es el factor decisivo¶
Al igual que ocurre con varias intervenciones quirúrgicas en el codo, la técnica genera más debate del que justifican las evidencias. Las revisiones mencionadas anteriormente consideraron que ambos métodos son seguros y eficaces; además, una revisión narrativa de 639 pacientes concluyó que no era posible determinar cuál procedimiento resulta superior [6].
El factor determinante en la práctica clínica es lo que se necesita abordar. La artroscopia resulta adecuada para intervenciones en los compartimentos anterior y posterior; sin embargo, en casos de codo rígido que requiera una liberación capsular extensa, o cuando la anatomía esté alterada y sea necesario visualizar y proteger algún nervio, la cirugía abierta podría ser más segura.
Referencias¶
[1] Chou TA, Ma H, Wang J, Tsai S, Chen C, Wu P, et al. Artroplastia total de codo en pacientes con artritis reumatoide: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(8):967-80. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1465.R1
[2] Wang J, Ma H, Chou TA, Tsai S, Chen C, Wu P, et al. Resultados tras la artroplastia total de codo en casos de artritis reumatoide frente a condiciones postraumáticas: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(12):1489-97. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B12.BJJ-2019-0799.R1
[3] White CHR, Ravi V, Watson J, Badhrinarayanan S, Phadnis J. Revisión sistemática sobre el desbridamiento artroscópico frente al abierto en el codo artrítico. Arthroscopy. 2020;37(2):747-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005
[4] Guerrero EM, Bullock GS, Helmkamp JK, Madrid A, Ledbetter L, Richard MJ, et al. Impacto clínico del desbridamiento osteocapsular artroscópico frente al abierto en la artrosis primaria del codo: una revisión sistemática. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(4):689-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.003
[5] de Klerk HH, Welsink CL, Spaans AJ, Verweij LPE, van den Bekerom MPJ. Desbridamiento artroscópico y abierto en la artrosis primaria del codo: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(12):874-82. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095
[6] Poonit K, Zhou X, Zhao B, Sun C, Yao C, Zhang F, et al. Tratamiento de la artrosis del codo mediante desbridamiento abierto o artroscópico: una revisión narrativa. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x
Evidence & references
This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.
Overview¶
Epidemiology and Demographics¶
- Symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the elbow affects 2% of the population [5].
- The average age of presentation for elbow osteoarthritis is 50 years, with a range of 20 to 70 years [5].
- Men are affected by primary elbow osteoarthritis more often than women at a 4:1 ratio [5].
- Hand dominance and strenuous manual labor are associated with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [5].
- Secondary causes of elbow osteoarthritis include trauma, osteochondritis dissecans, and synovial osteochondromatosis [5].
Pathoanatomy¶
- Elbow osteoarthritis is characterized by osteophyte formation, capsular contracture, and loose bodies, often with relative preservation of the joint space [5].
- Periarticular hypertrophic osteophytes act as a mechanical block at the end ranges of flexion and extension [5].
- Advanced elbow osteoarthritis rarely presents with joint space narrowing [5].
- Elbow osteoarthritis typically involves the radiocapitellar joint articular cartilage preferentially, with relative preservation of the ulnohumeral articular surfaces [5].
Clinical Presentation and Evaluation¶
- Patients with elbow osteoarthritis typically present with loss of terminal extension and flexion and painful catching, clicking, or locking of the elbow [5].
- Pain in elbow osteoarthritis is typically noted at the end ranges of motion and not through the midrange [5].
- Night pain is not typical of elbow osteoarthritis; if present, an inflammatory cause of the arthritis should be considered [5].
- Forearm rotation is relatively preserved until later in the disease process of elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- Ulnar neuropathy is present in up to 50% of patients with elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- Standard AP and lateral radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process, coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa [5].
- Radiographs of the elbow typically show preserved joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint and mildly narrowed joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint [5].
- Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in the elbow [5].
- CT may be useful for surgical planning of elbow osteoarthritis by allowing a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
Nonoperative Management¶
- Nonoperative treatment remains the first step in the early management of elbow osteoarthritis [1].
- Rest, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and activity modification are the mainstays of nonsurgical treatment for elbow osteoarthritis [5].
Operative Management¶
- Surgical indications for elbow osteoarthritis include failure to respond to nonsurgical interventions, loss of motion that interferes with activities of daily living, and painful locking or catching of the elbow [5].
- Joint-sparing procedures such as débridement, excision of osteophytes, capsular release, and removal of loose bodies are preferred for elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- Total elbow arthroplasty is rarely indicated for elbow osteoarthritis and is not indicated for patients younger than 65 years or physically active patients because of concerns about implant longevity [5].
- The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi arthroplasty is a classic open procedure in which the olecranon fossa is trephinated and osteophytes are removed [5].
- Limitations of the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure include incomplete anterior release and incomplete osteophyte removal anteriorly [5].
- Either a medial or lateral column approach can be used for open débridement, loose body removal, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy depending upon the location of the pathology and concomitant procedures [5].
- Contraindications for arthroscopic procedures in elbow osteoarthritis include severe contracture and periarticular heterotopic ossification [5].
- Relative contraindications for arthroscopic procedures in elbow osteoarthritis include prior ulnar nerve transposition and prior extensive open procedures [5].
- Osteocapsular arthroplasty refers to the arthroscopic technique for elbow joint débridement involving capsular release, loose body removal, and excision of osteophytes [5].
- Ulnar nerve transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament should be considered for patients with less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion regardless of the type of procedure used [5].
- Capsulectomy and debridement through a medial trans-flexor approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [2].
- Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is a safe, efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
- Arthroscopic debridement based on computer simulation is recommended in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow [7].
- Arthroscopic treatment provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate [9].
- Elbow arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates [10].
- Open elbow debridement and the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
- The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow [21].
- Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis [23].
- Open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow osteoarthritis [32].
- Surgical options for severe elbow arthritis must be tailored to cartilage integrity and bone structure, with total elbow arthroplasty generally avoided in young, active patients due to poor durability [44].
Complications¶
- Deep infections in the elbow are more common than other joints treated arthroscopically, occurring in 0.8% to 2.2% of cases [5].
- Infection related to intraoperative corticosteroid injections can manifest as a complication of elbow surgery [5].
- Stiffness due to heterotopic ossification is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
- Hematoma formation is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
- Transient nerve palsies complicate 1% to 3% of cases, with radial and ulnar nerves being the most common [5].
- Synovial ganglion formation is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Epidemiology & Demographics¶
- Symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is relatively rare, affecting 2% of the population [5].
- The average age of presentation for primary elbow osteoarthritis is 50 years, with a range of 20 to 70 years [5].
- Men are affected more often than women by primary elbow osteoarthritis at a 4:1 ratio [5, 36].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow tends to affect the dominant arm in males with a history of manual labor [12].
- Posttraumatic arthritis is commonly seen after elbow injuries such as distal humerus fractures, radial head fractures, proximal ulna fractures, or elbow fracture-dislocations [6].
- Posttraumatic arthritis can develop in response to the initial cartilage insult or secondary to residual articular incongruities from injuries [6].
- Postinjury malunions, nonunions, or residual instability can alter kinematics and load across the elbow, predisposing it to degenerative changes [6].
- Posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow primarily affects young males [95].
Bony Anatomy & Biomechanics¶
- The elbow is a trocho-ginglymoid joint consisting of medial and lateral articulations that afford bony stability [51].
- The ulnohumeral joint is formed by the articulation of the trochlea with the ulna within the greater sigmoid notch [51].
- The ulnohumeral joint has highly congruent anatomy through almost 180° of articular contact, with the exception of the bare area of the greater sigmoid notch which is devoid of cartilage [51].
- The radiocapitellar joint is formed by the articulation of the capitellum and the radial head [51].
- The radial head is a concave elliptical structure covered with articular cartilage along the radiocapitellar joint and approximately 270° of the articular margin [51].
- The distal humeral articulation is angled 30° from the longitudinal axis [51, 19, 20].
- The axis of rotation is 5° to 7° angulated in the coronal plane to the epicondylar axis, with the medial side more distal than the lateral side [51].
- In full extension, 60% of axial load is transmitted through the radiocapitellar joint [19, 20].
- The normal range of elbow flexion/extension is 0 to 150 degrees [19, 20].
- The normal forearm pronosupination is 80 to 85 degrees in each direction [19, 20].
- The functional range of motion for the elbow is 30 to 130 degrees for flexion/extension and 50 degrees for pronosupination [19, 20].
- The normal valgus carrying angle of the elbow is 5 to 10 degrees for men and 10 to 15 degrees for women [19, 20].
- The ulnohumeral articulation is a primary stabilizer of the elbow [18].
- The radiocapitellar articulation is a secondary stabilizer of the elbow [18].
Ligamentous Anatomy¶
- The medial collateral ligament (MCL) consists of anterior, posterior, and transverse bundles [19, 20].
- The anterior bundle of the MCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress within functional elbow range of motion [19, 20].
- The posterior bundle of the MCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress with the elbow in maximal flexion [19, 20].
- Stability in full extension is provided by the MCL, joint capsule, and ulnohumeral articulation [19, 20].
- The radial head functions as an important secondary stabilizer to valgus stress, particularly in medial collateral ligament–deficient elbows [79].
- The lateral ulnar collateral ligament acts as the primary stabilizer to posterolateral rotatory instability [79].
Pathoanatomy of Osteoarthritis¶
- Osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by osteophyte formation, capsular contracture, and loose bodies, often with relative preservation of the joint space [5].
- Osteoarthritis typically involves the radiocapitellar joint articular cartilage preferentially, with relative preservation of the ulnohumeral articular surfaces [5].
- Radiocapitellar degeneration is more common with increasing age [12].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow starts on the lateral side and progresses into the ulnohumeral articulation [12].
- The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved in primary elbow osteoarthritis, with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum [12].
- Osteophytic change occurs predominantly in the ulnohumeral compartment of the elbow [87].
- Joint space narrowing more frequently affects the radiocapitellar articulation than the ulnohumeral compartment [87].
- The primary pathology of elbow osteoarthritis is loss of articular cartilage with resulting osteophyte formation on the olecranon process, coronoid process, and their respective fossae [69].
- Secondary resultant changes in elbow osteoarthritis involve osteophyte formation along the margin of the radial head and formation of loose bodies [69].
- Three-dimensional computational models identify unique regions of bony impingement in elbow osteoarthritis, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension [49].
Clinical Presentation & Evaluation¶
- Night pain is not typical of elbow osteoarthritis; if present, an inflammatory cause should be considered [5].
- Most patients with elbow osteoarthritis initially complain of pain at terminal limits of motion as a result of capsular stretch and osteophyte impingement [69].
- Later in the disease process of elbow osteoarthritis, pain through the mid arc of motion develops as the extent of cartilage loss progresses [69].
- Radiographs of elbow osteoarthritis typically show preserved joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint and mildly narrowed joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint [5].
- Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in elbow osteoarthritis [5].
- CT may be useful for surgical planning in elbow osteoarthritis, allowing detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
- In valgus extension overload syndrome, the olecranon is repeatedly and forcefully driven into the olecranon fossa during throwing, exerting shear forces on the medial aspect of the olecranon tip and the olecranon fossa [14].
- The pathoanatomy of valgus extension overload syndrome includes chondrosis, osteophyte development on the posteromedial olecranon and humerus, and loose bodies [14].
Classification¶
Radiographic Classification Systems¶
- The Broberg and Morrey classification system is based on osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing [12].
- The Hastings and Retting classification system focuses on radiocapitellar wear and subluxation [12].
- The Broberg and Morrey classification system grades elbow arthrosis as grade 0 (normal joint), grade 1 (slight joint-space narrowing with minimum osteophyte formation), grade 2 (moderate joint-space narrowing with moderate osteophyte formation), and grade 3 (severe degenerative change with gross destruction of the joint) [80].
- The Hastings and Retting classification system was developed based on commonly demonstrated radiographic features of degenerative changes, including joint space narrowing and marginal osteophytes [13].
- The Hastings and Retting classification system is a useful tool in predicting surgical outcome following debridement of primary elbow osteoarthritis [13].
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes were best in patients classified as class I preoperatively and worst in those classified as class III using the Hastings and Retting system [13].
- Both the Broberg and Morrey and Hastings and Retting classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [28].
- The four grades of the Broberg and Morrey classification system have only fair interobserver reliability that is influenced by subspecialty and experience [80].
- Binary rating systems for elbow arthrosis, such as "none or mild" versus "moderate or severe," resulted in moderate agreement among observers [80].
CT-Based Classification Systems¶
- Kwak et al. described a CT-based method of quantifying elbow arthritis [12].
- The CT-based classification demonstrated high correlation with the visual analog scale and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score [12].
- The CT-based classification demonstrated moderate correlation with range of motion [12].
- A CT-based staging system was highly reproducible and clinically feasible compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems for elbow osteoarthritis [34].
- A bony landmarks classification system effectively delineated osteophyte distribution in elbow patients using three-dimensional computed tomography [56].
Other Classification Systems¶
- The Larsen and Sharp classifications can reliably be used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels [74].
Clinical Presentation¶
Epidemiology and Demographics¶
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is most commonly seen in middle-age males who are heavy laborers [13].
- The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2%, with most cases being asymptomatic [8].
- The prevalence of elbow osteoarthritis in respondents aged 40 years or older was 55.0%, with a symptomatic prevalence of 22.6% [31].
- Older age, male sex, and a history of elbow trauma are significant risk factors for elbow osteoarthritis [31].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow accounts for 2%-3% of patients presenting with elbow arthritis [13].
Pathoanatomy¶
- Advanced disease rarely presents with joint space narrowing [5].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is unique due to relative preservation of articular cartilage and maintenance of joint space with hypertrophic osteophyte formation [25].
- The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum in primary osteoarthritis [12].
History and Symptoms¶
- Patients typically present with loss of terminal extension and flexion and painful catching, clicking, or locking of the elbow [5].
- Pain is typically noted at the end ranges of motion and not through the midrange [5].
- The degree of disability caused by osteoarthritis depends on the patient’s vocation and physical disability [5].
- Clinically, primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by stiffness, pain, mechanical symptoms, and weakness [12].
Physical Examination¶
- Inspection should check for prior surgical incisions and joint effusion at the lateral soft spot [5].
- Pain during range of motion assessment is usually felt at the end ranges of flexion and extension rather than throughout the arc [5].
- Forearm rotation is relatively preserved until later in the disease process [5].
- Understanding whether the patient has pain throughout the arc of motion or only at terminal limits is of paramount importance for evaluation [73].
Imaging¶
- Standard AP and lateral radiographs should be obtained for evaluation [5].
- Radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process (anterior and medial), coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa [5].
- Joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint are usually preserved on radiographs [5].
- Joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint are mildly narrowed on radiographs [5].
- Loose bodies may be evident on radiographs, which typically underestimate the number present [5].
- CT may be useful for surgical planning and allows a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
- CT scans with 3D reconstructions may be useful for evaluating the extent and location of disease and for surgical planning [73].
- MRI may be useful to evaluate the status of soft tissues including the medial and lateral collateral ligamentous complexes [73].
- Electromyography and nerve conduction studies may be useful to evaluate the degree of nerve compression and contribution to elbow pain or dysfunction [73].
Investigations¶
Radiography¶
- Plain radiographs remain the hallmark and best screening test for elbow evaluation [18].
- Standard views for elbow radiographs include AP and lateral views, with internal and external oblique views obtained if necessary [39].
- In primary elbow osteoarthritis, osteophytes are typically seen on the coronoid and olecranon tips [39].
- Loss of the concavity of the radial head, coronoid, and olecranon fossa is a radiographic finding in elbow osteoarthritis [39].
- Loose bodies may be seen in the anterior or posterior compartments on elbow radiographs [39].
- The ulnohumeral articular joint space is preferentially preserved in elbow osteoarthritis [39].
- Ulnohumeral joint space loss on radiographs suggests inflammatory or posttraumatic arthritis [39].
- CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis [94].
Computed Tomography¶
- CT is indicated for the assessment of severe osteoarthritis of the elbow to determine the location of loose bodies and osteophytes [39].
- CT is helpful when assessing for malunion architecture and the location and pattern of osteophytes and/or loose bodies [30].
- Three-dimensional CT is used to check for heterotopic ossification [30].
- CT is not necessary when elbow stiffness is entirely soft-tissue related [30].
- A CT-based staging system for elbow osteoarthritis was highly reproducible and clinically feasible compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems [34].
- Three-dimensional computational models identified the locations and volumes of bony impingement in patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow [49].
- Three-dimensional computational models highlighted unique regions of impingement, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension [49].
- Pre-operative simulation results can be used as an index to determine the osteophytes to be removed during arthroscopic surgery for elbow osteoarthritis [46].
Magnetic Resonance Imaging¶
- MRI is the imaging modality best suited for evaluating soft-tissue structures in the elbow, including ligaments, tendons, cartilage, and nerves [57].
- MRI can be used to evaluate ligaments and tendons in the elbow but is rarely indicated [30].
- Magnetic resonance arthrography is particularly beneficial in the evaluation of osteochondral lesions, loose bodies, and ulnar collateral ligament injury [57].
- MRI may be most helpful in evaluating associated injuries including partial or complete tears of the medial collateral ligament [14].
Classification Systems¶
- The Broberg and Morrey classification is based on osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing [12].
- The Hasting and Retting system focuses on radiocapitellar wear and subluxation [12].
- Both the Broberg and Morrey and Hasting and Retting classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [28].
- A CT-based classification for elbow arthritis demonstrated high correlation with visual analog scale and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score [12].
- A CT-based classification for elbow arthritis demonstrated moderate correlation with range of motion [12].
Prevalence and Demographics¶
- The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2% [8].
- Most cases of primary elbow osteoarthritis in the Japanese cohort were asymptomatic [8].
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow affects less than 2% of the population [12].
Pathology and Imaging Correlates¶
- Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by stiffness, pain, mechanical symptoms, and weakness [12].
- Radiographically, primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is highlighted predominantly by osteophyte formation and progresses with cartilage loss and joint space narrowing [12].
- The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved in primary osteoarthritis with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum [12].
- Posttraumatic arthritis can develop in response to the initial cartilage insult or secondary to residual articular incongruities from injuries such as distal humerus fractures, radial head fractures, proximal ulna fractures, or elbow fracture-dislocations [6].
- Postinjury malunions, nonunions, or residual instability can alter kinematics and load across the elbow, predisposing the elbow to degenerative changes [6].
- Posttraumatic arthritis of the elbow is frequently associated with bone loss, making surgical treatment difficult [6].
Treatment¶
Nonoperative Management¶
- Nonsurgical treatments can be effective for reducing symptoms but have limited effectiveness for improving range of motion limitations and pain related to impinging osteophytes [36].
- Nonsurgical management may provide relief in early stages of elbow arthritis [35].
Surgical Indications and Goals¶
- The goal of treatment for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow is to obtain a low level of pain with sufficient motion range to ensure good function, while preserving future surgical options and delaying elbow arthroplasty to the extent possible [3].
- Surgical treatment for elbow arthritis is based on disease etiology, severity of degeneration, and patient age [11].
- Treatment of elbow arthritis must be individualized based on etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands [22].
- When conservative management fails, the appropriate surgical treatment for elbow arthritis must factor in the patient’s age, activity level, expectations, degree of pathologic changes, patient health, and surgeon experience [71].
Joint-Sparing Procedures: Arthroscopic¶
- Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty (AOA) is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
- Arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis of the elbow results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates [10].
- Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate [9].
- Arthroscopic debridement for the elbow osteoarthritis provided satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome [67].
- Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis significantly improved 6-month clinical results for functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion [61].
- Osteocapsular debridement is an effective surgical treatment option for patients with symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management [38].
- Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate [63].
- Arthroscopic debridement in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow is recommended based on computer simulation studies [7].
- Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome [64].
- Contraindications for elbow arthroscopy include severe contracture and periarticular heterotopic ossification [5].
- Relative contraindications for elbow arthroscopy include prior ulnar nerve transposition and prior extensive open procedures [5].
- Elbow arthroscopy is technically demanding, and several neurovascular structures that are at risk during the procedure include the radial, ulnar, and median nerves [36].
- The radial nerve is at greatest risk during arthroscopic capsular release, followed by the ulnar and median nerves [68].
- Strategies to protect neurovascular structures during arthroscopic capsular release include insufflating the joint before establishing portals, using proximally positioned medial and lateral portals in the anterior compartment, keeping the elbow flexed when establishing anterior portals, using retractors during débridement and capsulotomy, releasing the anterior capsule proximally, and avoiding cautery and shavers in the posterior medial gutter [68].
Joint-Sparing Procedures: Open¶
- Capsulectomy and debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow through a medial trans-flexor approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective [2].
- The medial approach is effective for the treatment of advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, especially in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms as well as medial osteophytes [16].
- The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi (OK) procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow [21].
- Both open elbow debridement and the OK procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
- Open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow OA [32].
- In the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure, the olecranon fossa is trephinated and osteophytes are removed [5].
- Either a medial or lateral column approach can be used for open débridement, loose body removal, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy depending upon the location of the pathology and concomitant procedures to be performed [5].
- The open lateral column (Morrey) approach is indicated for extrinsic and/or intrinsic contracture that has failed nonsurgical treatment and must be combined with a medial release when severe loss of flexion is noted [68].
- The open medial “over the top” (Hotchkiss) approach is indicated for patients with extrinsic contractures, associated medial side heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, and/or preoperative flexion limited to 90° to 100° [68].
- A combined approach is indicated for cases of significant elbow stiffness in which a unilateral approach is inadequate for complete elbow release, cases in which previous hardware removal is necessary, and select cases with medial and lateral heterotopic ossification [68].
- Open debridement and radiocapitellar replacement (LRE) was performed in 24 patients with primary or post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow, with 19 total LRE and 5 hemi-LRE procedures [27].
Adjunctive Procedures¶
- Ulnar nerve transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) should be considered for patients who have less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion [5].
- Ulnar nerve decompression/transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the MCL should be considered for patients who have less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion [36].
- If the elbow has less than 90° to 100° of flexion, the posteromedial band of the MCL and the posterior capsule are released to restore flexion, and ulnar nerve decompression or transposition should be considered [68].
Advanced and Salvage Procedures¶
- Total elbow arthroplasty is best reserved for low demand, elderly patients who will be able to comply with the 5-lb weightlifting restriction imposed postoperatively to protect the implants from bearing wear, hardware loosening, or failure [71].
- Interposition arthroplasty is considered for intrinsic contractures in young patients (20 to 50 years) with articular cartilage destruction in whom the anatomic architecture of the distal humerus and proximal ulna are relatively preserved [68].
- Elbow arthrodesis is reserved for patients with painful arthritis who are not candidates for total elbow arthroplasty, especially individuals who place high demands on the upper extremities, such as manual laborers [70].
- Elbow arthrodesis is also indicated for persistent infection, including tuberculosis, and massive upper extremity trauma seen on the battlefield [70].
- For unilateral arthrodesis of the elbow, a position of 90 to 100 degrees of flexion is desirable to provide the most powerful grip strength [70].
- Bilateral elbow arthrodesis rarely is indicated because of resultant functional limitations [70].
- If bilateral elbow arthrodesis is indicated, one elbow should be placed in 110 to 120 degrees of flexion to permit the patient to reach the mouth, and the other should be placed in 45 to 65 degrees to aid in personal hygiene [70].
Complications¶
- Deep infections in the elbow are more common than in other joints treated arthroscopically, with a rate of 0.8% to 2.2% [5].
- Infection can manifest as superficial minor wound complications or deep infection [5].
- Infection is related to intraoperative corticosteroid injections [5].
- Transient nerve palsies complicate 1% to 3% of cases [5].
- Radial and ulnar nerve palsies are the most common transient nerve palsies following elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
- Total elbow arthroplasty is associated with substantial complication and reoperation rates [60].
Recovery¶
Nonoperative Management¶
- Rest, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and activity modification are the mainstays of nonsurgical treatment [5].
Surgical Outcomes and Survivorship¶
- Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
- Patients with either posttraumatic or primary degenerative osteoarthritis can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration after arthroscopic elbow debridement [15].
- Both open elbow debridement and the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
- Serial assessment of patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty showed that clinical outcomes improved from preoperative assessment to short- and medium-term follow-up, although range of motion decreased between short- and medium-term follow-up [37].
Treatment Goals¶
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Nonoperative treatment remains the first step in the early management of elbow osteoarthritis. [1] (10.2106/jbjs.e.00568)
- [L4] This approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. [2] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018)
- [L4] The goal of treatment is to obtain a low level of pain with sufficient motion range to ensure good function, while preserving future surgical options and delaying elbow arthroplasty to the extent possible. [3] (10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.004)
- [L4] Elbow AOA is a safe, efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis. [4] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.018)
- [L5] [6] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014)
- [L4] The study recommends this technique in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow. [7] (10.1302/0301-620x.96b2.30714)
- [L3] The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2%, with most cases being asymptomatic. [8] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.015)
- [L4] This minimally invasive technique provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate. [9] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.003)
- [L1] Elbow arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates. [10] (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.247)
- [L5] Surgical treatment for elbow arthritis is based on disease etiology, severity of degeneration, and patient age. [11] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.022)
- [L3] [12] (10.1177/17585732251327183)
- [L4] [13] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014)
- [L3] Patients with either pathology can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration. [15] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018)
- [L4] The medial approach is effective for the treatment of advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, especially in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms as well as medial osteophytes. [16] (10.2106/jbjs.d.02684)
- [L4] Both open elbow debridement and the OK procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases. [17] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.138)
- [L4] The OK procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow. [21] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.052)
- [L5] The appropriate treatment for elbow arthritis depends on the etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands. [22] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.019)
- [L4] Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis. [23] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036)
- [L4] Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is unique due to relative preservation of articular cartilage and maintenance of joint space with hypertrophic osteophyte formation. [25] (10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005)
- [L4] [27] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.071)
- [L3] Both the BM and HR classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. [28] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.015)
- [L3] The prevalence of elbow OA was 55.0% in respondents aged 40 years or older, with a symptomatic prevalence of 22.6%; older age, male sex, and a history of elbow trauma were identified as significant risk factors. [31] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.049)
- [L5] However, from the data we obtained the open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow OA. [32] (10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x)
- [L4] CT-based staging system was highly reproducible and clinically feasible, compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems, for elbow osteoarthritis. [34] (10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.004)
- [L5] Treatment of elbow arthritis must be individualized based on etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands; nonsurgical management may provide relief in early stages, while surgical options range from arthroscopic debridement for pain at motion extremes to total elbow arthroplasty for pain throughout the arc of motion. [35] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.037)
- [L4] Serial assessment of patients with primary elbow OA who underwent arthroscopic OCA showed that the clinical outcomes improved from preoperative assessment to short- and medium-term follow-up, although ROM decreased between short- and medium-term follow-up. [37] (10.1177/23259671231162398)
- [L2] Osteocapsular debridement is an effective surgical treatment option for patients with symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management. [38] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.060)
- [L4] Surgical options must be tailored to cartilage integrity and bone structure, with total elbow arthroplasty generally avoided in young, active patients due to poor durability. [44] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100736)
- [L4] These results can be used as an index to determine the osteophytes to be removed during arthroscopic surgery for elbow osteoarthritis. [46] (10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101667)
- [L4] Three-dimensional computational models identified the locations and volumes of bony impingement in patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow and highlighted unique regions of impingement, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension. [49] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.035)
- [L3] The bony landmarks classification system effectively delineated osteophyte distribution in elbow patients. [56] (10.1186/s13018-025-06145-9)
- [L4] Total elbow arthroplasty remains associated with substantial complication and reoperation rates. [60] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100981)
- [L3] Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis significantly improved 6-month clinical results for functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion. [61] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.002)
- [L1] Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate. [63] (10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095)
- [L4] Arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. [64] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009)
- [L4] Arthroscopic debridement for the elbow osteoarthritis provided satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. [67] (10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60056-7)
- [L4] Both systems can reliably be used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels. [74] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.074)
- [L3] [80] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.043)
- [L3] Osteophytic change occurs predominantly in the ulnohumeral compartment of the elbow, whereas joint space narrowing more frequently affects the radiocapitellar articulation. [87] (10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.005)
- [L1] CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis. [94] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001)
- [L5] [95] (10.1007/s00167-015-3518-7)
References¶
[1] Management of Elbow Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.e.00568
[2] Capsulectomy and Debridement for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow Through a Medial Trans-Flexor Approach. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018
[3] Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.004
[4] Outcomes of Elbow Arthroscopic Osteocapsular Arthroplasty. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.018
[5] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > I. Osteoarthritis.
[6] Elbow Arthritis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014
[7] Arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow, based on computer simulation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2014. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.96b2.30714
[8] Prevalence and associated factors of primary elbow osteoarthritis in the Japanese general elderly population: a Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.015
[9] Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.003
[10] Arthroscopic Debridement for Primary Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Elbow Leads to Significant Improvement in Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.247
[11] Surgical Options for the Arthritic Elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.022
[12] Sex-related differences in wear patterns in primary elbow osteoarthritis. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251327183
[13] Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: Lack of radiographic evidence for morphologic predisposition, results of operative debridement at intermediate follow-up, and basis for a new radiographic classification system. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014
[14] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Injuries in the Athlete* > III. Valgus Extension Overload Syndrome and Posterior Impingement.
[15] Midterm outcomes and survivorship of arthroscopic elbow debridement: a comparison of posttraumatic versus primary degenerative osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018
[16] Débridement Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02684
[17] Long-term survivorship of open débridement and débridement arthroplasty for elbow arthritis: a retrospective chart review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.138
[18] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Summary and Conclusions.
[19] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. SECTION 16 PATELLAR TRACKING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY > ELBOW.
[20] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. ELBOW.
[21] The outerbridge-kashiwagi procedure for primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow vs. post traumatic arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.052
[22] Elbow Arthritis: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.019
[23] Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for advanced-stage primary osteoarthritis of the elbow using a computed tomography–based classification. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036
[25] Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow: Current Treatment Options. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005
[27] Open debridement and radiocapitellar replacement in primary and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow: a multicenter study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.071
[28] Reliability testing of two classification systems for osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.015
[30] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > IV. Evaluation.
[31] The prevalence of elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly populations: the relationship between risk factors and function. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.049
[32] Treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow with open or arthroscopic debridement: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x
[34] Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the computed tomography-based radiographic classification of primary elbow osteoarthritis: comparison with plain radiograph-based classification and clinical assessment. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.004
[35] Elbow Arthritis: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.037
[36] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > Osteoarthritis.
[37] Serial Changes in Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Osteocapsular Arthroplasty for Primary Elbow Osteoarthritis: A Medium-term Follow-up Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231162398
[38] The Clinical Impact of Different Approaches to Osteocapsular Debridement for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow: A Systematic Review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.060
[39] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Imaging of the Shoulder and Elbow > II. Elbow.
[44] Management of Severe Elbow Arthritis in a Young Patient. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100736
[46] Predicting impinging osteophytes based on pre-operative simulation results to guide arthroscopic débridement for elbow osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101667
[49] Identifying the Location and Volume of Bony Impingement in Elbow Osteoarthritis by 3-Dimensional Computational Modeling. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.035
[51] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Anatomy > Bony Anatomy.
[56] Bony landmarks guided mapping of the osteophytes of the elbow osteoarthritis patients: a three dimensional computed tomograph based study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06145-9
[57] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Sports Medicine 6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Elbow > Introduction.
[60] Total Elbow Arthroplasty Complication, Reoperation, and Revision Rates: A Comparison Between Arthroplasty for Arthritis Versus Fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100981
[61] Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results and analysis of predictive factors. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.002
[63] Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095
[64] Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: analysis of preoperative factors affecting outcome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009
[67] Factors Affecting the Results of Arthroscopic Debridement for the Elbow Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60056-7
[68] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > VI. Treatment.
[69] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Etiologies.
[70] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER ARTHRODESIS FOR BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY > ELBOW ARTHRODESIS.
[71] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Summary.
[73] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Evaluation.
[74] Reliability testing of the Larsen and Sharp classifications for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.074
[79] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Anatomy of the Shoulder, Arm, and Elbow > II. Arm and Elbow.
[80] Radiographic Arthrosis After Elbow Trauma: Interobserver Reliability. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.043
[87] Radiographic changes at the elbow in primary osteoarthritis: A comparison with normal aging of the elbow joint. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.005
[94] Effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography in evaluating primary elbow osteoarthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001
[95] Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the elbow. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3518-7