Skip to content

Pathology & Anatomy

Prearthritic intra-articular hip pathology, including FAI, dysplasia, microinstability, and ONFH, focusing on early diagnosis to prevent premature joint degeneration.

Overview

Acetabular retroversion and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) management rely on precise characterization of existing lesions and rigorous patient selection to ensure clinical success [2]. Appropriate surgical indications based on preoperative intra-articular cartilage degeneration are paramount for achieving long-term outcomes in periacetabular osteotomy [3]. While acetabular subchondral cysts may not contraindicate hip arthroscopy in FAI patients otherwise indicated for surgery [29], the dysplastic cohort demonstrates outcomes and failure rates similar to rigorously matched controls at midterm follow-up in arthroscopic labral repair [4].

For borderline dysplasia, results represent the work of experienced surgeons selectively managing multiple aspects of hip pathology to optimize outcomes in a defined cohort [11]. Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral preservation and capsular plication in these patients should be performed by surgeons with expertise in advanced arthroscopic techniques using strict patient selection criteria [24]. With improvements in preoperative workup, imaging, and surgical technique, positive results are anticipated in older nonarthritic patients undergoing hip arthroscopy [78].

Current evidence on femoral head fractures regarding indications, variant patterns, surgical approaches, and outcomes has been summarized [74], while understanding emerging technologies in orthopaedic trauma is of critical importance for their utilization [76]. Preoperative planning remains essential to define anatomy and ensure suitable implants are available for total hip arthroplasty in adult hip dysplasia [30]. There is a recognized need for standardized clinical and radiological criteria to guide surgical treatment for FAI [23], as surgeons are reluctant to offer surgical treatment without correction of osseous deformity, particularly for cam-type pathomorphology [60].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

A comprehensive understanding of hip anatomy and normal function is critical for identifying pathologies and developing successful treatment strategies [1]. Abnormal hip morphology predates arthrosis and is not secondary to the osteoarthritic process [6]. Hip pain in the absence of osteoarthritis may result from a complex combination of dynamic and static mechanical stresses [9]. While variations exist in testing performed by hip specialists, sufficient commonality supports a recommended battery of physical examination maneuvers for evaluation [91].

Osseous Morphology: Male and female patients differ in hip structure, biomechanics, and operative findings of symptomatic labral tears [50]. Observed hip flexion in asymptomatic young women is substantially less than historically reported [25]. Increased mid-sagittal center edge angle remains the sole significant contributor to reduced hip flexion, suggesting a bipolar effect on range of motion [90]. Bony hip morphology was not associated with the risk of groin injuries in male professional soccer players [69]. The greater trochanter classification system, based on anatomy and biomechanics, can distinguish various types of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and aid in surgical strategy selection [31].

Ligamentous & Capsular Constraints: Both osseous and soft tissue constraints are important to hip biomechanics depending on the direction of applied force [44]. Hip capsular strain varies between ligaments based on both hip position and applied rotational force [72]. A patient with a hip capsular injury demonstrated marked improvement in kinematic and kinetic performance measures, as well as MRI appearance of the torn capsule and gluteus minimus tendon, following treatment [65].

Kinematics & Biomechanics: An understanding of hip joint biomechanics is essential for diagnosing and treating disorders, allowing clinicians to assimilate the effects of motions and deformations from forces acting on the joint to guide interventions [37]. Complex dynamic interplay exists between the hip and spinopelvic parameters; a cam deformity, acetabular undercoverage, and increased spinopelvic angles are predictive of a symptomatic hip state [85]. Hip impingement in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may routinely occur at flexion angles below 90° in neutral rotation, with males engaging at higher flexion angles than females [89]. Impaired squat performance in FAIS is predominantly predicted by sagittal plane knee and hip biomechanics and hip external rotator strength, and less by frontal plane pelvic range of motion and hip morphology [62]. After an ACL injury prevention program, athletes exhibiting the greatest reduction in knee abduction moments showed greater baseline hip adduction excursion and corresponding improvements in hip flexion, knee abduction kinematics, and hip flexion moments [82]. Total hip arthroplasty significantly alters hip abductor and adductor muscle lengths and moment arms during gait, with the implanted side showing shorter adductor muscles and reduced moment arms compared to the non-implanted side [92].

Clinical Context: Hip injuries in young athletes are being diagnosed with increasing frequency due to advancements in technology and understanding of pathomechanics [63].

Classification

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH): A greater trochanter-based classification system distinguishes various types of DDH and aids in surgical strategy selection [31]. For patients aged above 13 years, a classification scheme based solely on the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) allows for reduced radiation, time, and cost [68]. Future improvements in terminology and classification for congenital hip disease are expected to be based on genetic factors [52].

Fatty Degeneration of Gluteus Muscles: Both the Goutallier classification system and the Quartile system perform equally well in assessing fatty degeneration of the gluteus muscles [58]. These systems show excellent levels of interrater and intrarater agreement for this assessment [58].

Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index: The modified approach to measuring the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof index has better intraobserver and interobserver reliability compared with the original index [67]. Type II and III sourcil types account for the majority of cases in these assessments [67].

Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease: The Stulberg classification system demonstrates marginally acceptable intra-rater reliability [84]. There is significant variability between classifications assigned by different raters using the Stulberg system, even after intervention [84]. Consequently, the reliability of the Stulberg system calls into question the validity of treatment decisions, outcome evaluations, or epidemiological studies based on it [84].

Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis: A deep learning model exhibits high accuracy in segmenting and grading necrotic lesions according to the Steinberg classification using MRI [66]. Different classification systems for femoral head avascular necrosis demonstrate varying levels of reliability and diagnostic precision [87].

Intra-articular Hip Pathology: Arthroscopic classification of intra-articular hip pathology demonstrates at best moderate interrater reliability [88]. Further development and refinement of multifactorial grading systems for describing labral injury are indicated [88].

Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine (AIIS): Preoperative hip internal rotation does not correlate with AIIS type [95]. Impingement tests do not correlate with AIIS type [95]. The utility of the AIIS classification system in identifying pathologic AIIS anatomy is questioned [95].

Other Considerations: A more accurate set of definitions must be developed to allow for more accurate diagnosis of early hip disease in young adults [96].

Clinical Presentation

A comprehensive understanding of hip anatomy and normal function is critical for identifying pathologies and formulating successful treatment strategies [1]. While clinical assessment can accurately determine the existence of intra-articular abnormalities, it remains poor at defining their specific nature [12]. Consequently, accurate diagnosis is essential for providing valuable care to patients with hip dysplasia [42] and for characterizing lesions in acetabular retroversion to ensure adequate patient selection [2].

Asymptomatic Findings: Abnormal hip morphology predates arthrosis and is not secondary to the osteoarthritic process [6]. FAI morphologic features and labral injuries are common in asymptomatic individuals [8, 35], including asymptomatic adolescent athletes where more than two-thirds show evidence of such lesions on MRI [18]. Similarly, hip and pelvis pathology is frequently uncovered on MRI of asymptomatic hockey players [16], yet this pathology typically does not produce symptoms or result in missed games within four years [16]. Despite the prevalence of these findings, it remains unclear if such pathology is truly common or if radiologic signs require better refinement to define abnormality [35]. Furthermore, the presence of FAI morphology does not necessarily indicate that FAI is the primary source of hip pain [38].

Diagnostic Modalities: Hip pain in the absence of osteoarthritis may stem from a complex combination of dynamic and static mechanical stresses [9]. MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 34% in identifying any pathologic process of the ligamentum teres [20]. Arthroscopy may be necessary to substantiate the diagnosis of pigmented villonodular synovitis in the hip and to assess accompanying damage [39]. A painful squat test provides limited diagnostic utility in CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement [46].

Differential Diagnosis and Red Flags: Extra-articular etiologies of pain represent an important subset of hip disorders that can be accurately identified through physical examination and imaging [14]. The recognition of both hip and lumbar spine pathologies may help reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, and managing these entities in the appropriate sequence may reduce persistent symptoms [15]. Other less common causes, such as osteoid osteoma, should be included in the differential diagnosis, especially when atypical clinical and radiological signs are found [38]. Proper diagnosis and treatment of complex hip pathologies demonstrate promising results with the potential to alter early degenerative changes in the adult hip [43]. Understanding the etiology of intra- and extra-articular complaints requires comprehensive management of the spectrum of posterior hip diseases [36].

Investigations

Plain radiography: Clinicians must understand the position of the head-neck junction visualized for each view to make educated decisions regarding radiograph selection [64]. Joint space width serves as a tool to predict articular cartilage pathology, though it has limitations; specifically, predicting pathology is unreliable for patients with joint spaces greater than 2 mm in width [57]. Other methods of investigation should be used in conjunction with radiographic joint space assessment [57]. Radiological findings consistent with a prior slipped capital femoral epiphysis are present in 6.6% of young adults [75].

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate for hips with histological proof of osteonecrosis and those with medullary changes without necrotic bone [45]. However, MRI demonstrates poor specificity and negative predictive value for hip pathology, meaning a negative result may warrant further investigation [51]. In asymptomatic participants, MRI revealed abnormalities in 73% of hips, with labral tears identified in 69% of joints [73]. Hip and pelvis pathology is commonly uncovered on MRI of asymptomatic hockey players, yet this does not produce symptoms or result in missed games within 4 years in most players [16]. Pathologic changes seen on MRI were symptomatic in less than two thirds of elite female ballet dancers [59]. More than two thirds of asymptomatic adolescent athletes had evidence of asymptomatic hip pathological lesions on MRI, where decreased range of motion was associated with structural hip deformity [18]. MRI demonstrated sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 34% in identifying any pathologic process of the ligamentum teres [20]. There was not a significant difference between different MRI modalities regarding the measurement of hip labral width compared with intraoperative assessment [40].

CT: CT was found to have higher interobserver reliability than MRI for measuring femoral anteversion [41]. Diagnosis of femoral anteversion should not rely exclusively on either physical examination or radiologic criteria [41]. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the use of CT imaging with 3D planning to determine the most practical and accurate imaging modality for hip femoral version [61].

Other Considerations: Extensive knowledge of anatomy and normal function of the hip is critical to identifying pathologies and developing successful treatment strategies [1]. Clinical assessment accurately determined the existence of intra-articular abnormality but was poor at defining its nature [12]. Recognition of both hip and lumbar spine pathologies may help reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, and management of both entities in the appropriate sequence may help reduce the likelihood of persistent symptoms [15]. Despite unfavorable radiographic ratings, patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head in children and adolescents who have Gaucher disease were asymptomatic and independent [26]. Observed hip flexion in the asymptomatic hips of young women is substantially less than has been historically reported [25]. Two cases of osteonecrosis of the acetabulum following pelvic irradiation were reported, noting that this condition presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges [71].

Treatment

Non-Operative

Nonoperative treatment is a valid long-term option for degenerative hip abductor lesions, particularly partial tears, which demonstrate a low risk of clinically relevant progression or muscle fatty infiltration and outcomes similar to operatively treated lesions [70]. Small, asymptomatic, medially-placed lesions of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head may be managed with observation alone [48]. Hyaluronic acid is safe and effective for mild femoroacetabular impingement, providing significant pain reduction and functional improvement [56]. Management of early, symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip in adolescents and young adults includes nonsurgical modalities alongside open joint preservation techniques [83].

Operative

Indications: Surgical management is indicated for progressive, painful, unilateral deformity or leg-length discrepancy in childhood coxa vara, whereas moderate nonprogressive deformity often does not require surgery [80]. Appropriate surgical indications for periacetabular osteotomy are paramount and must be based on preoperative intra-articular cartilage degeneration to achieve long-term success [3]. Age over 45 is not a contraindication for periacetabular osteotomy or hip arthroscopy if articular cartilage status is normal [77]. Acetabular subchondral cysts may not be a contraindication to hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome who would otherwise be indicated for this surgery [29]. Surgical management is indicated for patients with larger lesions of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head, which carry a 25% to 50% risk of progression [48].

Surgical Approach / Technique: Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral preservation and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia should be performed by surgeons with expertise in advanced arthroscopic techniques using strict patient selection criteria [24]. Clinical outcomes of acetabular retroversion techniques depend on correct characterization of existing lesions and adequate patient selection [2]. Primary repair of the acetabular labrum showed good clinical results with favorable outcomes and evidence of good healing, even among 11% of patients who required repeat arthroscopy [55]. Segmental and circumferential acetabular labral reconstruction have comparable outcomes in the treatment of irreparable or unsalvageable labral pathology [53]. Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis may have a protective effect on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay of at least two weeks [79].

Implant Selection: Preoperative planning is essential to define anatomy and ensure suitable implants are available for total hip arthroplasty in adult hip dysplasia [30]. The combined use of autologous bone or bone marrow can increase the success rate of core decompression for the treatment of femoral head necrosis [47].

Adjuncts: Cell therapies in patients with early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head suggest improved clinical outcomes, decreased radiographic progression of disease, decreased revision rate, and a low complication rate [19]. Improved histology at the tendon-to-bone interface was correlated with improved final construct strength at the 12-week time point in a sheep model using an interposition bioresorbable scaffold [21].

Other Considerations: The dysplastic cohort had outcomes and failure rates similar to rigorously matched controls at midterm follow-up for arthroscopic labral repair [4]. Patients with subchondral acetabular edema or cystic change on MRI have inferior outcomes for arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement compared with patients with similar age and activity level without MRI subchondral cystic changes [49]. Despite unfavorable radiographic ratings, patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head in children and adolescents who have Gaucher disease were asymptomatic and independent [26]. Short-term and intermediate-term results for hip preservation are favorable, but there is limited evidence on long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark [5]. There is a need for the development of standardized clinical and radiological criteria that serve as guidelines for surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement with surgical hip dislocation [23]. The effect of radiation therapy versus usual care for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis on functional outcomes remains unclear because surgery to perform heterotopic ossification excision is exceedingly rare [10]. Extra-articular etiologies of pain represent an important subset of hip disorders that can be accurately identified through physical examination and imaging [14]. There is a severe lack of evidence on the athlete characteristics and clinical course of nonreturning athletes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and the rate of subsequent hip procedures is unknown [81]. The final outcome of treatment for congenital dislocation of the hip in boys may be satisfactory, but numerous procedures may be necessary to achieve this result [54]. There is no consensus yet on a particular treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head, with surgical options aiming to preserve the joint if diagnosed before collapse [93]. We cannot yet cure Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, but we have advanced our understanding of outcomes with surgery or nonsurgical treatment [86]. Treatment options for hallux rigidus and osteoarthrosis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint range from non-operative measures to various surgical procedures including cheilectomy, arthroplasty, and arthrodesis, with selection depending on disease stage and patient factors [94].

Complications

Anatomical & Pathological Considerations: Extensive knowledge of hip anatomy and normal function is critical to identifying pathologies and developing successful treatment strategies [1]. Abnormal hip morphology predates arthrosis and is not secondary to the osteoarthritic process [6]. The cam deformity appears to have been nonexistent among ancient humans and is perhaps predominantly a product of modern-day stresses [98]. The deformity of congenital dislocation of the hip is more frequently produced by violence, pathological changes from inflammation, or injury in utero rather than primary non-development of the acetabulum [99].

Surgical Indications & Outcomes: Appropriate surgical indications based on preoperative intra-articular cartilage degeneration are paramount to achieving long-term success in periacetabular osteotomy [3]. The dysplastic cohort had outcomes and failure rates similar to those of rigorously matched controls at midterm follow-up [4]. There is limited evidence on long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark for hip preservation [5]. Results in borderline dysplasia represent the work of an experienced surgeon selectively managing multiple aspects of hip pathology to optimize outcomes in this defined cohort of patients [11]. Survivorship for patients with borderline dysplasia undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was 98.2% at midterm follow-up and 76.3% at long-term follow-up [17]. FAI surgery yielded favorable outcomes at short- to midterm follow-up [22]. Primary labral reconstruction demonstrated favorable outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up [27]. Early detection and treatment is critical to reducing complications and optimizing outcomes for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants up to 6 months of age in the long term [28].

Disease Progression & Prognosis: Degenerative change occurred earliest in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, whereas the natural history of patients with femoroacetabular impingement was quite similar to structurally normal hips [32]. Collapse progression on the symptomatic side is a poor prognostic factor for the natural history of contralateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head [33]. The sequence of events supports the theory that cystic arthrosis is a primary phenomenon that may precede and hasten the onset of osteoarthritis [34]. Cell therapies in patients with early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head suggest improved clinical outcomes, decreased radiographic progression of disease, decreased revision rate, and a low complication rate [19].

Other Considerations: The pathology of a specimen of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease of eighteen months' clinical duration and six months of roentgenographic changes is described [7]. FAI morphologic features and labral injuries are common in asymptomatic patients [8]. The effect of radiation therapy versus usual care for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis on functional outcomes remains unclear because surgery to perform heterotopic ossification excision remains exceedingly rare [10]. Further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether the grafted area will maintain structural and functional integrity over time for autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis [13]. Authors express concerns regarding labral calcification studies, suggesting that labral calcification may be a normal physiological process and that study designs may suffer from selection bias and unclear pathophysiologic characteristics [97]. Understanding the natural history and management options is an important part of preventing disability and maintaining independence in an increasingly aging and active Down syndrome population [100].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): Evidence does not specify a discrete week range for light activity or return to desk work in the provided literature. However, short-term and intermediate-term results for hip preservation procedures are generally favorable, suggesting a period of early functional recovery [5]. Clinical outcomes for acetabular retroversion techniques and periacetabular osteotomy depend heavily on correct lesion characterization and appropriate patient selection to achieve success [2, 3].

Full activity (months): The literature does not define a specific month range for full activity or return to sport. While FAI surgery and primary labral reconstruction have demonstrated favorable outcomes at short- to midterm follow-up and minimum 10-year follow-up respectively, the evidence base lacks explicit timelines for full functional return [22, 27]. Survivorship for patients with borderline dysplasia undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was 98.2% at midterm follow-up and 76.3% at long-term follow-up, though specific activity milestones are not detailed [17].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark remain limited in evidence [5]. Further studies are required to determine if grafted areas maintain structural and functional integrity over time for autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis [13]. Outcomes for late-presenting developmental hip dysplasia deteriorate with increasing delay, reaching a tipping point around eight years of age where treatment complications may yield results no better than the untreated course [101].

Rehabilitation protocol: No specific rehabilitation protocols, including PT phasing, immobilization duration, or weight-bearing progression, are detailed in the provided evidence. The pathology of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease with eighteen months' clinical duration and six months of roentgenographic changes is described, but specific post-operative management is not outlined [7]. Similarly, while improved histology correlated with improved construct strength at the 12-week time point for tendon-to-bone interface healing using an interposition bioresorbable scaffold, specific rehabilitation timelines are not provided [21].

Functional milestones: Validated PROM trajectories or specific outcome benchmarks are not explicitly quantified in the provided text. The effect of radiation therapy versus usual care for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis on functional outcomes remains unclear due to the rarity of subsequent excision surgery [10]. Results in managing borderline dysplasia represent the work of an experienced surgeon selectively managing multiple aspects of hip pathology to optimize outcomes in a defined cohort [11].

Other Considerations: Hip pain in the absence of osteoarthritis may stem from a complex combination of dynamic and static mechanical stresses [9]. FAI morphologic features and labral injuries are common in asymptomatic patients, complicating the correlation between pathology and symptoms [8]. The dysplastic cohort demonstrated outcomes and failure rates similar to rigorously matched controls at midterm follow-up in arthroscopic labral repair [4]. Early detection and treatment are critical for reducing complications and optimizing long-term outcomes in developmental dysplasia of the hip up to 6 months of age [28]. Degenerative changes occur earliest in developmental dysplasia, whereas the natural history of femoroacetabular impingement resembles that of structurally normal hips [32]. Collapse progression on the symptomatic side is a poor prognostic factor for the natural history of contralateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head [33]. The sequence of events in bilateral primary cystic arthrosis supports the theory that cystic arthrosis is a primary phenomenon that may precede and hasten osteoarthritis onset [34]. In later stages of bone apposition of the acetabular rim in deep hips, bone formation cannot be distinguished from native bone, and the labrum may appear nearly absent on imaging [102]. Although radiographic indices improved consistently over time in hips without osteonecrosis, hips with osteonecrosis exhibited abnormal acetabular remodeling indices throughout follow-up [103].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] The clinical outcomes of both techniques are dependent on the correct characterization of existing lesions and adequate selection of patients. (10.1302/2058-5241.3.180015)
  • [L4] Appropriate surgical indications based on preoperative intra-articular cartilage degeneration are paramount to achieving long-term success in PAO. (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.060)
  • [L3] The dysplastic cohort had outcomes and failure rates similar to those of rigorously matched controls at midterm follow-up. (10.1177/0363546518767399)
  • [L5] While short-term and intermediate-term results are favorable, there is limited evidence on long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark. (10.1007/s00167-023-07409-9)
  • [L3] Abnormal hip morphology predates arthrosis and is not secondary to the osteoarthritic process. (10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.283)
  • [L4] FAI morphologic features and labral injuries are common in asymptomatic patients. (10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.042)
  • [L5] Hip pain in the absence of osteoarthritis may be due to a complex combination of mechanical stresses, both dynamic and static. (10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.022)
  • [L3] However, its effect on functional outcomes remains unclear because surgery to perform heterotopic ossification excision remains exceedingly rare. (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00491)
  • [L5] The results in this article represent the work of an experienced surgeon selectively managing multiple aspects of hip pathology to optimize outcomes in this defined cohort of patients. (10.2106/jbjs.22.01162)
  • [L4] Clinical assessment accurately determined the existence of intra-articular abnormality but was poor at defining its nature. (10.1177/0363546504266480)
  • [L4] However, further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether the grafted area will maintain structural and functional integrity over time. (10.1007/s00167-010-1042-3)
  • [L5] The recognition of both hip and lumbar spine pathologies may help reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, and the management of both entities in the appropriate sequence may help reduce the likelihood of persistent symptoms. (10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00740)
  • [L4] Hip/pelvis pathology is commonly uncovered on MRI of asymptomatic hockey players; however, this pathology does not produce symptoms or result in missed games within 4 years in most players. (10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.100)
  • [L4] Survivorship at midterm follow-up was 98.2% and 76.3% at long-term follow-up. (10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.030)
  • [L3] More than two thirds of these participants had evidence of asymptomatic hip pathological lesions on MRI. (10.1177/0363546513488748)
  • [L2] Cell therapies in patients with early stages of ONFH suggest improved clinical outcomes, decreased radiographic progression of disease, decreased revision rate, and a low complication rate. (10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.049)
  • [L2] In this patient population, MRI demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 34%, respectively, in identifying any pathologic process of the ligamentum teres. (10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.001)
  • [L5] Improved histology was correlated with improved final construct strength at the 12-week time point. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.024)
  • [L3] FAI surgery yielded favorable outcomes at short- to midterm follow-up. (10.1177/0363546516688636)
  • [L4] This review suggests that there is a need for the development of standardized clinical and radiological criteria that serve as guidelines for surgical treatment for FAI. (10.1007/s00167-012-2231-z)
  • [L4] These procedures should be performed by surgeons with expertise in advanced arthroscopic techniques, using strict patient selection criteria, with emphasis on labral preservation and capsular plication. (10.1177/0363546517743720)
  • [L4] Observed hip flexion in the asymptomatic hips of young women is substantially less than has been historically reported. (10.2106/jbjs.19.01088)
  • [L4] Despite unfavorable radiographic ratings, patients were asymptomatic and independent. (10.2106/00004623-199601000-00003)
  • [L2] Primary labral reconstruction demonstrated favorable outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up. (10.1177/03635465251392196)
  • [L5] Early detection and treatment is critical to reducing complications and optimizing outcomes for patients in the long term. (10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00500)
  • [L3] Acetabular subchondral cysts may not be a contraindication to hip arthroscopy in patients with FAIS who would otherwise be indicated for this surgery. (10.1177/03635465251405731)
  • [L5] Preoperative planning is essential to define anatomy and ensure suitable implants are available. (10.2106/jbjs.k.00779)
  • [L3] The greater trochanter classification system based on the anatomy and biomechanics could distinguish various types of DDH and aid in making surgical strategies. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.013)
  • [L3] Degenerative change occurred earliest in patients with DDH, whereas the natural history of patients with FAI was quite similar to structurally normal hips. (10.1007/s11999-016-4815-2)
  • [L3] Collapse progression on the symptomatic side is a poor prognostic factor for the natural history of contralateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head. (10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.005)
  • [Case_report] The sequence of events supports the theory that cystic arthrosis is a primary phenomenon that may precede and hasten the onset of osteoarthritis. (10.2106/00004623-199605000-00019)
  • [L5] FAI morphology and labral injuries are commonly reported in asymptomatic individuals, but it is unclear if such pathology is actually common or if radiologic signs need better refinement to determine what constitutes abnormal. (10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.077)
  • [L5] Understanding the etiology of and evolving research on intra- and extraarticular hip complaints requires comprehensive diagnosis and management of the spectrum of posterior hip diseases. (10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00629)
  • [L5] An understanding of hip joint biomechanics constitutes an important background for the diagnosis and treatment of hip disorders, allowing clinicians to assimilate the effects of motions and deformations resulting from forces acting on the joint to guide appropriate medical interventions. (10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.027)
  • [L5] The presence of FAI morphology does not necessarily mean that FAI is the primary source of hip pain; other less common causes, such as osteoid osteoma, should be included in the differential diagnosis, especially when atypical clinical and radiological signs are found. (10.1007/s00167-014-2985-6)
  • [L4] Arthroscopy may be necessary to substantiate the diagnosis, as well as to assess and address other accompanying damage. (10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.002)
  • [L2] There was not a significant difference between different MRI modalities. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.027)
  • [L3] CT was found to have higher interobserver reliability than MRI, and diagnosis should not rely exclusively on either examination or radiologic criteria. (10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021)
  • [Commentary] It is only through these studies that our capacity to make accurate diagnoses is improved and, more important, without a diagnosis, how can we provide valuable care to our patients? (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.041)
  • [L5] Both osseous and soft tissue constraints are important to hip biomechanics depending upon the direction of applied force. (10.1007/s00167-012-2255-4)
  • [L3] Magnetic resonance imaging was accurate in all hips with histological proof of osteonecrosis and in those with medullary changes without necrotic bone. (10.2106/00004623-198971050-00002)
  • [L3] Its utility in the diagnostic evaluation of FAI remains limited. (10.1007/s00167-013-2668-8)
  • [L1] The combined use of autologous bone or bone marrow can increase the success rate. (10.1186/s13018-019-1359-7)
  • [L2] The review provides an up-to-date, evidence-based guide to the management, both non-operative and operative, of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head, emphasizing that small, asymptomatic, medially-placed lesions may be treated with observation alone while larger lesions have a 25% to 50% risk of progression. (10.1302/0301-620x.99b10.bjj-2017-0233.r2)
  • [L3] These patients have inferior outcomes for arthroscopic treatment of FAI compared with patients with similar age and activity level without MRI subchondral cystic changes. (10.1177/0363546515612448)
  • [L3] Male and female patients differ in their hip structure, biomechanics, and operative findings of symptomatic labral tears. (10.1177/0363546514532226)
  • [L3] However, MRI has poor specificity and negative predictive value, and thus, a negative MRI result may warrant further investigation. (10.1186/s13018-018-0832-z)
  • [Letter] Future improvements in terminology and classification are expected to be based on genetic factors. (10.1007/s11999-008-0630-8)
  • [L4] Although both techniques demonstrated improvement in patient-reported outcomes, the systematic review did not demonstrate clinical superiority of either technique due to study heterogeneity and low level of evidence. (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.10.016)
  • [L4] The final outcome of treatment may be satisfactory, but numerous procedures may be necessary to achieve this result. (10.2106/00004623-199507000-00001)
  • [L4] This study showed good clinical results of primary repair with favorable outcomes and evidence of good healing, even among the 11% of patients who required repeat arthroscopy. (10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.007)
  • [L4] Hyaluronic acid is safe and effective in the treatment of mild femoroacetabular impingement, with significant pain reduction and function improvement. (10.1007/s00167-013-2581-1)
  • [Commentary] Predicting articular cartilage pathology in the hip with radiographic joint space has been unreliable for patients having joint spaces >2 mm in width; joint space width is a tool that can be used, but with some limitation, and other methods of investigation such as magnetic resonance imaging should be used in conjunction with radiographic joint space. (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.014)
  • [L4] Both the Goutallier classification system and the new Quartile system performed equally well in assessing fatty degeneration of the gluteus muscles, showing excellent levels of interrater and intrarater agreement. (10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.045)
  • [L4] Pathologic changes seen on MRI were symptomatic in less than two thirds of the dancers. (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.012)
  • [L4] Surgeons are willing to participate in surgical versus nonsurgical trials with a 6-month crossover endpoint, yet surgeons are reluctant to offer surgical treatment of FAI without correction of osseous deformity, particularly for cam-type pathomorphology. (10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.003)
  • [L5] Future studies are warranted to evaluate the use of CT imaging with 3D planning to determine the most practical and accurate imaging modality. (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.011)
  • [L3] This impaired squat performance is predominantly predicted by sagittal plane knee and hip biomechanics and hip external rotator strength, and less by frontal plane pelvic ROM and hip morphology in patients with FAIS. (10.1177/03635465211029032)
  • [L5] Hip injuries in young athletes are being diagnosed with increasing frequency due to advancements in technology and understanding of pathomechanics. (10.5435/jaaos-21-11-665)
  • [L3] Our data will help clinicians to understand the position of the head-neck junction visualized for each radiographic view and make educated decisions in the selection of radiographs acquired in the clinic. (10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.031)
  • [L4] He also demonstrated marked improvement in kinematic and kinetic performance measures and MRI appearance of the torn hip capsule and gluteus minimus tendon. (10.1007/s00167-012-2232-y)
  • [L4] The proposed deep learning model exhibited high accuracy in segmenting and grading necrotic lesions according to the Steinberg classification using MRI. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.126)
  • [L2] Type II and III sourcil types account for the majority, to which the modified approach is better. (10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.024)
  • [L3] Our classification scheme based solely on LCEA could allow the use of less radiation and imaging, therefore potentially saving radiation, time, and cost. (10.1186/s12891-020-03515-8)
  • [L2] Bony hip morphology was not associated with the risk of groin injuries. (10.1177/0363546518763373)
  • [L4] Nonoperative treatment might be a valid long-term option for degenerative hip abductor lesions, especially for partial tears, which demonstrated a low risk of clinically relevant progression or muscle fatty infiltration and similar clinical outcomes to those reported in the literature for operatively treated hip abductor tendon lesions. (10.1177/03635465221135759)
  • [L5] The authors report two cases of osteonecrosis of the acetabulum following pelvic irradiation, noting that this condition presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges and has not been previously reported with pathological confirmation in the context of acetabular reconstruction. (10.2106/00004623-198870020-00021)
  • [L5] Hip capsular strain varies between ligaments depending on both hip position and applied rotational force. (10.1007/s00167-020-06035-z)
  • [L3] Magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic participants revealed abnormalities in 73% of hips, with labral tears being identified in 69% of the joints. (10.1177/0363546512462124)
  • [L4] The purpose of this review was to summarize current evidence on femoral head fractures regarding indications, variant patterns, surgical approaches, and outcomes. (10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01121)
  • [L3] This study indicates that 6.6% of young adults have radiological findings consistent with a prior SCFE, which seems to be more common than previously reported. (10.1302/0301-620x.95b4.29910)
  • [L5] Age over 45 is not a contraindication for PAO/hip arthroscopy if articular cartilage status is normal. (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.074)
  • [L5] With improvements in preoperative workup, imaging, and surgical technique, the authors anticipate continued positive results in this population. (10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.026)
  • [L3] Non-emergency intracapsular osteotomy may have a protective effect on the epiphyseal vasculature and should be undertaken with a delay of at least two weeks. (10.1302/0301-620x.97b3.34430)
  • [L5] Surgical management is indicated for progressive, painful, unilateral deformity or leg-length discrepancy, while moderate nonprogressive deformity often does not require surgery. (10.5435/00124635-199803000-00003)
  • [L1] There is a severe lack of evidence on the athlete characteristics and clinical course of the nonreturning athletes, and the rate of subsequent hip procedures is unknown. (10.1177/0363546520956292)
  • [L1] After an ACL-IPP, athletes that exhibit the greatest reduction in knee abduction moments exhibit greater hip adduction excursion at baseline and show corresponding improvements in hip flexion and knee abduction kinematics and hip flexion moments. (10.1007/s00167-018-5158-1)
  • [L5] Management of early, symptomatic DDH includes nonsurgical modalities and open joint preservation techniques. (10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00533)
  • [L4] Although intra-rater reliability was marginally acceptable, the degree of variability between the classifications assigned by different raters — even after the intervention — calls into question the reliability of the system of Stulberg et al.; consequently, the validity of any treatment decisions, outcome evaluations, or epidemiological studies based on this system is also in question. (10.2106/00004623-199909000-00002)
  • [L2] Complex dynamic interplay exists between the hip and spinopelvic parameters; a cam deformity, acetabular undercoverage, and increased spinopelvic angles are predictive of a hip symptomatic state. (10.1177/0363546518800825)
  • [L5] We cannot yet cure Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, but we are working on it and have advanced our understanding of outcomes with surgery or nonsurgical treatment. (10.5435/00124635-201011000-00001)
  • [L3] The study demonstrates varying levels of reliability and diagnostic precision among different classification systems for femoral head avascular necrosis. (10.1186/s12891-025-08398-1)
  • [L4] Further development and refinement of multifactorial grading systems for describing labral injury are indicated. (10.1007/s00167-020-06215-x)
  • [L4] Hip impingement in those with FAIS may routinely occur at hip flexion angles below 90° in neutral rotation, with males engaging at higher flexion angles than females. (10.1002/arj.70005)
  • [L3] Increased mid-sagittal center edge angle remained the sole significant contributor to reduced hip flexion, suggesting hip range of motion is affected in a bipolar fashion. (10.1177/2325967119s00421)
  • [L4] There are variations in the testing that hip specialists perform to examine and evaluate their patients, but there is enough commonality to form the basis to recommend a battery of physical examination maneuvers that should be considered for use in evaluating the hip. (10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.015)
  • [L4] THA significantly alters hip abductor and adductor muscle lengths and moment arms during gait, with the implanted side showing shorter adductor muscles and reduced moment arms compared to the non-implanted side. (10.1186/s13018-020-01832-1)
  • [L5] There is no consensus yet on a particular treatment, with surgical options aiming to preserve the joint if diagnosed before collapse, while future therapies include biologically active molecules and implants. (10.1302/2058-5241.4.180036)
  • [L5] Treatment options range from non-operative measures to various surgical procedures including cheilectomy, arthroplasty, and arthrodesis, with selection depending on disease stage and patient factors. (10.2106/00004623-199806000-00015)
  • [L3] Neither preoperative hip internal rotation nor impingement tests correlate with AIIS type as previously suggested questioning the utility of the AIIS classification system in identifying pathologic AIIS anatomy. (10.1097/01.blo.0000533626.25502.e1)
  • [L4] A more accurate set of definitions must be developed in order to allow for more accurate diagnosis of early hip disease. (10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.095)
  • [Letter] The authors express concerns regarding the original study's methodology, suggesting that labral calcification may be a normal physiological process and that the study design may suffer from selection bias and unclear pathophysiologic characteristics. (10.1186/s13018-020-01744-0)
  • [L4] The cam deformity appears to have been nonexistent among ancient humans and is perhaps predominantly a product of modern-day stresses. (10.2106/jbjs.o.00169)
  • [L4] The author concludes that the deformity is more frequently produced by violence, pathological changes from inflammation, or injury in utero rather than primary non-development of the acetabulum, noting that the pathological specimen confirms a primary dislocation in utero. (10.1007/s11999-008-0186-7)
  • [L5] Understanding the natural history and management options is an important part of preventing disability and maintaining independence in an increasingly aging and active Down syndrome population. (10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00179)
  • [L4] Outcomes deteriorate with increasing delay of presentation, with a tipping point reached around eight years of age after which complications from treatment may produce outcomes no better than the untreated clinical course. (10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.35395)
  • [L3] In later stages, this bone formation cannot be distinguished from the native bone and the labrum may appear to be nearly absent on imaging studies. (10.2106/jbjs.j.01799)
  • [L3] Although radiographic indices improved consistently with time in hips without osteonecrosis, hips with osteonecrosis had abnormal indices of acetabular remodeling throughout followup. (10.1007/s11999-013-2804-2)

References

[1] Chapter 34 Anatomy and Biomechanics, Evaluation, Clinical Examination, and Imaging of the Hip. 2020.

[2] Acetabular retroversion. EFORT Open Reviews. 2018. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180015

[3] Preoperative Rather Than Postoperative Intra‐Articular Cartilage Degeneration Affects Long‐Term Survivorship of Periacetabular Osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.060

[4] Are Results of Arthroscopic Labral Repair Durable in Dysplasia at Midterm Follow-up? A 2-Center Matched Cohort Analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518767399

[5] The growth of hip preservation as a speciality. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07409-9

[6] Pathomorphological Findings and Prearthrotic Deformities Predicting Osteoarthrosis of the Hip Joint. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.283

[7] The Pathology of Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease: A CASE REPORT.. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 1973.

[8] Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.042

[9] Static and Dynamic Mechanical Causes of Hip Pain. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.022

[10] A Multicenter, Modern Cohort, Study of Radiation Therapy Versus Usual Care for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Through a Posterior Approach. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00491

[11] Managing Borderline Dysplasia: It Can Take More Than Just a Periacetabular Osteotomy. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01162

[12] Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Assessment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Arthrography, and Intra-Articular Injection in Hip Arthroscopy Patients. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504266480

[13] Mid‐term results of Autologous Matrix‐Induced Chondrogenesis for treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1042-3

[14] Chapter 13 Extra-articular Hip Disorders. 2019.

[15] Differentiating Hip Pathology From Lumbar Spine Pathology: Key Points of Evaluation and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2017. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00740

[16] Asymptomatic Hip/Groin Pathology Identified on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Professional Hockey Players: Outcomes and Playing Status at 4 Years' Follow‐up. Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.100

[17] Mid‐ and Long‐Term Outcomes Are Favorable for Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.030

[18] Decreased Range of Motion Is Associated With Structural Hip Deformity in Asymptomatic Adolescent Athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513488748

[19] Evidence for the Use of Cell-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review of the Literature. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.049

[20] Preoperative Diagnosis of Pathologic Conditions of the Ligamentum Teres: Is MRI a Valuable Imaging Modality?. Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.001

[21] A prospective study comparing tendon-to-bone interface healing using an interposition bioresorbable scaffold with a vented anchor for primary rotator cuff repair in sheep. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.024

[22] Outcome of Hip Impingement Surgery: Does Generalized Joint Hypermobility Matter?. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516688636

[23] Surgical indications for treatment for femoroacetabular impingement with surgical hip dislocation. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2231-z

[24] Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Labral Preservation and Capsular Plication in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia: Minimum 5-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517743720

[25] Impingement-Free Hip Flexion in Asymptomatic Young Adult Women. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.01088

[26] The Natural History of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in Children and Adolescents Who Have Gaucher Disease. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1996. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199601000-00003

[27] Arthroscopic Primary Labral Reconstruction in the Hip: Minimum 10-Year Outcomes With a Nested Propensity-Matched Control. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251392196

[28] AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria: The Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Infants up to 6 Months of Age: Intended for Use by General Pediatricians and Referring Physicians. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2019. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00500

[29] Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Acetabular Cysts: A Multicenter Matched Controlled Study From the MASH Study Group. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251405731

[30] Total Hip Arthroplasty for Adult Hip Dysplasia. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.k.00779

[31] A Novel Classification Method for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Based on the Greater Trochanter of the Femur. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.013

[32] The John Charnley Award: Redefining the Natural History of Osteoarthritis in Patients With Hip Dysplasia and Impingement. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4815-2

[33] Collapse Progression or Cessation Affects the Natural History of Contralateral Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.005

[34] Bilateral Primary Cystic Arthrosis of the Acetabulum. A Case Report. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1996. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00019

[35] Editorial Commentary: Hip Imaging Studies Suggest Significant Pathology in Asymptomatic Individuals. Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.04.077

[36] Current Concepts Review: Evaluation and Management of Posterior Hip Pain. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00629

[37] A Clinically Relevant Review of Hip Biomechanics. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.027

[38] Atypical hip pain: coexistence of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and osteoid osteoma. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2985-6

[39] Two to 10 Years' Follow‐up of Arthroscopic Management of Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis in the Hip: A Case Series. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.002

[40] Validity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Hip Labral Width Compared With Intraoperative Assessment. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.027

[41] Femoral Anteversion in the Hip: Comparison of Measurement by Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Physical Examination. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.021

[42] Editorial Commentary: Quantifying Anterior and Lateral Acetabular Coverage in Hip Dysplasia: What About Posterior Coverage?. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.041

[43] Chapter 35 Early Degenerative Changes of the Hip. 2020.

[44] A biomechanical analysis of the soft tissue and osseous constraints of the hip joint. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2255-4

[45] The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1989. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198971050-00002

[46] A painful squat test provides limited diagnostic utility in CAM‐type femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2668-8

[47] The efficacy and safety of core decompression for the treatment of femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1359-7

[48] An evidence-based guide to the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b10.bjj-2017-0233.r2

[49] Is Subchondral Acetabular Edema or Cystic Change on MRI a Contraindication for Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement?. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515612448

[50] Sex-Based Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Patients With Symptomatic Hip Labral Tears. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514532226

[51] Hip pathology: the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0832-z

[52] Reply to Letter to Editor: Congenital Disease of the Hip. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0630-8

[53] Segmental and Circumferential Acetabular Labral Reconstruction Have Comparable Outcomes in the Treatment of Irreparable or Unsalvageable Labral Pathology: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.10.016

[54] Congenital dislocation of the hip in boys.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1995. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00001

[55] Primary Repair of the Acetabular Labrum: Outcomes With 2 Years' Follow‐Up. Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.007

[56] Femoroacetabular impingement: is hyaluronic acid effective?. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2581-1

[57] Editorial Commentary: Hip Joint Space as a Predictor of Cartilage Pathology: A Basic Tool for a Complex Task. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.014

[58] Assessment of Fatty Degeneration of the Gluteal Muscles in Patients With THA Using MRI: Reliability and Accuracy of the Goutallier and Quartile Classification Systems. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.045

[59] Correlation of Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Hips of Elite Female Ballet Dancers. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.012

[60] Surgeon Willingness to Participate in Randomized Controlled Trials for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.003

[61] Editorial Commentary: Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus Computed Tomography Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3‐Dimensional Imaging. Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.011

[62] Impaired Lower Extremity Biomechanics, Hip External Rotation Muscle Weakness, and Proximal Femoral Morphology Predict Impaired Single-Leg Squat Performance in People With FAI Syndrome. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211029032

[63] Hip Pathology in the Adolescent Athlete. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2013. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-21-11-665

[64] Do Your Routine Radiographs to Diagnose Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Visualize the Region of the Femoral Head‐Neck Junction You Intended?. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.031

[65] Treatment of a hip capsular injury in a professional soccer player with platelet‐rich plasma and bone marrow aspirate concentrate therapy. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2232-y

[66] Development of a Deep Learning Model for the Volumetric Assessment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head on Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.126

[67] A Modified Approach to Measuring Femoro‐Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index Has Better Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability Compared With the Original Femoro‐Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof Index. Arthroscopy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.024

[68] The lateral center-edge angle as radiographic selection criteria for periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged above 13 years. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03515-8

[69] Musculoskeletal Screening Tests and Bony Hip Morphology Cannot Identify Male Professional Soccer Players at Risk of Groin Injuries: A 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518763373

[70] Natural History of Degenerative Hip Abductor Tendon Lesions. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/03635465221135759

[71] Osteonecrosis of the acetabulum following radiation therapy. A report of two cases.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1988. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198870020-00021

[72] Hip capsular strain varies between ligaments dependent on both hip position- and applied rotational force. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06035-z

[73] Prevalence of Abnormal Hip Findings in Asymptomatic Participants. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512462124

[74] Femoral Head Fractures: Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2024. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01121

[75] Radiological findings that may indicate a prior silent slipped capital femoral epiphysis in a cohort of 2072 young adults. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2013. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b4.29910

[76] Chapter 3 Emerging Technologies in Orthopaedic Trauma. 2021.

[77] Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients 45 Years and Older Have Similar Outcomes to a Younger Cohort: Articular Cartilage Status Is the Primary Determinant of Outcome. Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.074

[78] Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy—Safe, Effective, and Still Improving in Older Nonarthritic Patients. Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.026

[79] The treatment of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis by either intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy or pinningin situ. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b3.34430

[80] Coxa Vara in Childhood: Evaluation and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1998. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199803000-00003

[81] Can We Identify Why Athletes Fail to Return to Sport After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0363546520956292

[82] Hip biomechanics differ in responders and non-responders to an ACL injury prevention program. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5158-1

[83] Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2020. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00533

[84] Stulberg Classification System for Evaluation of Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1999. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199909000-00002

[85] Can We Discriminate Symptomatic Hip Patients From Asymptomatic Volunteers Based on Anatomic Predictors? A 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Study on Cam, Pincer, and Spinopelvic Parameters. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518800825

[86] Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease 100 Years On: What Have We Learned?. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2010. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201011000-00001

[87] Comparative analysis of intra- and interobserver reliability and validity of five basic classifications used to determine the stage of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08398-1

[88] Arthroscopic classification of intra‐articular hip pathology demonstrates at best moderate interrater reliability. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06215-x

[89] Impingement in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Routinely Occurs Below 90° of Hip Flexion. Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/arj.70005

[90] The Bipolar Hip: Combined Acetabular and Femoral Pathomorphology Determine Hip Motion. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119s00421

[91] The Pattern and Technique in the Clinical Evaluation of the Adult Hip: The Common Physical Examination Tests of Hip Specialists. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.015

[92] Adverse effects of total hip arthroplasty on the hip abductor and adductor muscle lengths and moment arms during gait. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01832-1

[93] Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: pathophysiology and current concepts of treatment. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180036

[94] Current Concepts Review - Hallux Rigidus and Osteoarthrosis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1998. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00015

[95] Revisiting the Anteroinferior Iliac Spine: Is the Subspine Pathologic? A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533626.25502.e1

[96] Reliability Of Radiographic Diagnoses In The Young Adult Hip: A Multicenter Study. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.11.095

[97] Letter to the editor: Labral calcification plays a key role in hip pain and symptoms in femoroacetabular impingement. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01744-0

[98] The Antiquity of the Cam Deformity. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.o.00169

[99] The Classic: Congenital Dislocation of the Hip. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0186-7

[100] Hip Instability in Patients With Down Syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00179

[101] A review of long-term outcomes for late presenting developmental hip dysplasia. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b6.35395

[102] Bone Apposition of the Acetabular Rim in Deep Hips. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.j.01799

[103] Osteonecrosis Complicating Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Compromises Subsequent Acetabular Remodeling. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-2804-2

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.