Acromioclavicular Joint Injury (Shoulder Separation)¶
Acromioclavicular separation: Rockwood grading and CC reconstruction (corpus-synthesised).
Overview¶
Acromioclavicular joint injuries present a lack of consensus on the optimal surgical technique, resulting in unique complication profiles based on the technique used [1]. Treatment for bipolar clavicle injury, involving posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint and anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint, should primarily aim to restore the anatomy of both joints [3]. In acute high-grade instabilities, there is a high prevalence (30%) of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies; some indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open AC repair [8].
Anatomic acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single tendon graft provides greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction [4]. Reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic dislocations results in significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related to clinical symptoms after a mean follow-up of 31.7 months [5]. Use of the pectoralis minor tendon as a local source of autograft tissue in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction is feasible and potentially advantageous [10].
Both open and arthroscopic repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation using a single tight rope yield good clinical results, but the arthroscopic technique is more expensive and has a longer surgical time [6]. There are no statistically significant differences between suture button and hook plate techniques for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation regarding operation time, coracoclavicular distance, complications, or loss of reduction [7]. A rare case of acute traumatic subacromial type VI acromioclavicular injury was treated with open reduction and distal clavicle resection, noting that joint obliquity may predispose patients to this locked dislocation mechanism [9]. In a survey of treatment for acromioclavicular joint separations in Japan, only 11 members opted for conservative treatment, while approximately 95% of physicians chose surgery [11].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Acromioclavicular joint injuries involve the acromioclavicular joint complex, including its anatomy and biomechanics [2]. Bipolar clavicle injury is defined as posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint [3].
Osseous Considerations: The synchondrosis of an os acromiale can be injured following trauma, though rarely [12]. Distal clavicle excision for arthritis has a higher failure rate in patients with prior low-grade separations [13]. A center-center or medial-center tunnel orientation results in a higher peak load to failure, which may lessen the risk of coracoid fracture during drilling with a 6-mm cannulated drill bit [22]. Attempts to create a tunnel based on the anatomic footprints for transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling results in a nearly universal medial cortical breach of the coracoid process [23].
Ligamentous & Kinematic Integrity: There is a high prevalence (30%) of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities [8]. Some concomitant glenohumeral pathologies indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open AC repair [8]. Anatomic acromioclavicular reconstructions are biomechanically superior to nonanatomic techniques [13]. None of the described procedures for graft fixation restores the kinematics of the native coracoclavicular ligaments [17]. The A-P and S-I translational biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint were restored using a technique utilizing a single continuous intramedullary free tendon graft [21]. Only combined AC and CC reconstruction can adequately reestablish physiological horizontal ACJ stability [27].
Classification¶
There is no consensus on a gold standard for diagnostic measures needed to classify acute acromioclavicular joint injuries [14]. Additionally, a lack of consensus exists on the optimal surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint injuries [1].
Clinical Presentation¶
There is no consensus on a gold standard for diagnostic measures needed to classify acute acromioclavicular joint injuries [14]. Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies are present in 30% of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities [8]. Some concomitant glenohumeral pathologies indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open acromioclavicular joint repair [8]. One in five subjects with surgically treated acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations has an associated intraarticular lesion that requires further intervention [20].
The synchondrosis of an os acromiale can be injured following trauma, although rarely [12]. Appropriate radiographic investigation for os acromiale injury includes axillary views [12]. A rare case of acute traumatic subacromial type VI acromioclavicular injury involved a locked dislocation mechanism potentially predisposed by joint obliquity [9]. Bipolar clavicle injury can present as posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint [3].
Investigations¶
There is no consensus on a gold standard for diagnostic measures needed to classify acute acromioclavicular joint injuries [14].
Plain radiography: Appropriate radiographic investigation, including axillary views, is necessary to identify injuries such as a fracture of an os acromiale with associated rupture of the coracoclavicular ligaments [12].
Other Considerations: A high prevalence (30%) of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies exists among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities [8]. Some concomitant glenohumeral pathologies indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open acromioclavicular repair [8]. The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20% [20]. One in five subjects with surgically treated acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations will have an associated intraarticular lesion that requires further intervention [20].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative¶
Conservative and surgical treatments are both effective in acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis management [19]. In Japan, approximately 95% of physicians chose surgery for acromioclavicular joint separations, while only 11 members opted for conservative treatment [11].
Operative¶
Indications: Restoration of the anatomy of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints should be the primary goal of treatment for bipolar clavicle injury involving posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint [3]. Acute traumatic subacromial type VI acromioclavicular injury can be treated with open reduction and distal clavicle resection [9]. Surgical fixations of the coracoid process and acromioclavicular joint for combined acromioclavicular joint dislocation and coracoid avulsion provide rigid stability and allow early rehabilitation with excellent functional outcome [16].
Surgical Approach / Technique: Both open and arthroscopic repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation using a single tight rope yield good clinical results, but the arthroscopic technique is more expensive and has a longer surgical time [6]. Anatomic acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single tendon graft provides greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction [4]. Anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstructions are biomechanically superior to nonanatomic techniques [13]. Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations results in significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related to clinical symptoms after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months [5]. Use of the pectoralis minor tendon as a local source of autograft tissue in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction is feasible and potentially advantageous [10]. None of the described procedures for graft fixation at the coracoid process restores the kinematics of the native coracoclavicular ligaments [17].
Implant Selection: There are no statistically significant differences between suture button and hook plate techniques for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation regarding operation time, coracoclavicular distance, complications, and loss of reduction [7]. The 15-degree clavicular hook plate is superior to the 0-degree hook plate in reducing shoulder pain and improving postoperative recovery in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation [29]. Clavicle fracture at the suture hole is a rare complication after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a suture-button [15].
Other Considerations: There is a lack of consensus on the optimal surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint injuries, leading to unique complication profiles based on the technique used [1]. Distal clavicle excision for arthritis has a higher failure rate in patients with prior low-grade separations [13].
Complications¶
Technique-Specific Profiles: A lack of consensus on optimal surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint injuries leads to unique complication profiles based on the technique used [1]. Arthroscopic repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation is more expensive and has a longer surgical time compared to open repair [6]. Treatment with hook plate or K-wires is associated with the highest complication rates among surgical techniques for acromioclavicular joint instability [34]. Modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction has the highest unplanned reoperation rates among surgical techniques for acromioclavicular joint instability [34]. There are no statistically significant differences in complications between suture button and hook plate techniques for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation [7].
Technical Failure and Reduction Loss: Placement of the coracoid button centrally under the coracoid base is crucial to prevent failure in minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique [18]. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous peroneus longus tendon is associated with a high rate of loss of reduction and tunnel widening [30].
Perioperative and Associated Pathologies: Early surgery results in a reduced risk of infection and loss of reduction compared with delayed surgery for acromioclavicular joint dislocations [33]. Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies have a high prevalence (30%) in acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities and could be missed by an isolated open AC repair [8]. Clavicle fracture at the suture hole is a rare complication after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a suture-button [15].
Recovery¶
Light activity (weeks): Evidence does not specify a week range for light activity or desk work.
Full activity (months): Evidence does not specify a month range for manual work or sport.
Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Patients undergoing coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations achieved significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related to clinical symptoms after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months [5].
Rehabilitation protocol: Surgical fixations of the coracoid process and AC joint in cases of combined acromioclavicular joint dislocation and coracoid avulsion provide rigid stability and allow early rehabilitation with excellent functional outcome [16].
Functional milestones: Patients undergoing coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations achieved significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related to clinical symptoms after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months [5].
Other Considerations: A lack of consensus exists on the optimal surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint injuries, leading to unique complication profiles based on the technique used [1]. Anatomic acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single tendon graft provides greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction [4]. Both open and arthroscopic repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation using a single tight rope yielded good clinical results [6]. The arthroscopic technique for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair is more expensive and has a longer surgical time than the open technique [6]. There is a high prevalence (30%) of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities, some of which indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open AC repair [8]. A rare case of acute traumatic subacromial type VI acromioclavicular injury was treated with open reduction and distal clavicle resection [9]. Joint obliquity may predispose patients to the locked dislocation mechanism seen in traumatic subacromial dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint [9]. Approximately 95% of physicians in Japan chose surgery for acromioclavicular joint separations, while only 11 members opted for conservative treatment [11]. The age of the patient at trauma had a significant influence on the functional outcome of minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique [18]. Placement of the coracoid button centrally under the coracoid base is crucial to prevent failure in minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique [18]. Restoration of the anatomy of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints should be the primary goal of treatment for bipolar clavicle injury involving posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint [3].
Key Evidence¶
- [L4] A lack of consensus exists on the optimal surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint injuries, leading to unique complication profiles based on the technique used. (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00696)
- [L5] This article provides a current, in-depth treatise on all aspects of acromioclavicular joint complex injuries, including anatomy, biomechanics, evaluation, and surgical outcomes, to guide clinical decision-making. (10.1177/0363546506298022)
- [L4] Restoration of the anatomy of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints should be the primary goal of treatment for this rare injury. (10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.016)
- [L5] This novel single tendon anatomic acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction provided greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than the isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction. (10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x)
- [L4] Patients who underwent the index procedure achieved significant improvement in shoulder function without complications related clinical symptom after a mean follow-up interval of 31.7 months. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.019)
- [L1] Both open and arthroscopic repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation yielded good clinical results, yet the arthroscopic technique is more expensive and has a longer surgical time. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.06.007)
- [L1] However, for operation time, coracoclavicular distance, complications, and loss of reduction, there were no statistically significant differences between the techniques. (10.1177/0363546519858745)
- [L4] This prospective study showed a high prevalence (30%) of concomitant glenohumeral pathologies, of which some indicate additional surgical therapy and could be missed by an isolated open AC repair. (10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.016)
- [Case_report] The authors report a rare case of acute traumatic subacromial type VI acromioclavicular injury treated with open reduction and distal clavicle resection, noting that joint obliquity may predispose patients to this locked dislocation mechanism. (10.1016/j.jse.2006.03.005)
- [L5] Use of the pectoralis minor tendon as a local source of autograft tissue in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction is both feasible and potentially advantageous. (10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.007)
- [L5] Only 11 members opted for conservative treatment of ACJ separations, and approximately 95% of physicians chose surgery. (10.1016/j.jseint.2020.09.008)
- [L4] This case highlights that the synchondrosis of an os acromiale can be injured following trauma, though rarely, and emphasizes the need for appropriate radiographic investigation including axillary views and a flexible surgical approach. (10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.012)
- [L1] To date there is no consensus on a gold standard for diagnostic measures needed to classify acute AC joint injuries. (10.1186/s12891-017-1864-y)
- [Case_report] The present case indicated that a clavicle fracture at the suture hole, although rare, is one of the complications after an acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a suture-button. (10.1186/s12891-019-2720-z)
- [L5] Surgical fixations of the coracoid process and AC joint provide rigid stability and allow early rehabilitation with excellent functional outcome. (10.1136/bcr-2014-208563)
- [L5] None of the described procedures for graft fixation restores the kinematics of the native coracoclavicular ligaments. (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.026)
- [L4] The age of the patient at trauma had a significant influence on the functional outcome, and placement of the coracoid button centrally under the coracoid base is crucial to prevent failure. (10.1007/s00167-013-2737-z)
- [L4] Conservative and surgical treatments are both effective in acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis management. (10.1007/s00167-020-06377-8)
- [L1] One in five subjects with surgically treated acute ACJ dislocations will have an associated intraarticular lesion that requires further intervention. (10.1007/s00167-020-05917-6)
- [L5] The A-P and S-I translational biomechanical characteristics of the AC joint were restored using the new technique described. (10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.013)
- [L5] Our biomechanical results showed a higher peak load to failure with a center-center or medial-center tunnel orientation, which may lessen the risk of coracoid fracture during drilling with a 6-mm cannulated drill bit. (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.004)
- [L5] Attempts to correct this nonanatomic configuration by creating a tunnel based on the anatomic footprints results in a nearly universal medial cortical breach of the coracoid process. (10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.008)
- [L5] The results suggest that only combined AC and CC reconstruction can adequately reestablish physiological horizontal ACJ stability. (10.1007/s00167-014-2895-7)
- [L3] The 15-degree hook plate is superior to the 0-degree hook plate in reducing shoulder pain and improving postoperative recovery in the treatment of AC joint dislocation. (10.1177/0300060518786910)
- [L4] The procedure is associated with a high rate of loss of reduction and tunnel widening but no donor site morbidity. (10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.009)
- [L2] Early surgery results in better functional and radiological outcomes with a reduced risk of infection and loss of reduction compared with delayed surgery. (10.1302/0301-620x.95b12.31802)
- [L1] Treatment with hook plate/K-wires was associated with the highest complication rates, and modified Weaver-Dunn had the highest unplanned reoperation rates. (10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.016)
See Also¶
References¶
[1] Acromioclavicular Separations: Complications and How to Avoid Them. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00696
[2] Evaluation and Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506298022
[3] Bipolar clavicle injury: posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint: A report of two cases. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.016
[4] Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x
[5] Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: clinical and imaging outcomes. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.019
[6] Open versus modified arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using a single tight rope: randomized comparative study of clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.06.007
[7] Suture Button Versus Hook Plate for Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519858745
[8] Prevalence and pattern of glenohumeral injuries among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.016
[9] Traumatic subacromial dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint: A case report. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.03.005
[10] Anatomy of the pectoralis minor tendon and its use in acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.007
[11] Treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations in Japan: a survey. JSES International. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.09.008
[12] Fracture of an os acromiale with associated rupture of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.012
[13] Chapter 76 Disorders of the Acromioclavicular Joint. 2019.
[14] The acutely injured acromioclavicular joint – which imaging modalities should be used for accurate diagnosis? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1864-y
[15] Clavicle fracture at the suture hole after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a suture-button: a case report. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2720-z
[16] Combined acromioclavicular joint dislocation and coracoid avulsion in an adult. BMJ Case Reports. 2015. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2014-208563
[17] Tendon Graft Fixation Sites at the Coracoid Process for Reconstruction of the Coracoclavicular Ligaments: A Kinematic Evaluation of Three Different Surgical Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.08.026
[18] Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2737-z
[19] No differences between conservative and surgical management of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: a scoping review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06377-8
[20] The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05917-6
[21] Biomechanical evaluation of a coracoclavicular and acromioclacicular ligament reconstruction technique utilizing a single continuous intramedullary free tendon graft. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.013
[22] Biomechanical Evaluation of Effect of Coracoid Tunnel Placement on Load to Failure of Fixation During Repair of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.004
[23] Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.008
[27] Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2895-7
[29] Fifteen-degree clavicular hook plate achieves better clinical outcomes in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Journal of International Medical Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518786910
[30] A prospective study of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous peroneus longus tendon for acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.009
[33] Controversies relating to the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2013. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b12.31802
[34] Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.016