Clinicians › Elbow
Olecranon Fracture Fixation (ORIF)

For patients: a plain-language version of this topic is available. See the patient guide.
Overview¶
Olecranon fractures are typically managed surgically to restore the extensor mechanism, with operative techniques including Kirschner wire tension band combined with anatomical locking plate, suture anchor fixation, and low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis [1, 3, 4]. For Mayo type II fractures, plate fixation demonstrates better efficacy and safety compared to tension band wiring [23], although some data indicate no significant differences in clinical or patient-rated outcome measures between these two methods [10]. Modern fixation techniques may offer superior functional outcomes, faster healing, and fewer complications than traditional tension band wiring [15]. Regardless of the specific surgical method, fracture type, or patient gender, no significant differences in functional outcomes or secondary operations are observed [9].
Nonoperative management remains a viable option for specific populations. Displaced fractures in patients older than 70 years may be effectively managed nonoperatively to produce high satisfaction and functional range of motion [17]. Data on managing these fractures nonoperatively in patients over 75 years old offers valuable information for developing personalized treatment plans, though it does not definitively settle the debate on this approach [5]. For displaced olecranon fractures, the timing of fixation does not significantly increase the rate of early complications or reoperation [2]. However, surgical treatment is generally associated with a high rate of complications [9].
Conservative management yields favorable results in select cases. A majority of olecranon fractures heal uneventfully with good or excellent results, with a small loss of motion to be expected [6]. In pediatric cases, nonsurgically treated minimally displaced olecranon fractures require close radiographic follow-up due to the risk of further displacement [7].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Osseous and Articular Considerations¶
The guiding principle in surgical techniques for olecranon fractures is to restore a congruent humeroulnar joint and allow restoration of upper extremity function [48]. Fixation of olecranon fractures must be secure enough to permit early motion to avoid significant stiffness of the elbow joint [12]. Individuals with elbow degenerative changes had no inferior subjective elbow function compared to those with normal radiographs, except for those with joint space reduction [36].
Ligamentous and Soft Tissue Dynamics¶
The proposed fragment-specific classification system for complex olecranon fractures is anatomically based and considers deforming forces from ligaments and tendons [28]. Overhead elbow extension in the setting of a displaced olecranon fracture may be maintained if there is any continuity of the extensor mechanism with the ulnar shaft [54]. The medial forearm fascia and lateral forearm fascia contribute to overhead elbow extension in displaced olecranon fractures [54].
Complex Instability and Surgical Exposure¶
Trans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation is a rare injury with unique characteristics involving complex elbow instability [44]. Proximal ulnar osteotomy improves the visualization of the distal humeral articular surface compared with olecranon osteotomy [50].
Classification¶
Multiple classification systems for olecranon fractures exist, including AO, Mayo, Schatzker, and Colton [43]. None of these systems are widely accepted or provide direct and reliable advice on operative strategies [43].
Mayo: This system categorizes olecranon fractures into Type I (non-displaced), Type II (displaced stable), and Type III (unstable with dislocation) [31]. It subdivides each type into A (non-comminuted) and B (comminuted) [31]. Although designed to simplify categorization, the Mayo classification has poor reproducibility [40].
AO/OTA: The AO classification subsumes olecranon fractures to proximal forearm injuries [43].
Schatzker: This classification divides fractures into groups based on the quantity of fragments and fracture lines [43].
Colton: Similar to Schatzker, the Colton classification divides fractures into groups based on the quantity of fragments and fracture lines [43].
Gächter & Stutz: A novel fragment-specific classification system for complex olecranon fractures is anatomically based and considers deforming forces from ligaments and tendons [28].
Other Considerations: Olecranon fractures show a bimodal distribution, occurring in younger patients due to high-energy trauma and in elderly cohorts with low bone quality after low-energy falls [43]. Isolated olecranon fractures occur after low-energy trauma, especially in older women over 65 years of age [20]. Men show a higher proportion of high-energy trauma than women in both age groups regarding olecranon fractures [20]. The fracture mechanism in most cases is a direct impact to the posterior aspect in the range of 60° to 110° flexion [43]. Due to tension of the triceps brachii muscle, most olecranon fractures are dislocated and not suitable for conservative treatment [43]. Nonoperative treatment is common in uncomplicated olecranon fractures [20]. Aggregate data support the non-operative treatment of isolated undisplaced olecranon fractures with good results [8]. Aggregate data support the operative treatment of pediatric olecranon fractures displaced ≥4 mm [8]. Nonoperative treatment was performed in 21% of patients aged 65 years or older in a nationwide study [20]. Tension band wiring was used for most simple central olecranon fractures in a nationwide study [20]. Plate fixation was used in almost half of the operatively treated fractures classified as unstable comminuted central and distal olecranon fractures in a nationwide study [20].
Clinical Presentation¶
Olecranon fractures typically present in adults with an average age of 56.0 years (SD, 19.4 years), with a demographic profile essentially similar to that of patients with distal radius fractures [13, 47]. In population-based cohorts, females comprise 53.9% and males 46.1% of cases [13]. The majority of these fractures heal uneventfully with good to excellent results, though a small loss of motion is expected [6].
Fracture Morphology: In adult ORIF populations, 52.6% of fractures are comminuted and 47.4% are non-comminuted [13]. Classification distribution is predominantly Mayo Type II (78.8%), followed by Type III (10.9%) and Type I (10.3%) [13].
Associated Injuries: Most patients present with isolated injuries; 82.9% have no other fracture present, while 17.1% have an associated fracture [13]. Dislocations are uncommon: 89.4% have no dislocation, 10.3% have radiocapitellar dislocation, and 0.3% have ulnohumeral dislocation [13]. The Monteggia fracture pattern is rare, present in only 7.2% of cases (92.8% do not have this pattern) [13].
Complications and Outcomes: ORIF demonstrates low short-term complication rates [32]. However, smoking and ascites are specific comorbidities associated with an increased risk of short-term complications following ORIF [32]. Patients undergoing revisions beyond implant removal experience poorer functional outcomes [9].
Pediatric Considerations: In children, close radiographic follow-up is recommended for nonsurgically treated olecranon fractures due to the risk of further displacement after initial nonsurgical treatment [7].
Investigations¶
Plain radiography: Isolated olecranon fractures typically result from low-energy trauma, predominantly affecting older women (>65 years) [20]. The median patient age is 66 years, with 65% being female [20]. Fracture morphology distribution includes 12% proximal avulsion, 42% simple central, 29% comminuted central, and 16% distal [20]. In a nationwide study, 21% of patients aged ≥65 years received nonoperative treatment [20].
MRI: No specific MRI findings or indications are provided in the current evidence base.
CT: No specific CT findings or indications are provided in the current evidence base.
Bone scan: No specific bone scan findings or indications are provided in the current evidence base.
Tomosynthesis: No specific tomosynthesis findings or indications are provided in the current evidence base.
Aspiration: No aspiration protocols or findings are provided in the current evidence base.
Laboratory: No laboratory markers or indications are provided in the current evidence base.
Other Considerations: Pediatric Management: Nonoperative treatment yields good results for isolated undisplaced olecranon fractures in pediatric patients [8]. Operative treatment is indicated for pediatric fractures displaced ≥4 mm [8].
Associated Injuries: Ipsilateral olecranon fractures associated with radial neck fractures are not as rare as previously reported [62].
Surgical Planning: Fixation must be secure enough to permit early motion to avoid significant elbow stiffness [12]. No single technique manages all olecranon fractures [14]. Tension band wiring is used for most simple central olecranon fractures [20]. Plate fixation is utilized in almost half of operatively treated unstable comminuted central and distal olecranon fractures [20].
Outcome Assessment: The Subjective Elbow Value (SEV) correlates highly with the most commonly used scoring systems for elbow injury outcome evaluation [22].
Clinical Trial Data: The SOFIE trial randomized 64 patients with displaced olecranon fractures: 29 to operative and 35 to nonoperative groups [19]. Two patients from each group were lost to follow-up and excluded from the primary analysis [19].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative Management¶
Evidence does not definitively settle whether to manage olecranon fractures nonoperatively in patients over 75, but it offers data to develop personalized treatment plans tailored to each patient's needs [5]. Displaced olecranon fractures in elderly and medically unwell patients treated nonoperatively can result in reasonable range of motion, minimal pain, and maintenance of extension against gravity [53]. Aggregate data support the non-operative treatment of isolated undisplaced olecranon fractures with good results in pediatric patients [8].
Operative Management¶
Indications: Surgical treatment of olecranon fractures is associated with a high rate of complications, and patients undergoing revisions beyond implant removal had poorer functional outcomes [9]. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes or secondary operations with respect to fracture type, gender, or surgical method in the context of complications after open reduction and fixation [9].
Surgical Approach / Technique: A midline posterior incision with a slight lateral bent on the olecranon tip is used to avoid the weight-bearing zone during olecranon osteotomy approaches [67]. Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is performed in all cases during olecranon osteotomy or paratricipital approaches for complex intra-articular distal humerus fractures [67]. Chevron shape osteotomy of the ulna with apex distally at approximately 2 cm from the olecranon tip is used to expose the fracture, with the osteotomy site fixed with K wires stabilized with an 18-gauge wire in accordance with tension band wire principles [67].
Implant Selection: Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis is a safe and effective alternative treatment for olecranon fractures, yielding excellent subjective and objective clinical outcome measures [4]. Fixation of simple olecranon fractures with an intramedullary screw is a safe and easy method in young patients, leading to good functional and radiological results [16]. Plate fixation has better efficacy and safety than tension band wiring for Mayo II olecranon fractures [23]. The suture tension band technique is a viable option for managing simple olecranon fractures or fractures with minimal comminution, yielding excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes while avoiding hardware-related complications [29]. Internal fixation by cable pin system (CPS) is an effective method for olecranon fracture associated with shorter healing time, fewer complications, and better function than tension band wiring (TBW) [30]. Transosseous suture with high strength thread is a valid alternative for treating Mayo IIA olecranon fractures in adult patients, decreasing re-operation rates for implant removal [52]. A novel technique using suture tension band fixation with eyelet wires for simple olecranon fractures is hypothesized to provide satisfactory outcomes regarding pain, functional scores, and radiographic union [60]. Surgical treatment with plate fixation and bone grafting in a patient with a displaced olecranon fracture through a persistent physis resulted in bony union, full range of motion, and return to sports without complications at 2.5 years [21].
Pain Management: The use of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) for olecranon fracture fixation is a simple, safe, low-cost, and reproducible technique that obviates the need for general anesthesia or tourniquets [45].
Setting of Care: The use of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) for olecranon fracture fixation is a simple, safe, low-cost, and reproducible technique that obviates the need for general anesthesia or tourniquets [45].
Revision: In a cohort of patients aged 75-93 years with displaced olecranon fractures, complications developed in 40% of patients, including construct disassembly, infection, non-union, bone failure due to proximal fragmentation, and incomplete nerve injury [31]. Of 21 fractures treated by tension-band wiring in patients aged 75+, 33% were followed by complications and 8 required hardware removal [31]. Of 7 hook-plate fixations in patients aged 75+, 71% were followed by complications and 43% required hardware removal [31]. In the same elderly cohort, 37% of patients required revision surgery [31]. Locked plating of geriatric olecranon fractures with early mobilization leads to low fixation failure in patients over the age of 75 [11].
Complications¶
Hardware complications: Precontoured plate fixation of the olecranon is associated with hardware complications and reoperations [13].
Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: The incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis following isolated olecranon fractures has a median incidence of 19% at a median follow-up of 41 months [61].
Mortality: Olecranon fractures in the elderly have higher than expected 1 year mortality rates [68].
Other Considerations: Complication rates, including deep infection and nonunion, are high in transolecranon distal humerus fractures, with frequent long-term functional limitations [69].
Recovery¶
Light activity (weeks): Evidence does not provide specific week ranges for light activity or desk work return. Nonoperative management data in patients over 75 informs personalized plans but does not definitively settle the debate on this approach [5]. For pediatric patients, aggregate data support non-operative treatment of isolated undisplaced fractures with good results [8], though close radiographic follow-up is recommended due to the risk of further displacement after initial nonsurgical treatment [7].
Full activity (months): Professional baseball players undergo return to sport at a rate of 67.5% following olecranon ORIF [63]. This return rate is no different from natural attrition among matched controls [63].
Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Primary osteosynthesis successfully restored structural stability and achieved union at 6 months in a patient with bilateral olecranon fractures as the first presentation of sarcoidosis [35]. Patients undergoing revisions beyond implant removal for olecranon fractures had poorer functional outcomes [9]. No significant differences in functional outcomes or secondary operations were found with respect to fracture type, gender, or surgical method [9].
Rehabilitation protocol: Specific rehabilitation protocols, immobilisation durations, or weight-bearing progressions are not detailed in the provided evidence.
Functional milestones: Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes [33]. Ding’s screw and tension band wiring (DSTBW) technology provides stable fixation for olecranon fractures, reducing the risk of internal fixation migration and failure [55].
Other Considerations: No specific functional milestones or PROM trajectories are provided in the evidence base.
Key Evidence¶
- [L3] Both operative procedures effectively treat Mayo type II olecranon fractures. [1] (10.1186/s12891-025-08843-1)
- [L3] The timing of fixation of displaced olecranon fractures does not significantly increase the rate of early complications or reoperation. [2] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.09.002)
- [L4] Suture anchor fixation of displaced olecranon fractures resulted in excellent midterm functional outcomes. [3] (10.5397/cise.2023.00528)
- [L3] Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis is a safe and effective alternative treatment of olecranon fractures with excellent subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. [4] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.019)
- [L2] While they did not definitively settle the debate about whether we should manage olecranon fractures nonoperatively in patients over 75, they did offer valuable data that surgeons and patients can use to develop personalized treatment plans tailored to each patient's needs. [5] (10.2106/jbjs.24.01097)
- [L4] A majority of olecranon fractures heal uneventfully with good/excellent results with a small loss of motion to be expected. [6] (10.1016/j.hcl.2015.07.003)
- [L4] Close radiographic follow-up for nonsurgically treated olecranon fractures is recommended. [7] (10.5435/jaaos-d-25-00821)
- [L4] Aggregate data support the non-operative treatment of isolated undisplaced olecranon fractures with good results, and support the operative treatment of fractures displaced ≥4 mm. [8] (10.1302/2058-5241.5.190082)
- [L4] Surgical treatment of olecranon fractures is associated with a high rate of complications, and patients undergoing revisions beyond implant removal had poorer functional outcomes; however, no significant differences in functional outcomes or secondary operations were found with respect to fracture type, gender, or surgical method. [9] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.004)
- [L1] No differences were found in clinical or patient-rated outcome measures between the two most frequent fixation methods (tension band wiring and plate fixation) of displaced olecranon fractures. [10] (10.1177/1457496919893599)
- [L4] Locked plating of geriatric olecranon fractures with early mobilization leads to low fixation failure. [11] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.027)
- [L5] Fixation must be secure enough to permit early motion to avoid significant stiffness of the elbow joint. [12] (10.5435/00124635-200007000-00007)
- [L4] [13] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.006)
- [Paper] No one technique is suitable for the management of all olecranon fractures. [14] (10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.013)
- [L1] Modern fixation techniques may offer superior functional outcomes, faster healing, and fewer complications than traditional tension band wiring for olecranon fractures. [15] (10.1186/s13018-025-06061-y)
- [L4] Fixation of simple olecranon fractures with an intramedullary screw is a safe and easy fixation method in young patients, leading to good functional and radiological results. [16] (10.1007/s00068-019-01114-4)
- [L4] Displaced olecranon fractures in patients older than 70 years may be effectively managed with nonoperative measures to produce high satisfaction and functional range of motion. [17] (10.1177/1558944720944261)
- [L1] [19] (10.2106/jbjs.24.00655)
- [L4] [20] (10.1007/s00068-021-01765-2)
- [Case_report] Surgical treatment with plate fixation and bone grafting in a patient with a displaced olecranon fracture through a persistent physis resulted in bony union, full range of motion, and return to sports without complications at 2.5 years. [21] (10.1177/2325967119881647)
- [L4] The SEV shows a high correlation to the most commonly used scoring systems for outcome evaluation after elbow injury. [22] (10.1055/a-0946-2649)
- [L1] Plate has better efficacy and safety for Mayo II olecranon fractures. [23] (10.1186/s13018-022-03262-7)
- [L4] This proposed classification system is anatomically based and considers the deforming forces from ligaments and tendons. [28] (10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.021)
- [L4] The suture tension band technique is a viable option for managing simple olecranon fractures or fractures with minimal comminution, yielding excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes while avoiding hardware-related complications. [29] (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.032)
- [L1] Internal fixation by CPS is an effective method for olecranon fracture and is associated with a shorter healing time, fewer complications and better function than TBW. [30] (10.1177/147323001204000324)
- [L4] [31] (10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103089)
- [L4] ORIF for olecranon fractures demonstrates low short-term complication rates; however, specific comorbidities such as smoking and ascites were associated with increased risk. [32] (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.017)
- [L3] Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes. [33] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.091)
- [Case_report] Primary osteosynthesis successfully restored structural stability and achieved union at 6 months in a patient with bilateral olecranon fractures as the first presentation of sarcoidosis, contrasting with previous reports of nonunion in known sarcoidosis cases. [35] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.016)
- [L3] Individuals with elbow degenerative changes had no inferior subjective elbow function compared to those with normal radiographs, except for those with joint space reduction. [36] (10.1007/s00402-020-03453-z)
- [L5] The Mayo classification was designed to simplify categorization of olecranon fractures but does not achieve this goal due to poor reproducibility. [40] (10.1097/corr.0000000000000614)
- [L4] [43] (10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.017)
- [L4] Trans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation is a rare injury with unique characteristics involving complex elbow instability. [44] (10.1186/s13018-023-03563-5)
- [L4] The use of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet for olecranon fracture fixation is a simple, safe, low-cost, and reproducible technique that obviates the need for general anesthesia or tourniquets. [45] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.12.006)
- [L3] Patients with olecranon fractures have essentially similar demographic characteristics compared to patients with distal radius fractures. [47] (10.1177/17585732221124301)
- [L5] The guiding principle is to restore a congruent humeroulnar joint and allow restoration of upper extremity function. [48] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.014)
- [L5] Proximal ulnar osteotomy improves the visualization of the distal humeral articular surface. [50] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.11.010)
- [L4] Transosseous suture with high strength thread is a valid alternative for treating Mayo IIA olecranon fractures in adult patients, decreasing re-operation rates for implant removal. [52] (10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.011)
- [L4] Displaced olecranon fractures in elderly and medically unwell patients treated nonoperatively can result in reasonable range of motion, minimal pain, and maintenance of extension against gravity. [53] (10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.001)
- [L5] Overhead elbow extension in the setting of a displaced olecranon fracture may be maintained if there is any continuity of the extensor mechanism with the ulnar shaft. [54] (10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.005)
- [Paper] DSTBW technology provides stable fixation for olecranon fractures, reducing the risk of internal fixation migration and failure. [55] (10.1186/s12891-023-06684-4)
- [L4] The authors describe a novel technique using suture tension band fixation with eyelet wires for simple olecranon fractures and hypothesize satisfactory outcomes regarding pain, functional scores, and radiographic union. [60] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100707)
- [L4] This review identified a median OA incidence of 19% at a median follow-up of 41 months following isolated olecranon fractures. [61] (10.1016/j.jse.2026.02.024)
- [L3] Fractures of the ipsilateral olecranon associated with the radial neck are not so rare as previously reported. [62] (10.1186/s13018-021-02373-x)
- [L3] Professional baseball players who undergo ORIF of an olecranon fracture have a return to sport rate of 67.5%, which is no different from natural attrition among matched controls. [63] (10.1177/0363546519844479)
- [L2] [67] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.002)
- [L3] Olecranon fractures in the elderly have higher than expected 1 year mortality rates. [68] (10.1177/1758573221994860)
- [L4] Complication rates, including deep infection and nonunion, are high, with frequent long-term functional limitations posed to the patient. [69] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.012)
See Also¶
References¶
[1] Efficacy evaluation of Kirschner wire tension band combined with anatomical locking plate in the treatment of Mayo type II olecranon fractures. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08843-1
[2] Timing of Olecranon Fracture Fixation Does Not Affect Early Complication or Reoperation Rates. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.09.002
[3] Midterm outcomes of suture anchor fixation for displaced olecranon fractures. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2024. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00528
[4] Clinical evaluation of double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures: A retrospective case-control study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.019
[5] Treatment of Displaced Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly: Should the Pendulum Swing?. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.01097
[6] Olecranon Fractures. Hand Clinics. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.07.003
[7] Further Displacement After Initial Nonsurgical Treatment of Minimally Displaced Olecranon Fractures in Children. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2026. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-25-00821
[8] Paediatric olecranon fractures: a systematic review. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190082
[9] Risk factors for complications and poor function after open reduction and fixation of olecranon fractures. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.004
[10] Treatment of Displaced Olecranon Fractures: A Systematic Review. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1457496919893599
[11] Locked Plating of Geriatric Olecranon Fractures and Early Mobilization Leads to Low Fixation Failure in Patients Over the Age of 75. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.027
[12] Olecranon Fractures: Treatment Options. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2000. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200007000-00007
[13] Hardware complications and reoperations following precontoured plate fixation of the olecranon: a population-based study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.006
[14] Olecranon fractures. Injury. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.013
[15] Modern fixation techniques versus traditional tension band wiring for olecranon fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes, healing time, and complications. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06061-y
[16] Intramedullary screw fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-019-01114-4
[17] Nonoperative Management of Olecranon Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review. HAND. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720944261
[19] Surgery for Olecranon Fractures in the Elderly (SOFIE). Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.00655
[20] Epidemiology, classification and treatment of olecranon fractures in adults: an observational study on 2462 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01765-2
[21] Surgical Treatment of Displaced Olecranon Fracture Through a Persistent Physis: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119881647
[22] Comparison of the Subjective Elbow Value with the DASH, MEPS und Morrey Score after Olecranon Fractures. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. 2019. DOI: 10.1055/a-0946-2649
[23] Efficacy and safety of tension band wire versus plate for Mayo II olecranon fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03262-7
[28] A novel fragment specific classification of complex olecranon fractures: 3-dimensional model design, radiological validation, and proposed surgical algorithm. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.021
[29] Outcomes of suture tension band technique for fixation of olecranon fractures: a retrospective case series. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.032
[30] Randomized Prospective Study of Olecranon Fracture Fixation: Cable Pin System versus Tension Band Wiring. Journal of International Medical Research. 2040. DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000324
[31] Is surgery needed for displaced olecranon fractures in patients aged 75 years or over?. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103089
[32] Short-term complications of open reduction and internal fixation of olecranon fractures: a national database study. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.017
[33] Can low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures reduce implant removal? A retrospective multicenter study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.091
[35] Bilateral olecranon fracture as first presentation of sarcoidosis: Case report and review of the literature. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.016
[36] Long-term outcomes after different types of Horne and Tanzer olecranon fractures. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03453-z
[40] Classifications in Brief: Mayo Classification of Olecranon Fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000614
[43] Plate fixation and tension band wiring after isolated olecranon fracture comparison of outcome and complications. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.017
[44] Trans-olecranon fracture posterior dislocation: a novel type of elbow injury. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03563-5
[45] Wide-Awake Olecranon Fracture Fixation: Is it Possible?. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.12.006
[47] Mortality and subsequent fractures of patients with olecranon fractures compared to other upper extremity osteoporotic fractures. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221124301
[48] Surgical Techniques of Olecranon Fractures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.014
[50] Proximal Ulna Osteotomy for Complex Fractures of the Distal Humerus: A 3-Dimensional Laser Analysis and Comparison With Olecranon Osteotomy. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.11.010
[52] Olecranon mayo IIA fractures treated with transosseous high strength suture: A series of 29 cases. Injury. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.011
[53] Outcomes of nonoperative management of displaced olecranon fractures in medically unwell patients. JSES International. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.001
[54] The medial forearm fascia and lateral forearm fascia contribute to overhead elbow extension in displaced olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.005
[55] The effect of ding’s screw and tension band wiring for treatment of olecranon fractures: a finite element study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06684-4
[60] Suture tension band fixation of olecranon fractures: description and early outcomes of a novel technique. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100707
[61] Incidence of Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis in Olecranon Fractures and the Role of Instability and Comminution in its Development: A Systematic Review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2026.02.024
[62] Management strategies of pediatric ipsilateral olecranon with associated radial neck fractures based on multicenter experience. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02373-x
[63] Performance and Return to Sport After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Olecranon in Professional Baseball Players. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519844479
[67] Outcome following olecranon osteotomy versus paratricipital approach for complex intra-articular (AO 13-C) fracture of distal humerus: a prospective comparative study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.002
[68] Complications and mortality associated with olecranon fractures in the elderly: a retrospective cohort comparison from a large level one trauma centre. Shoulder & Elbow. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1758573221994860
[69] Complications and functional outcomes after transolecranon distal humerus fracture. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.012