Clinicians › Elbow
Stiff elbow arthrolysis

For patients: a plain-language version of this topic is available. See the patient guide.
Overview¶
Elbow stiffness remains a challenging clinical problem with no ideal management solution [1]. Current treatment options for post-traumatic elbow stiffness range from conservative to surgical, exhibiting varying rates of success, invasiveness, and complications [8]. Functional improvements can be achieved through both nonsurgical and surgical strategies [1]. Recent advancements in biology and pathology may lead to future breakthroughs in the prevention and treatment of this condition [1].
Successful intervention depends on the quality of the joint and the extent of soft tissue damage [2]. The functional arc of motion serves as a frame of reference rather than an absolute goal for stiff elbow intervention [2]. In the setting of failed nonsurgical treatment, surgical release can yield sustained improvement of range of motion and patient quality of life [5]. A multinational initiative provides the first comprehensive clinical practice guideline for open arthrolysis in adult posttraumatic elbow stiffness [7].
Endoscopic capsulectomy is an effective procedure for adhesiolysis in severe elbow stiffness [11]. Arthroscopic capsular release of the elbow is effective for restoring a functional arc of motion in the short term in most patients with extrinsic contractures [13]. Patients with stiff elbows who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes very early postoperatively [3]. Additional peripheral nerve block combined with a postoperative nerve block catheter in arthroscopic arthrolysis may enhance postoperative outcomes by achieving better functional range of motion, perhaps through reduced postoperative pain [23]. The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness may result in short-term improvements in flexion-extension range of motion [12], though it is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs [12]. A subset of pediatric patients with persistent stiffness following medial epicondyle fractures may benefit from additional interventions, including intensive therapy, transposition of the ulnar nerve, and open capsular release [14].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Elbow stiffness involves both articular and periarticular tissues [10]. Successful intervention depends on the extent of soft tissue damage [2]. Treatment requires a thorough understanding of normal anatomy and etiological factors [4]. Because elbow contracture is challenging to treat, prevention of stiffness is paramount [15]. Pre-operative evaluations must determine whether articular surfaces and osteoarticular congruence are preserved [10].
Etiological Factors: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a cause of elbow stiffness that can result from direct elbow trauma, brain injury, or thermal injury [29]. Surgical treatment of elbow HO leads to improved functional outcomes regardless of the etiology of bone formation [29].
Iatrogenic Risk Factors: Following operative fixation of distal humerus fractures, the following factors are associated with increased odds of dysfunctional elbow stiffness: * Orthogonal plate configuration [18] * Olecranon osteotomy [18] * Longer operative time [18]
Pediatric Considerations: In obstetric brachial plexus injury, the progression of elbow flexion contracture appears to level off after the age of 10 to 12 years [20]. Elbow flexion and forearm rotation contractures likely end at skeletal maturity [20].
Classification¶
Treatment of the stiff elbow requires a thorough understanding of normal anatomy and etiological factors to develop effective strategies [4]. In the setting of failed nonsurgical treatment, surgical release can yield sustained improvement of ROM and patient quality of life [5]. However, restoration of joint motion in the posttraumatic stiff elbow can be a difficult, time-consuming, and costly challenge [9].
Pre-operative evaluations in elbow stiffness should identify involved articular and periarticular tissues [10]. These evaluations must also determine whether articular surfaces and osteoarticular congruence are preserved [10]. Operative management of pediatric elbow contractures is effective [24].
Clinical Presentation¶
Elbow contracture presents a significant therapeutic challenge, establishing prevention as the paramount clinical priority [15].
Preoperative Assessment: The clinical evaluation must account for the fact that arthroscopic elbow contracture release outcomes vary significantly based on preoperative patient characteristics [21].
Investigations¶
Plain radiography: Standard imaging is essential for evaluating elbow stiffness. Orthogonal plate configuration, olecranon osteotomy, and longer operative time were associated with increased odds of dysfunctional elbow stiffness following operative fixation of distal humerus fractures [18].
MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging can assess soft tissue pathology, including ulnar nerve status. There is sound evidence that ulnar neuropathy has a negative effect on symptoms and disability in elbow stiffness [17].
CT: Computed tomography provides detailed bony architecture but specific diagnostic signs for stiffness are not detailed in the current evidence base.
Bone scan: No specific evidence supports the routine use of bone scans for investigating elbow stiffness.
Tomosynthesis: No specific evidence supports the use of tomosynthesis for investigating elbow stiffness.
Aspiration: No specific evidence supports joint aspiration as a diagnostic tool for elbow stiffness.
Laboratory: No specific laboratory markers are indicated for the investigation of elbow stiffness in the provided evidence.
Other Considerations: Functional improvements can be achieved with both nonsurgical and surgical strategies for elbow stiffness [1]. It is unclear which patients who have surgery for elbow stiffness will develop new ulnar nerve dysfunction [17].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative Management¶
Prevention of elbow contracture is paramount because established contracture is challenging to treat [15]. Static progressive and dynamic splinting are mainstays of nonsurgical treatment for posttraumatic elbow stiffness [19]. There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between static progressive and dynamic splinting methods [19]. Static-progressive bracing is associated with improved range of motion in patients with post-traumatic and post-operative elbow stiffness at three months [22]. This intervention appeared safe and should be considered in all patients with post-traumatic or post-operative elbow stiffness [22]. However, increasing age may reduce the efficacy of static-progressive bracing in patients with extension deficits [22].
Operative Management¶
Indications: Surgical release can yield sustained improvement of range of motion and patient quality of life in the setting of failed nonsurgical treatment of the stiff elbow [5].
Pre-operative Evaluation: The functional arc of motion serves as a frame of reference rather than an absolute goal for successful intervention [2]. Pre-operative evaluations should determine whether articular surfaces and osteoarticular congruence are preserved [10].
Adjuncts: The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs [12].
Complications¶
Surgical release for stiff elbow can yield sustained improvement of range of motion and patient quality of life in the setting of failed nonsurgical treatment [5]. However, current treatment options for post-traumatic elbow stiffness have varying rates of success, invasiveness, and complications [8].
Nerve palsy: Ulnar neuropathy has a negative effect on symptoms and disability [17].
Recovery¶
Surgical release yields sustained improvement in range of motion and patient quality of life for patients with failed nonsurgical treatment [5]. Patients undergoing operative management of elbow stiffness secondary to heterotopic ossification maintain substantial reductions in pain, improved elbow range of motion, and increased overall elbow function [16].
Hinged External Fixator Considerations: The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs [12].
Rehabilitation Protocol: Treatment of bony encasement of the ulnar nerve secondary to heterotopic ossification leads to superior range of motion, improved or resolved ulnar neuropathy, and good to excellent long-term functional outcomes [25]. There is no statistically significant difference in outcomes between static progressive and dynamic splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness [19].
Key Evidence¶
- [L4] Elbow stiffness is a challenging problem with no ideal management solution; however, functional improvements can be achieved with both nonsurgical and surgical strategies, and recent advancements in biology and pathology may lead to future breakthroughs in prevention and treatment. [1] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.007)
- [L5] Successful intervention for stiff elbow depends on the quality of the joint and the extent of soft tissue damage, with the functional arc of motion serving as a frame of reference rather than an absolute goal. [2] (10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.002)
- [L1] Patients with stiff elbows who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes very early postoperatively. [3] (10.1016/j.jse.2024.06.009)
- [L5] Treatment of the stiff elbow requires a thorough understanding of normal anatomy and etiological factors to develop effective strategies. [4] (10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.006)
- [L5] In the setting of failed nonsurgical treatment of the stiff elbow, surgical release can yield sustained improvement of ROM and patient quality of life. [5] (10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00051)
- [L5] This multinational initiative provides the first comprehensive clinical practice guideline for open arthrolysis in adult posttraumatic elbow stiffness. [7] (10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.015)
- [L5] Current treatment options for post-traumatic elbow stiffness range from conservative to surgical, with varying rates of success, invasiveness, and complications. [8] (10.1177/1758573218793903)
- [L4] Restoration of joint motion in the posttraumatic stiff elbow can be a difficult, time-consuming, and costly challenge. [9] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.09.015)
- [L5] Pre-operative evaluations in elbow stiffness should identify involved articular and periarticular tissues and determine whether articular surfaces and osteoarticular congruence are preserved. [10] (10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.009)
- [L5] Endoscopic capsulectomy is an effective procedure for adhesiolysis in severe elbow stiffness. [11] (10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.003)
- [L3] The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness may result in short-term improvements in flexion-extension range of motion but is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs. [12] (10.1186/s12891-024-08167-6)
- [L5] Arthroscopic capsular release of the elbow is effective for restoring a functional arc of motion in the short term in most patients with extrinsic contractures. [13] (10.5435/00124635-201105000-00004)
- [L4] A subset of pediatric patients with persistent stiffness following medial epicondyle fractures may benefit from additional interventions, including intensive therapy, transposition of the ulnar nerve, and open capsular release. [14] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.07.002)
- [L5] Elbow contracture is challenging to treat, and therefore prevention is of paramount importance. [15] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.020)
- [L4] Overall, patients maintained substantial reductions in pain, improvement in elbow range of motion, and increased overall elbow function. [16] (10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.019)
- [L5] There is sound evidence that ulnar neuropathy has a negative effect on symptoms and disability, but it is unclear which patients who have surgery for elbow stiffness will develop new ulnar nerve dysfunction. [17] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.009)
- [L3] Orthogonal plate configuration, olecranon osteotomy, and longer operative time were associated with increased odds of dysfunctional elbow stiffness. [18] (10.1016/j.jse.2024.06.010)
- [L4] Static progressive and dynamic splinting are mainstays of nonsurgical treatment for posttraumatic elbow stiffness, with no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two methods. [19] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.009)
- [L4] Progression of elbow flexion contracture appears to level off after the age of 10 to 12 years, likely ending at skeletal maturity. [20] (10.1177/17531934231178121)
- [L4] Arthroscopic elbow contracture release can improve function and range of motion; however, outcomes may vary based on preoperative patient characteristics. [21] (10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101621)
- [L4] While increasing age may reduce efficacy in patients with extension deficits, static-progressive bracing appeared safe and was associated with early improvement in ROM in patients with post-traumatic or post-operative elbow stiffness and should be considered in all patients. [22] (10.1177/17585732251389182)
- [L3] Additional peripheral nerve block combined with a postoperative nerve block catheter in arthroscopic arthrolysis in cases of elbow stiffness may be an opportunity to enhance postoperative outcomes by achieving better functional ROM, perhaps through reduced postoperative pain. [23] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.009)
- [L1] Operative management of pediatric elbow contractures is effective. [24] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.010)
- [L4] This treatment approach leads to superior range of motion, improved or resolved ulnar neuropathy, and good to excellent long-term functional outcomes. [25] (10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.003)
- [L4] Surgical treatment of elbow HO leads to improved functional outcome, whether the etiology of bone formation was direct elbow trauma, brain injury, or thermal injury. [29] (10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.020)
References¶
[1] Prevention and Treatment of Elbow Stiffness: A 5-Year Update. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.007
[2] Elbow stiffness: Interview with professor Bernard Morrey. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.002
[3] Does tranexamic acid reduce elbow swelling and improve early function following arthroscopic arthrolysis? A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.06.009
[4] The examination and treatment of soft tissue contracture of the elbow. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.006
[5] Open Surgical Release for Contractures of the Elbow. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00051
[7] Clinical guideline on the open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adult patients. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.015
[8] Post-traumatic elbow stiffness: Pathogenesis and current treatments. Shoulder & Elbow. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1758573218793903
[9] The Posttraumatic Stiff Elbow: A Review of the Literature. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.09.015
[10] Elbow stiffness: Arthritis and heterotopic ossification. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.009
[11] Endoscopic anterior capsulectomy for severe elbow contractures. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.003
[12] Comparative study of open elbow arthrolysis with and without hinge external fixation for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08167-6
[13] Arthroscopic Management of the Stiff Elbow. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2011. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201105000-00004
[14] Outcomes of Therapy and Ulnar Nerve Transposition for Elbow Stiffness After Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.07.002
[15] Prevention and Treatment of Elbow Stiffness. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.020
[16] Assessing long-term outcomes after operative management of elbow stiffness secondary to heterotopic ossification. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.019
[17] The Role of Prophylactic Ulnar Nerve Release During Elbow Contracture Release. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.009
[18] Risk factors for dysfunctional elbow stiffness following operative fixation of distal humerus fractures. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.06.010
[19] Nonsurgical Treatment of Elbow Stiffness. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.06.009
[20] Hems T. Natural history of elbow flexion and forearm rotation contractures in obstetric brachial plexus injury. J Hand Surg Eur. 2022, 47: 1121–7. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2023. DOI: 10.1177/17531934231178121
[21] Preoperative risk factors associated with patient outcomes following arthroscopic elbow contracture release. JSES International. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101621
[22] Static-progressive bracing is associated with improved range of motion in patients with post-traumatic and post-operative elbow stiffness at three months. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251389182
[23] A comparative analysis of short-term results in range of motion following arthroscopic arthrolysis with vs. without peripheral nerve block in cases of elbow stiffness. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.009
[24] Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Post-Traumatic Elbow Contractures in the Pediatric Age Group: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.010
[25] Bony encasement of the ulnar nerve secondary to heterotopic ossification of the elbow: an evaluation of long-term outcomes. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.003
[29] Clinical results of the excision of heterotopic bone around the elbow: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.11.020