Weight, Obesity and Joint Health¶
How body weight and obesity affect joint load, osteoarthritis, and the risks and outcomes of joint surgery — including the role of weight loss before an operation.
Overview¶
Obesity is a systemic disease with profound inflammatory consequences on joint health, extending beyond its role as a mechanical burden on the knee [1]. High body mass index elevates the risk of both knee and hand osteoarthritis irrespective of metabolic status [5]. The increased risk of knee osteoarthritis attributed to high body mass index is more evident in metabolically healthy participants [5]. Central obesity is significantly associated with the risk of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis, particularly in secondary glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis and normal body mass index populations [12]. Fat distribution should be included in the early screening and risk assessment system for glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis [12].
Modern surgical practices and implant designs may have mitigated traditional obesity-related risks, resulting in minimal impact on loosening and mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty [8]. Body mass index does not affect clinical outcomes following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, with no significant differences observed between above-average and below-average body mass index groups [2]. Body mass index was not correlated with clinical improvements following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears [2]. Type 2 diabetes is not associated with excess risk of periprosthetic joint infection in obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty [3]. Type 2 diabetes constitutes a minor risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection in individuals of normal or underweight status [3].
Body mass index greater than 40 is not correlated with early complications in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty at an ambulatory surgical center [4]. Management of preoperative comorbidities and custom surgical planning can achieve outcomes comparable to those of patients with normal body mass indices at ambulatory surgical centers, questioning body mass index as an exclusion criterion [4]. A nonsignificant trend toward a higher complication rate was observed in patients with severe obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) undergoing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty [13]. A statistically significant increase in arthrofibrosis was found in patients with body mass index less than 25 kg/m2 undergoing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty [13].
Background & Causes¶
Obesity is a systemic disease with profound inflammatory consequences on joint health, extending beyond its role as a mechanical burden on the knee [1]. High body mass index elevates the risk of both knee and hand osteoarthritis irrespective of metabolic status [5]. The increased risk of knee osteoarthritis attributed to high body mass index is more evident in metabolically healthy participants [5].
Central obesity is significantly associated with the risk of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis, especially in secondary glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis and normal body mass index populations [12]. Fat distribution should be included in the early screening and risk assessment system for glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis [12].
Postoperative Progression: Following medial meniscus posterior root tear repair, osteoarthritis progression shows higher rates with elevated body mass index [29]. Obesity and preexisting osteoarthritis are known risk factors for predicting poor outcomes and conversion to arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy [14].
Surgical Outcomes: Body mass index does not affect clinical outcomes following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears [2]. Body mass index is not correlated with clinical improvements following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears [2].
Infection Risk: Type 2 diabetes is not associated with excess risk of periprosthetic joint infection in obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty [3]. Type 2 diabetes constitutes a minor risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection in individuals of normal or underweight weight [3].
Tissue Assessment: Body mass index has a weak-to-moderate association with peri-incisional adiposity in primary total joint arthroplasty patients [22]. Body mass index is not an appropriate proxy for the condition of peri-incisional adiposity in primary total joint arthroplasty patients [22].
Symptoms & Presentation¶
Obesity is a systemic disease with profound inflammatory consequences on joint health, extending beyond its role as a mechanical burden on the knee [1]. High body mass index elevates the risk of knee osteoarthritis irrespective of metabolic status [5]. This increased risk is more evident in metabolically healthy participants [5]. High body mass index also elevates the risk of hand osteoarthritis irrespective of metabolic status [5].
Central obesity is significantly associated with the risk of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis [12]. This association is especially evident in secondary glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis and normal body mass index populations [12].
Knee Arthroscopy Outcomes: Obesity and preexisting osteoarthritis are known risk factors for predicting poor outcomes and conversion to arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy [14]. The study linking obesity and preexisting osteoarthritis to poor outcomes lacks a control group and specific procedural details to determine if the surgery itself drives progression versus patient factors [14].
Hip Arthroscopy Trends: Modern hip arthroscopy patients demonstrate improved patient-reported symptoms at the time of surgery [19]. These patients show a decrease in mean body mass index [19]. They also report an increase in symptom duration prior to surgery [19].
Management¶
Obesity is a systemic disease with profound inflammatory consequences on joint health, extending beyond its role as a mechanical burden on the knee [1]. High body mass index elevates the risk of both knee and hand osteoarthritis irrespective of metabolic status [5]. The increased risk of knee osteoarthritis attributed to high BMI is more evident in metabolically healthy participants [5]. Effective osteoarthritis management during conservative and postsurgical phases must integrate mechanical, metabolic, and immunological insights to provide personalized joint preservation strategies [28].
Preoperative Optimization: Semaglutide appears to be a safe alternative to bariatric surgery for weight management before total hip arthroplasty, with similar implant survival and postoperative complication rates [25]. Findings support a BMI-based approach to perioperative semaglutide use, particularly in patients with a BMI greater than 30 [26]. Total weight loss percentage was higher in bariatric surgery patients compared to those undergoing immediate total knee arthroplasty in the SWIFT trial [27].
Ambulatory Surgical Center Selection: Body mass index greater than 40 is not correlated with early complications in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty at an ambulatory surgical center [4]. Focusing on management of preoperative comorbidities and custom surgical planning can achieve outcomes comparable to those of patients with normal BMIs at ambulatory surgical centers [4]. BMI should not serve as an exclusion criterion for primary total joint arthroplasty at ambulatory surgical centers; patient selection should be more inclusive and evidence-based [4].
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): A body mass index of 45 is a safe cut-off for cementless total knee arthroplasty, though numbers were too small to draw conclusions for patients with BMI ≥ 45 [6]. Modern surgical practices and implant designs may have mitigated traditional obesity-related risks, resulting in minimal impact on loosening and mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty [8]. Obesity remains a critical risk factor for mechanical failures in functionally aligned image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty, despite comparable functional outcomes [11]. Increasing obesity severity is not associated with higher rates of postoperative stiffness or inferior outcomes following manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty [9]. Concern for stiffness alone should not serve as a categorical barrier to total knee arthroplasty or manipulation under anesthesia when clinically indicated [9]. Current evidence does not support the routine use of tibial stem extensions in obese total knee arthroplasty patients due to insufficient, heterogeneous, and very low certainty data [17]. Specific tibial stem extension designs may benefit selected populations of obese total knee arthroplasty patients [17].
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): Type 2 diabetes is not associated with excess risk of periprosthetic joint infection in obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty [3]. Type 2 diabetes constitutes a minor risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection in individuals of normal or underweight status [3]. Obesity class does not associate with the incidence, timing, or invasiveness of reoperations after total hip arthroplasty [10]. In morbidly obese patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, dual mobility implants demonstrated excellent five-year survivorship with outcomes comparable or slightly superior to fixed-bearing constructs [24].
Hip Arthroscopy: Obese and overweight patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome convert to total hip arthroplasty at significantly higher rates compared with normal-weight patients [7]. Patients with obesity have greater than 2-fold odds of conversion to total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome [23]. Multicenter data demonstrates improved patient-reported symptoms at the time of surgery, a decrease in mean patient BMI, and an increase in symptom duration reported prior to surgery in modern hip arthroscopy patients [19].
Shoulder Arthroplasty: Obesity increases the risk of all-cause revisions and revision for instability or dislocation in patients receiving reverse total shoulder arthroplasty indicated for fractures [21].
Other Procedures: Body mass index does not affect clinical outcomes following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears [2]. There are no significant differences in clinical improvements between above-average and below-average BMI groups following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer [2]. Obesity substantially lengthened length of stay and encouraged undesirable discharge when compared to non-obese individuals in pediatric lower extremity fracture surgery [20].
Key Considerations¶
Obesity is a systemic disease with profound inflammatory consequences on joint health, extending beyond its role as a mechanical burden on the knee [1]. While traditional concerns persist, modern surgical practices and implant designs may have mitigated obesity-related risks, resulting in minimal impact on loosening and mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty [8].
Preoperative Risk Stratification: Type 2 Diabetes: Not associated with excess risk of periprosthetic joint infection in obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty [3]. It constitutes a minor risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection in individuals of normal or underweight status undergoing total hip arthroplasty [3]. BMI Thresholds: A BMI greater than 40 is not correlated with early complications in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty at an ambulatory surgical center [4]. Management of preoperative comorbidities and custom surgical planning can achieve outcomes comparable to those of patients with normal BMIs at ambulatory surgical centers, questioning BMI as an exclusion criterion [4]. A BMI of 45 is a safe cut-off for cementless total knee arthroplasty, though sample sizes were too small to draw conclusions for patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 45 [6]. Reoperation Risk: WHO obesity class is not associated with the risk, invasiveness, or timing of reoperations after total hip arthroplasty [10]. Ten-year functional outcomes and revision rates of total hip arthroplasty do not justify restricting access to surgery on the basis of BMI [31].
Procedure-Specific Outcomes: Shoulder Arthroplasty: Body mass index (BMI) does not affect clinical outcomes following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, with no significant differences observed between above-average and below-average BMI groups [2]. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of all-cause revisions and revision for instability or dislocation in patients receiving reverse total shoulder arthroplasty indicated for fractures [21]. Hip Arthroplasty: Obese and overweight patients convert to total hip arthroplasty at significantly higher rates compared with normal-weight patients following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome [7]. Dual mobility implants demonstrated excellent five-year survivorship with outcomes comparable or slightly superior to fixed-bearing constructs in morbidly obese patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty [24]. Knee Arthroplasty: Increasing obesity severity is not associated with higher rates of postoperative stiffness or inferior outcomes following manipulation under anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty [9]. Concern for stiffness alone should not serve as a categorical barrier to total knee arthroplasty or manipulation under anesthesia when clinically indicated [9]. Obese patients are at increased risk of higher revision rates following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [15].
Implant Selection and Revision: The current body of literature regarding tibial stem extension in total knee arthroplasty of obese patients is limited and heterogeneous, creating uncertainty rather than proving inefficacy [16]. Future multicenter studies with standardized implant designs, consistent BMI stratification, and at least 10 years of follow-up are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding tibial stem extension in obese total knee arthroplasty patients [16]. Current evidence does not support the routine use of tibial stem extensions in obese total knee arthroplasty patients due to insufficient, heterogeneous, and very low certainty data [17]. Specific implant designs may benefit selected populations despite the lack of support for routine use of tibial stem extensions in obese total knee arthroplasty patients [17].
Pediatric and Arthroscopy Considerations: Obesity substantially lengthened length of stay and encouraged undesirable discharge when compared to non-obese individuals following lower extremity fracture surgery in pediatric patients [20]. Obesity and preexisting osteoarthritis are risk factors for predicting poor outcomes and conversion to arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy [14]. The study linking obesity and osteoarthritis to conversion to arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy lacks a control group and specific procedural details to determine if surgery itself drives progression versus patient factors [14].
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Obesity is more than a mechanical burden on the knee; it is a systemic disease with profound inflammatory consequences on joint health. (10.1002/arj.70051)
- [L2] No significant differences were observed between above-average and below-average BMI groups, and BMI was not correlated with clinical improvements. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100634)
- [L2] However, T2DM constitutes a minor risk factor in individuals of normal/underweight. (10.1186/s12891-026-09568-5)
- [L3] Focusing on management of preoperative comorbidities and custom surgical planning can achieve outcomes comparable to those of patients who have normal BMIs at ASCs, questioning BMI as an exclusion criterion and advocating for more inclusive, evidence-based patient selection. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.065)
- [L2] High BMI elevates the risk of both knee and hand osteoarthritis irrespective of metabolic status, and the increased risk of knee osteoarthritis attributed to high BMI is more evident in metabolically healthy participants. (10.1186/s12891-026-09495-5)
- [L3] However, the numbers were too small to draw conclusions in patients who have a BMI ≥ 45. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.12.038)
- [L3] Obese and overweight patients converted to THA at significantly higher rates compared with normal-weight patients. (10.1177/03635465251400355)
- [L3] These findings suggest modern surgical practices and implant designs may have mitigated traditional obesity-related risks. (10.1016/j.arth.2026.04.031)
- [L3] These findings suggest that increasing obesity severity is not associated with higher rates of postoperative stiffness or inferior outcomes following MUA and that concern for stiffness alone should not serve as a categorical barrier to TKA or MUA when clinically indicated. (10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.080)
- [L3] In this cohort of obese patients who underwent THA, the WHO obesity class was not associated with risk, invasiveness, or timing of reoperations. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.026)
- [L3] However, obesity remains a critical risk factor for mechanical failures. (10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100861)
- [L2] Central obesity is significantly associated with the risk of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis, especially in secondary GJO and normal BMI populations, suggesting that fat distribution should be included in the early screening and risk assessment system for GJO. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.007)
- [L2] However, a nonsignificant trend toward a higher complication rate was observed in patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), while a statistically significant increase in arthrofibrosis was found in patients with BMI <25 kg/m2. (10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100927)
- [L5] Obesity and preexisting osteoarthritis are known risk factors for predicting poor outcomes and conversion to arthroplasty after knee arthroscopy, but the study lacks a control group and specific procedural details to determine if the surgery itself drives progression versus patient factors. (10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.036)
- [L3] Based on AOANJRR data, obese patients are at increased risk of higher rate of revision following UKA. (10.1177/2325967125s00336)
- [L5] The current body of literature is limited and heterogeneous, creating uncertainty rather than proving inefficacy; future multicenter studies with standardized implant designs, consistent BMI stratification, and at least 10 years of follow-up are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.047)
- [L5] The authors conclude that current evidence does not support the routine use of tibial stem extensions in obese total knee arthroplasty patients due to insufficient, heterogeneous, and very low certainty data, though specific designs may benefit selected populations. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.056)
- [L3] Otherwise, the complication profile was similar across the spectrum of BMI values. (10.1016/j.arth.2026.01.024)
- [L4] This multicenter data set has demonstrated improved patient-reported symptoms at the time of surgery, a decrease in mean patient BMI, and an increase in symptom duration reported prior to surgery. (10.1002/ksa.12745)
- [L4] Obesity substantially lengthened length of stay and encouraged undesirable discharge when compared to non-obese individuals. (10.1186/s12891-025-09349-6)
- [L3] Obesity has an increased risk of all-cause revisions and revision for instability or dislocation in patients receiving rTSA indicated for fractures. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.036)
- [L3] BMI has a weak-to-moderate association with peri-incisional adiposity in primary total joint arthroplasty patients. (10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.020)
- [L3] However, patients with obesity had >2-fold odds of conversion to THA. (10.1177/03635465251392585)
- [L3] In morbidly obese patients, DM implants demonstrated excellent five-year survivorship with outcomes comparable or slightly superior to fixed-bearing constructs. (10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.075)
- [L3] Semaglutide appears to be a safe alternative to bariatric surgery for weight management before THA, with similar implant survival and postoperative complication rates. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.068)
- [L3] Our findings support a BMI-based approach to perioperative semaglutide use, particularly in patients who have a BMI >30. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.056)
- [L1] Total weight loss % was higher in bariatric surgery patients (28.7%, P < 0.001). (10.1016/j.arth.2026.05.033)
- [Letter] Effective OA management during conservative and postsurgical phases must integrate mechanical, metabolic, and immunological insight to provide personalized joint preservation strategies. (10.1002/arj.70057)
- [L1] Following MMPRT repair, repairs show progression of osteoarthritis with higher rates seen with elevated BMI. (10.1002/arj.70028)
- [L3] The ten-year functional outcomes and revision rates of THA do not justify restricting access to surgery on the basis of BMI. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.044)
References¶
[1] Reframing Obesity in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Call for a Transdisciplinary Approach Beyond Biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/arj.70051
[2] Body mass index does not affect clinical outcomes following arthroscopically assisted posterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100634
[3] Type 2 diabetes is not associated with excess risk of periprosthetic joint infection in obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09568-5
[4] Body Mass Index > 40 Is Not Correlated With Early Complications in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty at an Ambulatory Surgical Center. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.065
[5] Does metabolically healthy obesity increase the risk of knee and hand osteoarthritis? A population-based cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-09495-5
[6] Body Mass Index of 45 Is a Safe Cut-Off for Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.12.038
[7] The Effect of Body Mass Index on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Analysis With 10-Year Follow-up. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251400355
[8] Obesity and Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisited: Minimal Impact on Loosening and Mechanical Failure in the Modern Era. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.04.031
[9] Obesity Severity and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisited: A Contemporary Analysis of Patients Requiring Manipulation Under Anesthesia. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.080
[10] Obesity Class Does Not Associate With Incidence, Timing, or Invasiveness of Reoperations After Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.026
[11] Impact of high body mass index on functionally aligned image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty: Comparable functional outcomes but higher mechanical failures. Journal of ISAKOS. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100861
[12] Association between central obesity and the risk of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.07.007
[13] Impact of body mass index on robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty outcomes: A retrospective cohort analysis. Journal of ISAKOS. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100927
[14] Editorial Commentary: Obesity and Osteoarthritis Are Risk Factors for Conversion to Arthroplasty, With or Without Previous Knee Arthroscopic Surgery. Arthroscopy. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.036
[15] Obesity is Associated with Higher Rates of Revision Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/2325967125s00336
[16] Letter to the Editor Commenting on: "Current Evidence Does Not Support the Use of Tibial Stem Extension in Total Knee Arthroplasty of Obese Patients: A Systematic Review". The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.047
[17] Reply to: "Letter to the Editor Commenting on: 'Current Evidence Does Not Support the Use of Tibial Stem Extension in Total Knee Arthroplasty of Obese Patients: A Systematic Review'". The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.056
[18] Rising Body Mass Index Increased Early Complications, But Not Early Reoperations Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.01.024
[19] Lower body mass index and symptom burden in modern hip arthroscopy patients: Updated epidemiology and trends from the MASH multicenter cohort. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12745
[20] Impact of pediatric obesity on surgical outcomes of lower extremity fractures: a nationwide analysis (2010–2019). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09349-6
[21] Revision rates between obese and nonobese total shoulder arthroplasty patients: an Australian registry data study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.036
[22] Body Mass Index is Not an Appropriate Proxy for the Condition of Peri-Incisional Adiposity in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.08.020
[23] Obese Patients Treated by Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome — 10-Year Functional Outcomes and Conversion Rates to Arthroplasty Compared With Normal-Weight Patients. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251392585
[24] Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Morbid Obesity: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis of Dual Mobility and Standard Fixed-Bearing Implants. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.03.075
[25] Is Semaglutide a Safer Weight-Management Option Than Bariatric Surgery for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)?. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.068
[26] The Effect of Body Mass Index on the Efficacy of Semaglutide Use at the Time of Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.056
[27] Impact Of Prior Bariatric Surgery Versus Immediate Total Knee Arthroplasty On Knee Function Among Patients Who Have Severe Obesity And Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: The SWIFT Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.05.033
[28] Author Reply to “Reframing Obesity in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Call for a Transdisciplinary Approach Beyond Biomechanics”. Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/arj.70057
[29] Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Repairs Show Osteoarthritis Progression Over Time With Higher Rates Seen With Higher Body Mass Index. Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/arj.70028
[31] Do the Ten-Year Functional Outcomes and Revision Rates of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients Justify Restricting Their Access to Surgery?. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.044