Skip to content

What's New — Foot — August 2026

19 new articles published this month.

Themes: Hallux valgus and MTP1 surgery · Calcaneal fracture management · Midfoot trauma and classification · Athletic performance and injury screening · Reconstruction and salvage procedures · Clubfoot and humanities

Digest generated 2026-09-14 08:31:52+00:00.


Highlights

Hallux valgus and MTP1 surgery

This month's hallux valgus literature spans deformity quantification, joint-preserving versus joint-sacrificing correction, and adjacent midfoot implications. A new articular dislocation angle quantifies first MTP subluxation and delineates the contributions of HVA, DMAA, and DASA to the deformity [2]. In severe hallux valgus, retrospective comparison of Scarf osteotomy against first MTP arthrodesis addresses satisfaction, footwear needs, residual pain, and complications [19]. Concomitant second tarsometatarsal arthrodesis during hallux valgus correction produced distinct radiographic midfoot and transverse arch changes versus isolated correction [5], while long-term data on first MTP total arthroplasty for hallux rigidus report implant retention and revision outcomes beyond ten years [1].

Calcaneal fracture management

Three studies address operative treatment and its complications in the calcaneus. Comparing robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation, sinus tarsi approach, and extended lateral approach for displaced intra-articular fractures, all achieved similar radiographic and functional results, but the minimally invasive option reduced blood loss and accelerated early recovery while the extended lateral approach carried the highest wound complication rate [18]. For fracture-related infection with soft-tissue defects, bone cement with local flap transfer suited smaller defects and free myocutaneous flaps larger ones, with outcomes stratified by FRI classification [16]. Additionally, subtalar arthrodesis showed no union-rate differences between graft choices, informing salvage fusion decisions [15].

Midfoot trauma and classification

Lisfranc injuries take center stage with a newly proposed Suthersan classification developed from a large single-surgeon series, designed to capture force propagation through the midfoot and improve on the limited outcome correlation of Myerson-Hardcastle and Nunley-Vertullo systems [17]. Complementing this, anchor-based thresholds for minimal clinically important difference were found to better define meaningful six-month recovery after Jones fracture open reduction and internal fixation than distribution-based methods, offering more clinically applicable recovery benchmarks for midfoot-adjacent forefoot trauma care [9].

Athletic performance and injury screening

Sports-focused foot and ankle research this month emphasizes screening and return-to-play. A systematic review of hallux sesamoidectomy in active patients found high return-to-sport rates around 92% with defined time frames and complications [8]. Countermovement jump force-plate metrics were linked to traditional performance measures in youth female soccer athletes, clarifying field applicability [11]. A multimodal 3D running assessment combining markerless motion capture, ground reaction forces, and surface EMG identified biomechanical asymmetries tied to running-related injury risk [14]. In professional baseball, lower-extremity injury in MLB pitchers was associated with increased subsequent upper-extremity injury risk, underscoring kinetic-chain vulnerability [12].

Reconstruction and salvage procedures

Complex reconstructive scenarios are covered across several reports. Hexapod-assisted tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis after talectomy using the TL-HEX system achieved limb salvage in high-risk patients with talar destruction from infection, avascular necrosis, trauma, or neuroarthropathy [4]. For Freiberg's disease, meta-analysis compared autologous osteochondral transplantation with dorsiflexion closing wedge metatarsal osteotomy on functional, radiographic, and complication outcomes [13]. Accelerated rehabilitation after suture-tape-augmented modified-Brostrom reconstruction permitted immediate weight bearing without increased failure rates [10]. A case report also described extension-type hallux checkrein deformity after fibular osteotomy during high tibial osteotomy, highlighting EHL tethering as a rare complication [7].

Clubfoot and humanities

Two remaining articles round out the digest. A prospective observational study correlated serial foot anthropometric measurements with the Modified Pirani score during Ponseti correction of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus, adding objective morphological monitoring to clinical scoring [3]. Separately, an arts and humanities piece, 'Dorsiflex,' reflects on anatomy, movement, and the human body through pastel artwork created during a neurology clerkship [6].

Articles by Theme

Hallux valgus and MTP1 surgery (4)

1. Gulhan DA, Ergin M, Erkoçak ÖF, et al. Long-term clinical, functional and radiological outcomes after total arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in the treatment of hallux rigidus. International Orthopaedics 2026. doi:10.1007/s00264-026-07008-6

This retrospective single-center study evaluated 41 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint total arthroplasty for hallux rigidus with a minimum ten-year follow-up, comparing clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes between one and ten years postoperatively. Among the 35 patients with retained implants, VAS and AOFAS Hallux-MTP-IP scores and dorsiflexion range of motion remained improved at long-term follow-up, though implant retention and revision requirements were assessed across the full cohort. The findings provide long-term data to inform surgical decision-making and patient counseling regarding implant survival and the durability of pain relief and function after first MTP joint arthroplasty.

2. Guo M, Liu F, Gan Y, et al. The Articular Dislocation Angle of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2026. doi:10.2106/jbjs.25.00955

This radiographic study introduced the articular dislocation angle (ADA), defined as the angle between lines perpendicular to the proximal articular surface of the proximal phalanx and the distal articular surface of the first metatarsal, to quantify subluxation or dislocation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in hallux valgus. Measurement of HVA, DMAA, DASA, and ADA on weight-bearing radiographs of 70 feet revealed quantitative relationships among these parameters, delineating the relative contributions of each deformity component to hallux valgus pathology. The ADA offers surgeons a reproducible preoperative measurement to characterize joint dislocation and plan corrective osteotomies tailored to the specific deformity components present.

5. Kim J, Kyung MG, An Y, et al. Radiographic changes in midfoot alignment after hallux valgus correction with and without concomitant second tarsometatarsal arthrodesis: a comparative study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2026. doi:10.1007/s00402-026-06471-5

This retrospective matched comparative study of 73 feet with hallux valgus and medial column malalignment compared radiographic arch changes after hallux valgus correction with (n=37) versus without (n=36) concomitant second tarsometatarsal arthrodesis at a minimum one-year follow-up. The TMT arthrodesis group demonstrated greater correction of transverse arch parameters (M2-M5 angle, C1-M2 distance) than isolated hallux valgus correction, with medial column alignment (lateral Meary's angle) also assessed. These findings suggest that adding second TMT arthrodesis in selected patients with symptomatic arthritis and medial column malalignment provides additional midfoot alignment correction beyond that achieved with hallux valgus correction alone.

19. Mahieu A, Mouton A, Graff W. Scarf osteotomy versus first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis for severe hallux valgus: a retrospective comparative study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104810

In a single-surgeon retrospective series of 61 feet with severe hallux valgus (lateral sesamoid displacement >75% of the intermetatarsal space), first MTP arthrodesis (25 feet) was compared with Scarf osteotomy (36 feet) at minimum one-year follow-up. The study tested whether arthrodesis yields more very satisfied patients, less footwear adaptation, less residual pain, and different complication rates than the joint-preserving Scarf osteotomy. Results inform procedure selection for severe deformity, though the retrospective single-centre design limits generalizability.

Calcaneal fracture management (3)

15. Munoz M, Khvesyuk M, Leroux V, et al. No differences in union rates between grafts for subtalar arthrodesis. EFORT Open Reviews 2026. doi:10.1530/eor-2024-0202

This EFORT Open Reviews article compared union rates across different graft options for subtalar arthrodesis. The analysis found no significant differences in fusion success between graft types. Surgeons can therefore select graft material based on other considerations such as cost, availability, or donor-site morbidity rather than expected union rate.

16. Zhou F, Liu H, Zhang Y, et al. Surgical treatment of fracture-related infections of the calcaneus with relevant soft-tissue defects. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113398

This retrospective study of 43 patients compared bone cement with local flap transfer (for defects ≤3 cm) versus free myocutaneous flap reconstruction (for defects >3 cm) in treating calcaneal fracture-related infection with soft-tissue defects after ORIF. Both techniques produced significant improvements in AOFAS hindfoot and VAS pain scores with comparable complication rates, though free flaps required longer operative time and greater blood loss. Defect size can guide selection between these two reconstruction strategies for this challenging condition.

18. Zhao B, Ma C, Liu Q, et al. Comparison of three surgical methods in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: A retrospective study. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113468

This retrospective cohort of 190 patients (202 feet) with Sanders II/III displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures compared robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation, sinus tarsi approach open reduction, and extended lateral approach plating. Radiographic and final AOFAS/VAS outcomes were similar across groups, but robot-assisted fixation reduced blood loss and weight-bearing time with faster early function, while the extended lateral approach carried the highest wound complication rate (12.2% vs 0% and 1.8%). Robot-assisted percutaneous fixation may be preferable when available, though longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm equivalence in final function.

Midfoot trauma and classification (2)

9. Olawin A, Saggar R, Mozzocio J, et al. Paper 59. Anchor-Based Thresholds May Better Define Meaningful 6-Month Recovery Than Distribution Methods Following Jones Fracture Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/2325967126s00316

This retrospective study compared anchor-based versus distribution-based methods for calculating minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for FAAM-ADL, FAAM-Sport, and VAS pain scores after ORIF of Jones fractures. Anchor-based thresholds derived from sensitivity/specificity analyses better identified patients achieving meaningful 6-month functional recovery than the one-half standard deviation distribution method. Clinically, MCID thresholds for this procedure should be anchor-derived rather than distribution-derived to accurately benchmark recovery.

17. Cawley WC, Hwang P, Mittal R, et al. Rethinking the Lisfranc injury: Rationale for and development of a new classification system for Lisfranc injuries. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113422

The authors developed the Suthersan classification for Lisfranc injuries from a large single-surgeon case series at an Australian tertiary trauma centre, excluding direct crush injuries, with inter- and intra-observer reliability as primary outcomes. The system was designed to address limitations of the Myerson-Hardcastle and Nunley & Vertullo classifications by accounting for force propagation through the midfoot to identify structures requiring stabilisation. If reliability proves adequate, it could standardize management and improve prognostication for these frequently missed injuries.

Athletic performance and injury screening (4)

8. Bouzid N, Johri M, Simpson C, et al. Return to Athletic Activity Following Sesamoidectomy: A Systematic Review of Time Frames and Clinical Outcomes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/23259671261477555

This systematic review of six studies comprising 193 athletically active patients (72.2% female) evaluated return to sport and complications after partial or complete hallux sesamoidectomy for refractory sesamoid pathology. The weighted mean return-to-sport rate was 91.9% at a mean of 12.2 weeks, with 83.6% returning to preoperative performance levels and complication rates ranging from 0% to 29.2%. These findings provide evidence-based expectations for counseling athletic patients that sesamoidectomy reliably permits return to sport within approximately three months, albeit with a notable risk of complications.

11. Lambert BS, Momin S, Rivera A, et al. Poster 164. Translating Force Plate Data: Linking Countermovement Jump Metrics to Traditional Performance Measures in Youth Female Soccer Athletes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/2325967126s00462

This study linked countermovement jump (CMJ) force plate metrics, such as peak force, rate of force development, and asymmetry indices, to traditional field-based performance tests in youth female soccer athletes, a population at elevated lower extremity injury risk. The analysis clarified how portable force plate outputs correspond to conventional measures familiar to coaches and clinicians. This translation enhances the practical utility of CMJ testing for interpreting neuromuscular status and guiding training and rehabilitation in youth sports.

12. Menta S, Locascio L, Sciascia A, et al. Poster 173. Leg Up or Letdown? Exploring the Link Between Lower-Body Injury and Upper Extremity Injury in MLB Pitchers. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/2325967126s00471

This retrospective cohort study of MLB pitchers (2017-2024) used public injury and Statcast data with multivariable logistic regression to test whether prior lower extremity injury predicts subsequent upper extremity injury, adjusting for age, workload, fastball velocity, and a novel pitch-mix entropy metric. It provides large-scale epidemiologic evidence on the kinetic chain hypothesis linking lower-body injury to upper-body injury in professional pitchers. Results inform injury-prevention efforts by clarifying whether protecting or rehabilitating the lower extremity may reduce upper extremity injury risk in pitchers.

14. Haddas R, Salazar BP, Shu Y, et al. Poster 184. Running Smarter: Clinically Relevant 3D Biomechanical Insights to Identify and Prevent Injury Risk in Athletes. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/2325967126s00482

This retrospective study of 20 runners developed and demonstrated a clinically feasible multimodal running assessment combining 3D markerless motion capture, ground reaction force analysis, and surface electromyography. The protocol identified biomechanical and neuromuscular asymmetries and joint-specific loading patterns linked to running-related injuries that 2D gait evaluation cannot capture. Clinically, it enables targeted, personalized injury-prevention and treatment strategies for youth and adult runners.

Reconstruction and salvage procedures (4)

4. Guerrero Serrano JA, Sánchez Morata E, García López JM, et al. Hexapod-assisted limb salvage after talectomy: outcomes of tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the TL-hex system. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2026. doi:10.1007/s00402-026-06379-0

This retrospective observational study evaluated talectomy followed by tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the TL-HEX hexapod external fixator in high-risk patients with severe talar destruction from infection, avascular necrosis, trauma, Charcot neuroarthropathy, or failed ankle arthroplasty between 2020 and 2024. Radiographic fusion and hindfoot alignment were assessed as primary outcomes, with functional scores, pain relief, complications, and satisfaction as secondary measures. The results support hexapod-assisted tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis as a viable limb-salvage strategy, offering computer-assisted multiplanar correction for complex hindfoot reconstruction when arthroplasty or joint preservation is not feasible.

7. Takada S, Okada Y, Suzuki H, et al. A Rare But Important Complication After Fibular Osteotomy During Lateral Closing-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Extension-Type Checkrein Deformity of the Hallux: A case report. Journal of ISAKOS 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jisako.2026.101197

This case report describes a man in his 40s who developed an extension-type checkrein deformity of the hallux six months after lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy with fibular osteotomy, caused by presumed tethering of the extensor hallucis longus at the osteotomy site with hypertrophic callus formation. Because proximal EHL excursion was markedly restricted despite preserved distal gliding, an EHL-to-extensor digitorum longus tendon transfer was performed rather than local release, resulting in full hallux motion recovery without recurrence. Surgeons performing LCW-HTO with fibular osteotomy should recognize this rare tendon-related complication, and the report highlights that tendon transfer may be required when tethering prevents adequate proximal tendon excursion.

10. Curatolo C, Martin K, Anand S. Paper 61. Immediate Weight Bearing after Modified-Brostrom Reconstruction: A Retrospective Review of an Accelerated Rehab Protocol. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/2325967126s00318

This retrospective review of 119 patients evaluated a suture-tape-augmented modified-Bröström reconstruction combined with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol allowing immediate weight bearing as tolerated. Early functional testing (heel-rise and hop tests at six weeks) showed good recovery without increased failure or complication rates, supporting the authors' hypothesis. The findings suggest immediate weight bearing after augmented lateral ankle ligament reconstruction is safe and permits early return to activity.

13. Tham A, Rubin J, Lowton E, et al. Poster 106. Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation Versus Dorsiflexion Closing Wedge Metatarsal Osteotomy for Freiberg’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/2325967126s00410

This systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-guided search through August 2025) compared autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) with dorsiflexion closing wedge metatarsal osteotomy (DCWMO) for advanced Freiberg's disease, pooling AOFAS scores, VAS pain, range of motion, and complications. It is the first meta-analysis to directly compare these joint-preserving procedures. The results guide surgical decision-making by clarifying which approach offers superior functional, radiographic, and safety outcomes.

Clubfoot and humanities (2)

3. Suresh M, Pinto DJV, Rajasekharan P. Relationship of foot anthropometry with Modified Pirani score during Ponseti correction of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus: a prospective observational study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2026. doi:10.1007/s00402-026-06467-1

This prospective observational study of 30 children with idiopathic unilateral clubfoot undergoing Ponseti correction measured five foot anthropometric parameters weekly over eight weeks and correlated them with simultaneously assessed Modified Pirani scores. Anthropometric measurements, particularly toe-to-midheel distances, showed significant correlations with Pirani scores, with good inter-observer reliability, providing objective morphological evidence of deformity correction. These findings suggest that simple anthropometric measurements can complement the clinical Pirani score as quantitative, objective tools for monitoring clubfoot correction during Ponseti treatment.

6. Singh A. Dorsiflex. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2026. doi:10.2106/jbjs.26.00832

This is an arts and humanities perspective piece featuring 'Dorsiflex,' a soft pastel drawing created by a medical student during a neurology clerkship, accompanied by an artist statement. The work depicts feet demonstrating dorsiflexion at the center of the composition with minimally rendered, intentionally unfinished hands, reflecting the artist's evolving professional identity and growing awareness of how movement is examined, lost, or altered in clinical practice. The piece illustrates the intersection of anatomical art and clinical medicine, highlighting how artistic study of movement deepens understanding of the musculoskeletal and neurologic examination.

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.