Skip to content

Spinal Anatomy & Physiology

Lumbar spinal anatomy and biomechanics, focusing on neuroforaminal and central canal dimensions and the drivers of degenerative stenosis.

Overview

Spinal deformities and disorders require a tailored approach grounded in precise anatomical assessment and imaging. A novel rabbit model of angular kyphosis provides a reliable platform for investigating pathophysiology and evaluating interventions [1]. Effective management relies on understanding the specific indications, advantages, and disadvantages of radiographs, CT, MRI, and other techniques [2]. Comprehensive evaluation includes data on bone density of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine measured using Hounsfield units of computed tomography from 4350 vertebrae, which aids in assessing spinal status and designing preoperative plans before instrumentation [56].

Clinical management of thoracolumbar and lumbosacral pain is highly individualized based on pathology, symptomatic involvement, and the patient's physical demands [4]. Nonsurgical treatment usually serves as the first line of therapy [4]. Physical examination encompasses inspection, palpation, range of motion testing, and neurologic evaluation to identify spinal pathology, nonspinal conditions, and signs of symptom magnification [5]. Absolute surgical indications for disc herniation include deteriorating neurological deficits with myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome [22].

Surgeons must account for anatomical variations, such as the differing rates of presence of 11 thoracic and 6 lumbar vertebrae in asymptomatic Chinese adult volunteers, when performing surgery or assessing alignment parameters [61]. Standard positioning for Cobb angle radiographic measurements is recommended to avoid technical causes for the appearance of a curve [26]. While various stereophotogrammetric protocols exist to quantify multi-segmental motion of the thoracolumbar spine, no standard guideline exists and these approaches remain limited from a clinical point of view [23]. Finally, protocols in place at centers minimize the risk of spinal cord ischemia during planned sacrifice of radiculomedullary vessels, though elucidation of exact compensation mechanisms requires further study via comparative angiography [60]. A 1957 report on mechanical tests of the lumbosacral spine remains a preliminary report without clinical conclusions regarding outcomes or efficacy [14].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

The spine's unique bony, ligamentous, neural, and vascular anatomy facilitates multiple biologic and biomechanical functions, providing axial support with significant flexibility while protecting neural structures [30]. Su's three-column theory aligns with the characteristics of vertebral physiological structure, fracture patterns, and biomechanics [48]. Critical spinal lytic defects result in kinematic abnormalities and lower the compressive strength of the spine [62].

Geometric deformations of the lumbar disc occur during axial body rotations [38], and load-displacement curves of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine are non-linear [66]. Motions of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine are coupled [66], with increasing load significantly impacting the coupled translational movement of lumbar facet joints [54]. The position of the lumbar spine center of rotation changes with variations in load and differs between movement types [21], while distinct motion patterns exist in the lower lumbar spine [21]. Individual kinematic variables and lumbar lordosis have weak to moderate effects on intervertebral range of motion at other intervertebral levels [65].

Global lumbar spine kinematics do not reflect regional lumbar spine kinematics [16], and pelvic, trunk, and upper limb biomechanics in individuals with spinal deformities are complex [57]. Lumbosacral and hip motions are the major contributors to global alignment postural change [58]. With advancing age, spinopelvic biomechanics demonstrate decreased spinal mobility but increased pelvic and hip mobility [51]. Changes in lumbar-stabilizing mechanisms in the presence of muscle fatigue seem to be caused by modulation of lumbopelvic kinematics [59]. Higher values of ligament stiffness over all lumbar levels could lead to a shift of the loading and the motion between segments to the lower lumbar levels [73].

Loading in the anterior-oblique direction requires lower external force or moment to keep the lumbar spine in the neutral position compared to vertical or posterior-oblique directions [70]. Understanding the biomechanical principles of spinal instrumentation and motion coupling is essential for optimizing three-dimensional correction of thoracolumbar spinal deformities and achieving favorable mechanical environments for fusion [52]. Spine balance can alter total hip arthroplasty outcomes [72]. Currently available wearable devices are capable of assessing spinal posture with good accuracy in the clinical setting [18].

Classification

Roussouly-based Axis: The T4-L1-Hip axis is conceptually aligned with the description of spinal shapes in the Roussouly classification but utilizes continuous measures of spinal alignment [53].

Degenerative Thoracolumbar Kyphosis: A novel classification for degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis proposes four types based on thoracolumbar kyphosis and balance, followed by targeted treatment strategies for various types [64].

Hip-Spine Classification: The Hip-Spine Classification system allows surgeons to make appropriate evaluations preoperatively and guides the use of dual-mobility components in patients with spinopelvic pathology to reduce the risk of dislocation [49].

Other Considerations: No existing prognostic classification system can predict which patients with a congenital osseous anomaly of the cervical spine are at risk for future neurologic injury [43]. Further analysis by an expert panel is required to develop specific classification criteria for thoracolumbar fascia [50]. Distal radius bone mineral density has the potential to be integrated into future osteoporosis classification systems [67]. There is a need for consistent nomenclature, advanced imaging, and the integration of artificial intelligence to personalize care based on individual anatomy and biomechanics [80].

Clinical Presentation

Clinical evaluation begins with a comprehensive history and physical examination to distinguish spinal pathology from nonspinal conditions and identify signs of symptom magnification [5]. General principles include inspection, palpation, range of motion testing, and neurologic evaluation. While understanding the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of radiographs, CT, and MRI is critical for safe management [2], imaging findings must be interpreted cautiously. Roentgenographic abnormalities in asymptomatic individuals represent imaging findings only, and clinical decisions regarding thoracic spine pain usually require additional studies [12]. Furthermore, MRI findings are not predictive of the development or duration of low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects [7], and few MRI findings show large magnitude associations with chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms even with specific outcome definitions [3].

Imaging Modalities: MRI is a non-invasive, high-resolution, multiplanar modality essential for evaluating the cervical spine spectrum, providing detailed visualization of osseous structures, discs, the spinal cord, and nerve roots [17]. It is also an excellent modality for imaging pathologic processes in the pediatric spine [19]. Wearable devices are currently capable of assessing spinal posture with good accuracy in the clinical setting [18]. Accessory ossicles exhibit varied prevalence and clinical significance, with some presenting minor associations with symptoms and others linked to specific syndromes or disorders [36]. A unique neural arch shape may clarify the pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis and explain its greater prevalence in females [13].

Red-Flag Patterns and Urgent Management: When cauda equina syndrome is diagnosed, urgent surgical decompression of the spinal canal is indicated regardless of the setting [37]. Early investigation is warranted for cervical vertebral anomalies associated with intermittent and significant pain [39]. Treatment for anomalies of the occipitocervical articulation depends on symptom severity and neurological involvement; fusion is indicated for instability causing cord compression, while laminectomy or foramen magnum enlargement may be necessary for compression [40]. In idiopathic scoliosis, pushing conditions warrant attention to the lower spinal cord and nerve roots on both sides of the main thoracic curve [41].

Pathophysiology and Management Principles: A novel rabbit model of angular kyphosis provides a reliable platform for investigating spinal deformity pathophysiology and evaluating therapeutic interventions [1]. Management of thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine-related pain is highly individualized based on pathology, symptomatic involvement, and patient activity demands, with nonsurgical treatment usually serving as the first line of therapy [4]. The monograph on cervical syndrome presents contradictory conceptions regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, though there is general agreement on the role of intervertebral foramina in nerve-root irritation and the significance of the cervical sympathetic nervous system [15]. Specialty updates review high-quality research to support treatment decision-making across cervical and lumbar conditions, deformity, cord injury, and trauma [20].

Investigations

Plain radiography: While specific indications for radiographs vary by pathology, an understanding of their advantages and disadvantages relative to other modalities is critical for the safe and effective management of spinal disorders [2].

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging is a non-invasive, high-resolution, multiplanar modality essential for evaluating the spectrum of cervical spinal disease, providing detailed visualization of osseous and soft-tissue structures including intervertebral discs, the spinal cord, and nerve roots [17]. It is also an excellent modality for imaging pathologic processes in the pediatric spine with high-resolution views of osseous and soft-tissue structures [19]. In the cervical region, a comprehensive reference source exists on the use of MRI and CT for scanning the entire spine [63]. A progression of degenerative changes on cervical MRI was detected in nearly all subjects over a 20-year period [31]. MR images can distinguish histological structures of normal and malformed mouse spines, where malformed vertebrae were accompanied by adjacent intervertebral structures corresponding to fully segmented structures in human congenital scoliosis, though intervertebral conditions varied [68]. Specialized pulse sequences and imaging techniques are defined for evaluating the spine, characterizing the three compartments for spinal tumor classification and providing knowledge of common spinal tumors [77]. The proposed method offers an option for quantifying cervical spine muscle composition and morphology using MRI [78]. Performing both quantitative T2 relaxation time and magnetic transfer ratio imaging under the same conditions is helpful in evaluating disc degeneration [69]. A prospective longitudinal trial on spinal cord motion as a new diagnostic MRI parameter will offer data to establish PC-MRI for spinal cord motion in the diagnostic work-up of patients with spinal canal stenosis [82]. However, few MRI findings showed large magnitude associations with symptom outcomes even with specific definitions for spine-related symptom outcomes [3]. Findings on magnetic resonance scans were not predictive of the development or duration of low-back pain [7]. Findings on MRI of the thoracic spine represent roentgenographic abnormalities only, and clinical decisions concerning thoracic spine pain treatment usually require additional studies [12]. A routine MRI evaluation appears warranted for patients with presumed idiopathic scoliosis if aged less than 10 years, being male, or having a left thoracic or right lumbar curve [74]. The investigation represents the best available evidence regarding the radiographic and clinical natural history of cervical degeneration, with data that will critically influence discussions with patients regarding their MRI findings [11].

CT: Lumbar HR-MDCT is not valid for the in vivo evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine as there was no significant correlation between HR-MDCT and micro-CT analysis of vertebral biopsies [81].

Other Considerations: A novel rabbit model of angular kyphosis provides a reliable platform for investigating the pathophysiology of spinal deformities and evaluating therapeutic interventions [1]. Due to the unique microarchitecture of the cervical vertebrae, fractures occur much later in this region than in the thoracic or lumbar spine [10]. Imaging studies should be used to confirm the clinical impression derived from history and physical examination, with careful correlation of anatomic abnormalities to symptoms, and advanced neurodiagnostic imaging should be refrained from until appropriate nonoperative management has failed [83].

Treatment

Non-Operative

Nonsurgical treatment serves as the first line of therapy for thoracolumbar and lumbosacral spine-related pain, with management highly individualized based on pathology, symptomatic involvement, and the patient's activity or physical demands [4]. For acute low back pain, individualized administration route preference-matched treatment improves therapeutic outcomes, though further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm this benefit [47]. Management of low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy ranges from conservative and pharmacologic measures to surgical treatment, often requiring a collaborative plan between orthopaedic surgeons and obstetricians [87]. Treatment for separation of the symphysis pubis in association with childbearing is generally non-operative, with surgery reserved for inadequate reduction or persistent symptoms [86]. High-quality studies targeting non-surgical treatment as an evidence-based alternative to surgical interventions for conditions related to excessive anterior pelvic tilt are warranted [89].

Operative

Indications: Absolute surgical indications for disc herniation include deteriorating neurological deficits with myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome [22]. Spinal anesthesia by mini-laminotomy should be considered for patients in whom general anesthesia is contraindicated and neuraxial anesthesia is extremely difficult, such as patients with ankylosing spondylitis [79].

Surgical Approach / Technique: Percutaneous spinal endoscopy with a unilateral interlaminar approach to perform bilateral decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis demonstrated good clinical and radiographic efficacies in short-term follow-up [9]. This approach did not cause meaningful changes in IHI, CDS, and spine stability in short-term follow-up [9]. Instrumentation should never extend beyond the contralateral intervertebral disc border, regardless of presumed vascular anatomy, during oblique lumbar interbody fusion [75].

Implant Selection: A 3D-printed porous stand-alone interbody cage for cervical fusion is safe and effective for cervical fixation, showing no adverse effects on the cervical spine or animal bodies [46]. This cage demonstrates equivalent fixation and healing capabilities compared to control devices [46].

Adjuncts: Recent advances in cervical spinal cord stimulation have demonstrated improved efficacy as a therapeutic intervention for restoring hand functions in individuals with spinal cord injuries or stroke [45]. Cervical spinal cord stimulation yields significant improvements in grip force, proximal arm strength, and muscle activation with both immediate and sustained effects [45]. Advances in medical care and rehabilitation continue to improve, but treatment outcomes following tissue regeneration for spinal cord injury remain dismal [6].

Other Considerations: A novel rabbit model of angular kyphosis provides a reliable platform for investigating the pathophysiology of spinal deformities and evaluating therapeutic interventions [1]. An understanding of available spine imaging modalities is critical to safely and effectively manage spinal disorders, with specific indications, advantages, and disadvantages for radiographs, CT, MRI, and other techniques depending on the pathology [2]. Utilizing standard positioning for Cobb angle radiographic measurements is recommended to avoid technical causes for the appearance of a curve [26]. Results from 3D markerless asymmetry analysis lead to a more conservative approach in monitoring of scoliotic curves in clinical applications [85]. Using 3D markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis would result in a smaller number of radiographs being saved [85]. Using 3D markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis would decrease the risk of having non-measured curves with progression [85]. Improved spinal morphology of postsurgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has no significant impact on their static standing balance [8]. Six months of spinal growth modulation created significant spinal deformity in all three planes compared with sham-surgery controls [88]. The paper on mechanical tests of the lumbosacral spine does not provide a clinical conclusion regarding patient outcomes or treatment efficacy [14]. The literature offers various stereophotogrammetric protocols to quantify multi-segmental motion of the thoracolumbar spine without a standard guideline, and approaches remain limited from a clinical point of view [23]. A range of wearable technologies and biofeedback modalities are used to modulate spine motor control, though standardized reporting and further research are needed to establish clinical efficacy [42]. Specialty updates review the highest-quality peer-reviewed research in spinal conditions to support treatment decision-making for cervical and lumbar spine conditions, pediatric and adult spinal deformity, spinal cord injury, and spinal fracture and trauma [20].

Complications

Instability: While percutaneous spinal endoscopy with a unilateral interlaminar approach for central lumbar spinal stenosis did not cause meaningful changes in IHI, CDS, or spine stability in short-term follow-up [9], the extent of inferior articular process (IAP) resection is critical. In the short term, patients with > 50% IAP defects show no difference in lumbar stability or clinical outcomes compared to those with ≤ 50% defects after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy [25]; however, complete loss of the inferior articular process remains a concern for long-term instability [25]. Additionally, fractures occur much later in the cervical vertebrae than in the thoracic or lumbar spine due to the unique microarchitecture of the cervical vertebrae [10].

Neurological & Clinical Progression: Most patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy become worse clinically if the disorder is left untreated, with more than 50 percent progressing to severe disability [34]. Despite advances in medical care and rehabilitation, treatment outcomes following tissue regeneration for spinal cord injury remain dismal [6]. Although major abnormalities are found on magnetic resonance scans of the cervical spine in 19 percent of asymptomatic subjects, such findings must be strictly matched with clinical signs and symptoms before therapy is instituted [91]. Furthermore, few MRI findings showed large magnitude associations with symptom outcomes even when applying more specific definitions for spine-related symptom outcomes [3].

Other Considerations: Development of a novel rabbit model of angular kyphosis provides a reliable platform for investigating the pathophysiology of spinal deformities and evaluating therapeutic interventions [1]. Schroth exercises exhibited long-term effects in improving both spinal deformity and quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [24], yet improved spinal morphology of postsurgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients has no significant impact on their static standing balance [8]. Spinal deformities in Noonan syndrome tend to develop early and are relatively severe, necessitating clinical and radiographic assessment with careful follow-up for early detection and treatment [33]. A unique neural arch shape may clarify the pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis and explain its greater prevalence in females [13]. The investigation represents the best available evidence regarding the radiographic and clinical natural history of cervical degeneration, with data that will have a critical influence on discussions with patients regarding their MRI findings [11]. Measurements document the radiographic parameters of the cervical spine in children followed longitudinally from before the age of three years through skeletal maturity [35]. Despite significant changes during skeletal maturity, modifications in spinal curvatures are not large enough to be considered in clinical practice and to impact surgical planning [93]. Repetitive loading of the spine has demonstrable short-term and possibly permanent effects on the lumbar intervertebral disk, as suggested by T2* values in asymptomatic elite rowers [71]. The observed epidemiology of lumbar spinal degeneration in the community-based population is consistent with an ordered progression beginning in the anterior structures for the majority of individuals [32]. No associations between paraspinal muscle composition or cross-sectional area and low back pain experienced were observed after a five-year follow-up in fighter pilots [29]. An understanding of available spine imaging modalities is critical to safely and effectively manage spinal disorders, with specific indications, advantages, and disadvantages for radiographs, CT, MRI, and other techniques depending on the pathology [2]. The sagittal spinal alignment should be considered when assessing the long-term prognosis of patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [28]. Vascular complications of intervertebral-disc surgery are rare but extremely serious, requiring early recognition and immediate treatment to avoid high morbidity and mortality [92].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): Evidence does not define specific week ranges for light activity or return to desk work. However, short-term follow-up studies indicate that percutaneous spinal endoscopy with a unilateral interlaminar approach for central lumbar spinal stenosis did not cause meaningful changes in IHI, CDS, or spine stability [9]. Similarly, patients with > 50% inferior articular process defects show no difference in lumbar stability or clinical outcomes compared to those with ≤ 50% defects after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy in the short term [25].

Full activity (months): Short-term studies demonstrate similar clinical improvements for both disk replacements and fusion procedures at up to 2-year follow-up [84]. Schroth exercises exhibited long-term effects in improving both spinal deformity and quality of life [24]. Improved spinal morphology of postsurgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients has no significant impact on their static standing balance [8].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Treatment outcomes following tissue regeneration for spinal cord injury remain dismal despite advances in medical care and rehabilitation [6]. Longitudinal cumulative outcomes after adult spinal deformity surgery can be assessed utilizing patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate quality of life and disability over time [27]. Most patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy become worse clinically if the disorder is left untreated, with more than 50 percent progressing to severe disability [34]. Curves of more than 50 degrees progress relentlessly after skeletal maturity in institutionalized adults with cerebral palsy [96].

Rehabilitation protocol: No specific rehabilitation protocols, immobilisation durations, or weight-bearing progressions are detailed in the provided evidence. However, spinal deformities in Noonan syndrome tend to develop early and are relatively severe, necessitating clinical and radiographic assessment with careful follow-up for early detection and treatment [33]. Scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy children is fully reducible in the initial stage and becomes structural over time [94]. As the spinal curve progresses in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, flexibility decreases over time [94].

Functional milestones: Few MRI findings showed large magnitude associations with chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms even when applying more specific definitions for spine-related symptom outcomes [3]. Findings on magnetic resonance scans were not predictive of the development or duration of low-back pain [7]. No associations between paraspinal muscle composition or cross-sectional area and low back pain were observed after a five-year follow-up in fighter pilots [29]. Sagittal spinal alignment should be considered when assessing the long-term prognosis of patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [28].

Other Considerations: The investigation represents the best available evidence regarding the radiographic and clinical natural history of cervical degeneration [11]. A progression of degenerative changes in the cervical spine on MRI over a 20-year period was detected in nearly all subjects [31]. The observed epidemiology of lumbar spinal degeneration in a community-based population is consistent with an ordered progression beginning in the anterior structures for the majority of individuals [32]. Radiographic parameters of the cervical spine in children have been documented longitudinally from before the age of three years through skeletal maturity [35]. Knowing the timing of the growth peak provides valuable information on the likelihood of progression to a magnitude requiring spinal arthrodesis in girls with idiopathic scoliosis [95]. The magnitude of the curve at the time of skeletal maturity is the factor that correlates most with continued progression after skeletal maturity in institutionalized adults with cerebral palsy [96]. Complete loss of the inferior articular process remains a concern for long-term instability after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy [25].

Key Evidence

  • [L5] It provides a reliable platform for investigating the pathophysiology of spinal deformities and evaluating therapeutic interventions. (10.1186/s13018-025-06220-1)
  • [L2] Even when applying more specific definitions for spine-related symptom outcomes, few MRI findings showed large magnitude associations with symptom outcomes. (10.1186/1471-2474-15-152)
  • [L5] Advances in medical care and rehabilitation continue to improve, but treatment outcomes following tissue regeneration for spinal cord injury remain dismal. (10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00314)
  • [L2] The findings on magnetic resonance scans were not predictive of the development or duration of low-back pain. (10.2106/00004623-200109000-00002)
  • [L3] Improved spinal morphology of postsurgical AIS patients has no significant impact on their static standing balance. (10.1186/s12891-020-03462-4)
  • [L4] The clinical and radiographic efficacies of this surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis were good in short-term follow-up, and this surgery did not cause meaningful changes in IHI, CDS, and spine stability in short-term follow-up. (10.1186/s12891-021-04100-3)
  • [L5] Due to the unique microarchitecture of the cervical vertebrae, fractures occur much later in this region than they do in the thoracic or lumbar spine. (10.1186/s13018-022-03105-5)
  • [L4] The investigation represents the best available evidence regarding the radiographic and clinical natural history of cervical degeneration, with data that will have a critical influence on discussions with patients regarding their MRI findings. (10.2106/jbjs.18.00071)
  • [L4] We emphasize that these findings represent roentgenographic abnormalities only, and any clinical decisions concerning the treatment of pain in the thoracic spine usually require additional studies. (10.2106/00004623-199511000-00001)
  • [L3] This unique neural arch shape may clarify the pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis and explain its greater prevalence in females. (10.1186/s12891-021-04901-6)
  • [Paper] The paper is a preliminary report on mechanical tests of the lumbosacral spine and does not provide a clinical conclusion regarding patient outcomes or treatment efficacy. (10.2106/00004623-195739050-00014)
  • [L5] The monograph presents contradictory conceptions regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical syndrome, though there is general agreement on the role of intervertebral foramina in nerve-root irritation and the significance of the cervical sympathetic nervous system. (10.2106/00004623-195638020-00031)
  • [L3] Global lumbar spine kinematics do not reflect regional lumbar spine kinematics, which has implications for interpretation of measures of spinal posture, motion and loading. (10.1186/1471-2474-9-152)
  • [L5] MRI is a non-invasive, high-resolution, multiplanar imaging modality that provides detailed visualization of osseous and soft-tissue structures of the cervical spine, including the intervertebral discs, spinal cord, and nerve roots, and is essential for evaluating the spectrum of cervical spinal disease. (10.2106/00004623-200200002-00009)
  • [L1] Our findings suggest that currently available devices are capable of assessing spinal posture with good accuracy in the clinical setting. (10.1186/s12891-019-2430-6)
  • [L5] Magnetic resonance is an excellent modality for imaging pathologic processes in the pediatric spine, allowing high-resolution views of osseous and soft-tissue structures. (10.5435/00124635-200307000-00004)
  • [L5] This Specialty Update reviews the highest-quality peer-reviewed research in the area of spinal conditions, highlighting advances in the management of cervical and lumbar spine conditions, pediatric and adult spinal deformity, spinal cord injury, and spinal fracture and trauma to support treatment decision-making. (10.2106/jbjs.17.00276)
  • [L4] The position of the lumbar spine center of rotation changes with variations in load and differs between movement types, suggesting distinct motion patterns in the lower lumbar spine. (10.1186/s12891-025-08410-8)
  • [L5] Absolute surgical indications for disc herniation include deteriorating neurological deficits with myelopathy or cauda equina syndrome. (10.1302/2058-5241.6.210020)
  • [L1] The literature offers various stereophotogrammetric protocols to quantify multi-segmental motion of the thoracolumbar spine without a standard guideline, and approaches remain limited from a clinical point of view. (10.1186/s12891-022-05925-2)
  • [L1] Meanwhile, Schroth exhibited long-term effects in improving both spinal deformity and quality of life. (10.1186/s12891-024-08223-1)
  • [L4] In the short term, patients with > 50% IAP defects show no difference in lumbar stability or clinical outcomes compared to those with ≤ 50% defects, though complete IAP loss remains a concern for long-term instability. (10.1186/s12891-025-09004-0)
  • [L4] We recommend utilizing this standard in studying various disorders of the spine to avoid technical causes for the appearance of a curve. (10.1186/s12891-021-03949-8)
  • [L3] The study describes the longitudinal cumulative outcome after adult spinal deformity surgery, utilizing patient-reported outcome measures to assess quality of life and disability over time. (10.1186/s12891-025-08927-y)
  • [L3] The sagittal spinal alignment should be considered when assessing the long-term prognosis of patients with rTSA. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.10.017)
  • [L2] However, no associations between muscle composition or CSA and low back pain experienced were observed after the five-year follow-up. (10.1186/s12891-019-2551-y)
  • [L3] A progression of degenerative changes in the cervical spine on MRI over the 20-year period was detected in nearly all subjects. (10.2106/jbjs.17.01347)
  • [L3] The observed epidemiology of lumbar spinal degeneration in the community-based population is consistent with an ordered progression beginning in the anterior structures, for the majority of individuals. (10.1186/1471-2474-12-202)
  • [L4] Since the deformities tend to develop early and are relatively severe, a clinical and, if necessary, radiographic assessment of the spine with careful follow-up should be performed for early detection and treatment of spinal deformity. (10.2106/00004623-200110000-00006)
  • [L5] Most patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy become worse clinically if the disorder is left untreated, with more than 50 percent progressing to severe disability. (10.2106/00004623-199409000-00020)
  • [L3] The measurements presented in the current study are important because they are the first, as far as we know, to document the radiographic parameters of the cervical spine in children who were followed longitudinally from before the age of three years through the course of growth and development until skeletal maturity. (10.2106/00004623-200108000-00011)
  • [L4] Accessory ossicles of the spine exhibit varied prevalence and clinical significance, with some presenting minor associations with symptoms and others linked to specific syndromes or spinal disorders. (10.1186/s13018-024-05407-2)
  • [L5] Regardless of the setting, when cauda equina syndrome is diagnosed, the treatment is urgent surgical decompression of the spinal canal. (10.5435/00124635-200808000-00006)
  • [L4] These data can provide new insights into the biomechanics of the lumbar spine and optimize the parameters of artificial lumbar spine devices. (10.1186/s12891-022-05160-9)
  • [L4] Treatment depends on symptom severity and neurological involvement; fusion is indicated for instability causing cord compression, while laminectomy or foramen magnum enlargement may be necessary for compression. (10.2106/00004623-196850020-00008)
  • [L5] Pushing conditions also warrant attention to the lower spinal cord and the nerve roots on both sides of the main thoracic curve. (10.1186/s12891-024-07832-0)
  • [L1] The review identifies a range of wearable technologies and biofeedback modalities used to modulate spine motor control, highlighting the need for standardized reporting and further research to establish clinical efficacy. (10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3)
  • [L5] No existing prognostic classification system can predict which patients with a congenital osseous anomaly of the cervical spine are at risk for future neurologic injury. (10.2106/00004623-200202000-00017)
  • [L5] Recent advances in cervical spinal cord stimulation have demonstrated improved efficacy as a therapeutic intervention for restoring hand functions in individuals with spinal cord injuries or stroke, yielding significant improvements in grip force, proximal arm strength and muscle activation with both immediate and sustained effects. (10.1177/17531934241307515)
  • [L5] The findings suggest that the intervertebral PSAC are safe and effective for cervical fixation, showing no adverse effects on the cervical spine or animal bodies, and demonstrating equivalent fixation and healing capabilities compared to control devices. (10.1186/s13018-025-06458-9)
  • [L2] Individualized administration route preference-matched treatment in acute low back pain improves therapeutic outcomes, although further studies with larger cohorts are needed. (10.1186/s13018-020-01594-w)
  • [L4] The authors provide strong evidence that Su's three-column theory complies with the characteristics of vertebral physiological structure, vertebral fracture, and vertebral biomechanics. (10.1186/s12891-020-03550-5)
  • [L3] The Hip-Spine Classification system allows surgeons to make appropriate evaluations preoperatively, and it guides the use of DM components in patients with spinopelvic pathology in order to reduce the risk of dislocation in these high-risk patients. (10.1302/0301-620x.103b7.bjj-2020-2448.r2)
  • [L4] Further analysis by an expert panel is required to develop specific classification criteria for thoracolumbar fascia. (10.1186/s12891-018-2088-5)
  • [L3] With advancing age, spinopelvic biomechanics demonstrate decreased spinal mobility and increased pelvic/hip mobility. (10.1302/0301-620x.106b8.bjj-2023-1197.r1)
  • [L5] Understanding the biomechanical principles of spinal instrumentation and motion coupling is essential for optimizing three-dimensional correction of thoracolumbar spinal deformities and achieving favorable mechanical environments for fusion. (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01156)
  • [L2] The T4-L1-Hip axis is conceptually aligned with the description of spinal shapes in the Roussouly classification but with the advantage of utilizing continuous measures of spinal alignment. (10.2106/jbjs.24.01489)
  • [L5] Increasing the load has a significant impact on the coupled translational movement of lumbar facet joints. (10.1186/s13018-022-03016-5)
  • [L4] These data from the individual spinal segments may be helpful to comprehensively evaluate the status of the spine and to design a better preoperative plan before instrumentation. (10.1186/s12891-024-07324-1)
  • [L1] This review highlights the complexity of pelvic, trunk and upper limb biomechanics in individuals with spinal deformities. (10.1186/s13018-025-06063-w)
  • [L3] The lumbosacral and hip motions were the major contributors to global alignment postural change. (10.1186/s12891-021-04865-7)
  • [L3] Changes in lumbar-stabilizing mechanisms in the presence of muscle fatigue seem to be caused by modulation of lumbopelvic kinematics. (10.1186/1471-2474-11-112)
  • [L5] Elucidation of the exact mechanisms for compensation after radiculomedullary vessel sacrifice requires further study but will be aided by preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative comparative angiography; protocols in place at centers minimize the risk of spinal cord ischemia during planned sacrifice. (10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00219)
  • [L4] The authors encourage spinal surgeons and researchers to be aware of such variations when performing thoracic- and lumbar-level surgery and assessing spinal alignment and parameters. (10.1186/s13018-018-0835-9)
  • [L5] Critical spinal lytic defects result in kinematic abnormalities and lower the compressive strength of the spine. (10.2106/jbjs.19.00419)
  • [L5] This is a comprehensive, up-to-date reference source on the use of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for the scanning of the entire spine, serving as a useful text for any spine surgeon or radiologist. (10.2106/00004623-199410000-00028)
  • [L3] The study proposed a novel classification with four types of degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis based on thoracolumbar kyphosis and balance, followed by targeted treatment strategies for various types. (10.1186/s13018-025-05713-3)
  • [L4] This study found weak to moderate effects of individual kinematic variables and lumbar lordosis on IV-RoMmax at other intervertebral levels. (10.1186/s12891-016-0975-1)
  • [L5] The study documented the complete three-dimensional elastic physical properties of each lumbar intervertebral level, finding that load-displacement curves are non-linear and motions are coupled, with ranges of motion comparing favorably with reported in vivo values. (10.2106/00004623-199403000-00012)
  • [L3] Consequently, it has the potential to be integrated into future osteoporosis classification systems. (10.1186/s12891-025-09431-z)
  • [L5] MR images could be used to distinguish the histological structures of normal and malformed mouse spines, and malformed vertebrae were accompanied by adjacent intervertebral structures that corresponded to the fully segmented structures observed in human congenital scoliosis, but the intervertebral conditions varied. (10.1186/s12891-024-07460-8)
  • [L5] Performing both imaging modalities under the same conditions would be helpful in the evaluation of disc degeneration. (10.1186/s12891-015-0610-6)
  • [L5] Loading in the anterior-oblique direction required lower external force or moment to keep the lumbar spine in the neutral position compared to vertical or posterior-oblique directions. (10.1155/2018/4517471)
  • [L3] The T2* values suggest that repetitive loading of the spine has demonstrable short-term and possibly permanent effects on the lumbar intervertebral disk. (10.1177/23259671221088572)
  • [L4] Spine balance can alter THA outcomes, but the exact mechanism is yet to be elucidated. (10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.021)
  • [L5] Higher values of ligament stiffness over all lumbar levels could lead to a shift of the loading and the motion between segments to the lower lumbar levels. (10.1186/s12891-016-0942-x)
  • [L3] Thus, a routine MRI evaluation appears warranted for those patients if aged less than 10 years, being male or having left thoracic or right lumbar curve. (10.1186/s12891-016-1026-7)
  • [L5] Nevertheless, the general surgical principle remains paramount: instrumentation should never extend beyond the contralateral intervertebral disc border, regardless of presumed vascular anatomy. (10.1186/s13018-025-06066-7)
  • [L4] The study aimed to identify pathoanatomical pathways of degeneration in lumbar motion segments by clustering MRI findings, but the provided text does not contain the authors' explicit conclusion statement. (10.1186/1471-2474-14-198)
  • [L5] This report describes specialized pulse sequences and imaging techniques for evaluating the spine, defines the defining characteristics of the three compartments into which spinal tumors can be classified, and provides a basic knowledge of the tumors commonly encountered in the spine. (10.2106/jbjs.h.00825)
  • [L5] The proposed method provides an option rather than a final position for quantifying cervical spine muscle composition and morphology using MRI. (10.1186/s12891-018-2074-y)
  • [Case_report] This technique should be considered for patients in whom general anesthesia is contraindicated and neuraxial anesthesia is extremely difficult, such as patients with ankylosing spondylitis. (10.1007/s11999-010-1317-5)
  • [L5] The review underscores the need for consistent nomenclature, advanced imaging, and the integration of artificial intelligence to personalize care based on individual anatomy and biomechanics. (10.1302/0301-620x.106b11.bjj-2024-0373)
  • [L4] Lumbar HR-MDCT is not valid for the in vivo evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine as there was no significant correlation between HR-MDCT and micro-CT analysis of vertebral biopsies. (10.1186/s13018-020-01895-0)
  • [L4] This study will offer the needed data in order to establish PC-MRI on spinal cord motion within the diagnostic work-up of patients suffering from spinal canal stenosis. (10.1186/s13018-019-1381-9)
  • [L5] Imaging studies should be used to confirm the clinical impression derived from history and physical examination, with careful correlation of anatomic abnormalities to symptoms, and advanced neurodiagnostic imaging should be refrained from until appropriate nonoperative management has failed. (10.5435/00124635-199609000-00002)
  • [L5] Short-term studies demonstrate similar clinical improvements for both disk replacements and fusion procedures at up to 2-year follow-up. (10.5435/00124635-200612000-00002)
  • [L3] These results lead to a more conservative approach in monitoring of scoliotic curves in clinical applications; smaller number of radiographs would be saved, however the risk of having non-measured curves with progression would be decreased. (10.1186/s12891-018-2303-4)
  • [Case_report] The authors note that treatment is generally non-operative, with surgery reserved for inadequate reduction or persistent symptoms. (10.2106/00004623-198870020-00020)
  • [L4] Management ranges from conservative and pharmacologic measures to surgical treatment, often requiring a collaborative plan between orthopaedic surgeons and obstetricians. (10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00248)
  • [L5] Six months of spinal growth modulation created significant spinal deformity in all three planes compared with sham-surgery controls. (10.2106/jbjs.j.00247)
  • [L2] High-quality studies targeting non-surgical treatment as an evidence-based alternative to surgical interventions for conditions related to excessive anterior pelvic tilt are warranted. (10.1302/2058-5241.5.190017)
  • [L4] The finding of major abnormalities on magnetic resonance scans of the cervical spine in 19 percent of asymptomatic subjects suggests that such findings must be strictly matched with clinical signs and symptoms before therapy is instituted. (10.2106/00004623-199173070-00028)
  • [L5] Vascular complications of intervertebral-disc surgery are rare but extremely serious, requiring early recognition and immediate treatment to avoid high morbidity and mortality. (10.2106/00004623-196850020-00018)
  • [L4] Despite significant changes during skeletal maturity, the modifications in spinal curvatures are not large enough to be considered in clinical practice and to impact surgical planning. (10.2106/jbjs.22.00977)
  • [L4] Afterward, as spinal curve progresses, flexibility decreases over time. (10.1186/s12891-019-2661-6)
  • [L3] Knowing the timing of the growth peak provides valuable information on the likelihood of progression to a magnitude requiring spinal arthrodesis. (10.2106/00004623-200005000-00009)
  • [L3] The magnitude of the curve at the time of skeletal maturity is the factor that correlates most with continued progression after skeletal maturity, with curves of more than 50 degrees progressing relentlessly. (10.2106/00004623-198870090-00002)

See Also

References

[1] Development of a novel rabbit model of angular kyphosis and characterization of its neuropathological features. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06220-1

[2] Chapter 22 Imaging of the Spine. 2019.

[3] Longitudinal associations between incident lumbar spine MRI findings and chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms: retrospective analysis of data from the longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBACK). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-152

[4] Chapter 35 Thoracolumbar Spine. 2019.

[5] Chapter 12 Physical Examination of the Spine. 2019.

[6] Mediating the Secondary Effects of Spinal Cord Injury Through Optimization of Key Physiologic Parameters. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2016. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00314

[7] The Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine to Predict Low-Back Pain in Asymptomatic Subjects. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2001. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00002

[8] Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluating perioperative back pain through a simultaneous morphological and biomechanical approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03462-4

[9] Percutaneous spinal endoscopy with unilateral interlaminar approach to perform bilateral decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis: radiographic and clinical assessment. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04100-3

[10] Breaking strength and bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis: a biomechanical approximation based on load tests in 104 human vertebrae from the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spines of 13 body donors. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03105-5

[11] More Than a Snapshot of the Spine. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.18.00071

[12] Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine. Evaluation of asymptomatic individuals.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1995. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199511000-00001

[13] A morphological characterization of the lumbar neural arch in females and males with degenerative spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04901-6

[14] Some Mechanical Tests on the Lumbosacral Spine with Particular Reference to the Intervertebral Discs. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1957. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-195739050-00014

[15] Die cervikalen Vertebral-Syndrome. Eine vorläufige Bilanz der Kliniker. R. Janzen, W. Tonnis, F. Reischauer, and others. Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, 1955. DM 7.80. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1956. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-195638020-00031

[16] Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-152

[17] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE CERVICAL SPINE. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2002. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200200002-00009

[18] The role of wearables in spinal posture analysis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2430-6

[19] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pediatric Spine. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2003. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200307000-00004

[20] What’s New in Spine Surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.00276

[21] In vivo kinematic study of lumbar center of rotation under different loads. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08410-8

[22] Herniated discs: when is surgery necessary?. EFORT Open Reviews. 2021. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210020

[23] Stereophotogrammetric approaches to multi-segmental kinematics of the thoracolumbar spine: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05925-2

[24] Comparative efficacy of six types of scoliosis-specific exercises on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08223-1

[25] Classification of inferior articular process injury after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction and its clinical significance. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09004-0

[26] Proper positioning of mice for Cobb angle radiographic measurements. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-03949-8

[27] Longitudinal cumulative outcome after adult spinal deformity surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08927-y

[28] Global kyphosis of the spine influences the range of motion and deterioration of internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.10.017

[29] Cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles and its association with muscle strength among fighter pilots: a 5-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2551-y

[30] Chapter 46 Spinal Anatomy. 2020.

[31] A 20-Year Prospective Longitudinal Study of Degeneration of the Cervical Spine in a Volunteer Cohort Assessed Using MRI. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.17.01347

[32] Does lumbar spinal degeneration begin with the anterior structures? A study of the observed epidemiology in a community-based population. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-202

[33] Spinal Deformities in Noonan Syndrome. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2001. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00006

[34] Evaluation and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199409000-00020

[35] Growth and Development of the Pediatric Cervical Spine Documented Radiographically. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2001. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00011

[36] Anatomical variability, morphofunctional characteristics, and clinical relevance of accessory ossicles of the back: implications for spinal pathophysiology and differential diagnosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05407-2

[37] Cauda Equina Syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200808000-00006

[38] Investigation of geometric deformations of the lumbar disc during axial body rotations. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05160-9

[39] Intradural cysts of the cervical spine: report of three cases.. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 1978.

[40] Anomalies of the Occipitocervical Articulation. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1968. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196850020-00008

[41] Biomechanical study of spinal cord and nerve root in idiopathic scoliosis: based on finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07832-0

[42] Wearable technology mediated biofeedback to modulate spine motor control: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3

[43] Congenital Osseous Anomalies of the Upper and Lower Cervical Spine in Children. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2002. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00017

[45] Cervical spinal cord stimulation for treatment of upper limb paralysis: a narrative review. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241307515

[46] Preclinical evaluation of a 3D-printed porous stand-alone interbody cage for cervical fusion in a sheep model. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06458-9

[47] Matching actual treatment with patient administration-route-preference improves analgesic response among acute low back pain patients—a randomized prospective trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01594-w

[48] Analysis and improvement of the three-column spinal theory. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03550-5

[49] 2021 Otto Aufranc Award: A simple Hip-Spine Classification for total hip arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b7.bjj-2020-2448.r2

[50] Measuring the morphological characteristics of thoracolumbar fascia in ultrasound images: an inter-rater reliability study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2088-5

[51] Hip-spine parameters change with increasing age. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b8.bjj-2023-1197.r1

[52] Biomechanical Principles of Spinal Deformity Correction in the Thoracolumbar Spine. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01156

[53] The T4-L1-Hip Axis Objectifies the Roussouly Classification Using Continuous Measures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.24.01489

[54] The effect of various weight-bearing activities on the motion of lumbar facet joints in vivo. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03016-5

[55] Chapter 11 Anatomy of the Spine. 2019.

[56] Bone density of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine measured using Hounsfield units of computed tomography – results of 4350 vertebras. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07324-1

[57] Pelvic, trunk and upper limb biomechanics during walking in individuals with spinal deformities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06063-w

[58] Paradoxical spinopelvic motion: does global balance influence spinopelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty?. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04865-7

[59] Changes in the flexion-relaxation response induced by hip extensor and erector spinae muscle fatigue. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-112

[60] Spinal Cord Blood Supply and Its Surgical Implications. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00219

[61] Rate of presence of 11 thoracic vertebrae and 6 lumbar vertebrae in asymptomatic Chinese adult volunteers. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0835-9

[62] Large Lytic Defects Produce Kinematic Instability and Loss of Compressive Strength in Human Spines. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00419

[63] MRI and CT of the Spine.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199410000-00028

[64] A novel classification on degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis based on sagittal spino-pelvic alignment: should the thoracolumbar segments be intervened?. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05713-3

[65] Relationships between lumbar inter-vertebral motion and lordosis in healthy adult males: a cross sectional cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0975-1

[66] Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1994. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199403000-00012

[67] The added value of distal radius bone mineral density for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with a history of fragility fracture. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09431-z

[68] Histology and chronological magnetic resonance images of congenital spinal deformity: An experimental study in mice model. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07460-8

[69] Quantitative T2 relaxation time and magnetic transfer ratio predict endplate biochemical content of intervertebral disc degeneration in a canine model. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0610-6

[70] The Effect of Muscle Direction on the Predictions of Finite Element Model of Human Lumbar Spine. BioMed Research International. 2018. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4517471

[71] Patterns of Intervertebral Disk Alteration in Asymptomatic Elite Rowers: A T2 MRI Mapping Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine*. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221088572

[72] The Impact of Spino-Pelvic Alignment on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Critical Analysis of Current Evidence. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.021

[73] A numerical study to determine the effect of ligament stiffness on kinematics of the lumbar spine during flexion. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0942-x

[74] The prevalence of intraspinal anomalies in infantile and juvenile patients with “presumed idiopathic” scoliosis: a MRI-based analysis of 504 patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1026-7

[75] The relationship between the anatomical location of the left lumbar segmental artery and the course of the contralateral (right) segmental artery in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a cadaveric analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06066-7

[76] Can pathoanatomical pathways of degeneration in lumbar motion segments be identified by clustering MRI findings. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-198

[77] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Spine Tumors: Classification, Differential Diagnosis, and Spectrum of Disease. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.h.00825

[78] Towards defining muscular regions of interest from axial magnetic resonance imaging with anatomical cross-reference: part II - cervical spine musculature. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2074-y

[79] Case Report: Spinal Anesthesia by Mini-laminotomy for a Patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis who was Difficult to Anesthetize. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1317-5

[80] Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b11.bjj-2024-0373

[81] Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01895-0

[82] Assessment of spinal cord motion as a new diagnostic MRI-parameter in cervical spinal canal stenosis: study protocol on a prospective longitudinal trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1381-9

[83] Lumbar Spine Imaging: Role in Clinical Decision Making. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1996. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199609000-00002

[84] Total Disk Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200612000-00002

[85] 3D Markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2303-4

[86] Separation of the symphysis pubis in association with childbearing. A case report.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1988. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198870020-00020

[87] Low Back Pain and Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00248

[88] Intervertebral Disc Health Preservation After Six Months of Spinal Growth Modulation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00247

[89] Non-surgical interventions for excessive anterior pelvic tilt in symptomatic and non-symptomatic adults: a systematic review. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190017

[91] Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1991. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199173070-00028

[92] Vascular Complications of Disc Surgery. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1968. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196850020-00018

[93] Spinal Sagittal Alignment Changes During Childhood. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00977

[94] Scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy children is fully reducible in the initial stage, and becomes structural over time. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2661-6

[95] Relationship of Peak Height Velocity to Other Maturity Indicators in Idiopathic Scoliosis in Girls. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume*. 2000. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200005000-00009

[96] Progression of scoliosis after skeletal maturity in institutionalized adults who have cerebral palsy.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1988. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198870090-00002

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.