Skip to content

What's New — Ankle — October 2026

29 new articles published this month.

Themes: Syndesmosis Injury Fixation · Lateral Ankle Instability Surgery · Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes · Osteochondral Lesions of Talus · Achilles Tendon Pathology · Fracture Care and Education

Digest generated 2026-11-04 16:24:02+00:00.


Highlights

Syndesmosis Injury Fixation

Several articles address distal tibiofibular syndesmosis management, spanning novel fixation techniques and evidence on fixation methods. Arthroscopic-assisted adjustable progressive compression fixation combines rigid fixation strength with elastic compliance, allowing intraoperative tension adjustment [4], while needle arthroscopy-guided reduction with suture button fixation enables direct visualization to confirm anatomic reduction [9]. A cadaveric study validates fluoroscopic clamp placement methods along the transsyndesmotic axis, including effects of metal artefact [15]. A review of tightrope fixation summarizes evidence favoring suture-button devices over screws for diastasis, with lower malunion and fewer implant complications [26]. Finally, syndesmotic microinstability (<2 mm dynamic diastasis) accompanying ATFL injury did not compromise outcomes when left unfixed [27].

Lateral Ankle Instability Surgery

This theme covers arthroscopic management of chronic lateral ankle instability and lateral ligament repair. A modified all-inside arthroscopic anterior tibiofibular ligament repair with suture-based 'turn-back' reinforcement offers an augmentation option for poor-quality ligaments while avoiding stiffness from rigid bracing [8]. Return-to-sport outcomes after arthroscopic anatomic reconstruction with gracilis autograft show favourable RTS rates, with risk factors for recurrence identified in high-demand patients [22]. The debate over inferior extensor retinaculum reinforcement during arthroscopic Broström repair continues in correspondence, with letters noting that augmentation provides only modest early advantages without sustained superiority at final follow-up [16, 17].

Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes

Total ankle replacement (TAR) research this month spans implant biomechanics, perioperative care, and registry data. Cadaveric robotic gait simulation demonstrated that stemmed tibial components exhibit less bone-implant micromotion than low-profile designs, supporting their association with lower early mechanical failure [3]. A prospective study of a fast-track protocol after TAR showed safe early mobilization, multimodal pain management, and improved short-term function [6]. Preoperative psychiatric medication use was associated with postoperative complication rates after total ankle arthroplasty in a large propensity-matched database cohort [2]. An 11-year French national registry cohort provides population-based survival data, examining revision risk by implant model, patient characteristics, and surgeon volume [29].

Osteochondral Lesions of Talus

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are addressed from evolving treatment algorithms to long-term outcomes and prevention of progression. A state-of-the-art review outlines management strategies based on lesion size, morphology, subchondral bone involvement, and ankle stability, covering fragment fixation, bone marrow stimulation, and replacement procedures [10]. Autologous osteoperiosteal transplantation for cystic OLT showed that maximal outcome improvement thresholds predict satisfaction, with BMI and plug number influencing threshold achievement [7]. A perspective piece argues for earlier intervention in ankle cartilage damage, highlighting the posttraumatic pathway from sprain to end-stage osteoarthritis and the scarcity of evidence on nonoperative and biologic early treatments [12].

Achilles Tendon Pathology

Achilles tendon conditions feature across surgical innovation, cost-effectiveness, and sports epidemiology. A retrospective cohort comparing open central-splitting surgery with ultrasound-guided WALANT minimally invasive surgery for insertional Achilles tendinopathy found similar patient-reported outcomes at substantially lower cost [5]. A comprehensive review of insertional Achilles tendinopathy details etiology, pathophysiology including calcaneal prominence and impingement, and implications for treatment decision-making [25]. In elite sport, a 15-year analysis of NFL Achilles ruptures revealed preseason vulnerability, with temporal clustering of injuries across season phases informing prevention strategies [23].

Fracture Care and Education

This theme captures ankle fracture management, related periarticular trauma, and education. Osteoporosis was shown to be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after ankle open reduction and internal fixation in adults over 50, using a large propensity-matched database [14]. Video-assisted resident education improved ankle joint reduction quality in a prospective controlled study, supporting simulation-based training [24]. A current concepts review of acute intra-articular calcaneal fractures discusses minimally invasive techniques for restoring hindfoot alignment and articular congruity [19]. Navicular fractures in elite athletes prompted a methodological critique of the 2025 international consensus, recalculating return-to-sport timelines [13]. Pickleball and tennis injury trends from emergency department data round out the sports trauma picture [28].

Articles by Theme

Syndesmosis Injury Fixation (5)

4. Li K, Chen Y, Guo Q, et al. Arthroscopic‐Assisted Adjustable Progressive Compression Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injury. Arthroscopy Techniques 2026. doi:10.1002/atn2.70336

This technical note describes an arthroscopic-assisted adjustable progressive compression fixation technique for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries, using rotation of a fibular-side EndoButton to twist and shorten 4-strand high-tensile sutures. It combines rigid-fixation strength with elastic-fixation compliance, allowing real-time tension adjustment under arthroscopic and fluoroscopic visualization. This avoids the drawbacks of screw fixation (micromotion restriction, hardware removal) and nonadjustable elastic constructs.

9. Wójtowicz BG, Chlebanowski B, Taborski G, et al. Needle Arthroscopy‐Guided Anatomic Reduction and Suture Button Fixation of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis. Arthroscopy Techniques 2026. doi:10.1002/atn2.70332

The authors describe a surgical technique using needle arthroscopy to directly visualize the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during anatomic reduction and suture button fixation, with a four-cortex trans-syndesmotic tunnel created under fluoroscopic guidance and reduction confirmed in real time. Direct arthroscopic visualization may detect rotational and subtle translational malalignment that fluoroscopy alone can miss. This approach could lower the risk of syndesmotic malreduction while minimising soft-tissue disruption.

15. Nakajima H, Kimura S, Yamaguchi S, et al. Validity of fluoroscopic methods along the transsyndesmotic axis: A cadaveric study. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113629

In ten fresh-frozen cadaveric feet, the authors compared three fluoroscopic clamp placement methods for syndesmotic fixation (center-center, talar dome lateral, and incisura tangent) against the true transsyndesmotic axis, both with and without fracture fixation implants in place. The study quantified interaxis angle and distance deviations for each method and the effect of metal artifact. Findings guide surgeons in selecting the most accurate fluoroscopic landmark for clamp and screw placement during syndesmotic fixation.

26. Keating J. Tight rope fixation in fracture management. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113530

This review examines the evolution of tightrope (suture-button) fixation since its 2005 introduction as an alternative to syndesmosis screws in ankle fractures with diastasis. Published evidence suggests tightrope fixation achieves effective syndesmotic stabilisation with lower malunion rates, fewer implant complications, reduced need for implant removal, and in some trials better functional outcomes than screws. The technique has also proven effective for lateral third clavicular fractures and acromioclavicular dislocations, alone or combined with plating.

27. Shi P, Wei Y, Liu M, et al. The Impact of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Microinstability on Functional Outcomes in Patients With Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury Surgery. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/23259671261467551

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether untreated syndesmotic microinstability (dynamic diastasis <2 mm, identified arthroscopically) affects outcomes after isolated ATFL surgery without syndesmotic fixation. Patients with microinstability were compared to those with intact syndesmoses using Karlsson-Peterson, FAAM, and Tegner scores over follow-up. The findings clarify the clinical significance of subtle syndesmotic widening below the traditional 2-3 mm instability threshold in lateral ankle instability surgery.

Lateral Ankle Instability Surgery (4)

8. Hou H, Wang F, Hong J, et al. Modified All‐Inside Arthroscopic Anterior Tibiofibular Ligament Repair and Reinforcement in Chronic Ankle Instability. Arthroscopy Techniques 2026. doi:10.1002/atn2.70256

A modified all-inside arthroscopic technique for chronic ankle instability is described, using individualized portal placement and lasso-loop suturing of the anterior talofibular ligament with a flexible turn-back suture augmentation. The approach provides anatomic repair and enhanced stability in cases with poor ligament quality while avoiding the joint stiffness risk of rigid internal bracing.

16. Lee SH, Lim GH, Kang HT, et al. Efficacy of Inferior Extensor Retinaculum Reinforcement in Arthroscopic Ankle Lateral Ligament Repair: Response. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/03635465261470332

In this response to a letter, the authors note that two of their earlier studies addressed the same question as a recent randomised trial of inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement during arthroscopic Brostrom repair, with similar findings. Both prior studies showed equivalent 24-month functional outcomes, with IER augmentation offering only modest early advantages at 3 and 6 months. The available evidence suggests routine IER augmentation provides no sustained long-term benefit over isolated arthroscopic ligament repair.

17. Maffulli N, Spiezia F, Oliva F, et al. Efficacy of Inferior Extensor Retinaculum Reinforcement in Arthroscopic Ankle Lateral Ligament Repair: Letter to the Editor. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/03635465261470347

In this letter to the editor, the authors respond to a randomised trial of arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair with versus without inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) reinforcement by citing two earlier studies from their group. Those studies found that IER augmentation offered only a modest early functional advantage (at 3-6 months) with no sustained benefit at 24 months, whether compared with isolated Broström repair or semitendinosus autograft reconstruction. Clinically, this suggests IER reinforcement provides limited long-term added value and should be weighed against the findings of the new randomised trial.

22. Moussa MK, Bogdan P, Valentin E, et al. Return to Sport and Risk Factors for Recurrence After Arthroscopic Anatomic Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/23259671261486661

This case-control study evaluated 101 patients undergoing arthroscopic anatomic lateral ankle ligament reconstruction with gracilis autograft for chronic lateral ankle instability, with minimum 2-year follow-up. It assessed return-to-sport rates and timing, functional outcomes (FAAM scores), and risk factors for recurrence and rerupture using multivariate regression. The findings inform patient counseling and identification of high-risk patients after arthroscopic autograft reconstruction in high-demand populations.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes (4)

2. Martino JA, Pottanat P, Cave S, et al. Association of Preoperative Psychiatric Medication Use With Complication Rates After Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2026. doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-26-00140

Using the TriNetX database, patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty were stratified by preoperative psychiatric medication use and compared after 1:1 propensity score matching (1,164 patients per cohort). The study assessed postoperative medical and surgical complications at follow-up. The findings inform perioperative risk stratification and counseling for TAA patients with psychiatric medication exposure.

3. Henry JK, Hoffman J, Villar R, et al. Implant Choice Impacts Initial Tibial Component Micromotion in Total Ankle Replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2026. doi:10.2106/jbjs.26.00733

In 10 matched cadaveric pairs implanted with either a low-profile or stemmed total ankle replacement tibial component, gait was simulated with a 6-DOF robot and bone-implant micromotion was measured using digital image correlation with CT-derived rigid-body transformations. The hypothesis was that stemmed designs provide more robust fixation and less interface micromotion. Results bear on implant selection to reduce early mechanical failure risk in TAR.

6. Vena LM, Moggio L, Cofano E, et al. Clinical outcomes and feasibility of a fast-track protocol after total ankle replacement: a prospective study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2026. doi:10.1007/s00402-026-06532-9

A prospective observational study of 22 consecutive primary total ankle replacements evaluated a fast-track protocol including early mobilization, multimodal pain management, bleeding control, and structured physiotherapy with standardised discharge criteria. Outcomes included AOFAS scores at discharge, time to mobilization and ambulation, length of stay, and ASEPSIS wound scores. The study demonstrates the feasibility and short-term safety of fast-track recovery after total ankle replacement.

29. Besse J, Huot L, Judet T, et al. Outcomes of 11 years of total ankle replacement registry in France: a national population-based cohort study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104981

This nationwide French registry cohort study analyzed all primary and revision total ankle replacements performed between 2012 and 2023 (~500/year nationally), assessing implant survival by model, patient characteristics, and surgeon case volume, alongside 2-year clinical and radiological outcomes. The study addresses concerns about osteolysis, subsidence, and worse results in low-volume surgeons. Findings provide comprehensive population-based benchmark data on TAR survival and outcomes in France.

Osteochondral Lesions of Talus (3)

7. Hu F, Yang S, Shao Q, et al. Maximal Outcome Improvements Predict Patient Satisfaction After Autologous Osteoperiosteal Transplantation for Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus, With Body Mass Index and Plug Number Associated With Threshold Achievement. Arthroscopy 2026. doi:10.1002/arj.70651

In patients with Hepple V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus treated with autologous osteoperiosteal transplantation (minimum 24-month follow-up), maximal outcome improvement (MOI) thresholds for AOFAS, VAS, AAS, and FAOS were derived using ROC analysis against an anchor question on satisfaction. MOI predicted patient satisfaction, with BMI and number of plugs associated with threshold achievement. These thresholds aid postoperative counseling and benchmarking of surgical success.

10. Rubin J, Tham A, Gauthier P, et al. Evolving Management Strategies for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2026. doi:10.2106/jbjs.25.01591

This review synthesizes current management of osteochondral lesions of the talus, stratifying treatment by lesion size, morphology, cartilage integrity, subchondral bone involvement, and ankle stability. Fragment fixation is favored in acute lesions with viable fragments, bone marrow stimulation for small contained lesions, and osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation for larger or complex lesions. Clinicians should match the operative strategy to lesion characteristics, recognizing the variable long-term durability of fibrocartilage after marrow stimulation.

12. Hollander JJ, Dahmen J, Murawski CD, et al. From Sprain to End-Stage Osteoarthritis: Why Earlier Intervention in Ankle Cartilage Damage Deserves More Attention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2026. doi:10.2106/jbjs.26.00827

This perspective highlights that posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis imposes a health burden comparable to major chronic diseases and predominantly affects young, active patients, yet evidence for nonoperative and early interventions remains limited and methodologically weak. Because the posttraumatic pathway allows study of disease progression from cartilage injury to end-stage arthritis, early recognition and treatment represent the greatest opportunity to alter long-term outcomes. Clinicians should prioritise early identification of ankle cartilage damage and initiation of treatment rather than waiting for advanced disease.

Achilles Tendon Pathology (3)

5. Lindén L, Alfredson H, Mohaddes M, et al. Transition from open surgery to ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: similar patient-reported outcomes and substantially lower treatment costs. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2026. doi:10.1186/s12891-026-10631-4

In a retrospective historical cohort of 52 patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy, outcomes after open central-splitting surgery (n=20) were compared with ultrasound/colour Doppler-guided WALANT minimally invasive surgery (n=32), with 12-month SEFAS as the primary outcome. Patient-reported outcomes were similar between approaches, while the minimally invasive pathway incurred substantially lower treatment costs. This supports the transition to ultrasound-guided WALANT surgery in routine practice.

23. Kress DJ, Waldron P, Han D, et al. Seasonal Clustering of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in the NFL: A 15-Year Analysis Revealing Preseason Vulnerability. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2026. doi:10.1177/23259671261488665

This descriptive epidemiological study analyzed Achilles tendon ruptures among NFL players from 2010 to 2024 using publicly available data, stratifying injuries across season phases through multiple temporal models. The analysis revealed seasonal clustering with heightened vulnerability during the preseason period. These findings suggest that conditioning and workload patterns early in the season may elevate rupture risk, informing injury-prevention strategies in professional football.

25. Elkaïm M. Insertional Achilles tendinopathy State of pathology: Insertional tendon tendinopathies. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104974

This narrative review synthesizes the etiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of insertional Achilles tendinopathy, emphasizing its multifactorial origins (calcaneal prominence, biomechanical factors, footwear, metabolic causes) and the variable contributions of true enthesopathy versus posterior bone-tendon impingement with bursitis. Pain location, median for insertional tendinopathy versus more lateral for impingement, helps distinguish the two entities clinically. This distinction is deemed crucial for guiding appropriate treatment decisions.

Fracture Care and Education (5)

13. Zimmermann FJ, Amling M, Simon A. Navicular fractures in elite athletes: Clarifying the evidence base of the 2025 International Foot and Ankle Sports Consensus. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2026. doi:10.1002/ksa.70632

The authors critique the 2025 International Foot and Ankle Sports Consensus systematic review on navicular fractures in elite athletes, identifying methodological and reporting errors. Recalculation shows mean return to sport after operative treatment of navicular stress fractures is approximately 19.7 weeks (4.5 months), not the reported 8.2 weeks, consistent with the consensus recommendation of 4-6 months; several included studies also violated eligibility criteria. Return-to-sport counseling should rely on the corrected estimate of roughly 4-6 months after surgery.

14. Guruprasad P, Sivaram P, O’Neill C, et al. Impact of osteoporosis on outcomes following ankle open reduction and internal fixation. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113474

This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study using the TriNetX database compared postoperative outcomes after ankle fracture ORIF in adults aged 50 years or older with and without a prior osteoporosis diagnosis. The study was designed to determine whether osteoporosis is an independent risk factor for complications such as malunion, nonunion, and delayed healing. Results inform perioperative risk stratification and the need for bone health optimization in older patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation.

19. Lucas y Hernandez J. Acute intra-articular calcaneal fractures: currents concepts. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104916

This review summarizes current concepts in acute intra-articular calcaneal fractures, which most often involve the subtalar joint after high-energy trauma and carry substantial functional and socio-occupational consequences. Anatomical assessment guides prognosis, with CT as the reference standard for characterization and planning, while minimally invasive techniques (sinus tarsi approach, percutaneous fixation, intramedullary nailing) have shifted the surgery-versus-conservative debate. Displaced Sanders II-III fractures are the main indication for osteosynthesis, whereas Sanders IV fractures typically warrant discussion between ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis.

24. Bilodeau RE, Hall AJ, Como M, et al. Video-Assisted Resident Education is Associated with Improved Ankle Joint Reduction: A Prospective Controlled Study. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113823

This prospective controlled study evaluated whether video-assisted education improved ankle joint reduction quality among orthopaedic residents. Residents receiving video-based instruction achieved superior ankle reduction outcomes compared with controls. The results support incorporating video-assisted teaching into residency curricula to improve procedural competence in ankle fracture management.

28. Kiehl D, Ibrado R, Axelrod A, et al. Comparative Trends of Musculoskeletal Injury in Pickleball and Tennis: An 11-Year Analysis of U.S. Emergency Department Visits. Injury 2026. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2026.113791

This 11-year analysis of U.S. emergency department visits compared musculoskeletal injury trends between pickleball and tennis, capturing the surge in pickleball participation. The study characterizes injury patterns, rates, and temporal trends across the two racquet/paddle sports at the population level. Results inform injury prevention strategies and resource planning as pickleball-related injuries continue to grow.

1. Mahatme RJ, Moore SA, Muthusamy N, et al. Patellar Tendon Allograft Reconstruction Using Achilles Graft With Traversing Suprapatellar Cerclage Limbs. Arthroscopy Techniques 2026. doi:10.1002/atn2.70368

The authors present a surgical technique for patellar tendon reconstruction using an Achilles allograft with traversing suprapatellar cerclage limbs, aimed at chronic extensor mechanism deficiency and revision settings. The construct allows controlled restoration of patellar height, immediate extensor mechanism continuity, and load sharing during early healing. This offers a reproducible option when native tissue quality is poor.

11. Haroun HK, Mahmoud AN, Elabd MA. Inframalleolar Harvest of Split‐Thickness Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy Techniques 2026. doi:10.1002/atn2.70309

The authors present a technique for inframalleolar harvest of a partial-thickness peroneus longus tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Harvesting the anterior half of the tendon through an inframalleolar rather than retromalleolar approach yields greater tendon length, allowing graft preparation with adequate diameter. This may expand autograft options while mitigating concerns about ankle donor-site morbidity.

18. Philippeau J, Mehdi N, Favreau H, et al. French Innovations in Lower Limb arthroplasty that have Become “Gold Standards”: an overview. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2026.104802

This narrative overview highlights major French innovations in lower limb arthroplasty, including dual mobility cups for dislocation prevention, alumina ceramic bearings with low wear, and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft for revision hip arthroplasty. These techniques, developed through rigorous study design and long-term follow-up, have achieved international adoption. The review underscores how disciplined research methodology translated French innovations into globally recognised standards of care.

20. Lee S, D'Lima D, Yun MS, et al. Factors Affecting Changes in Ankle Symptoms Following Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2026. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2026.09.052

This study of 56 patients (85 knees) with varus knee osteoarthritis examined how pre- and postoperative radiological parameters relate to ankle symptoms after total knee arthroplasty, using the Foot Function Index at 12 months. Hindfoot alignment and talar tilt angles improved after TKA, and 17.6% of cases developed or had worsening ankle symptoms, which were associated with concomitant ankle osteoarthritis and postoperative hindfoot alignment angle. Clinically, patients with preexisting ankle osteoarthritis or adverse hindfoot alignment after TKA warrant closer ankle surveillance.

21. Viola V, Marelli N, Caplanusi T, et al. Orthopedic implant allergies: a review of current knowledge on metal hypersensitivity and prosthesis failure. EFORT Open Reviews 2026. doi:10.1530/eor-2025-0252

This narrative review synthesizes evidence on metal hypersensitivity in total joint arthroplasty, describing immune mechanisms and potential links to chronic pain, aseptic loosening, and early revision. Diagnostic approaches, including patch testing, lymphocyte transformation testing, and histopathology, remain variable with no consensus gold standard. Clinicians should consider metal hypersensitivity in unexplained implant-related symptoms, though the evidence base remains limited and diagnostic standardization is needed.

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.