Clinicians › Hand
Flexor tendon repair

For patients: a plain-language version of this topic is available. See the patient guide.
Overview¶
Flexor tendon repair in Zone II is a technically demanding procedure, yet outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. Primary repair in the digital sheath area has become standard practice, characterized by a shift toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation [12]. Many principles of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation can be applied to zones III–V [11]. However, no gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm, and repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty [2].
Despite improvements in surgical technique and rehabilitation, functional outcomes for flexor tendon injuries remain unreliable, with adhesion formation and joint contractures being the most common complications [5]. Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally have not yielded results as good as other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases [4]. Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice for flexor tendon injuries in zones I and II when direct repair is not possible or delayed [8]. A modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 utilizes a 6-strand core suture without circumferential suturing, selective pulley division, and partial FDS resection to facilitate early active motion and improve outcomes [19].
Secondary reconstruction remains an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries or those that have failed primary repair [6]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics and repair of tendons in the different zones, potential complications, rehabilitation protocols, recent advances in treatment, and future directions, including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site [7]. Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs regarding relative motion orthoses for early active motion [10].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Flexor tendons function as cables that transmit forces to move and stabilize joints [31]. An understanding of the biomechanics of the flexor tendon system is essential to proper evaluation and treatment of disorders of the upper extremity [31]. A thorough understanding of the anatomy and mechanism of injury is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative management of flexor tendon and pulley injuries in athletes [47].
Complications: Adhesion formation is the most common complication following flexor tendon injuries [5]. Joint contractures are the most common complication following flexor tendon injuries [5]. Functional outcomes for flexor tendon injuries remain unreliable despite improvements in surgical technique and rehabilitation [5].
Rehabilitation and Management: Many principles of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation can be applied to zones III–V [11]. Therapists must understand the implications of wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint positioning to safely facilitate tendon gliding and prevent secondary pathomechanical changes [36]. Complex hand injuries involving flexor tendons require management of associated soft tissue and bony injuries to optimize functional outcomes [43].
Classification¶
Flexor tendon injuries are complex, requiring management that considers surgical timing, injury location, approach, and soft tissue handling [14]. Consistent, successful management relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics, and repair of tendons in different zones, as well as potential complications, rehabilitation protocols, recent advances, and future directions including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site [7].
Zone II: Repair in Zone II is technically demanding [1]. However, outcomes for acute repairs have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. Subdividing Zone II is a key factor to improving outcomes [40].
Zone I: Injuries traditionally have not yielded results as good as other flexor tendon injuries [4]. Full motion is rarely regained, and good or excellent results are reported in only up to 67% of cases [4].
Digital Sheath Area: Primary repair has become standard practice [12]. Techniques have shifted toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation [12].
Zones I and II (Grafting): Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice when direct repair is not possible or is delayed [8].
Secondary Reconstruction: This remains an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries and those that have failed primary repair [6].
Key Factors for Outcomes: Improving outcomes in flexor tendon repair requires releasing critical pulleys (A2 and A4), using strong multi-strand repairs, and implementing early active motion [40]. Despite significant advances, the drive towards perfection in flexor tendon repair and reconstruction continues [13].
Other Considerations: No gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm [2]; repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty [2]. Currently, no strategies targeting growth factors are routinely used in clinical practice, though understanding their role should enable a more targeted approach to improve results [18]. Limited evidence exists for relative motion orthoses for early active motion in flexor tendon repairs [10]. The large heterogeneity in outcome domains assessed across studies highlights the need for a consistent core outcome set in future clinical research [9].
Clinical Presentation¶
The central tenet of modern flexor tendon surgery is to increase tendon healing and avoid adhesion formation by making a repair strong enough to move within a few days of injury [15]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics, and repair of tendons in different zones [7]. Outcomes for flexor tendon repair in Zone II have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. However, there is large heterogeneity in the outcome domains being assessed or measured across studies on hand flexor tendon injuries [9].
Complications: Tendon adhesion and joint contracture are the most common complications after flexor tendon repair [26]. These sequelae are managed through prevention, meticulous surgical technique, and thoughtful rehabilitation protocols [26]. Repair ruptures were documented in most reports on flexor tendon repair [16]. Repair rupture rates range from 4%-10% in finger flexors [16] and range from 3%-17% in the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) of thumbs [16].
Diagnostic Considerations: Pediatric flexor tendon injuries differ from adults in diagnosis and rehabilitation [17]. Pediatric cases often require surgical exploration due to uncooperative patients [17]. Closed flexor tendon disruptions include traumatic avulsion, spontaneous midsubstance rupture, attrition rupture, infiltrative tenosynovial rupture, and iatrogenic causes [32]. Spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand occur more often than one might recognize [23]. The majority of spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand involve the profundus tendon of the small finger in the palm [23].
Management Strategy: Flexor tendon repair techniques are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty [2]. Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice for flexor tendon injuries in zones I and II when repair is delayed [8]. Secondary reconstruction is an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries [6] and for flexor tendon injuries that have failed primary repair [6]. Limited evidence currently exists for the use of relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor tendon repairs in zones IV and VII [10]. Limited evidence currently exists for the use of relative motion orthoses for early active motion after flexor tendon repairs [10].
Investigations¶
Plain radiography: Indicated to assess for associated bony injuries or avulsion fractures preceding or accompanying flexor tendon trauma.
MRI: Useful for detailed soft-tissue evaluation, particularly in complex cases where tendon integrity and surrounding soft-tissue status require precise delineation beyond clinical examination.
CT: Not routinely indicated for isolated flexor tendon injuries unless complex intra-articular fracture patterns are suspected.
Bone scan: Limited utility in the acute setting of flexor tendon repair; reserved for specific diagnostic dilemmas such as occult osteomyelitis or stress fractures if clinically indicated.
Tomosynthesis: No specific role established in the routine workup of flexor tendon injuries.
Aspiration: Not indicated for isolated flexor tendon injuries without signs of septic arthritis or tenosynovitis requiring fluid analysis.
Laboratory: Pre-operative inflammatory markers (e.g., ESR, CRP) may be obtained if infection is a differential diagnosis, though routine labs are not required for sterile repairs.
Other Considerations: Adhesion formation and joint contractures represent the most common complications following flexor tendon injuries [5]. The central tenet of modern flexor tendon surgery is to increase tendon healing and avoid adhesion formation [15]. Modern techniques aim to create repairs strong enough to permit early motion within a few days of injury [15]. Primary repair has shifted toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation [12]. Despite significant advances, the drive towards perfection in flexor tendon repair and reconstruction continues [13]. Rupture rates for finger flexors range from 4% to 10% [16], while rupture rates for the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) of thumbs range from 3% to 17% [16]. Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice for injuries in zones I and II when direct repair is not possible or delayed [8]. Late direct repair is possible in approximately 1 in 10 to 1 in 15 patients where tendon ends can be approximated with acceptable tension [21]. Initial clinical experience with the volar plate of the distal interphalangeal joint as a distally based flap is encouraging, and this technique may take its place in flexor tendon surgery [20]. Limited evidence currently exists for the use of relative motion orthoses after flexor tendon repairs [10]. Even otherwise healthy patients can expect some residual digital stiffness following flexor tendon sheath infection despite aggressive and prompt antibiotic therapy and surgical intervention [30]. A consistent core outcome set is needed for future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries [9].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative¶
Limited evidence currently exists for relative motion orthoses after flexor tendon repairs [10]. There is limited evidence informing use of relative motion flexion orthoses following zone I-III flexor tendon repair [45]. There is not sufficient evidence to support true active motion as an effective or preferable choice for flexor tendon rehabilitation at this time [38].
Operative¶
Indications: Secondary reconstruction is an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries or those that have failed primary repair [6]. Patient selection, cooperation, and a rational goal are as key to success in flexor tenolysis as the operative procedure itself [24].
Surgical Approach / Technique: Flexor tendon repair in Zone II is technically demanding, but outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying [1]. Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally yield poorer results than other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases [4]. Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding anatomy, characteristics, and repair of tendons in different zones [7]. Management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding potential complications and rehabilitation protocols [7]. Management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding recent advances in treatment and future directions, including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site [7]. Management of flexor tendon injuries requires consideration of surgical timing, injury location, approach, and soft tissue handling [14].
A modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 utilizes a 6-strand core suture without circumferential suturing to facilitate early active motion and improve outcomes [19]. The modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 includes selective pulley division [19]. The modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 includes partial FDS resection [19]. Increasing the number of suture strands significantly improves the mechanical strength and gap resistance of flexor tendon repairs [48]. Using locking-loop configurations significantly improves the mechanical strength and gap resistance of flexor tendon repairs [48]. Optimizing suture purchase length significantly improves the mechanical strength and gap resistance of flexor tendon repairs [48]. Understanding the role of growth factors in tendon repair should enable a more targeted approach to improve results of flexor tendon repair [18].
Adjuncts: The authors no longer perform flexor tendon repair with tourniquet, sedation, or muscle paralysis [37].
Other Considerations: Adhesion formation and joint contractures are the most common complications after flexor tendon repair [5]. Tendon adhesion and joint contracture are managed through prevention, meticulous surgical technique, and thoughtful rehabilitation protocols [26]. Flexor tenolysis requires consideration of preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors [24]. Prompt recognition of problems and treatment with hand therapy, splinting, and/or surgery may help minimize recovery time and improve function after flexor tendon injuries [22].
Complications¶
Tendon Rupture: Repair rupture rates for finger flexors range from 4% to 10% [16], while rates for the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) of thumbs range from 3% to 17% [16]. Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs have very low to zero incidence of rupture [50]. Conversely, Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally yield poorer results than other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained [4].
Suture Technique Outcomes: Surgeons report good to excellent results in about 80% or more of tendons repaired with 4-strand or 6-strand core sutures [49]. Repair rupture rates are 2% to 5% for tendons repaired with 4-strand or 6-strand core sutures [49]. Outcomes of Zone 2 repairs are not dissimilar to those in other zones [50].
Stiffness / Arthrofibrosis: Repeated administration of sodium hyaluronate at the tendon repair site may be effective in improving postoperative active finger motion after primary hand flexor tendon repair in the mid-term [27].
Other Considerations: Late direct repair is possible in approximately 1 in 10 to 1 in 15 patients where tendon ends can be approximated with acceptable tension [21]. Prompt recognition of problems and treatment with hand therapy, splinting, and/or surgery may help minimize recovery time and improve function [22]. Patient selection, cooperation, and a rational goal are as key to success as the operative procedure itself for flexor tenolysis [24].
Recovery¶
Rehabilitation after surgical repair of flexor injuries remains a controversial topic, as motion at the repair site decreases the risk for adhesions but increases the risk for rupture [34]. The large heterogeneity in outcome domains assessed across studies highlights the need for a consistent core outcome set in future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries [9].
Rehabilitation protocol: A modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 utilizes a 6-strand core suture without circumferential suturing, selective pulley division, and partial FDS resection to facilitate early active motion and improve outcomes [19]. The author recommends the partial-range active flexion protocol as a safe, efficient, and generalizable framework for rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and other hand disorders, particularly where therapist assistance is unavailable [28].
Other Considerations: Future research is suggested to increase understanding of optimal age ranges for early active motion in children with flexor tendon injuries [29].
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Flexor tendon repair in Zone II is a technically demanding procedure, but outcomes have become more predictable and satisfying. [1] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.001)
- [L5] No gold standard has been determined for the optimal flexor tendon repair algorithm, and repairs are usually chosen based on familiarity, popularity, and technical difficulty. [2] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.025)
- [L5] Zone I flexor tendon injuries traditionally have not yielded results as good as other flexor tendon injuries, with full motion rarely regained and good/excellent results reported in only up to 67% of cases. [4] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.004)
- [L5] Despite improvements in surgical technique and rehabilitation, functional outcomes for flexor tendon injuries remain unreliable, with adhesion formation and joint contractures being the most common complications. [5] (10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004)
- [L5] Secondary reconstruction remains an important and useful technique for complicated flexor tendon injuries or those that have failed primary repair. [6] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.018)
- [L5] Consistent, successful management of flexor tendon injuries relies on understanding the anatomy, characteristics and repair of tendons in the different zones, potential complications, rehabilitation protocols, recent advances in treatment, and future directions, including tissue engineering and biologic modification of the repair site. [7] (10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00316)
- [L5] Tendon grafting is the treatment of choice for flexor tendon injuries in zones I and II when direct repair is not possible or delayed. [8] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.003)
- [L2] The large heterogeneity in the outcome domains being assessed/measured across studies highlights the need for a consistent core outcome set to be measured in future clinical research on hand flexor tendon injuries. [9] (10.1177/17531934251342732)
- [L1] Limited evidence currently exists for zones IV and VII extensor and for flexor tendon repairs. [10] (10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.011)
- [L5] Many of the principles of flexor tendon repair and rehabilitation can be applied to zones III–V. [11] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.007)
- [L5] Primary flexor tendon repair in the digital sheath area has become standard practice with a shift toward strong multistrand core sutures and modified pulley preservation. [12] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.003)
- [L5] Despite significant advances in flexor tendon repair and reconstruction, the drive towards perfection continues. [13] (10.1177/17531934251404821)
- [L5] Flexor tendon injuries are complex, and management requires consideration of surgical timing, injury location, approach, and soft tissue handling. [14] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.013)
- [L4] The central tenet of modern flexor tendon surgery is to increase tendon healing and avoid adhesion formation by making a repair strong enough to move within a few days of injury. [15] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.03.001)
- [L4] Repair ruptures were documented in most reports with rates ranging from 4%-10% in finger flexors and 3%-17% in FPL of thumbs. [16] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.005)
- [L5] Pediatric flexor tendon injuries differ from adults in diagnosis and rehabilitation, often requiring surgical exploration due to uncooperative patients. [17] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.004)
- [L5] Understanding the role that growth factors play in tendon repair should enable a more targeted approach to be developed to improve the results of flexor tendon repair, although currently no strategies are routinely used in clinical practice. [18] (10.1177/1753193413509231)
- [L5] The authors describe a modified protocol for primary flexor tendon repair in zones 1 and 2 that utilizes a 6-strand core suture without circumferential suturing, selective pulley division, and partial FDS resection to facilitate early active motion and improve outcomes. [19] (10.1016/j.hcl.2017.03.001)
- [L4] Initial clinical experience is encouraging and the volar plate flap technique may take its place in flexor tendon surgery. [20] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.004)
- [L4] Late direct repair is possible in a small proportion of patients (approximately 1 in 10 to 1 in 15) where tendon ends can be approximated with acceptable tension. [21] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.004)
- [L5] Prompt recognition of problems and treatment with hand therapy, splinting, and/or surgery may help minimize recovery time and improve function. [22] (10.5435/00124635-200607000-00001)
- [L4] Spontaneous flexor tendon ruptures of the hand occur more often than one might recognize, with the majority involving the profundus tendon of the small finger in the palm. [23] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.012)
- [L5] The article outlines preoperative, operative, and postoperative considerations for flexor tenolysis, emphasizing that patient selection, cooperation, and a rational goal are as key to success as the operative procedure itself. [24] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.008)
- [L5] Tendon adhesion and joint contracture are the most common complications after flexor tendon repair, managed through prevention, meticulous surgical technique, and thoughtful rehabilitation protocols. [26] (10.1016/j.hcl.2014.12.004)
- [L1] Repeated administration of sodium hyaluronate at the tendon repair site may be effective in improving postoperative active finger motion after primary hand flexor tendon repair in the mid-term. [27] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.012)
- [L5] The author recommends the partial-range active flexion protocol as a safe, efficient, and generalizable framework for rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and other hand disorders, particularly where therapist assistance is unavailable. [28] (10.1177/17531934211037112)
- [L5] Future research is suggested to increase understanding of repair strength, optimal age ranges for early active motion, and cost-effectiveness. [29] (10.1016/j.jht.2014.12.002)
- [L5] Despite aggressive and prompt antibiotic therapy and surgical intervention, even otherwise healthy patients can expect some residual digital stiffness following flexor tendon sheath infection. [30] (10.5435/jaaos-20-06-373)
- [L5] An understanding of the biomechanics of the flexor tendon system is essential to proper evaluation and treatment of disorders of the upper extremity, as the tendons function as cables transmitting forces to move and stabilize joints. [31] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.002)
- [L5] This article reviews different causes, diagnoses, and treatment options of closed flexor tendon disruptions, including traumatic avulsion, spontaneous midsubstance rupture, attrition rupture, infiltrative tenosynovial rupture, and iatrogenic causes. [32] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.005)
- [L5] Rehabilitation after surgical repair of flexor injuries is a controversial topic where motion at the repair site decreases risk for adhesions but increases risk for rupture. [34] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.010)
- [L5] Therapists must understand the implications of wrist and MCP joint positioning to safely facilitate tendon gliding and prevent secondary pathomechanical changes. [36] (10.1177/17531934241265579)
- [L5] The authors no longer perform flexor tendon repair with tourniquet, sedation, or muscle paralysis. [37] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.009)
- [L1] Based on a lack of superior benefits following true active motion regimens, there is not sufficient evidence to support true active motion as an effective or preferable choice for flexor tendon rehabilitation at this time. [38] (10.1016/j.jht.2018.06.001)
- [L5] The article reviews a three-decade research journey demonstrating that subdividing Zone 2, releasing critical pulleys (A2 and A4), and using strong multi-strand repairs with early active motion are key to improving outcomes in flexor tendon repair. [40] (10.1177/17531934221087585)
- [L5] Complex hand injuries involving flexor tendons require a physician-therapist team approach and management of associated soft tissue and bony injuries to optimize functional outcomes. [43] (10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.001)
- [L4] There is currently limited evidence informing use of relative motion flexion orthoses following flexor tendon repair. [45] (10.1016/j.jht.2022.11.004)
- [L5] A thorough understanding of the anatomy and mechanism of injury is critical for diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative management. [47] (10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.004)
- [L5] Increasing the number of suture strands, using locking-loop configurations, and optimizing suture purchase length significantly improve the mechanical strength and gap resistance of flexor tendon repairs. [48] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044)
- [L1] Over the past 10 years, surgeons have reported good to excellent results in about 80% or more of tendons repaired with 4-strand or 6-strand core sutures, with 2% to 5% repair ruptures. [49] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.007)
- [L5] Outcomes of Zone 2 repairs are not dissimilar to those in other zones with very low to zero incidence of rupture. [50] (10.1177/17531934211053757)
References¶
[1] Acute Flexor Tendon Repairs in Zone II. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.001
[2] Flexor Tendon Repairs: Techniques, Eponyms, and Evidence. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.025
[4] Zone I Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.004
[5] Complications After Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004
[6] Secondary Flexor Tendon Reconstruction, A Review. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.08.018
[7] Flexor Tendon Injuries. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00316
[8] Delayed Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries Including Grafting. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.003
[9] Developing a core outcome set for hand flexor tendon injuries: a systematic review of treatment outcomes. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251342732
[10] Relative motion orthoses for early active motion after finger extensor and flexor tendon repairs: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.011
[11] Treatment of Acute Flexor Tendon Injury: Zones III–V. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.007
[12] Current Practice of Primary Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.003
[13] The IFSSH consensus and current guidelines on flexor tendon repairs and reconstruction. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251404821
[14] Flexor Tendon Injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.013
[15] Primary Flexor Tendon Surgery. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.03.001
[16] Clinical Outcomes Associated with Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.005
[17] Pediatric Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.004
[18] The growth factors involved in flexor tendon repair and adhesion formation. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413509231
[19] Primary Flexor Tendon Repair with Early Active Motion. Hand Clinics. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.03.001
[20] Use of the Volar Plate of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint as a Distally Based Flap in Flexor Tendon Surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.004
[21] Uncommon Methods of Flexor Tendon and Tendon-Bone Repairs and Grafting. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.004
[22] Complications After Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00001
[23] Spontaneous Flexor Tendon Ruptures of the Hand: Case Series and Review of the Literature. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.012
[24] Flexor Tenolysis. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.008
[26] Management of Complications of Flexor Tendon Injuries. Hand Clinics. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.12.004
[27] Effectiveness of Sodium Hyaluronate and ADCON-T/N for the Prevention of Adhesions in Hand Flexor Tendon Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.012
[28] Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17531934211037112
[29] Flexor tendon injuries in children: Rehabilitative options and confounding factors. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.12.002
[30] Flexor Tendon Sheath Infections of the Hand. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2012. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-20-06-373
[31] Biomechanics of the Flexor Tendons. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.11.002
[32] Closed Flexor Tendon Ruptures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.005
[34] Postsurgical Rehabilitation of Flexor Tendon Injuries. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.010
[36] Zone-specific pitfalls in flexor tendon rehabilitation: management and prevention. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241265579
[37] Wide-awake Flexor Tendon Repair and Early Tendon Mobilization in Zones 1 and 2. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.009
[38] Flexor tendon rehabilitation in the 21st century: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.06.001
[40] Investigations into flexor tendon repair: a research journey over three decades. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17531934221087585
[43] Complex Injuries Including Flexor Tendon Disruption. Hand Clinics. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.12.001
[45] Relative motion flexion following zone I-III flexor tendon repair: Concepts, evidence and practice.. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.11.004
[47] Evaluation and Treatment of Flexor Tendon and Pulley Injuries in Athletes. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2019.12.004
[48] Technical and Biological Modifications for Enhanced Flexor Tendon Repair. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044
[49] Outcomes and Evaluation of Flexor Tendon Repair. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.007
[50] Flexor tendon repair: recent changes and current methods. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17531934211053757